With some of the responses on here and the overall theme of this thread, why on earth would he want to admit who he was, where he worked, or what his profession is if he even slightly was in favor of Flock? Trying to talk down to someone for not wanting to get doxed is a little ridiculous…
Flock/ City Council Meeting
70,537 Views |
711 Replies |
Last: 6 hrs ago by Hornbeck
I don't blame him for not wanting to dox himself. I was pointing out the absurdity of the statement that he isn't hiding behind an anonymous username.
What's even richer is when those who want to have as much info on us as they can have, don't want to be exposed. Real rich. If you proudly support surveillance say it with your chest, don't hide.
www.elitellp.net/
This is right on point.
I don't want to be doxed either...especially when someone who might abuse the information or doesn't care about my rights & might use the info.
The hypocrisy is very obvious though if you support flock and are worried about TexAgs.
I don't want to be doxed either...especially when someone who might abuse the information or doesn't care about my rights & might use the info.
The hypocrisy is very obvious though if you support flock and are worried about TexAgs.
Noticed that the Flock at Bird Pond and Frost is gone. Just the remains of a post at ground level.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Flock, the company, starting to crater. Cutting 18% of employees.
Exclusive-AI surveillance startup Flock Safety to cut several hundred jobs amid backlash, sources say
Exclusive-AI surveillance startup Flock Safety to cut several hundred jobs amid backlash, sources say
tu ag said:
This is right on point.
I don't want to be doxed either...especially when someone who might abuse the information or doesn't care about my rights & might use the info.
The hypocrisy is very obvious though if you support flock and are worried about TexAgs.
Hypocrisy is talking up how much you love freedom and the Constitution then side with any politician or judge who has the slightest inkling of disliking Flock, no matter their ulterior motives, not to mention the fact all the people crying about Flock, but then using OpenAI (which pings back what you write, it remembers you and builds a profile), your phone (it tracks you), Ring (recording your house and the street and sending back to a central server), Alexa or something similar, and so on.
All I'm saying is you shouldn't be throwing stones when it comes to hypocrisy.
Curator of [url=http://csroadsandretail.blogspot.com/]Brazos Buildings & Businesses[/url], the area's premier local history site.
You know every example you provided is voluntary, requires your consent and is not government sponsored surveillance right? Just checking.
www.elitellp.net/
Since you know my life, which of these applies to me as a hypocrite?
EliteElectric said:
You know every example you provided is voluntary, requires your consent and is not government sponsored surveillance right? Just checking.
I'll grant you that it's not the same thing, but I don't think that the people complaining have any of those things, nor are complaining Flock because it's sponsored by tax dollars.
But if broader examples aren't okay, where were you when the idea of comparing doxing yourself on TexAgs and anything less than being 100% against Flock came up?
tu ag said:
Since you know my life, which of these applies to me as a hypocrite?
I wasn't talking specifically about you, it was more of a general complaint about the thread.
Curator of [url=http://csroadsandretail.blogspot.com/]Brazos Buildings & Businesses[/url], the area's premier local history site.
PS3D said:
I'll grant you that it's not the same thing, but I don't think that the people complaining have any of those things, nor are complaining Flock because it's sponsored by tax dollars.
But if broader examples aren't okay, where were you when the idea of comparing doxing yourself on TexAgs and anything less than being 100% against Flock came up?
Literally 99% of the people who are anti FLOCK are complaining because it is state sponsored (tax payer funded) surveillance. Maybe 99.9%
I just think it's rich that a person is OK with state sponsored surveillance wherein millions of people have access to the data but want to hide behind a screen name on Texags. Remaining anonymous on a message board affords luxuries not afforded other places, you can hide behind a screen name and say whatever you want without risk of consequences. I do not want my tax dollars spent surveilling me, I am not a criminal, I am a law abiding citizen and that citizenship comes with rights outlined in this country's founding documents and supporting amendments.
www.elitellp.net/
CessAgs gonna CessAgs