CSHS is actually in the wrong location if this is your premise. It should have been built at Fitch and 6.
That's really outside the box and I'm willing to listen to suggestions, but I am in the I don't agree camp. I think it can be done properly. We will need a third HS eventually. Fixing the one we already have is probably cheaper.SARATOGA said:
Which is why Consol should be turned into something else, as the facility is too old, and the population with kids has moved south. We don't need a 3rd high school, we need a 2nd high school in the correct location which fixes zoning issues to common sense as well as the new school vs old school debate for resources.
gbennett said:
A few thoughts on this thread from a member of the bond committee and someone involved with the local softball/baseball community:
The softball/baseball community is united on this issue and wants Consol to be updated as the bond detailed. There is no purple v. maroon on this issue.
There was "limited" marketing from the district on why voting for Prop C & D was advantageous for the community.
The district did not want the story of the fields told through pictures and videos, which I believe hindered additional yes votes.
The new Super has a baseball background and evidently experience getting athletics bonds passed. We will see what he does from this point.
This is not about building a taj mahal or keeping up with others. It is about safety/risk management, fiscal responsibility, athletic performance and development, and meeting basic competition space requirements for a district that prides itself on "excellence".
In no way do I want to be taxed, however, this is a simple cost-benefit analysis that accounts for the very minor change in our taxes. Having lived in several states, across different university towns, it is easy to see where a lot of our (high) tax $ goes locally and it helps our kids. C & D should have passed.
This is what needs to happen. Come up with a bond that does nothing except get Consol facilities up to the same level as CSHS. Produce and promote a video presentation of the issues at Consol now so people understand why it is needed and the extent of the current disparity between facilities.TAMU1990 said:That's really outside the box and I'm willing to listen to suggestions, but I am in the I don't agree camp. I think it can be done properly. We will need a third HS eventually. Fixing the one we already have is probably cheaper.SARATOGA said:
Which is why Consol should be turned into something else, as the facility is too old, and the population with kids has moved south. We don't need a 3rd high school, we need a 2nd high school in the correct location which fixes zoning issues to common sense as well as the new school vs old school debate for resources.
According to a former employee of the district, the percentages of Castle Gate and Pebble Creek 2021 vote totals were relatively similar. Pebble Creek is a larger subdivision with a significant retiree and empty nester population who may be more inclined to vote no. Generally, this population votes against tax increases.
Unless Castle Gate has had a significant demographic change in the past 10 years, I'd say there are families with school aged children living in Castle Gate that don't want the tax increase either. 2021 failed because the district didn't communicate or present it well.
I'd suggest to the new Super to focus on both of these neighborhoods. Go to PCCC and talk with the retirees, go to luncheons at senior citizen centers, invite clergy to a presentation and tour both high schools. Ask for their assistance. Canvass Castle Gate, attend neighborhood HOAs, explain why Consol needs to be updated.
Stupe said:
"Respect our decision".
I always find it funny when people say or post that.
Respect it or what?
It's just the overuse of that phrase that I find funny. Not your specific post.AggieKatie2 said:Stupe said:
"Respect our decision".
I always find it funny when people say or post that.
Respect it or what?
WTH?!?! Is it a problem to ask elected officials and government employees to respect the voting results of their constituents? What a weird response. The "or what" is the risk of being voted out next election cycle. I mean, that's how politics works right?
CSHS is less than two miles from Fitch & 6. I don't think locating it there instead of where it is would have much of an effect on anything, other than the dirt would have probably been a lot more expensive.Cartographer said:
CSHS is actually in the wrong location if this is your premise. It should have been built at Fitch and 6.
Cartographer said:
that puts it closer to 5 miles away from consol and centralized into this southern region you are arguing we need to build into.
Agree 100% A LOT of money has gone into Consol since CSHS was built to make improvements, and I believe they are continuing to work on some currently. And with the passage of the most recent bond the whole discussion is a moot point because they about to expand Consol further.Quote:
But more to SARATOGA's point about repurposing Consol, you'd be forcing the large population of students that live between Rock Prairie and University to bus 3+ miles south for no reason. Like it or not, there's a large population of elementary students that live between those two major roadways due to the lack of affordable housing options south of RP.
I like the creative thinking but Consol is not going anywhere nor should it.
Username checks out.Cartographer said:
I think the largest problem with the idea of scrapping it is geographic. You're not going to find a campus location within CS proper and you're going to be stuck with a significant enrollment in that northern area that has to travel a good ways.
It might be a tear down and build in place thing but that location is good for a lot of reasons.
No worries, I've done the same thing!Cartographer said:
Sorry Tailgate! Thought I was responding to Saratoga!
No the voters have spoken... But when has that stopped our local government. I think it is time for CSISD to think of alternatives for the sports expansion.George Costanza said:
"We voted. Respect our decision. Classrooms are the priority right now, not athletic fields. We approved the largest general bond ever for this area and it's still not enough for the board."
Hopefully, they don't just put the same bond proposal out again ... obviously it needs to be adjusted to be approved by voters. However, there is no doubt if our community is gonna continue to field athletic teams, Consol NEEDS, at a minimum, an expanded fieldhouse, track resurfacing and concession stand and that at least should be put up for vote again asap.
So what does that actually cost? I was really surprised by the ratio that C and D failed by. If they really want athletic bonds to pass, they need to be asking for needs and not wants and trying to trim things to a reasonable number.George Costanza said:
Consol NEEDS, at a minimum, an expanded fieldhouse, track resurfacing and concession stand and that at least should be put up for vote again asap.
Quote:
College Station ISD's superintendent tells his school board that he plans to bring back in January, the planning committee that worked on the recent bond issue.
------
Harkrider says administrators will be taking a deeper dive into last week's election results after Thanksgiving.
The superintendent also noted that "realize when we were around 650 to 700 votes short out of 7,000, it is definitely gettable" to pass bonds for athletics facilities.
There was no disagreement among CSISD board members to continue educating voters about current conditions of athletic facilities and how they are used by students who are not on sports teams.
I think if more detailed information was presented with the needs for each expenditure and they looked reasonable, it may have passed.CS78 said:So what does that actually cost? I was really surprised by the ratio that C and D failed by. If they really want athletic bonds to pass, they need to be asking for needs and not wants and trying to trim things to a reasonable number.George Costanza said:
Consol NEEDS, at a minimum, an expanded fieldhouse, track resurfacing and concession stand and that at least should be put up for vote again asap.
Prop D was fairly straightforward. The majority of this baseball/softball request was turfing their 4 fields so that the athletes and coaches don't lose as much time prepping fields and waiting for them to dry out. In return they'll have more time for player development, substantially more time practicing on the field both during the fall and spring, and less cancelled games. They'll spend less time and money moving practices and games to other facilities and schools for rentals. The icing on the cake is the realistic potential of renting out these new facilities to outside organizations for summer tournaments where there is already a field shortage in town. These athletes and programs deserve turf fields which are the new standard. Not referring to the Woodlands, Katy and Allen. I'm referring to Navasota, Caldwell, Mumford, Franklin and Waller.woodiewood1 said:I think if more detailed information was presented with the needs for each expenditure and they looked reasonable, it may have passed.CS78 said:So what does that actually cost? I was really surprised by the ratio that C and D failed by. If they really want athletic bonds to pass, they need to be asking for needs and not wants and trying to trim things to a reasonable number.George Costanza said:
Consol NEEDS, at a minimum, an expanded fieldhouse, track resurfacing and concession stand and that at least should be put up for vote again asap.
Questions such as why do the stands need expanding if they are not full for the games should have been explained. Why does a few year old press box at CSHS need to be rebuilt?
To me, more explanation was needed in order to justify spending 38+ million on the two football programs and 13+ million on baseball/softball facilities....51 million in significant dollars.
First the Consul Sports parents and supporters could raise a percentage of the funds necessary. A good faith effort would show the voters that all parties are engaged. Second those who use the press boxes could also donate to the cause. Third alternative plans could be put forward that do not include double digit million dollar expenditures.George Costanza said:
"I think it is time for CSISD to think of alternatives for the sports expansion."
What do you mean? Also … does that train of thought apply to other extracurricular activities like band, theater, etc?
doubledog said:First the Consul Sports parents and supporters could raise a percentage of the funds necessary. A good faith effort would show the voters that all parties are engaged. Second those who use the press boxes could also donate to the cause. Third alternative plans could be put forward that do not include double digit million dollar expenditures.George Costanza said:
"I think it is time for CSISD to think of alternatives for the sports expansion."
What do you mean? Also … does that train of thought apply to other extracurricular activities like band, theater, etc?
What exactly do you think Tiger Club and Cougar Club do?doubledog said:
First the Consul Sports parents and supporters could raise a percentage of the funds necessary. A good faith effort would show the voters that all parties are engaged. Second those who use the press boxes could also donate to the cause. Third alternative plans could be put forward that do not include double digit million dollar expenditures.
doubledog said:First the Consul Sports parents and supporters could raise a percentage of the funds necessary. A good faith effort would show the voters that all parties are engaged. Second those who use the press boxes could also donate to the cause. Third alternative plans could be put forward that do not include double digit million dollar expenditures.George Costanza said:
"I think it is time for CSISD to think of alternatives for the sports expansion."
What do you mean? Also … does that train of thought apply to other extracurricular activities like band, theater, etc?