That would be icing on the cake to this whole theory if they chose to go this route
And then the movie ends with whoever Kylo's apprentice is coming out of hiding.jokershady said:
That would be icing on the cake to this whole theory if they chose to go this route
The dark side clouds everything. Impossible to see the future is.jokershady said:Yup. That is the one flaw with this idea. My only thought behind that is that it was not immediately known what kind of force user Anikan was going to be.bobinator said:
Okay, I suppose I could see that... but I'd think she would have been created at the same time as Anakin. Like when the dark side force user used the force to create a life, he didn't realize he was actually creating two lives and that somewhere else a second child was born.
I could see it though I guess.
Before he turned, Anikan did a lot of good for the Republic.
Quote:
I actually kind of like this except for the fact that the force decided to create Rey like 30 years after Plagueis created Anakin? Why?
Quote:
Like in the history of this Star Wars story Rey's birth comes much closer to a low water mark for the dark side than a high one right?
jackie childs said:
live look at star wars fanboys when you tell them the whole skywalker family was an evil creation that the force spent 9 movies and 80+ years trying to snuff out:
but those guys were independent contractors who knew the risk involvedCJS4715 said:
Luke killed lots of people on the first death star too. And allegedly on Jakku as well. Skywalkers are executioners with the exception of one.
I like it but I think that's way too complicated to turn out in the very last movie. That storyline should have been building all along. It would be almost like introducing the concept of Infinity Stones in Infinity War and ignoring them in the other Marvel movies leading up to it.TCTTS said:
Ok... so, taking Jokershady's awesome theory into account, and the ensuing discussion of it, along with the current Episode IX rumors, here's what I'm thinking would make the most sense, satisfy certain loose ends, and still remain true to the already established themes of TFA and TLJ. If I were Abrams, this would be my take...
- Darth Plagueis created Anakin. If that's not fact already, make it so. Plagueis picked some random woman on Tatooine and somehow incepted her with midi-chlorians or whatever. However he did it, this would be the first time in the galaxy's history that someone figured out how to create actual life with The Force. As laid out by Flashdiaz, this would also now make the Skywalker blood a basterdization (purposeful misspelling so at o not be censored) of The Force.
- Plagues was murdered, perhaps by Palpatine, his apprentice. However, Plagueis not only learned how to "keep the ones he cared about from dying," he learned how to keep even himself from dying. This is why Snoke looks the way he does, like a resurrected corpse. Snoke is Plagueis, Plagueis is Snoke. However, this process of resurrection took years, maybe even decades, and Plagueis/Snoke wasn't at full strength again, unable to reemerge and claim his rightful throne until Palpatine was defeated... by Plagueis' own creation.
- Plagueis then essentially got a do-over with Kylo, the grandson of his creation. Together, however, they needed to eliminate the son, "corrupted" by the light side of the Force, hence their pursuit of Luke.
- Kylo's big thematic push in TLJ is to "Let the past die. Kill it if you have to." So from a thematic standpoint, how do you challenge him in Episode IX? You don't let him kill the past. You make him face it. Kylo somehow learns that Snoke is Plagueis and that Plagueis created his grandfather. In other words, he learns that he killed the man who (essentially) created him. Maybe there's some record of this at Vader's fortress, maybe there's another character who emerges to tell the story, but as rumored, we see all of the above via flashbacks (even if only briefly). Kylo then has no choice but to face his past. His past literally flows through him. And in the end, his "redeeming" quality is that he ultimately "kills the past" by dying.
- Through all of this, Rey's existence is now given context. She was created by The Force (whether in birth or in childhood) to ultimately help Kylo fulfill his destiny... which is to "let" the past/himself die, to kill off the Skywalker bloodline once and for all, to balance out the equation. There's even some nice symmetry with Anakin being created on an outer-rim desert planet and The Force eventually willing Rey to one as well. Almost as if it has a sense of irony/symmetry/balance in its intentions. And this doesn't have to be explicit either. No one has to spell it out for her or the audience that the Force created her. It can basically be assumed. But if Abrams does want to make this explicit, he has plenty of Force ghosts who are now one with the Force and know of the Force's wants/needs/history/etc/that there can be a little info dump if necessary.
- IMO, this still wouldn't undercut the "nobody" theme established in TFA and TLJ, as the Force would have purposely gone out of its way to chose a nobody/non-Skywalker for its task. And in doing so, showed so many other "nobodies" (broom boy, etc) that it's not your bloodline that makes you great. Granted, Rey would still be "chosen" in this instance, which I kind of have an issue with, but as long the point is to essentially say, "You don't have to be a Skywalker to save the galaxy," I think I can be on board with that.
Thoughts? Yay? Nay? What am I missing?
Quote:
If I were Abrams, I wouldn't, at any point, even talk about Rey's parents or her past in this movie. That to me is the contrast with Ren, who is weighed down by his family history. He was always going to be someone, even if that someone ended up being bad.
Rey will continue to try and stop Kylo Ren, because that's what she feels like she has to do, not because that's what she was born to do. She does the right thing because she's truly selfless, not because someone told her it was right. That's also why I don't think she'll be able to kill Kylo Ren, and why Ren will ultimately allow himself to die and let Rey and the rest live. He won't come completely good, but he'll let the story end with his death, finally ending the Sith line.
agreedbobinator said:
I think you can get there with Kylo Ren's arc without bringing Rey into it. In a way she's the Obi Wan of this trilogy, at times risking her life trying to pull Kylo back from the dark side, and failing.
Right now Kylo Ren is the saga. He's the character that ties the whole franchise together. So in a way I think it's even more fitting if this saga dies with him.
I agree with you that it could be done. I guess by complicated I was speaking for the average Star Wars fan and not guys like you and I. I just think that if the whole concept of closing the saga hinges on 3 minutes of dialog from a prequel movie made in 2005, then it's going to hurt the movie.TCTTS said:
You're probably right.
That said, it could all be done in three quick minutes of exposition, to both Kylo and Rey, no problem. It's not that complicated.
However, I do admit that it's a lot of hot air and no real forward progress on the story at hand.