Agsuffering@bulaw said:
And yes, A&M would be a slightly better job for a new coach than FSU
We have the SEC brand.
We have better facilities.
We have a bigger stadium.
We have more money to pay assistants.
The X-factor right now is that FSU has a real coach in Jimbo.
Oh wow... where to begin with this post.
1. That is such a pathetic excuse for why we're better. Living through conference affiliation is honestly embarrassing.
2. How do you know we have better facilities? This argument drives me crazy. It's as if y'all believe that because our facilities are slightly newer that everyone else is stuck in the stone age, which is not true. Literally 30 schools have this same argument. Texas, Oregon, Oklahoma, Alabama, USC, Ohio State, you name em...
3. Yes, because stadium size is the ultimate seller. Last time I checked, a full stadium is loud and looks/sounds like a full stadium with crazed/passionate fans.
4. Maybe that's true, but Florida State is a big enough power that is not going to be outbid for football coaches. I'd agree with your sentiment if this were Arizona State or Boston College you were talking about.
FSU since 1990 has been the better job, and like someone said earlier, very few people outside of B/CS would disagree.