JJxvi said:
I'm curious, we have a system of schools generally with a flagship friendly Chancellor. With how toothless the NCAA is, what would hypothetically stop us from bankrolling some of the athletic budget of the satellite campuses in exchange for something similar to partnerships and rights of first refusal on talent. What if we like outright hired and paid for their coaching staff but we could like call them up to the main campus at the end of any year we chose. Maybe its dumb and not optimal regardless, but could some University system do that?
Definitely not the Cal system. There are varying levels of hate throughout, and they'd all rather watch UCLA burn than try to be farm systems for the Bruins. Then again they all consider themselves real schools, which judging by your post you don't share for A&M's system brethren.
Not the Texas system either. UTEP would be wondering why wouldn't the chancellor make Texas give them the players/coaches since UTEP won a national championship over Kentucky.
If we're talking state policy/money, four other schools within the A&M system play Div. 1 basketball with a chance for automatic selection to the Dance in their conferences. They'd more likely vote for A&M to have to split its players/coaches amongst them.