TCTTS said:
FTACO97 said:
Buck Compton said:
Very few people in the real world (the actual audience) have seen the movie yet.
Now we're already deciding it's going to kill enthusiasm. There are reddit threads destroying the movie. We're deciding who needs to be fired. This is fantastic.
The internet is a cesspool.
THIS.
It's quite absurd that we're already trashing the movie and saying it's horrible when only 1 of us has seen it and it sounded like he loved it. Back to a point made a few pages back, we put way too much faith and credibility in critics. Why is it we can't wait until we see it and then decide for ourselves? We take what these folks write up for "click value" and believe it at face value. These are the same critics that put TLJ at 91% on RT (and even though I'm still a TLJ fan, it seems the masses as a whole hated it).
On the other side of the coin, I'm sooooo tired of the cliched, stereotypical opinions people have of critics on this board. As if all critics are of the exact same mold, and all looking for nothing more than clicks instead of, you know, actually having to build and maintain a trust with their audience in order to keep that audience. That, and critics nowadays are so incredibly diverse in their backgrounds, personalities, platforms, and approaches that it seems so absurd to me to constantly try and crowd them under the same umbrella. Also, way more than just critics have seen the movie by now. Screenings have basically been happening non-stop for a well over a day now and all types of Average Joes are attending and weighing in. I agree that I others are probably placing too much weight on reactions so far, but the denial of the reactions so far is just as weird to me.
I agree that critics are diverse. I primarily have a few average Joes on YouTube that I follow that I tend to agree with. But the critics that write for Forbes, Variety, etc. I cannot stand.
I read their reviews of Star Wars and in it they made the following statements:
"The villainous forces of "Star Wars" were always a sci-fi variation on 20th-century fascism, and that made them, at the time, seem ominous but historically distant. But in "The Rise of Skywalker," the fascism looms, for the first time, as something more real; it's what we're now facing."
"It represents the cultural theft of
Star Wars from today's kids by today's arrested-development-stricken adults.
Star Wars was a franchise first and foremost for children, and the kids who grew up with
Harry Potter, The Hunger Games and the MCU have embraced harsh truths and challenging narratives. Lucasfilm and Disney's
The Rise of Skywalker feels explicitly crafted for the "Rian Johnson ruined
Star Wars!" and "George Lucas ruined my childhood!" demographics, right down to its near erasure of Kelly Marie Tran's Rose Tico. It's bad enough that adults no longer see grown-up movies in theaters, but now yesterday's geeks who have taken over pop culture feel entitled to have the kid-friendly franchises aimed at them as well. "
"It's not just that
Rise of Skywalker undoes
Last Jedi's "it's not your franchise anymore" metaphorsaimed at a generation that grew up loving
Star Wars and then allowed two Palpatine-ish leaders (George W. Bush and Trump) to come into powerfor generic "don't worry,
Star Wars is still the best!" fan bait."
WTF THIS IS WHY PEOPLE HATE CRITICS.
People with English degrees from Bowling Green interjecting their political commentary and cultural views into movie reviews. Gag.