Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Nothing has changed: Steve Spurrier is new OC

343,665 Views | 1168 Replies | Last: 8 yr ago by ksAG04
Red Skye
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Look at the post above yours...look at the effort people are going to defend him. Irony abounds.

You're just pissed we lolpoors found out about Chavis before you did.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I used to be a lolpoor, damnit!....i've changed
Panama Red
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Its as likely that Rojo has insider info as it is that he is guessing. There was plenty of information out there to make that guess on 12/29:

Posted by BTHOthatguy on 12/29 at 8:38 p.m.
quote:
1. Hop and Billy believe the hire will be made tomorrow.

2. LSU plays tomorrow morning.

3. Beatty says Sumlin always hires people that beat him. LSU is the only team to consistently stop Sunlin.

4. We start losing recruits the very next day the first published report that Chavis is interested.

5. We have our guy and Chavis STILL has not signed his deal.

6. Hop said it's Durkin, Foster or Chavis. Durkin is rumored to Michigan, Foster signed his deal and has been fairly vocal he's not going anywhere.

7. Chavis is the ONLY name to appear in the press as anything other than speculation.
Spyderman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No doubt this guy has some sources, but this most likely a fluid situation that can change at anytime.
Panama Red
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag_Derp is the winner.
Posted 7:38p, 12/28/14
quote:
Chavis to A&M is official
kammrath
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Look at the post above yours...look at the effort people are going to defend him. Irony abounds.
I honestly don't think anyone (well very few) are about "defending Rojo" but actually about trying to find and defend the truth in all this. I think most people are fascinated by Rojo because the actual evidence points to him having real inside info. If there is actual evidence pointing to him being a fraud, a liar, and a troll then I think 99% of the people who are intrigued by what he is saying want to hear that and change their minds and stop listening to him. The problem is that the evidence against him isn't there....at least that has been brought forth in a clear way.

So if you have concrete evidence, bring it out. It would be nice to legitimately discredit him so that this madness can stop.
mhayden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At least Rojo only posts a handful of times trying to be right.

The number of posters trying to post hundreds of times to be right that Rojo is wrong is even worse.

One is a guy that may or may not have info and is sharing it. The others are people who can't stand someone might know something that they don't and want to shoot it down.
Red Skye
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
I used to be a lolpoor, damnit!....i've changed

Oh, I see, so now you're all high and mighty throwing dog **** at us common folk from the window of your country club.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bruh, I drive a ****ty old truck and whatever golf excursions I get on the local municipality course is with a set of 1970s PING that my dad used in his college days.


Bottom line: I spend more $$ on TexAgs than I should...
Red Skye
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
bruh, I drive a ****ty old truck and whatever golf excursions I get on the local municipality course is with a set of 1970s PING that my dad used in his college days.


Bottom line: I spend more $$ on TexAgs than I should...

T&P
kammrath
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Ag_Derp is the winner.
Posted 7:38p, 12/28/14
quote:
Chavis to A&M is official

Have you looked at all AggieRojo posts from that time frame that mention Chavis?
VaultingChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Ag_Derp is the winner.
Posted 7:38p, 12/28/14
quote:
Chavis to A&M is official

He posted that immediately after this article with this quote was posted as a new thread:

quote:
"Not one man on his (Texas A&M) staff came from any place other than a team that he lost to," Beaty said of Sumlin. "And particularly a team that overachieved in an area. His guys on his staff are all guys that beat him somewhere."
Ag_derp was just saying if that article was correct, you would expect Sumlin would hire Chavis. Not based on inside sources like Rojo claimed.
Ragoo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
Ag_Derp is the winner.
Posted 7:38p, 12/28/14
quote:
Chavis to A&M is official

He posted that immediately after this article with this quote was posted as a new thread:

quote:
"Not one man on his (Texas A&M) staff came from any place other than a team that he lost to," Beaty said of Sumlin. "And particularly a team that overachieved in an area. His guys on his staff are all guys that beat him somewhere."
Ag_derp was just saying if that article was correct, you would expect Sumlin would hire Chavis. Not based on inside sources like Rojo claimed.
so not spurrier??????
Panama Red
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
Ag_Derp is the winner.
Posted 7:38p, 12/28/14
quote:
Chavis to A&M is official

Have you looked at all AggieRojo posts from that time frame that mention Chavis?
Yes.

Ag_derp's post was before Rojo ever posted the name Chavis.

I do not think Ag_Derp was passing on info. I think he was guessing or trolling.

As for AggieRojo, maybe he is trolling about Spurrier, maybe he isn't. My personal guess is that he does know someone that has information.
VaultingChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
so not spurrier??????
Based on what Beaty was quoted as stating as fact, the answer would be yes. Sumlin is going against the trend with Spurrier.
Leeman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Will Sumlin muzzle Spurrier at press conferences ?
kammrath
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
quote:
Ag_Derp is the winner.
Posted 7:38p, 12/28/14
quote:
Chavis to A&M is official

Have you looked at all AggieRojo posts from that time frame that mention Chavis?
Yes.

Ag_derp's post was before Rojo ever posted the name Chavis.

I do not think Ag_Derp was passing on info. I think he was guessing or trolling.

As for AggieRojo, maybe he is trolling about Spurrier, maybe he isn't. My personal guess is that he does know someone that has information.

Thanks.

Yeah, I agree. The derp post seems exactly like a guess or troll based on the OP's article.

I also agree that AggieRojo truly seems to have a legit source. I think that is verified by how staff treats him and his own posting behaviors. Obviously he could be wrong about Spurrier being "done" but I would strongly suspect that there have been legit conversations about Spurrier coming to A&M.

Time will tell.
Panama Red
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is just a guess, but I think it goes something along the lines of the source telling Rojo "Sumlin is seriously talking to Foster/Chavis/Spurrier," then he runs to post that its "official" before it is to that stage.

I'd probably do the same. Aren't many things in life better than being immortal on Texags.
kammrath
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
This is just a guess, but I think it goes something along the lines of the source telling Rojo "Sumlin is seriously talking to Foster/Chavis/Spurrier," then he runs to post that its "official" before it is to that stage.

I'd probably do the same. Aren't many things in life better than being immortal on Texags.
I could definitely see that being the case. Jumping the gun ever so slightly, even though his posts have seemed to be careful about wording things (which points to an attention to detail).

Anyways, do you have a guess why this thread was deleted and then reinstated?? I thought Rojo's speculation about Spav might have been the cause, but that is still fully intact.....

M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
I honestly don't think anyone (well very few) are about "defending Rojo" but actually about trying to find and defend the truth in all this. I think most people are fascinated by Rojo because the actual evidence points to him having real inside info.
lol except Rojo stated from his own account that he was strictly sunshine pumping about recruiting. People are using the chavis prediction and Kyler/Mack's commitment as badges that prove his worth. I can't speak to the Chavis deal with anymore certainty than you can, but from his own mouth, half of his "fame" is fabricated nonsense. And people are quick to forget that.

Don't believe me? Upgrade your subscription level and gander at this thread. Rojo admits to making up horse**** to prop up recruiting.

http://texags.com/forums/25/topics/2598000/1
Federale01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
so not spurrier??????
Based on what Beaty was quoted as stating as fact, the answer would be yes. Sumlin is going against the trend with Spurrier.
There have been, and are, several guys on the staff that Sumlin has never lost to.
kammrath
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
I honestly don't think anyone (well very few) are about "defending Rojo" but actually about trying to find and defend the truth in all this. I think most people are fascinated by Rojo because the actual evidence points to him having real inside info.
lol except Rojo stated from his own account that he was strictly sunshine pumping about recruiting. People are using the chavis prediction and Kyler/Mack's commitment as badges that prove his worth. I can't speak to the Chavis deal with anymore certainty than you can, but from his own mouth, half of his "fame" is fabricated nonsense. And people are quick to forget that.

Don't believe me? Upgrade your subscription level and gander at this thread. Rojo admits to making up horse**** to prop up recruiting.

http://texags.com/forums/25/topics/2598000/1
Well I can't speak to the thread you linked above, but I would have never claimed that he wasn't sunshine pumping last year when he was saying that the signing day was going to be the greatest ever and was talking about how great things were in the program and how national championships were just around the corner. I think it was clear as day that he was playing the roll of a "cheerleader." BUT to me that has nothing to do with his claims of knowing inside info. He can know things and sunshine pump, they aren't mutually exclusive.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
BUT to me that has nothing to do with his claims of knowing inside info.
Rojo CLAIMED to have inside recruiting info and others are using it to support THIS CURRENT SPURRIER INSIDE INFO.

And the two are directly related in terms of Rojo's credibility.
kammrath
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
BUT to me that has nothing to do with his claims of knowing inside info.
Rojo CLAIMED to have inside recruiting info and others are using it to support THIS CURRENT SPURRIER INSIDE INFO.

And the two are directly related in terms of Rojo's credibility.
I don't understand your point. Can you clarify it for me? Are you saying that Rojo came out and said that he never in fact had any inside info on recruiting and he made all that up?
PsychoAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He DID know about the Daylon Mack silent commit...
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
quote:
BUT to me that has nothing to do with his claims of knowing inside info.
Rojo CLAIMED to have inside recruiting info and others are using it to support THIS CURRENT SPURRIER INSIDE INFO.

And the two are directly related in terms of Rojo's credibility.
I don't understand your point. Can you clarify it for me? Are you saying that Rojo came out and said that he never in fact had any inside info on recruiting and he made all that up?
LOL YES!

He predicted the "greatest class ever" and posted similar innuendos about Mack, Murray, Sheffield and other recruits (Boyd, ect.). All seemed well for Rojo with Mack re-committing and Kyler's reaffirmation...until things went sideways with Sheffield...and then with Boyd....and then generally no other high end recruits. People called out Rojo, blah blah blah, he then states that his intentions for posting were strictly to help "salvage" a class that was in danger of mean message board posters. He said users should only post positive things and that his posts were intended to generate positivity. NOTHING MORE. NO GRAND PREDITIONS. NO INSIDE INFO.

He had no clue where Kyler, Mack, etc. were going because they didn't either. And the rest of the thread devolves into work nitpicking and other nonsense. But that's the gist.
kammrath
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
BUT to me that has nothing to do with his claims of knowing inside info.
Rojo CLAIMED to have inside recruiting info and others are using it to support THIS CURRENT SPURRIER INSIDE INFO.

And the two are directly related in terms of Rojo's credibility.
I don't understand your point. Can you clarify it for me? Are you saying that Rojo came out and said that he never in fact had any inside info on recruiting and he made all that up?
LOL YES!

He predicted the "greatest class ever" and posted similar innuendos about Mack, Murray, Sheffield and other recruits (Boyd, ect.). All seemed well for Rojo with Mack re-committing and Kyler's reaffirmation...until things went sideways with Sheffield...and then with Boyd....and then generally no other high end recruits. People called out Rojo, blah blah blah, he then states that his intentions for posting were strictly to help "salvage" a class that was in danger of mean message board posters. He said users should only post positive things and that his posts were intended to generate positivity. NOTHING MORE. NO GRAND PREDITIONS. NO INSIDE INFO.

He had no clue where Kyler, Mack, etc. were going because they didn't either. And the rest of the thread devolves into work nitpicking and other nonsense. But that's the gist.
So you can provide a statement by him saying that he had no inside info on Mack giving a silent commit?

(Also, it is important to note that all inside info on recruiting is guessing and trusting the verbals of kids who can and will change their mind.)

***I think you should quote Rojo himself so that everyone can interpret and read for themselves.
RDV-1992
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To those of you wondering: AggieRojo is a troll.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2/4/2015
AggieRojo:
quote:
Two weeks ago

-- Kyler Murry was "a lock to t.u.", and lot's of people were posting negative comments about him
-- Daylon Mack was "a lock to t.u." and lots of people were posting negative comments about him

Do you remember that? I didn't come here to "build up expectations". I came here to shut up the idiots that were sinking our chances of getting these two back and flipping back a couple of others.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
see above
kammrath
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
see above
Thanks for quoting that.

But I guess I don't get the impression that he is saying that he made everything up, especially once he started boldly claiming that Mack was in and had essentially silently committed. Sounds like he is saying that a big agenda he had last year was rallying the troops so they wouldn't devolve into attacking recruits on the fence.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lol c'mon man...I'm not going to re-post the entire 10 page thread, but if you read it you'd see there's no dispute. He posts in many different ways that he was simply sunshine pumping.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And when it's not Spurrier he's going to come on here and make up some other excuse. And then he'll re-emerge somewhere else and make another bold prediction that people will flock to. (wash, rinse, repeat)
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lateralus Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
If he's right, Texas Aggie football is in deep dookie... A 70 yr old ball coach that quit on his team, is not who A&M needs as an OC.


You know, if we actually hired Nick Saban some people would find a reason to ***** about it on this board.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.