Aggies2009 said:

---

TXAggie2011 said:

---

Quote:

---

That's a fair post... I'll agree with most of it.

Then again, the overwhelming potbanger talking points were that "it doesn't matter how great a team we were because we didn't get to Omaha". But then that changed when we did make Omaha with a "lesser" team.

---

If someone here makes that argument, by all means argue with them about it, but save me some time and don't trick me into reading a response to something I didn't say.

---

The common sense would dictate that that part of my post wasn't directed at you, wouldn't it? I do specifically remember you saying after 2015 that we had a great season. At least you're consistent on that.

---

TXAggie2011 said:

---

histag10 said:

---

TXAggie2011 said:

---

Quote:

---

That's a fair post... I'll agree with most of it.

Then again, the overwhelming potbanger talking points were that "it doesn't matter how great a team we were because we didn't get to Omaha". But then that changed when we did make Omaha with a "lesser" team.

---

If someone here makes that argument, by all means argue with them about it, but save me some time and don't trick me into reading a response to something I didn't say.

---

Kind of like where you omitted the part of my post where ij basically said the same thing as you? Top 16 =/= best 16

---

If I left something in the following where you "basically say" the "best 16" teams in a given year aren't the "top 16", then it was entirely unintentional.

Quote:

---

Top 16 teams in 1 year do not necessarily mean the same top 16 in later years.

You can't say "top 16 teams" and then start picking and choosing teams from dfifferent seasons.

The year we made Omaha we were a top 16 team. The years we didn't, we weren't. Maybe the competition was tougher those years.

---

---

TXAggie2011 said:

---

Aggies2009 said:

---

TXAggie2011 said:

---

Quote:

---

That's a fair post... I'll agree with most of it.

Then again, the overwhelming potbanger talking points were that "it doesn't matter how great a team we were because we didn't get to Omaha". But then that changed when we did make Omaha with a "lesser" team.

---

If someone here makes that argument, by all means argue with them about it, but save me some time and don't trick me into reading a response to something I didn't say.

---

The common sense would dictate that that part of my post wasn't directed at you, wouldn't it? I do specifically remember you saying after 2015 that we had a great season. At least you're consistent on that.

---

I don't remember what I said in 2015. You need a different hobby than TexAgs scorekeeper.

---

Quote:

---

The above part. Which was posted quite a bit before you replied.

---

Quote:

---

Cal Fullerton left the cws before us last year.

Start pumping.

---

jkag89 said:

---

Yet somehow four games into a 30 game conference slate is already defining the Ags season, Considering how the Ags started the SEC last season (and looked far far worse) you would think some would step back from the cliff a bit.

---

TXAggie2011 said:

---

Quote:

---

I'm sorry that you have a terrible memory.

Also, you have 31,000 posts on this site to my 7,000. Who needs a better hobby here?

---

I would contend your 7,000 posts would be a better hobby if a single one wasn't focused on judging the character and good Aggieness of others and trashing those you judge negatively.

But I digress before I'm accused of doing the same.

---

jkag89 said:

---

Yep, they are are also the same folks who will weep, wail & gnash their teeth that the NCAA Committee always screws us by giving a super tough Road to Omaha yet when we catch a break it somehow doesn't really count because it wasn't against tougher competition. I'm sure The Debt thinks I should be super depressed not only in that it has been 1993 since the Ags earned a W in Omaha but also because it was not against one of the Who's Who but to usually lowly Kansas.

---

jkag89 said:

---

Yep, they are are also the same folks who will weep, wail & gnash their teeth that the NCAA Committee always screws us by giving a super tough Road to Omaha yet when we catch a break it somehow doesn't really count because it wasn't against tougher competition. I'm sure The Debt thinks I should be super depressed not only in that it has been 1993 since the Ags earned a W in Omaha but also because it was not against one of the Who's Who but to usually lowly Kansas.

---

Aggies2009 said:

---

TXAggie2011 said:

---

Quote:

---

I'm sorry that you have a terrible memory.

Also, you have 31,000 posts on this site to my 7,000. Who needs a better hobby here?

---

I would contend your 7,000 posts would be a better hobby if a single one wasn't focused on judging the character and good Aggieness of others and trashing those you judge negatively.

But I digress before I'm accused of doing the same.

---

You're right. Spending 31,000 posts here is a FAR better hobby because I said something you didn't like.... Awesome logic there.

---

TXAggie2011 said:

---

Aggies2009 said:

---

TXAggie2011 said:

---

Quote:

---

I'm sorry that you have a terrible memory.

Also, you have 31,000 posts on this site to my 7,000. Who needs a better hobby here?

---

I would contend your 7,000 posts would be a better hobby if a single one wasn't focused on judging the character and good Aggieness of others and trashing those you judge negatively.

But I digress before I'm accused of doing the same.

---

You're right. Spending 31,000 posts here is a FAR better hobby because I said something you didn't like.... Awesome logic there.

---

Don't flatter yourself.

---

The Debt said:

---

Weird efight between a Top 750 starred contributor vs a Top 1500 starred contributor.

---

Aggies2009 said:

---

The Debt said:

---

Weird efight between a Top 750 starred contributor vs a Top 1500 starred contributor.

---

Considering I've posted less than a quarter of the times he has, wouldn't that mean I'm better, per capita?

---

The Debt said:

---

Aggies2009 said:

---

The Debt said:

---

Weird efight between a Top 750 starred contributor vs a Top 1500 starred contributor.

---

Considering I've posted less than a quarter of the times he has, wouldn't that mean I'm better, per capita?

---

Premium posters get 2x stars. The potd metric has confirmed this.

---

TXAggie2011 said:

---

Aggies2009 said:

---

TXAggie2011 said:

---

Aggies2009 said:

---

TXAggie2011 said:

---

Quote:

---

I'm sorry that you have a terrible memory.

Also, you have 31,000 posts on this site to my 7,000. Who needs a better hobby here?

---

I would contend your 7,000 posts would be a better hobby if a single one wasn't focused on judging the character and good Aggieness of others and trashing those you judge negatively.

But I digress before I'm accused of doing the same.

---

You're right. Spending 31,000 posts here is a FAR better hobby because I said something you didn't like.... Awesome logic there.

---

Don't flatter yourself.

---

Yeah, sorry. Let me take it from you, someone who's bled all over this site to the tune of 31,000 posts in less time. Awesome hobby you've got there!

---

I'm not saying my TexAgs posting is the pinnacle of hobbies. I don't care how many posts you or I have, I'm just saying you come here looking to be pissed off so no wonder you get so pissed off even when the offending argument isn't in front of you.

---

Aggies2009 said:

---

The Debt said:

---

Aggies2009 said:

---

The Debt said:

---

Weird efight between a Top 750 starred contributor vs a Top 1500 starred contributor.

---

Considering I've posted less than a quarter of the times he has, wouldn't that mean I'm better, per capita?

---

Premium posters get 2x stars. The potd metric has confirmed this.

---

Wait... Has this really been researched and investigated? Lmao

Premium or basic? Cause I'm not premium...

---

The Debt said:

---

jkag89 said:

---

Yep, they are are also the same folks who will weep, wail & gnash their teeth that the NCAA Committee always screws us by giving a super tough Road to Omaha yet when we catch a break it somehow doesn't really count because it wasn't against tougher competition. I'm sure The Debt thinks I should be super depressed not only in that it has been 1993 since the Ags earned a W in Omaha but also because it was not against one of the Who's Who but to usually lowly Kansas.

---

Man, someday you need to invite me over and show me all the imaginary championship banners you hung in your den.

---

The Debt said:

---

My SO was always amazed at the volume of posting that happens on this site. Tens of thousands of degreed Americans discussing sports and news
Millions of manhours. She thought we should be able to better mankind somehow but the best thing we have accomplished is wondering what Fran would look like with different moustaches.

---

The Debt said:

---

4chan is weaponized autism where they can peice together coordinates of pics online using wind direction of leaves in pic, flightaware, and regional vegetation.


We have that on the OB...but we don't use it to screw with Shia Labeouf.

---