quote:
How you choose to rationalize the periphery is fine with me. Dirk proved it on the court. Malone got close but never did.
Based on this, specifically your statement that "Dirk proved it on the court", how do you explain their per game averages in the playoffs?
Malone - pts 24.7, rbs 10.7, a 3.2, FG% 46
Dirk - 25.9, 10.3, 2.6, 46%,
So Dirk is only better in 1 category by 1 point, but he "proved it on the court"? Malone was just as good if not better in the playoffs than Dirk has been.
quote:
I think Dirk deserves credit for winning the championship with a bunch of good role players as opposed to superstars. Against THE best player of our generation, and another who will go down as one of the best. Since yall are not Dallas fans for the most part, does that gain any special notoriety with you?
Does Malone not deserve credit for going to back to back NBA finals, something Dirk hasn't done, and losing to the best player in NBA history? Not of our generation, not of the last 50 years, but the entire history of the NBA? Does that not gain any special notoriety with you? Especially after I just showed you that Dirk hasn't outperformed Malone in the playoffs?
[This message has been edited by prepyag03 (edited 6/27/2012 1:01p).]