LA Mayor Race

68,481 Views | 615 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by Noctilucent
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, always fighting tooth and nail against the most common sense, easy to implement anti-fraud control that the rest of the world uses: showing an ID to prove the person voting is the person who is registered to vote should tell everyone all they need to know.

But then you end up reading multiple paragraphs of possible excuses for why the plots on a graph might be totally legit. And then you get ridiculed and shut down because a recount just counted the fraud again or because a judge dropped a case challenging it on standing.
TexasAGGIEinAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just your friendly reminder that no matter how blatant the election cheating is, and how we think it should end or people be prosecuted, nothing will ever happen. This is all a tremendous waste of time and concern. The 3 west coast states are their own countries and impenetrable by logic, accountability and fairness. We'd be better off sawing them off like Bugs Bunny and letting them float into the Pacific.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Wow! What a coincidence!
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No worries! It's just another discontinuity!
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
AgsinGA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The citizens of CA should send their departure itinerary to the governor, mayor and their representatives.

If the republicans were smart, they would have put up or should put up signs at interstates at the border and all major cities with the population gains (haha) or losses. it would show:
Tax paying citizens
Illegal aliens
with net gains and losses.

Next to each put the net tax impact.

Clear concise and easy to understand.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Surely Republicans knew this would happen, but they can NEVER catch the dems doing it? I find that harder and harder to believe every time it happens.
sanangelo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We have to out-cheat them until they realize ballot harvesting hurts them as badly.

There is no reason Republicans, who are way smarter than Democrats, can not beat them at their own game.

Let the cheating begin!
San Angelo LIVE!
https://sanangelolive.com/
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I mean if you are going to go to the trouble to fake a couple hundred thousand ballots for a nobody, you may as well get your money's worth and vote for a tax increase too.
Ozzy Osbourne
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrats are very concentrated in ghettos and homeless encampments. Republicans are spread out across large rural areas. Ballot harvesting is a rigged game in the Dems favor.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexAgs91 said:

Surely Republicans knew this would happen, but they can NEVER catch the dems doing it? I find that harder and harder to believe every time it happens.
What do you think republicans in California have the power to do? They are not in control of any aspect of their government.
ABATTBQ87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

TexAgs91 said:

Surely Republicans knew this would happen, but they can NEVER catch the dems doing it? I find that harder and harder to believe every time it happens.

What do you think republicans in California have the power to do? They are not in control of any aspect of their government.

HollywoodBQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgsinGA said:

The citizens of CA should send their departure itinerary to the governor, mayor and their representatives.

If the republicans were smart, they would have put up or should put up signs at interstates at the border and all major cities with the population gains (haha) or losses. it would show:
Tax paying citizens
Illegal aliens
with net gains and losses.

Next to each put the net tax impact.

Clear concise and easy to understand.

It's precious that you think these California voters pay taxes.
Or that the Democrat politicians even care what the voters think.

There are so many groupthink sheeple voting in California, it's not even funny.

And with the cash economy, believe me, there are plenty of people collecting government checks while their cash income is overlooked.

The weather in LA is great. I was just out there last weekend and it was magnificent but... I think I paid almost $30,000 in State Income Tax the last year I was there, not to mention a 10.25% Sales Tax.

Before I turned in my rental car, I filled up with 87 Octane for $6.25/gal. When I got back to Houston, I filled up my own car with 93 Octane for $3.97/gal.

There is no hope for California. None at all. It's going to get way worse before they even think about making a change.
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It will never get better. See New York.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
snowminer said:

I'm one person. I cant be expected to argue with umpteen people concurrently. If I am going to waste my time posting here, which clearly I am, the I have to find a discussion point that I am interested in and knowledgeable about and stick to it. That point here is that these trend line analyses are posted here as 'evidence' of systemic fraud, when they are clearly explained by the process working as usual.

California clearly has election integrity issues as does the country as a whole. Some real, some perceived. Some of California's policies are indefensible on a rational basis. In any case there needs to be progress towards resolving these issues. However, I simply don't agree that much of the evidence some of you use to indicate fraud is really all that credible or convincing, and some of it like these trend lines is just plainly doesn't indicate what you think it does. I am certainly am not convinced that any of your evidence demonstrates the kind of systematic fraud that would be required to alter the outcome of an election that is not already within the margin for error.

If you want to believe that the Democrats have fired up their election rigging machine to prevent Spencer Pratt from being the runner up in a mayoral election that he has almost surely no chance of winning, but they decided to let Hilton win over Steyer, then I just don't think that's credible. But you're free to believe what you want to at the end of the day.

With that said, the Trump administration says they have multiple election probes ongoing and they have been investigating ballots from 2020, so maybe we'll get actual answers. We'll see. Until then, I think I've had my fill, so don't waste your time expecting me to respond any further.


Glad to see you say this. If you acknowledge this, then the next logical step is that any data we see coming out of it has to be questioned and scrutinized, ideally through an independent audit that apparently CA is blocking from happening. Why would they do that if they had nothing to hide as they claim?

I recall a day during the Oscars when they made a show of pulling Deloitte, or whatever Big 4 is what at the time, onto the stage to ensure the audience the votes for a f'ing actor award were legit. But, in 2026, they won't do that for the most sacred civic duty in this country in the same state that has a wholly unique process riddled with failure points.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
snowminer said:

I'm one person. I cant be expected to argue with umpteen people concurrently. If I am going to waste my time posting here, which clearly I am, the I have to find a discussion point that I am interested in and knowledgeable about and stick to it. That point here is that these trend line analyses are posted here as 'evidence' of systemic fraud, when they are clearly explained by the process working as usual.

California clearly has election integrity issues as does the country as a whole. Some real, some perceived. Some of California's policies are indefensible on a rational basis. In any case there needs to be progress towards resolving these issues. However, I simply don't agree that much of the evidence some of you use to indicate fraud is really all that credible or convincing, and some of it like these trend lines is just plainly doesn't indicate what you think it does. I am certainly am not convinced that any of your evidence demonstrates the kind of systematic fraud that would be required to alter the outcome of an election that is not already within the margin for error.

If you want to believe that the Democrats have fired up their election rigging machine to prevent Spencer Pratt from being the runner up in a mayoral election that he has almost surely no chance of winning, but they decided to let Hilton win over Steyer, then I just don't think that's credible. But you're free to believe what you want to at the end of the day.

With that said, the Trump administration says they have multiple election probes ongoing and they have been investigating ballots from 2020, so maybe we'll get actual answers. We'll see. Until then, I think I've had my fill, so don't waste your time expecting me to respond any further.

California's current policies around the LA mayor race are no less despicable than the policies demonstrated by certain election operations in 2020 from the likes of Fulton county, the entire state of Michigan, Maricopa county, the state of Wisconsin, and Philadelphia county.

To ignore all of the smoke around each one of these places, each which received tens of $millions of Zuckerbucks with contractual claw-backs for not following certain behaviors that obfuscated the auditability of election returns, is to put one's head in the sand and ignore mountains of very real evidence.

You can soak your willful ignorance of that behavior with as much AI-assisted fancy pants prose as you want, but it doesn't make that position any more rational.
sanangelo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ozzy Osbourne said:

Democrats are very concentrated in ghettos and homeless encampments. Republicans are spread out across large rural areas. Ballot harvesting is a rigged game in the Dems favor.

Then Republicans pose as Democrats and harvest the same ballot pool.
San Angelo LIVE!
https://sanangelolive.com/
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The West Coast states are Dem dictatorships where voting is an illusion but the corruption is real

The people there can't vote their way out of it anymore than the people of North Korea or China can
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That ****ing cheater Newsom.



BREAKING NEWS: Tens of thousands of Spencer Pratt voters are now receiving rejection letters from the county clerk saying that their ballots were not counted due to signature irregularities.

Yet, Governor Gavin Newsom just passed legislation that would make it illegal for anyone conducting oversight, to contest signatures that they deemed fraudulent.

Democrats allow ballots to be signed with an X, a -, or a to pass and count, but all of a sudden, only Republican signatures are being flagged for irregularities, rejected, and not counted.

One of these California Republican voters said that his signature has been on file for over 20 years and there has never been an issue until he voted for Spencer Pratt.

Nithya Ramen has beaten Spencer Pratt by less than 3000 votes. There are at least 18,000 Pratt voters who received this letter saying their votes were rejected.
I don’t get enough credit for the things I manage not to say.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Actual Stalinists are in charge in California
God loves you so much He'll meet you where you are. He also loves you too much to allow to stay where you are.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't know how we can send voting "observers" to every 3rd world craphole and yet we can't legally do a damn thing about voting integrity in our own sovereign nation. We're doomed...
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Newsome said he was going to "break the glass"
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Democrats allow ballots to be signed with an X, a -, or a to pass and count, but all of a sudden, only Republican signatures are being flagged for irregularities, rejected, and not counted.

That's a big oopsie. Equal protection issue.
Tone2002
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Okay Los Angeleans (sp?) are not as crazy as I thought they were. Spencer is out.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tone2002 said:

Okay Los Angeleans (sp?) are not as crazy as I thought they were. Spencer is out.


Lolz. Please post here the crazy things Pratt said he was going to do if he were to win.

Also, choosing an actual cuban trained commie who let her city burn while on a virtue signaling trip to Ghana and someone who is even further left than her is not a sign of sanity
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tone2002 said:

Okay Los Angeleans (sp?) are not as crazy as I thought they were. Spencer is out.

Very insightful, just like every other drive by poster
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgBQ-00 said:

Actual Stalinists are in charge in California

Ballot harvesting has consequences.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who?mikejones! said:

Newsome said he was going to "break the glass"


Newson really needs the crap beaten out of him, but since that can't happen, I want someone to go after him legally. I want this piece of **** shut down.
I don’t get enough credit for the things I manage not to say.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tone2002 said:

Okay Los Angeleans (sp?) are not as crazy as I thought they were. Spencer is out.


So you literally don't give a ****ing rats ass that they are completely cheating and it's Spencer that should be in the runoff. Disgusting.

A pile of cow dung would be better than these two horrid women. This guy actually made sense, listened to advisors and wanted to get to the root of the problems, but you don't give a **** do you.

Just absolutely gross.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
California should be ashamed of itself and lots of heads should roll over this bull*****
I don’t get enough credit for the things I manage not to say.
TRX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's a damn shame, what a waste of a beautiful place. Wish I could've seen it but it's not worth the risk anymore.
ULTRA MAGA
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tone2002 said:

Okay Los Angeleans (sp?) are not as crazy as I thought they were. Spencer is out.


Yo bro. What it be like?






oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well, someone sure is tone deaf
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tone2002 said:

Okay Los Angeleans (sp?) are not as crazy as I thought they were. Spencer is out.


You should move to L.A.
K Bo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


got me kinda juiced
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
K Bo said:



got me kinda juiced


Holy ****ing ****

That is freaking nails. Bro declared war and is now taunting them without having to worry about any repercussions

Burn it all down Spencer! It needs to be rebuilt
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hope he has the goods. If he does he may "have and accident" though. That state is run by pure evil.
God loves you so much He'll meet you where you are. He also loves you too much to allow to stay where you are.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.