quote:

---

I know what transpired (in detail) and I'm shocked it's not been made public so far. My buddy told me because he had to vent his anger the evening after it went down but he made me swear not to mention it to anyone to avoid embrarrassing the Aggie administration at such a delicate juncture. (When things get tense everybody assumes Aggies will act like children. I'm not sure why.) Maybe somebody here knows what I'm referring too. It happened one day after the presidents, chancellors and ADs of Tech, A&M and UT announced that they had met and agreed to act in solidarity with regard ot any conference moves. After hearing the story, I was pretty furious but I never mentioned it to anyone after the PAC-10 move died because it didn't seem that important any more.

---

What a ****ing idiot.

quote:

---

BohunkAg
posted 2:07p, 08/12/10


Tell me you aren't pulling the "there's something I can embarrass all Aggies with but I'm not allowed to tell you" card, are you?

---

Bo thinks you're a dumbf***, sam

http://texags.com/main/forum.reply.asp?topic_id=1669198&forum_id=6


[This message has been edited by Greg Marmalard (edited 8/12/2010 2:12p).]

My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl who saw Ferris pass out at 31 Flavors last night. I guess it's pretty serious.

Poor, stupid BPB

Greg, the difference being that the info in this thread is what Sammy was referring to, while your boy bonnieprincess is just making **** up, as usual.

of course theres a difference. theres ALWAYS a difference.

BPB - Are you serious? Please tell us what you know!

quote:

---

"there's something I can embarrass all Aggies with but I'm not allowed to tell you" card

---

quote:

---

Obviously, this thread did not go the way y'all planned. (First time I ever got to say that. lol.)

FYI. There is only one thing that has not been made public and it won't be revealed by requesting emails. I know what transpired (in detail) and I'm shocked it's not been made public so far. My buddy told me because he had to vent his anger the evening after it went down but he made me swear not to mention it to anyone to avoid embrarrassing the Aggie administration at such a delicate juncture. (When things get tense everybody assumes Aggies will act like children. I'm not sure why.) Maybe somebody here knows what I'm referring too. It happened one day after the presidents, chancellors and ADs of Tech, A&M and UT announced that they had met and agreed to act in solidarity with regard ot any conference moves. After hearing the story, I was pretty furious but I never mentioned it to anyone after the PAC-10 move died because it didn't seem that important any more. Anyone here get scoop from the highest levels of your admin to know what I am referring too?

---

You led with that first sentence, and then followed it up with THAT???

We were so embarrassed we used our stand alone and still standing SEC offer to bully our way into one of the 3 biggest pieces of the Big 12 money pie, while tceh was forced to give up money from their already much lesser share to compensate us.

Robbing the poor to feed the rich, so to say.

quote:

---

There's NO invitation to the SEC or anywhere else.

---

So he's convinced there was no offer....but then says:

quote:

---

The SEC's goal was to put out the Pac10 fire and they succeeded. Also, people forget to mention that even aTm itself was split on whether to stay or go somewhere else.

---

How did the SEC succeed, if they didnt do anything? Why was A&M split, if we didnt have another option?



Do Tech grads not read what they post?

If you chose between 2 & 3 hours, you've just won $130. Congrats to all winning bettors.

Thanks, Bonnie. I'm glad we have tards like you to protect the reputation of our school. Without desperate idiots like you, the house of cards that is Texas A&M would come crashing down.

Good Lord, I spend a half hour ripping out Puddy and Bo's eyeballs and peeing into their skulls over on AO and I come back to tards in denial even AFTER the strongest facts yet to come out are posted?

quote:

---

I know what transpired (in detail) and I'm shocked it's not been made public so far. My buddy told me because he had to vent his anger the evening after it went down but he made me swear not to mention it to anyone to avoid embrarrassing the Aggie administration at such a delicate juncture.

---

Welcome back from unicorn land where that apparently took place, Hostile.

Page 5

quote:

---

FYI. There is only one thing that has not been made public and it won't be revealed by requesting emails. I know what transpired (in detail) and I'm shocked it's not been made public so far.

---

I know what it is! The reason the Big 12 stayed together is because a Nigerian prince offered to share his fortune with the conference if all replied to his email with their account information!

Gigem314 with the...

I love you, Puddy. Bo's alright too, but he has a gland problem.

quote:

---

For example, A&M had 2 offers: one offer to join the PAC-10 as part of the UT/OU/Tech/OSU/A&M package, and one offer to join the SEC as part of the OU/A&M package deal. What's not to understand?

---

How ****ing stupid are you? In the files it CLEARLY STATES that OU swore their allegiance to tu very early on and made that clear to all parties involved. Therefore, since it also states that A&M had multiple suitors, it is fairly easy to conclude that the SEC was NOT expecting to land OU by offering A&M as well.

Tards can't even follow simple logic when it's written down in simple, plain english right in front of them

ruddy - that gif

We were so embarrassed we used our stand alone and still standing SEC offer to bully our way into one of the 3 biggest pieces of the Big 12 money pie, while tceh was forced to give up money from their already much lesser share to compensate us.

Robbing the poor to feed the rich, so to say


If you actually had an offer, then why the heck didn't you guys take it and blow this conference up.

We'll see if you guys end up getting the promised monopoly money from bobo.

quote:

---

If you actually had an offer, then why the heck didn't you guys take it and blow this conference up.

---

Asked and answered. Can ANY of you idiots read?

quote:

---

We'll see if you guys end up getting the promised monopoly money from bobo.

---

We'll still make more money than you because your school is POS and has absolutely zero pull.

You can't stand that.

quote:

---

If you actually had an offer, then why the heck didn't you guys take it and blow this conference up.

We'll see if you guys end up getting the promised monopoly money from bobo.

---

Why leave when we are promised more money to stay put? The Big12 is also lighter on competition but with the same BCS bid the SEC gets. We don't have to rock the boat this way and risk pissing off lawmakers. IF the money isn't there, we will look even more justified in leaving.

quote:

---

of course theres a difference. theres ALWAYS a difference.

---

The problem is, this is what you do when you're at a loss because you know that you've been beaten, but you refuse to admit it. Just because you don't understand the difference doesn't mean you can crylaugh the difference out of actually existing.

quote:

---

We'll still make more money than you because your school is POS and has absolutely zero pull.

You can't stand that.

---

quote:

---

We'll see if you guys end up getting the promised monopoly money from bobo.

---

I think I speak for every Aggie alive when I say I sure as Hell hope we don't so we can tell Beebe to **** off and join a real conference. That isnt what this thread is about at all, it's about factually destroying the premises that A&M didnt have an SEC offer and that tceh had any sort of pull at all

As a side note, utex is absolutely dominating this board today. He's going to challenge Wilt's 100 point game if he keeps crossing tards and draining 25 footers like this

quote:

---

while tceh was forced to give up money from their already much lesser share to compensate us.

---

Not true. Tech is not one of the schools that has to give up anything to UT, OU, or A&M.

quote:

---

Not true. Tech is not one of the schools that has to give up anything to UT, OU, or A&M.

---

quote:

---

Not true. Tech is not one of the schools that has to give up anything to UT, OU, or A&M.

---

quote:

---

As a side note, utex is absolutely dominating this board today. He's going to challenge Wilt's 100 point game if he keeps crossing tards and draining 25 footers like this

---

Looks like AggieNed has some competition.

quote:

---

Not true. Tech is not one of the schools that has to give up anything to UT, OU, or A&M.

---

quote:

---

How ****ing stupid are you? In the files it CLEARLY STATES that OU swore their allegiance to tu very early on and made that clear to all parties involved. Therefore, since it also states that A&M had multiple suitors, it is fairly easy to conclude that the SEC was NOT expecting to land OU by offering A&M as well.

---

So I must make an assumption to arrive at your preferred conclusion? No thank you sir. I learned about the dangers of making assumptions years ago from old coach Buttermaker.