While I am not at all surprised by the story, I applaud the OP for at least attempting to take a stealership to task. Most people don't have the time, money, and/or energy to fight these sleezebuckets.
Rendered Fat said:NTXAg10 said:
It's an error to think this suit will hit their pocketbook. The suit will be turned into their insurance company who will foot the defense(under a reservation of rights) and ultimately any settlement reached.
This sort of thing is already priced into underwriting models so it's just another blip on the radar for the dealership. I say this as someone who has handled the claims for the carrier and who is now an underwriter.
You'll do more damage getting after their reputation on any website you can leave a review. Post the text chain. Hit them on social media. Use your education and make an emotional argument to the public for why no one should buy cars from people who screw over old people.
I know it sounds stupid, but I almost want to try and plead OUT of coverage so they can't just turn it over to the carrier and be done with it. This has nothing to do with money anyway. I'm going to draft the DTPA letter this morning and see how it goes. Looks like John Masten ("Beck and Masten") is the registered agent so hopefully I'll at least get his attention.
aggiedata said:Naveronski said:
I'm skeptical if "she" even exists, or if it's a shell account used by several employees to market the dealership, and that's why you couldn't speak with her.
I found her!
Rendered Fat said:
DTPA notice letter was mailed today via certified and regular mail. I'll keep y'all posted if anyone is interested in how this turns out. Thanks for all of the comments on this.
If the seller actually has the vehicle and collects the earnest money; this is an easy contract to sign. The contract puts the burden on the buyer to complete the sale. If the buyer does not complete the sale, the earnest money is kept by the seller. The key here is earnest money at risk.Rustys-Beef-o-Reeno said:
If I'm a seller there is no way I'm agreeing to that contract.
TxAggieBand85 said:If the seller actually has the vehicle and collects the earnest money; this is an easy contract to sign. The contract puts the burden on the buyer to complete the sale. If the buyer does not complete the sale, the earnest money is kept by the seller. The key here is earnest money at risk.Rustys-Beef-o-Reeno said:
If I'm a seller there is no way I'm agreeing to that contract.
Probably was not clear that the earnest money is part of the sales price, not an option to buy.
If the seller does not have the vehicle, they never sign the contract; thus don't have to waste any more time.
I've done this a few times without any issues.
Quote:
they will laugh in your face as they throw it in the trash.
Naveronski said:
This is why people buy from 1ags' and APT's friends, or Sewell.
Their "hookups" have great prices, but there's no hassle or wasted time.
Rendered Fat said:Cromagnum said:TulaneAg said:Cromagnum said:
Not sure what OP expects. The dealer can't sell you a vehicle they don't have, and isn't obligated to sell you one at the price you want. Sucks you wasted a lot of road time though.
That's what you got out of that story?
That's what I get out of it when there is no VIN# mentioned. At minimum this should have been pulled to verify that a specific truck (or trucks) is physically on the lot.
Of course they've canceled the link now, but the text that she sent me (that I alluded to above) was a hyperlink to a specific vehicle that had the VIN and stock number on the link. Thank God I had the foresight to screenshot the link before they deleted it. This wasn't for some arbitrary, pie in the sky truck. We had a deal on a specific unit. And I specifically asked her if the unit was on the lot and she replied "yes, it's here."
For the life of me, I cannot understand how some of you goaltend so hard for scumbag dealerships. It is utterly amazing.
Quote:
Scummy people will still try to rip people off selling cars for the rest of forever.
Quote:
I AM shocked that so many consumers are indirectly fine with it by refusing to do anything about it or even support holding them accountable.
reproag said:Naveronski said:
This is why people buy from 1ags' and APT's friends, or Sewell.
Their "hookups" have great prices, but there's no hassle or wasted time.
Quote:
Maybe so, but if that's the case, the consumer has literally no bargaining power and no expectation of a fair and honest process. What a terrible and unfair position to be in.
What do we do? Go talk to our pro-business anti-regulation state representatives that all get a big fat check from major dealers and dealer associations? Hire an attorney to tilt at a windmill for us for a couple hundred bucks an hour?Rendered Fat said:coolerguy12 said:Rendered Fat said:Cromagnum said:TulaneAg said:Cromagnum said:
Not sure what OP expects. The dealer can't sell you a vehicle they don't have, and isn't obligated to sell you one at the price you want. Sucks you wasted a lot of road time though.
That's what you got out of that story?
That's what I get out of it when there is no VIN# mentioned. At minimum this should have been pulled to verify that a specific truck (or trucks) is physically on the lot.
Of course they've canceled the link now, but the text that she sent me (that I alluded to above) was a hyperlink to a specific vehicle that had the VIN and stock number on the link. Thank God I had the foresight to screenshot the link before they deleted it. This wasn't for some arbitrary, pie in the sky truck. We had a deal on a specific unit. And I specifically asked her if the unit was on the lot and she replied "yes, it's here."
For the life of me, I cannot understand how some of you goaltend so hard for scumbag dealerships. It is utterly amazing.
Not goaltending for the dealer. But don't get surprised when people in an industry that is known for lying lie to you. Yeah it sucks but it's not surprising at all. Blow them up on social media, file suit, do whatever you feel is necessary, but nothing is going to change. Scummy people will still try to rip people off selling cars for the rest of forever. There are good ones out there, find them and reward them for being ethical.
I'm not shocked that dealerships are by and large unethical scumbags.
I AM shocked that so many consumers are indirectly fine with it by refusing to do anything about it or even support holding them accountable. Almost to the extent of goaltending for them. In no other trade is that mentality present.
I sent my demand letter on Monday and have to wait 60 days before I can sue. I don't think they'll even respond, thinking I'm just bluffing, so we probably won't hear any updates for two months.
helgs said:
I'm way late to this, but just read through this post. Good luck to you. I work in the auto industry (not for a dealer) and I can almost guarantee you that the dealership will eventually cave. Every dealership I work with does this. fights it initially to see how serious you are, then caves because it's way cheaper to pay you off than to fight the negative press.
But on this comment, I had a slight issue with:Quote:
Maybe so, but if that's the case, the consumer has literally no bargaining power and no expectation of a fair and honest process. What a terrible and unfair position to be in.
The consumer has the ultimate bargaining power in any consumer transaction. The consumer has the ultimate say in the deal. I know that's not how a lot of people operate, but if you are a wise consumer, who has experience or knowledge in the type of transaction, you have the last say in the deal no matter what. If a dealer isn't willing to give you what you want, you leave.
That being said, I totally get that's not how the majority of transactions work in the real world, but that doesn't mean it's not true still.
The Fife said:
In before Jim Adler!
I like this plan.lb3 said:
Give 'em hell! If you get to a jury you win BIG.
If you decide not to sue, I will be happy to donate a few hours to negotiate a price on a vehicle with them then then walk right before the signature and drop your name as I'm walking out the door.
Start with a take home test drive, then come back the next day and spend 5 or 6 hours negotiating the price get lots of dealer add ons but haggle on the price of each. Go back out on the lot to look at different wheel options, change mind 3 times, and to keep the salesman on the hook, switch vin numbers mid deal to a lower tier model (at same price) with a color you 'prefer' not available on the higher priced vehicle.double aught said:I like this plan.lb3 said:
Give 'em hell! If you get to a jury you win BIG.
If you decide not to sue, I will be happy to donate a few hours to negotiate a price on a vehicle with them then then walk right before the signature and drop your name as I'm walking out the door.
Quote:
"We charge $1050 for our service dept to check on the vehicles and get them right. it is only mysterious if you are paying that without it been disclosed like other dealers hide in their sales price."