I am not one who ever stated the money wasn't promised, or that Tech had as much power as some other schools. I am not reading the whole thing, but this was in one of the letters to Guy Bailey:
quote:
The five agreed that they wanted to ensure that those three schools remain and to try to
induce them to do so by guaranteeing OU, Texas and Texas A&M at least $20 million of total revenue in 2012-
13-the first year of a new media contract.
Does that mean it is only guaranteed that year? Like I said, I didn't read most of it, just bits here and there. And does this document mean you aggies no longer hate Dan Beebe? He's still a piece of sh*t, and I would still be cautious about buying what he's selling.
Instead of trying to prove that we could go wherever we want without UT, I'll just be happy that we will get to go with them if they go to the Pac 16 some time down the road.
(Greg is still getting his goalie gloves on, so I tried to fill in for him here
)