Heads should roll for this idiocy.
That game would 8-0 at the 15 minute markJarrin' Jay said:
The leagues have nothing to do with it as the INTL. teams play in competitions, has nothing to do with how much they get paid to play for their job in a league.
What the USSF needs to do is keep separate books for the USMNT and USWNT and they can then better measure the economics, metrics, etc. to present their arguments.
They should also then play a not-so-friendly match between the USMNT and USWNT with first team players and an huge performance based incentive to make the men play their best. When that game is 8-0 at HT the Prez of USSF should then ask Megan Rapinoe if she wants to keep playing or talking about equal pay or will just shut up and accept the fact she is already compensated really well with excellent benefits for a part-time job.....
The Women's World Cup is a TV spectacle, but it doesn't take much to get sports on TV these days.
It is completely silly. There are teenage boys under professional development contracts that get paid more in England and Germany than the first team professional women do for their job. If the best player on the Bayern frau team said she should be paid the same as Robert Lewandowski you would be able to hear the laughter in College Station.
Serena Williams, probably the best female tennis player of all time and a dominant competitor once said she could not stay on the court and compete with any male player in the Top 100 or maybe 200, something like that.
Total and complete honesty and self-awareness, the lady Aggie footballers could beat my last 40+ team, but that does not mean anything
I watch the Women's World Cup and strongly support the USWNT, but their arguments are seriously flawed.
oragator said:
The reason the argument is so dumb, beyond the obvious, is that their level of talent is completely irrelevant to the argument.
The only argument to be made is how much they are worth to the USSF. If the tv contact for the men's game is triple the women, or you need to pay men more to play for the team because they are risking higher salaries long term if they were to get injured, those should be easy arguments to make, without resorting to insulting ones that alienate Sponsors and fans. It's mind blowing that the argument made last week was approved by someone. One of the dumbest public statements/arguments I have ever seen,
In the soccer world, isn't our women's team just about Serena Williams and the men's team just about ATP World #200 Bernard Tomic?Quote:
Serena Williams, probably the best female tennis player of all time and a dominant competitor once said she could not stay on the court and compete with any male player in the Top 100 or maybe 200, something like that.
Listening to the JD and the Rod (fka Americas Best Soccer) podcast yesterday, apparently the difference in skill level has a legal precedent when determining equality of wages. So while the legal argument may have made sense and had historical precedent, the optics were really really bad. JD and Rod went over it a bit and an attorney/listener called in and gave some insight.oragator said:
The reason the argument is so dumb, beyond the obvious, is that their level of talent is completely irrelevant to the argument.
Quote:
Former U.S. Soccer Federation president Carlos Cordeiro is considering a run to reclaim his old position, multiple federation sources have told ESPN, with one source saying Cordeiro has made up his mind and has shared plans to run with others privately.
According to the sources, Cordeiro has received multiple nominations from the voting membership, as required as part of the presidential candidate process, and in recent days has wrestled with the decision on whether to run against current president Cindy Parlow Cone. Cone announced last August that she would seek re-election.