raiderpower makes me laugh.

They are reading these documents with the FACTS squarely in front of them, and they are still denying the obvious truth.

It's almost painful to read.....

quote:

---

NO, THEY DIDN'T. aTm DID NOT have a stand alone invitation. It was contingent on OU. My cousin works in the aTm A.D. and I can't see him lying to me about something like that. OU is perfectly happy about the new situation and aTm has no leverage left over. Even IF and i specify "IF" aTm had a stand alone invite to the SEC, I can promise you that the state govt. would get involved. If you recall, Pac10 Commish Larry Scott admitted that Texas politics was a big part of the problem.

---

[This message has been edited by UTex09 (edited 8/12/2010 1:12p).]

I'm gonna make this simple for you tards!

The AD lies to his own family about certain issues and I know that for a fact. I'm sure this dude's cousin has all the inside scoop though.

quote:

---

NO, THEY DIDN'T. aTm DID NOT have a stand alone invitation. It was contingent on OU. My cousin works in the aTm A.D. and I can't see him lying to me about something like that. OU is perfectly happy about the new situation and aTm has no leverage left over. Even IF and i specify "IF" aTm had a stand alone invite to the SEC, I can promise you that the state govt. would get involved. If you recall, Pac10 Commish Larry Scott admitted that Texas politics was a big part of the problem.

---

This guy is PIZZED folks!

quote:

---

NO, THEY DIDN'T. aTm DID NOT have a stand alone invitation. It was contingent on OU. My cousin works in the aTm A.D. and I can't see him lying to me about something like that. OU is perfectly happy about the new situation and aTm has no leverage left over. Even IF and i specify "IF" aTm had a stand alone invite to the SEC, I can promise you that the state govt. would get involved. If you recall, Pac10 Commish Larry Scott admitted that Texas politics was a big part of the problem.

---

Have to admit I haven't read the first few pages of this post so I may not have this quite on point. In the email Beebe states OU, A&M and UT each had more than 1 offer. I thought we all knew that. For example, A&M had 2 offers: one offer to join the PAC-10 as part of the UT/OU/Tech/OSU/A&M package, and one offer to join the SEC as part of the OU/A&M package deal. What's not to understand?

You forget at this point BPB, that OU had already said they were sticking with Texas and not going to the SEC. Sorry, try again.

quote:

---

A&M had 2 offers: one offer to join the PAC-10 as part of the UT/OU/Tech/OSU/A&M package, and one offer to join the SEC as part of the OU/A&M package deal. What's not to understand?

---

except ou had already pledged their allegiance to go wherever texas went by the time that email was sent.

meaning that A&M still had other offers beyond any sort of perceived attachment with OU.

Butt Plug Billy:

quote:

---

A&M had 2 offers: one offer to join the PAC-10 as part of the UT/OU/Tech/OSU/A&M package, and one offer to join the SEC as part of the OU/A&M package deal. What's not to understand?

---

I have yet to see one shred of evidence that our SEC offer was contingent on OU or anyone else.

In fact, the only people I see making that statement are butthurt whorns and tards.

I have seen mountains of evidence suggesting our SEC offer was stand alone.

This is awesome!

Shaft!

It's almost like the tards think if they keep repeating the same falsehoods over and over again then somehow it will become true.

Before Harry takes it down

quote:

---

Posted: Today 1:39 PM

RE: Conference Realignment E-Mail

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Texags rivalries sure are having a nice circle jerk over this.
Reply | Quote

---

Whatever does he mean?! I don't get it...

Edit: From RaiderPower

[This message has been edited by GvineAg89 (edited 8/12/2010 1:50p).]

quote:

---

A&M had 2 offers: one offer to join the PAC-10 as part of the UT/OU/Tech/OSU/A&M package, and one offer to join the SEC as part of the OU/A&M package deal. What's not to understand?

---

A&M had a stand alone offer to join the SEC. I know it sucks because your school clearly had no offer outside of tagging along with the big brothers, but those are the facts. Maybe the Mountain West will come calling the next time around and tech can get their own little deal.

Poor pathetic Tards...

I guess I don't see how that email says anything different than what's been reported many times in the past. It's just a big bag of "so what". I get that y'all expect Tech fans to go ape over this but I'm not sure why. We vented when the deal went sour and then moved on to focus on 2011-2012 recruiting and the upcoming season. I guess I just don't have strong enough feelings to rehash what's already been killed and buried by UT and Beebe. The emails are posted on our premium site but the few responses are pretty tepid.

Obviously, this thread did not go the way y'all planned. (First time I ever got to say that. lol.)

FYI. There is only one thing that has not been made public and it won't be revealed by requesting emails. I know what transpired (in detail) and I'm shocked it's not been made public so far. My buddy told me because he had to vent his anger the evening after it went down but he made me swear not to mention it to anyone to avoid embrarrassing the Aggie administration at such a delicate juncture. (When things get tense everybody assumes Aggies will act like children. I'm not sure why.) Maybe somebody here knows what I'm referring too. It happened one day after the presidents, chancellors and ADs of Tech, A&M and UT announced that they had met and agreed to act in solidarity with regard ot any conference moves. After hearing the story, I was pretty furious but I never mentioned it to anyone after the PAC-10 move died because it didn't seem that important any more. Anyone here get scoop from the highest levels of your admin to know what I am referring too?

quote:

---

Anyone here get scoop from the highest levels of your admin to know what I am referring too?

---

Someone else must be referring because you are referring too! /grammar nazi

BPB, you're still dreaming. the top won't stop spinning.

quote:

---

RaiderCrusader1
Rookie
390 posts this site
Send Private Message
Posted: Today 1:04 PM
RE: Conference Realignment E-Mail 

Saiken wrote:
RaiderCrusader1 wrote:
RedRaider3920 wrote: People still need to understand that right now Bebee has no way to give them their money.  It was all talk.  Now, he is desperately trying to do that...with Tech attacking everyhwere we can.

OU and UT have already said they won't take their money.  Only greedy, bankrupt **** still wants it.  It won't happen, Bebee won't deliver, and then we can all finally leave.

This is what I've been trying to say all along.  The letter that SpreadsheetAG posted was pretty much spot on.  Beebe knows that the current revenue distribution model plus the estimated figures from the new TV package will easily guarantee OU and UT their 20 mil.   Beebe knows he's in the clear if he can get that. 

Trust me, aTm can ***** and moan all they want if they don't get their 20 mil. but there's not a darn thing they can do about it.  There's NO invitation to the SEC or anywhere else.   The SEC's goal was to put out the Pac10 fire and they succeeded.  Also, people forget to mention that even aTm itself was split on whether to stay or go somewhere else.

This is just false.

A&M had an invitation, and will get it again if they want it.
--------------------------------------
NO, THEY DIDN'T.   aTm DID NOT have a stand alone invitation.  It was contingent on OU.  My cousin works in the aTm A.D. and I can't see him lying to me about something like that.  OU is perfectly happy about the new situation and aTm has no leverage left over.  Even IF and i specify "IF" aTm had a stand alone invite to the SEC, I can promise you that the state govt. would get involved.  If you recall, Pac10 Commish Larry Scott admitted that Texas politics was a big part of the problem.

---

Seriously, how butthurt can one tard be?

waaaahhhhhh waaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhh no they didn't no they didn't please don't let it be true

quote:

---

I know what transpired (in detail) and I'm shocked it's not been made public so far. My buddy told me because he had to vent his anger the evening after it went down but he made me swear not to mention it to anyone to avoid embrarrassing the Aggie administration at such a delicate juncture.

---

You're such a little b*tch.

quote:

---

but he made me swear not to mention it to anyone to avoid embrarrassing the Aggie administration at such a delicate juncture.

---

Oh boy. Are you kidding me?

Tell me you aren't pulling the "there's something I can embarrass all Aggies with but I'm not allowed to tell you" card, are you?

quote:

---

After hearing the story, I was pretty furious but I never mentioned it to anyone after the PAC-10 move died because it didn't seem that important any more. Anyone here get scoop from the highest levels of your admin to know what I am referring too?

---

what an idiot

Tard:

quote:

---

My buddy told me because he had to vent his anger the evening after it went down but he made me swear not to mention it to anyone to avoid embrarrassing the Aggie administration at such a delicate juncture.

---

Of course, of course.