Prosperdick said:

---

At this point it will be an interesting race to the bottom for how quickly Bass can kill LA versus Mandami killing NY.

You would think these deep blue cities failing at exponential rates would be eye-opening to the casual observer but sadly it won't.

---

They keep blaming the rich for not paying their fair share, rinse…repeat.

MelvinUdall said:

---

Prosperdick said:

---

At this point it will be an interesting race to the bottom for how quickly Bass can kill LA versus Mandami killing NY.

You would think these deep blue cities failing at exponential rates would be eye-opening to the casual observer but sadly it won't.

---

They keep blaming the rich for not paying their fair share, rinse…repeat.

---

This is what happens when we have a large population that don't work and contribute to the system, they just take take take and still find a way to blame those who fund the majority of our federal government.

Your president was a reality tv star and he's accomplished more that he promised to do than any president your lifetime.

Welp, looks like the people of los angles will have a choice in November between a communist and a communist

#democracy

🚨 JUST IN: NITHYA RAMAN SURGES IN LATE MAIL BALLOTS, overperforms and is on track to unseat Spencer Pratt for 2nd place unless something changes

This is unreal...

Raman just NETTED +4,000 VOTES on Pratt across one drop, winning 33.5% of the latest LA mail, per VoteHub

🔵… pic.twitter.com/f3lBeEZWiP

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) June 4, 2026

Watched this last night and it was a solid hour long conversation filmed last weekend a few days before the election.

There is no legitimate way that Noodles is suddenly surging and on pace to surpass Pratt, yet she is now with a 70% chance to do so on Polymarket.

Other than the obvious 2020 biggest rig job and steal in the history of American politics, I'm trying to think of a bigger rig incoming in recent memory. I'm sure there are plenty the Dems have pulled off but this one is certainly most top of mind:

Silly old republican voters go vote in person. Leftist NGOs harvest all the mailed out ballots. That's how "democracy" works.

Rockdoc said:

---

Don't worry California, you're gonna get what you deserve. Enjoy.

---

I REALLY love this, get what you deserve. Everyone knows this has been rigged. Did WE deserve the 2020 fake results? Oh it comes to Texas, we'll fight. No, no one will do anything

What's even weirder according to that data is Steve Hilton got about 50,000 votes in the governor race in the same dump but Pratt got zero.

Big Al 1992 said:

---

Has there ever been a Republican that has gained an advantage when late votes were counted. It goes one way (d) every time.

---

Why the **** do you think Trump is trying to pass the SAVE act along with the rest of the small majority of people in Congress with any integrity?

Los Angeles Mayor Primary 2026 Live Results https://share.google/C4brd6bkxA3vlghWf





This is as of about 6:30 June 5.

I would like to know where those Twitter posts get their info.

Who?mikejones! said:

---

Spencer Pratt got 0 out of 24,000 votes in a late night LA ballot drop.

0/24,000

A guy getting around 30% support got 0 out of 24,000.

Astronomically small probability of happening.

Impossible.

California no longer even hides it.

Doors need to be kicked in.

— C3 (@C_3C_3) June 5, 2026

---

"For whatever reason, the late mail-in votes in key races tend to pull Dems ahead"

Hmm, I wonder why 🤔 pic.twitter.com/Y9AbrxR0jT

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) June 5, 2026

for whatever reason....

johnnyblaze36 said:

---

Big Al 1992 said:

---

Has there ever been a Republican that has gained an advantage when late votes were counted. It goes one way (d) every time.

---

Why the **** do you think Trump is trying to pass the SAVE act along with the rest of the small majority of people in Congress with any integrity?

---

He can't. McConnell and Thune are TDS traitors who just voted against it AGAIN.

According to artificial intelligence, the statistical probability of Spencer Pratt getting 0 out of 24,000 votes in last nights late night Los Angeles ballot drop is “1 in trillions”

California Democrats are rigging the election pic.twitter.com/t01wHDU1n6

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) June 5, 2026

YouBet said:

---

johnnyblaze36 said:

---

Big Al 1992 said:

---

Has there ever been a Republican that has gained an advantage when late votes were counted. It goes one way (d) every time.

---

Why the **** do you think Trump is trying to pass the SAVE act along with the rest of the small majority of people in Congress with any integrity?

---

He can't. McConnell and Thune are TDS traitors who just voted against it AGAIN.

---

Not that I want to stand up for him at all, but I read that Thune voted yes. Murkowski, McConnell and Tillis voted no. Collins even voted yes the second time through (which I think was the earlier version of the act w/o the men in women's sports and transgender language).

dvldog said:

---

YouBet said:

---

johnnyblaze36 said:

---

Big Al 1992 said:

---

Has there ever been a Republican that has gained an advantage when late votes were counted. It goes one way (d) every time.

---

Why the **** do you think Trump is trying to pass the SAVE act along with the rest of the small majority of people in Congress with any integrity?

---

He can't. McConnell and Thune are TDS traitors who just voted against it AGAIN.

---

Not that I want to stand up for him at all, but I read that Thune voted yes. Murkowski, McConnell and Tillis voted no. Collins even voted yes the second time through (which I think was the earlier version of the act w/o the men in women's sports and transgender language).

---

Yep, I mistakenly switched Tillis with Thune. I wonder why Thune changed his mind. Probably using turtle as cover. The latter of whom shouldn't even be in the Senate anymore. Having mini strokes on live tv and all.

are we supposed to switch over to the new thread someone started on CA vote counting?

What is the source for the 0-24k twitter claim?

not sure the source, but I saw dozens of tweets last night with that screenshot of that impossible ballot drop


why do democrats think mass mailing ballots out to 100% of the people on old outdated voter rolls, not requiring an ID to vote as proof the person voting is the person who is registered, not requiring a signature verifcation on mailed back ballots to the registered voter, etc. is sure and free from possible fraud?

Not sure who to believe.

No, it did not happen.@spencerpratt (orange on the graph) received votes in every single ballot drop.

This is fake news. https://t.co/ZRVSAwJGaq pic.twitter.com/nr3GYKgxyD

— Elizabeth Barcohana (@E_Barcohana) June 5, 2026

Some of you actually thought Pratt was going to win? Were you born yesterday?

AozorAg said:

---

Some of you actually thought Pratt was going to win? Were you born yesterday?

---

he should have finished second and been in the runoff.

I won't be convinced both communists beat him with: no ID to vote, mass mailed ballots, no signature verification requirements, not post date requirement if there's another date written on the ballot, and endless counting for days or a week. defend those policies. tell me how secure they all are. tell me how those policies "protect our democracy".

oh no said:

---

AozorAg said:

---

Some of you actually thought Pratt was going to win? Were you born yesterday?

---

he should have finished second and been in the runoff.

I won't be convinced both communists beat him with: no ID to vote, mass mailed ballots, no signature verification requirements, not post date requirement if there's another date written on the ballot, and endless counting for days or a week. defend those policies. tell me how secure they all are. tell me how those policies "protect our democracy".

---

Read this morning they accept votes up to 22 days after the election. Crazy absurd. So we aren't going to know for a while.

AozorAg said:

---

Some of you actually thought Pratt was going to win? Were you born yesterday?

---

No, we didn't think he was going to win but we were somewhat hoping for a semi honest vote count against the cheating Dems. Silly us.

oh no said:

---

AozorAg said:

---

Some of you actually thought Pratt was going to win? Were you born yesterday?

---

he should have finished second and been in the runoff.

I won't be convinced both communists beat him with: no ID to vote, mass mailed ballots, no signature verification requirements, not post date requirement if there's another date written on the ballot, and endless counting for days or a week. defend those policies. tell me how secure they all are. tell me how those policies "protect our democracy".

---

Is he not in second place now?


I know they have not finished the counting yet, so the outcome is still TBD. That said, I am am asking for the third time, what is the source for the claim regarding the 24k vote drop on favor of Raman?

Please don't say it was all on twitter.

Somedays reading politics board is like reading a game thread on Liuccis board and the opposing team takes a 0-3 lead in the first quarter. WE ARE SO EFFING SCREWED BRO

Update as of about 7:30 PM on Friday

If all of the remaining votes when to only Raman and Pratt, she would need 54% to beat him out of the runoff. Of course then Black Velma might wonder why she got zero of the remaining mail in votes.

Red flag… 🚩🚩🚩

39.3% vote in…
Karen Bass had 117,579
Spencer Pratt had 86,323

42.4% vote in…
Karen Bass 130,429
Spencer Pratt 86,323

Virtually every candidate received votes except for Spencer Pratt. Impossible. https://t.co/pUkm64MG37 pic.twitter.com/RwK3cppdCf

— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) June 3, 2026

It comes from thsi guy who took a screen shot of a count update, to my knowledge

🗳️ Many have been asking me describe the potential signature verification loophole for Los Angeles mail in ballots.

It says: “If a voter is unable to sign, the voter can make a mark witnessed by one person.”

Here, the person drew a happy face & “witnessed” it with a scribble.… pic.twitter.com/PZxSoiJdS8

— Houman David Hemmati, MD, PhD (@houmanhemmati) June 6, 2026

Meanwhile, the union for the concession workers at SoFi Stadium voted to go on strike last night right ahead of our first World Cup match there. An "opportune" moment to screw over fans wanting to see the USMNT.

Quote:

---

Around 2,000 hospitality workers at Los Angeles' SoFi Stadium overwhelmingly voted to authorize a strike, their union said Friday night.

The stoppage, authorized by 96% of voting members, could occur at any time, though union officials made it clear that the U.S. national team's opening World Cup match against Paraguay on June 12 would be an opportune moment.

---

Sounds like a great experience to for everyone.

Quote:

---

If workers walk off the job, soccer fans who paid thousands of dollars to attend the match might have a hard time getting refreshments. FIFA, soccer's governing body, has recommended fans arrive three hours early for matches at the stadium, located just outside L.A., which suffers from difficult parking and chaotic road access.

A strike at SoFi Stadium would be an embarrassment for Los Angeles as it gears up to host eight World Cup matches, the 2027 Super Bowl and the 2028 Olympics. It would also be a black eye for FIFA, soccer's global governing body, which has advertised high-end food and beverage service in the stadium's suites while charging thousands of dollars for tickets.

---

What a disaster.