Who?mikejones! said:

---

Difference being that other stayes at least usually make some effort to clean up the rolls. Cali doesn't.

Even then- heres the biggest issue:

https://nypost.com/2026/06/09/us-news/thousands-of-homeless-la-voters-registered-at-shelters-without-beds-including-one-linked-to-raman/

Quote:

---

Among them was the St. Joseph Center in Venice, a drop-in center that, according to voting records, had 185 voters registered to its address and received $600,000 in taxpayers' money from the homeless and housing committee while Raman was chair

---

Quote:

---

One homeless man on Skid Row, Norman, said he's witnessed voter registration efforts in the area for years and claims he had previously been paid to help sign up voters and that cigarettes were offered to some people during the drives.

---

Now, inquiring minds might suggest that they when pay all these homeless people to register and then ballots are sent out to every registered voter and thousands are sent to homeless drop in shelters with few actual residents- who fills them out?

The wanderer on the street or someone else?

---

That's the issue with every mail in ballot. No one knows who actually fills them out.

Be they me-maw out in the country, abuelo in the nursing home, or Jane Doe in shelters.

Either get rid of all mail in voting or fix it.

Me, I'd rather it be gotten rid of entirely.

Wheel my old ass into a booth so I can pull my own damn lever if I want to vote that badly enough.

No Spin Ag said:

---

96AgGrad said:

---

Well I guess asking for a ballot to vote by mail is exactly the same as flooding the system with them, right? Hasn't changed in a century?

---

Is it still one person having only one vote counted?

Yes, it's slow and annoying, but that doesn't mean it's cheating. Stupid. Yes. Idiotic, honestly, but not cheating.

---

Why would you think it is stupid and idiotic? I think it was designed to be slow.

No Spin Ag said:

---

VegasAg86 said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

There's always something fishy, but when "the system is rigged!" Is only ever called when one's side loses, it starts to sound a lot like the sky is falling.

I'm sure there's some idiots that get through, but when California has been doing mail in voting for over a century (per the Google) yet it's only been since Trump's been a politician that the system has been rigged, yet only when a republican loses, it kind of loses its effect, especially over a decade and a half later.

---

It's a Democrat controlled state, with Democrat controlled voting, of course only one side is ever going to complain about it being rigged. What a foolish point.

California only started mailing ballots to every active registered voter in 2022. What happened before that really isn't relevant.

You should change your name to Leftist Spin Ag, No Spin is laughably false.

---

So no one on the right complained about rigged elections before 2022?

---

How about when Nixon complained about JFK stuffing the ballots in Chicago?

Nixon was right.

Who?mikejones! said:

---

Not really. If it were dem vs republican only, then maybe.

---

They're pumping up the fellow dem to push the republican completely out of the runoff election. If it were just Pratt vs Bass then he would have a chance to beat her and/or they would really have to crank the fraud up to hide the results. It's still dem over republican fraud, but it's the runoff election version of the game.

No Spin Ag said:

---

digging tunnels said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

zephyr88 said:

---

Trump was right... again.

Rigged election. Corrupt media.

---

"My guy didn't win, the system is rigged!"

Reminds me a lot of, "I didn't fail the test, the teacher gave me an 'F'!" No, little Tommy didn't study and guessed on every question, but, yeah, it's the teacher's fault.

---

Some first time voters can register with a gym membership or a prescription. That doesnt sound fishy at all, does it? Hmmm. What particular group of people would that help to let them vote???

---

There's always something fishy, but when "the system is rigged!" Is only ever called when one's side loses, it starts to sound a lot like the sky is falling. of loses its effect, especially over a decade and a half later.

---

Uou realize we consistently want secure elections, right? You realize these elections never fall to republicans, right? You realize this only happens in "blue" areas, right? You realize it's only statists who want this, right?

California has also been documented to mail ballots to previously registered former residents that have moved out of state. They will mail to a forward address for years. Nothing stops said former resident from voting because nobody is checking.

I honestly hope that the Media keeps pushing the "no fraud here" narrative on this one.

They are getting too sloppy, Pratt doesn't give a F***, he's not Trump, and he is likely to get outside funding to help him combat the fraud after the fact.

The press is very potentially creating another "conspiracy theory" that is going to get taken down, and erode the press's credibility even more with the public, if that is possible.

I would rather lose a republican vote than give them flexible options in the name of convenience. Can any democrat make that same statement?

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

digging tunnels said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

zephyr88 said:

---

Trump was right... again.

Rigged election. Corrupt media.

---

"My guy didn't win, the system is rigged!"

Reminds me a lot of, "I didn't fail the test, the teacher gave me an 'F'!" No, little Tommy didn't study and guessed on every question, but, yeah, it's the teacher's fault.

---

Some first time voters can register with a gym membership or a prescription. That doesnt sound fishy at all, does it? Hmmm. What particular group of people would that help to let them vote???

---

There's always something fishy, but when "the system is rigged!" Is only ever called when one's side loses, it starts to sound a lot like the sky is falling. of loses its effect, especially over a decade and a half later.

---

Uou realize we consistently want secure elections, right? You realize these elections never fall to republicans, right? You realize this only happens in "blue" areas, right? You realize it's only statists who want this, right?

---

I see people on the left crying about rigged elections all the time going back, at least, to Gore's loss.

Don't get me wrong, I fully believe people try to vote illegally, be they to get their one vote counted multiple times, or to get other views illegally put in the system to sway an election.

I guess I'm just tired of hearing about rigged elections, again, I've got too many people on the left who say the same thing when their guy loses.

Like immigration, election system needs to be completely overhauled, and until politicians from the WH to the bottom rail to make it happen, in every one of the 50 states so it's all the same, this will never stop being an issue. Just like immigration.

BusterAg said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

VegasAg86 said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

There's always something fishy, but when "the system is rigged!" Is only ever called when one's side loses, it starts to sound a lot like the sky is falling.

I'm sure there's some idiots that get through, but when California has been doing mail in voting for over a century (per the Google) yet it's only been since Trump's been a politician that the system has been rigged, yet only when a republican loses, it kind of loses its effect, especially over a decade and a half later.

---

It's a Democrat controlled state, with Democrat controlled voting, of course only one side is ever going to complain about it being rigged. What a foolish point.

California only started mailing ballots to every active registered voter in 2022. What happened before that really isn't relevant.

You should change your name to Leftist Spin Ag, No Spin is laughably false.

---

So no one on the right complained about rigged elections before 2022?

---

How about when Nixon complained about JFK stuffing the ballots in Chicago?

Nixon was right.

---

Joe Kennedy one of the all-time biggest election cheaters for his kids there ever was.

And let's not forget about LBJ rigging his elections in Texas.

Democrats cheat. It's who they are.

doubledog said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

96AgGrad said:

---

Well I guess asking for a ballot to vote by mail is exactly the same as flooding the system with them, right? Hasn't changed in a century?

---

Is it still one person having only one vote counted?

Yes, it's slow and annoying, but that doesn't mean it's cheating. Stupid. Yes. Idiotic, honestly, but not cheating.

---

Why would you think it is stupid and idiotic? I think it was designed to be slow.

---

Because there has to be a better way. With all the tech and systems in place, I can't believe mail in ballots, no matter how they get there, is the best way.

MouthBQ98 said:

---

California has basically legalized ballot harvesting and made their election process a black box that can't be validated and investigated by design. It is corrupt by design, using methods and processes that are considered unethical and open to and enabling easy fraud and manipulation by most other US states and democratic nations. They simply made it either legal or eliminated any mechanism for accountability and then cut loose NGO and activist organizations to fund or suppport harvesting activities. The left now so dominates funding and local political support there that they utterly overwhelm any counter effort by conservatives for the most part. It is a lost cause there. Best hope is to retain a handful of conservative representatives from the rural farming areas. You can write off the rest of the state to gradual economic self immolation.

---

Or.....

We could keep primarying GOP senators until we get meaningful national election reform laws passed.

No Spin Ag said:

---

doubledog said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

96AgGrad said:

---

Well I guess asking for a ballot to vote by mail is exactly the same as flooding the system with them, right? Hasn't changed in a century?

---

Is it still one person having only one vote counted?

Yes, it's slow and annoying, but that doesn't mean it's cheating. Stupid. Yes. Idiotic, honestly, but not cheating.

---

Why would you think it is stupid and idiotic? I think it was designed to be slow.

---

Because there has to be a better way. With all the tech and systems in place, I can't believe mail in ballots, no matter how they get there, is the best way.

---

As a first step, they could outlaw mail-in ballots that don't arrive by Election Day. If you are too f'ing lazy to get your ballot in by then, then you shouldn't be voting in the first place. No one else on the planet lets losers submit their ballots up to 22 days after an election. That is flat out built on purpose for fraud.

Also, they apparently do not have early voting consistently implemented like Texas does.

Going to have to nuke the filibuster and that's definitely a brinksmanship risk game.

YouBet said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

doubledog said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

96AgGrad said:

---

Well I guess asking for a ballot to vote by mail is exactly the same as flooding the system with them, right? Hasn't changed in a century?

---

Is it still one person having only one vote counted?

Yes, it's slow and annoying, but that doesn't mean it's cheating. Stupid. Yes. Idiotic, honestly, but not cheating.

---

Why would you think it is stupid and idiotic? I think it was designed to be slow.

---

Because there has to be a better way. With all the tech and systems in place, I can't believe mail in ballots, no matter how they get there, is the best way.

---

As a first step, they could outlaw mail-in ballots that don't arrive by Election Day. If you are too f'ing lazy to get your ballot in by then, then you shouldn't be voting in the first place. No one else on the planet lets losers submit their ballots up to 22 days after an election. That is flat out built on purpose for fraud.

Also, they apparently do not have early voting consistently implemented like Texas does.

---

Agreed. 1,000%.

I did hear that the mail in ballots can be counted so long as they're post marked the day of the election, which is complete BS.

They should be mailed in no later than a week before election day. Even in Texas, it doesn't take more than a couple of days to get from one corner of the state to the other.

This one thing would at least make sure votes are counted much sooner to election day than this far out.

It's so obtuse to think that the system designed in California, despite everything being legal, is not made to be rigged.

Add in the fact that votes can't be verified

The whole system is bull****

No Spin Ag said:

---

doubledog said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

96AgGrad said:

---

Well I guess asking for a ballot to vote by mail is exactly the same as flooding the system with them, right? Hasn't changed in a century?

---

Is it still one person having only one vote counted?

Yes, it's slow and annoying, but that doesn't mean it's cheating. Stupid. Yes. Idiotic, honestly, but not cheating.

---

Why would you think it is stupid and idiotic? I think it was designed to be slow.

---

Because there has to be a better way. With all the tech and systems in place, I can't believe mail in ballots, no matter how they get there, is the best way.

---

We already have a better way. It's called in-person voting with a valid ID and a paper ballot.

Tech is ripe for fraud as well. There needs to be an 100% auditable paper trail. God forbid we ever go to completely online voting, and cheating is as easy as a few lines of code or increasing a column of votes by 10%.

96AgGrad said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

doubledog said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

96AgGrad said:

---

Well I guess asking for a ballot to vote by mail is exactly the same as flooding the system with them, right? Hasn't changed in a century?

---

Is it still one person having only one vote counted?

Yes, it's slow and annoying, but that doesn't mean it's cheating. Stupid. Yes. Idiotic, honestly, but not cheating.

---

Why would you think it is stupid and idiotic? I think it was designed to be slow.

---

Because there has to be a better way. With all the tech and systems in place, I can't believe mail in ballots, no matter how they get there, is the best way.

---

We already have a better way. It's called in-person voting with a valid ID and a paper ballot.

Tech is ripe for fraud as well. There needs to be an 100% auditable paper trail. God forbid we ever go to completely online voting, and cheating is as easy as a few lines of code or increasing a column of votes by 10%.

---

Agreed.

In person with the required ID and paper ballot trail is the only way for truly secure voting. Anything else leaves the door open for fraud and illegalities of whatever magnitude.

Now for our politicians to make it happen for all citizens in every state. I won't hold my breath.

MouthBQ98 said:

---

Going to have to nuke the filibuster and that's definitely a brinksmanship risk game.

---

It will be nuked.

Better the Republicans be the ones to do it.

96AgGrad said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

doubledog said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

96AgGrad said:

---

Well I guess asking for a ballot to vote by mail is exactly the same as flooding the system with them, right? Hasn't changed in a century?

---

Is it still one person having only one vote counted?

Yes, it's slow and annoying, but that doesn't mean it's cheating. Stupid. Yes. Idiotic, honestly, but not cheating.

---

Why would you think it is stupid and idiotic? I think it was designed to be slow.

---

Because there has to be a better way. With all the tech and systems in place, I can't believe mail in ballots, no matter how they get there, is the best way.

---

We already have a better way. It's called in-person voting with a valid ID and a paper ballot.

Tech is ripe for fraud as well. There needs to be an 100% auditable paper trail. God forbid we ever go to completely online voting, and cheating is as easy as a few lines of code or increasing a column of votes by 10%.

---

Using tech to vote is too dangerous now. With advent of AI and quantum computing on near horizon, it will be even more hacked than it already is.

The best way to ensure election integrity is a paper ballot, in-person, with bi-partisan election admins and observers.

No Spin Ag said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

digging tunnels said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

zephyr88 said:

---

Trump was right... again.

Rigged election. Corrupt media.

---

"My guy didn't win, the system is rigged!"

Reminds me a lot of, "I didn't fail the test, the teacher gave me an 'F'!" No, little Tommy didn't study and guessed on every question, but, yeah, it's the teacher's fault.

---

Some first time voters can register with a gym membership or a prescription. That doesnt sound fishy at all, does it? Hmmm. What particular group of people would that help to let them vote???

---

There's always something fishy, but when "the system is rigged!" Is only ever called when one's side loses, it starts to sound a lot like the sky is falling. of loses its effect, especially over a decade and a half later.

---

Uou realize we consistently want secure elections, right? You realize these elections never fall to republicans, right? You realize this only happens in "blue" areas, right? You realize it's only statists who want this, right?

---

I see people on the left crying about rigged elections all the time going back, at least, to Gore's loss.

---

OK. And Gore literally tried to steal that election by hyper-analyzing only districts he had a chance of winning. He tried to disenfranchise Florida voters. It's what democrats always do.

Democrats favor selections, not elections.

No Spin Ag said:

---

doubledog said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

96AgGrad said:

---

Well I guess asking for a ballot to vote by mail is exactly the same as flooding the system with them, right? Hasn't changed in a century?

---

Is it still one person having only one vote counted?

Yes, it's slow and annoying, but that doesn't mean it's cheating. Stupid. Yes. Idiotic, honestly, but not cheating.

---

Why would you think it is stupid and idiotic? I think it was designed to be slow.

---

Because there has to be a better way. With all the tech and systems in place, I can't believe mail in ballots, no matter how they get there, is the best way.

---

You did not read the part about it is designed to be slow. The slower it is the more opportunity to skew the election. I think it is not stupid it is devious.

No Spin Ag said:

---

I did hear that the mail in ballots can be counted so long as they're post marked the day of the election, which is complete BS. out.

---

Except the "postmark" can be handwritten on the envelope, which means it isn't actually a postmark and it doesn't actually have to be done by Election Day. It's fraud by design.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

I did hear that the mail in ballots can be counted so long as they're post marked the day of the election, which is complete BS. out.

---

Except the "postmark" can be handwritten on the envelope, which means it isn't actually a postmark and it doesn't actually have to be done by Election Day. It's fraud by design.

---

I didn't know the USPS did that.

I've only ever known there to be a stamp, presumably by a machine.

I just read, thanks to your post, that USPS will do a manual post mark. Yeah, that needs to be eliminated, period.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

digging tunnels said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

zephyr88 said:

---

Trump was right... again.

Rigged election. Corrupt media.

---

"My guy didn't win, the system is rigged!"

Reminds me a lot of, "I didn't fail the test, the teacher gave me an 'F'!" No, little Tommy didn't study and guessed on every question, but, yeah, it's the teacher's fault.

---

Some first time voters can register with a gym membership or a prescription. That doesnt sound fishy at all, does it? Hmmm. What particular group of people would that help to let them vote???

---

There's always something fishy, but when "the system is rigged!" Is only ever called when one's side loses, it starts to sound a lot like the sky is falling. of loses its effect, especially over a decade and a half later.

---

Uou realize we consistently want secure elections, right? You realize these elections never fall to republicans, right? You realize this only happens in "blue" areas, right? You realize it's only statists who want this, right?

---

I see people on the left crying about rigged elections all the time going back, at least, to Gore's loss.

---

OK. And Gore literally tried to steal that election by hyper-analyzing only districts he had a chance of winning. He tried to disenfranchise Florida voters. It's what democrats always do.

Democrats favor selections, not elections.

---

Gore was about as horrible a person, if not candidate, as Hillary, and that's saying something.

He had no business winning, and thankfully for all of his obvious shenanigans he still lost. We dodged a major bullet with him.

It's a shame ManBearPig drowned to death when the east coast was submerged after the polar ice cap melted around 10 years ago. We should have listened to him. May he RIP along with the millions that perished back then.

Lady got CA ballots mailed to her dog.

Dog's mailed ballot was successfully counted in a CA election (Newsom recall), but was rejected a year later in a federal election.

Newsom doesn't see the problem. Just happy a republican voting dog owner got caught due to ID

She did not "get caught". She turned herself into authorities. Her dog's mail in ballot was successfully counted in the statewide election to recall Gov. Newsom in 2021, but it was rejected in the 2022 federal primary election. Proof of ID or residence is not required in CA… https://t.co/ojOmkfNa0G

— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) June 9, 2026

No Spin Ag said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

digging tunnels said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

zephyr88 said:

---

Trump was right... again.

Rigged election. Corrupt media.

---

"My guy didn't win, the system is rigged!"

Reminds me a lot of, "I didn't fail the test, the teacher gave me an 'F'!" No, little Tommy didn't study and guessed on every question, but, yeah, it's the teacher's fault.

---

Some first time voters can register with a gym membership or a prescription. That doesnt sound fishy at all, does it? Hmmm. What particular group of people would that help to let them vote???

---

There's always something fishy, but when "the system is rigged!" Is only ever called when one's side loses, it starts to sound a lot like the sky is falling. of loses its effect, especially over a decade and a half later.

---

Uou realize we consistently want secure elections, right? You realize these elections never fall to republicans, right? You realize this only happens in "blue" areas, right? You realize it's only statists who want this, right?

---

I see people on the left crying about rigged elections all the time going back, at least, to Gore's loss.

---

OK. And Gore literally tried to steal that election by hyper-analyzing only districts he had a chance of winning. He tried to disenfranchise Florida voters. It's what democrats always do.

Democrats favor selections, not elections.

---

Gore was about as horrible a person, if not candidate, as Hillary, and that's saying something.

He had no business winning, and thankfully for all of his obvious shenanigans he still lost. We dodged a major bullet with him.

---

Yet in hindsight W wasn't much better. Just more establishment slop.

Russian collusion was the Dems version of "its rigged", only it was 100% bull*****

Only Dems are in favor of less transparency, less custodial control of ballots, less ID for voters, allowing illegals to vote, etc. So its little surprise that one side more than the other claims "its rigged" because the Dems favor a system that wouldn't pass a basic audit.

Useful Idiot Kristen Welker's PATHETIC defense of California election fraud DEBUNKED

Larry O'Connor takes Welker to task for the rigged system she's dismissing.

"The real scandal coming out of California right now is quite possibly every single thing we are seeing transpire… pic.twitter.com/qZkRMm88yH

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) June 8, 2026

Quote:

---

Townhall.com
@townhallcom
Useful Idiot Kristen Welker's PATHETIC defense of California election fraud DEBUNKED

Larry O'Connor takes Welker to task for the rigged system she's dismissing.

"The real scandal coming out of California right now is quite possibly every single thing we are seeing transpire before our very eyes is 100% legal."

O'Connor explains that anyone with a functional brain can see what's happening in California and know that the election is being stolen.

"You can steal something and not break the law. And that's what's happening here. They are stealing it without actually breaking the law."

As a former Californian resident, O'Connor breaks down the entire process.

"This is the election system in California as we speak. Anybody who is a registered voter gets a ballot mailed to them, and you register to vote because you walk into a DMV, and you automatically get registered no matter what. And as you know, California leads the nation in giving driver's licenses and registrations to illegal immigrants, people who are in the country illegally, and they're getting driver's ed. They're getting commercial driver's license in California right now. And when you go through the process, they register you to vote. And there is no check for citizenship. There's no check for ID, there's no check for anything. And they'll register to vote. And you're on the voter rolls."

O'Connor even stated he hasn't lived in Los Angeles County since 2012, and he's STILL being notified by email that his ballot has been mailed to him.

"I don't know who's got it. Whatever address I used to live in has has the Lawrence O'Connor ballot, and I'd love to know if I voted. I probably have without anyone knowing it."

And then comes the issue of ballot harvesting...

"In California, individuals can go and collect ballots from anyone. They can go and knock on the doors and say, 'Hey, give me your ballot. I'll take care of it for you' legally. And those people who knock on your door and collect your ballot, they call it 'ballot harvesting,' they can work for political entities. They can work for political action committees."

"They can go and they can pick and choose what ballots they want to collect. And they bring them in or they don't. And every mail in ballot, there is no ID required for every single mail in or drop box ballot. All you've got to do is sign the ballot. But of course, it would be discriminatory to allow somebody who is illiterate and can't write their name to not vote."

"So when you sign your ballot, you can just make a mark. You can make a smiley face if you want, but it's witnessed. Don't worry. There's a little box for a witness to sign. But of course, there's no name associated with a witness. It's just a signature. And oh, by the way, when those ballots are collected, the witness signature isn't checked."

"They just check that there is a signature for a witness. So, of course, there's nothing keeping people from making a little mark on the signature for the voter. And then that same person squiggling the witness box, putting it in an envelope and then having those votes come in. Oh, what else are they doing in California? Well, they allow ballots that come in as late as a week after Election Day to be counted. That doesn't seem right. Oh. It's okay. The ballot had to be mailed or put into a Dropbox or delivered by Election Day. But of course, if it's not postmarked, they'll overlook that. If there's no postmark at all on the envelope, they'll just look at whatever date you put on it and they'll trust you, and then they'll count the ballots."

"Every single thing I just described for you is accurate and legal. They're not breaking the law. They're following the laws that they have written so that they can get away with this garbage and everyone knows it."

@LarryOConnor

---

agent-maroon said:

---

Why are we surprised? It's not like this doesn't ever happen in other blue state elections. Obvious fraud is now just the way dems get things done

---

If the counts from vote batches were independent, identically distributed and released at a continuous rate, then we might expect a continuous trend in this plot. However, we know for a fact they are not. Votes are collected and counted by precincts, cities, and counties, each of which will have non-independent and varying distributions of votes. Small batches from small counties will give the appearance of a continuous trend, but large batches from the few large counties will always cause the appearance of a discontinuity. So the basic assumption that would allow you to claim that discontinuities in the plot are evidence of election fraud is entirely false. These jumps are nothing more than evidence that batches of vote counts are not independent and identically distributed, which we already knew.

You bandy about this thread making comments about 'statistics,' but posting this plot as evidence of election fraud without commentary at best illustrates your lack of critical thinking and your own fundamental lack of knowledge of statistics. A lot of the blame falls on the media for presenting vote counting as a horse race, but still, I would have hoped for more from someone purporting to be a physician.

No Spin Ag said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

I did hear that the mail in ballots can be counted so long as they're post marked the day of the election, which is complete BS. out.

---

Except the "postmark" can be handwritten on the envelope, which means it isn't actually a postmark and it doesn't actually have to be done by Election Day. It's fraud by design.

---

I didn't know the USPS did that.

I've only ever known there to be a stamp, presumably by a machine.

I just read, thanks to your post, that USPS will do a manual post mark. Yeah, that needs to be eliminated, period.

---

I don't know that they do. And California does not care. This was just another exception they made to allow cheating.

oh no said:

---

Lady got CA ballots mailed to her dog.

Dog's mailed ballot was successfully counted in a CA election (Newsom recall), but was rejected a year later in a federal election.

Newsom doesn't see the problem. Just happy a republican voting dog owner got caught due to ID

She did not "get caught". She turned herself into authorities. Her dog's mail in ballot was successfully counted in the statewide election to recall Gov. Newsom in 2021, but it was rejected in the 2022 federal primary election. Proof of ID or residence is not required in CA… https://t.co/ojOmkfNa0G

— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) June 9, 2026

---

And this exposes the tragic scenario that law-abiding Californians find themselves in...

Strongly suspect voter fraud? Well, that's too bad, because you have no proof.

Ok. So in order to provide proof of the holes in the system that can easily be abused, you demonstrate how easy it is to have your dog registered to vote, and successfully have his vote counted in the election.

But when you provide this proof of concept, California prosecutes you for voter fraud.

Nice scheme they've got going there.