Here's the thing with that or any other statement VAR gives...
"The VAR deemed there was sufficient contact on Ings' lower leg and recommended an on-field review. The referee overturned his original decision and awarded a penalty."
...is a bunch of bull*****
They word it as if it was just the on-field referee seeing the light after the replay and realizing he missed something. But that's not what happens. That's never what happens.
Instead what happened...what always happens...is some guy in a booth miles away looking at a TV replay, deciding that the referee made a mistake and then, indirectly, telling the referee that they need to change their call by saying "you need to review this".
No referee in the world has ever looked at a VAR replay like that and walked away saying "OK, I'm good with the call I made...play on." Why? Because a senior colleague is effectively telling you that you didn't. They wouldn't send it down to your review if they thought you got it right.
It's the same bull**** as last year and the year before with VAR. It's what they said they would stop doing now and only do it in egregious situations. But the league hasn't. They can't manage it. They have no idea how to use VAR properly and never will.