LA Mayor Race
68,407 Views |
615 Replies |
Last: 3 hrs ago by Noctilucent
Bondag said:
They just manufacture votes out of thin air, don't even try to hide it anymore.
property and voting rights is what makes America wealthy. without those, we are India, Africa, third world
B-school professor told me - a legal system that enforces contracts, especially Intellectual Property rights.Dave Robicheaux said:
property and voting rights is what makes America wealthy. without those, we are India, Africa, third world
He's staying positive on X but...
Folks, we're dealing with a fraction of a percentage point difference, there's still hundreds of thousands of votes outstanding, and LA officials have given us the next 3 weeks to count! Let's git-r-dun!
— Spencer Pratt (@spencerpratt) June 8, 2026
Gambling giant forces paid influencers to delete LA mayor race posts as election interference claims explode https://t.co/NBnsxYZebt pic.twitter.com/yFd54Ey5S1
— New York Post (@nypost) June 8, 2026
I'd love to get a count of how many late ballots they've tossed, and who they were for.
Insert Marty McFly "I've seen this one before" gif here.
Trump was right... again.
Rigged election. Corrupt media.
Rigged election. Corrupt media.
zephyr88 said:
Trump was right... again.
Rigged election. Corrupt media.
"My guy didn't win, the system is rigged!"
Reminds me a lot of, "I didn't fail the test, the teacher gave me an 'F'!" No, little Tommy didn't study and guessed on every question, but, yeah, it's the teacher's fault.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
No Spin Ag said:zephyr88 said:
Trump was right... again.
Rigged election. Corrupt media.
"My guy didn't win, the system is rigged!"
Reminds me a lot of, "I didn't fail the test, the teacher gave me an 'F'!" No, little Tommy didn't study and guessed on every question, but, yeah, it's the teacher's fault.
Was Tommy taking a Statistics class?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Nsa- don't be obtuse. The mail in ballot results are so statistically improbable that it must be cheating.
Well, actually, I'm not sure it is cheating. California has basically made legal and institutionalized cheating through mail in voting. They've made it impossible to figure it out anyway. So we will likely never know.
It's quite funny that some random dem highly outperformed a much better known incumbent dem, but only in mail ins. My ignorant self would think that the two dems would likely track heir day of performances or at least be somewhat close in the results.
Well, actually, I'm not sure it is cheating. California has basically made legal and institutionalized cheating through mail in voting. They've made it impossible to figure it out anyway. So we will likely never know.
It's quite funny that some random dem highly outperformed a much better known incumbent dem, but only in mail ins. My ignorant self would think that the two dems would likely track heir day of performances or at least be somewhat close in the results.
Interesting to see the posters who are obvious DSA members, with their little "assignments". I knew a kid involved with the DSA until he's conscious got the better of him. He said he had "assignments" for the good of the revolution.
You little budding commies think things like this election fraud, etc, will be rewarded. You think your role will be recognized and you'll have a position of power in the new Socialist government. Spoiler alert: You won't
Read Solzhenitsyn. The last think the ultimate leaders of your glorious revolution would want it productive competition to their personal power. History is filled with with people like you
You little budding commies think things like this election fraud, etc, will be rewarded. You think your role will be recognized and you'll have a position of power in the new Socialist government. Spoiler alert: You won't
Read Solzhenitsyn. The last think the ultimate leaders of your glorious revolution would want it productive competition to their personal power. History is filled with with people like you
No Spin Ag said:zephyr88 said:
Trump was right... again.
Rigged election. Corrupt media.
"My guy didn't win, the system is rigged!"
Reminds me a lot of, "I didn't fail the test, the teacher gave me an 'F'!" No, little Tommy didn't study and guessed on every question, but, yeah, it's the teacher's fault.
Some first time voters can register with a gym membership or a prescription. That doesnt sound fishy at all, does it? Hmmm. What particular group of people would that help to let them vote???
Who?mikejones! said:
It's quite funny that some random dem highly outperformed a much better known incumbent dem, but only in mail ins. My ignorant self would think that the two dems would likely track heir day of performances or at least be somewhat close in the results.
If they did that, then the ratios would require a total voter quantity that would exceed the finite number of potential voters. Harder to hide, but not impossible (see 2020 presidential elections)
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Who?mikejones! said:
It's quite funny that some random dem highly outperformed a much better known incumbent dem, but only in mail ins. My ignorant self would think that the two dems would likely track heir day of performances or at least be somewhat close in the results.
Raman entering the race was very strategic. Toss away candidate they can perform the voting fraud with, while Bass in the clear if/when all of this reaches the surface. But it won't because investigations take time they dont have in a voting cycle.
digging tunnels said:No Spin Ag said:zephyr88 said:
Trump was right... again.
Rigged election. Corrupt media.
"My guy didn't win, the system is rigged!"
Reminds me a lot of, "I didn't fail the test, the teacher gave me an 'F'!" No, little Tommy didn't study and guessed on every question, but, yeah, it's the teacher's fault.
Some first time voters can register with a gym membership or a prescription. That doesnt sound fishy at all, does it? Hmmm. What particular group of people would that help to let them vote???
There's always something fishy, but when "the system is rigged!" Is only ever called when one's side loses, it starts to sound a lot like the sky is falling.
I'm sure there's some idiots that get through, but when California has been doing mail in voting for over a century (per the Google) yet it's only been since Trump's been a politician that the system has been rigged, yet only when a republican loses, it kind of loses its effect, especially over a decade and a half later.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Well I guess asking for a ballot to vote by mail is exactly the same as flooding the system with them, right? Hasn't changed in a century?
And the concerned moderates still do not understand the danger of the left and the dems. They illegally stole an election. They did it right in front of our eyes and don't care that we know. And yet CM's will vote for dems because Orange Man Bad or talarico seems like such a nice man.
96AgGrad said:
Well I guess asking for a ballot to vote by mail is exactly the same as flooding the system with them, right? Hasn't changed in a century?
Is it still one person having only one vote counted?
Yes, it's slow and annoying, but that doesn't mean it's cheating. Stupid. Yes. Idiotic, honestly, but not cheating.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Not really. If it were dem vs republican only, then maybe.
But, because we have two dems and a republican, it seems to me that the mail in vote would 1. Favor the dems 2. More closely mirror the in person democrat voting patterns
It probably wouldn't be that one, relatively unknown candidate would outperform their polling without a little help.
But again, its either been made legal or the process has been *******ized so to make it impossible to confirm votes, voters, chain of custody etc
But, because we have two dems and a republican, it seems to me that the mail in vote would 1. Favor the dems 2. More closely mirror the in person democrat voting patterns
It probably wouldn't be that one, relatively unknown candidate would outperform their polling without a little help.
But again, its either been made legal or the process has been *******ized so to make it impossible to confirm votes, voters, chain of custody etc
No Spin Ag said:96AgGrad said:
Well I guess asking for a ballot to vote by mail is exactly the same as flooding the system with them, right? Hasn't changed in a century?
Is it still one person having only one vote counted?
Yes, it's slow and annoying, but that doesn't mean it's cheating. Stupid. Yes. Idiotic, honestly, but not cheating.
Is it?
No Spin Ag said:96AgGrad said:
Well I guess asking for a ballot to vote by mail is exactly the same as flooding the system with them, right? Hasn't changed in a century?
Is it still one person having only one vote counted?
I guess we'll never know.
What about paying for votes? What about 120 year olds voting 51 times?
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-05-18/skid-row-voter-charges
https://nypost.com/2026/06/09/us-news/thousands-of-homeless-la-voters-registered-at-shelters-without-beds-including-one-linked-to-raman/
Now, inquiring minds might suggest that they when pay all these homeless people to register and then ballots are sent out to every registered voter and thousands are sent to homeless drop in shelters with few actual residents- who fills them out?
The wanderer on the street or someone else?
🚨 Meet Doris, she lives in California and is registered as a 126 year old who has voted in 51 elections and has NO IDEA.
— Nick shirley (@nickshirleyy) June 7, 2026
California’s voting system is so corrupt that by simply knocking on the door of the “126 year old” proves election fraud.
EXPOSE IT ALL. pic.twitter.com/5WEaFKem3P
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-05-18/skid-row-voter-charges
https://nypost.com/2026/06/09/us-news/thousands-of-homeless-la-voters-registered-at-shelters-without-beds-including-one-linked-to-raman/
Quote:
Among them was the St. Joseph Center in Venice, a drop-in center that, according to voting records, had 185 voters registered to its address and received $600,000 in taxpayers' money from the homeless and housing committee while Raman was chair
Quote:
One homeless man on Skid Row, Norman, said he's witnessed voter registration efforts in the area for years and claims he had previously been paid to help sign up voters and that cigarettes were offered to some people during the drives.
Now, inquiring minds might suggest that they when pay all these homeless people to register and then ballots are sent out to every registered voter and thousands are sent to homeless drop in shelters with few actual residents- who fills them out?
The wanderer on the street or someone else?
No Spin Ag said:digging tunnels said:No Spin Ag said:zephyr88 said:
Trump was right... again.
Rigged election. Corrupt media.
"My guy didn't win, the system is rigged!"
Reminds me a lot of, "I didn't fail the test, the teacher gave me an 'F'!" No, little Tommy didn't study and guessed on every question, but, yeah, it's the teacher's fault.
Some first time voters can register with a gym membership or a prescription. That doesnt sound fishy at all, does it? Hmmm. What particular group of people would that help to let them vote???
There's always something fishy, but when "the system is rigged!" Is only ever called when one's side loses, it starts to sound a lot like the sky is falling.
I'm sure there's some idiots that get through, but when California has been doing mail in voting for over a century (per the Google) yet it's only been since Trump's been a politician that the system has been rigged, yet only when a republican loses, it kind of loses its effect, especially over a decade and a half later.
Has there been any other change around election operations that has occurred since 2020 that maybe you can think of? Has Trump been the only change?
No Spin Ag said:
There's always something fishy, but when "the system is rigged!" Is only ever called when one's side loses, it starts to sound a lot like the sky is falling.
I'm sure there's some idiots that get through, but when California has been doing mail in voting for over a century (per the Google) yet it's only been since Trump's been a politician that the system has been rigged, yet only when a republican loses, it kind of loses its effect, especially over a decade and a half later.
It's a Democrat controlled state, with Democrat controlled voting, of course only one side is ever going to complain about it being rigged. What a foolish point.
California only started mailing ballots to every active registered voter in 2022. What happened before that really isn't relevant.
You should change your name to Leftist Spin Ag, No Spin is laughably false.
Yet again...
Who?mikejones! said:
What about paying for votes? What about 120 year olds voting 51 times?🚨 Meet Doris, she lives in California and is registered as a 126 year old who has voted in 51 elections and has NO IDEA.
— Nick shirley (@nickshirleyy) June 7, 2026
California’s voting system is so corrupt that by simply knocking on the door of the “126 year old” proves election fraud.
EXPOSE IT ALL. pic.twitter.com/5WEaFKem3P
Those definitely need to be looked into. Those also have definitely in every election, in every state (red and blue) for as far back as I can recall. Again, when one side (i don't really care which because I say the same to libs who say the system was rigged when Trump won each time) only complains when they're guy loses but never when their guy wins, that's when I question the "concern" about the system.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
VegasAg86 said:No Spin Ag said:
There's always something fishy, but when "the system is rigged!" Is only ever called when one's side loses, it starts to sound a lot like the sky is falling.
I'm sure there's some idiots that get through, but when California has been doing mail in voting for over a century (per the Google) yet it's only been since Trump's been a politician that the system has been rigged, yet only when a republican loses, it kind of loses its effect, especially over a decade and a half later.
It's a Democrat controlled state, with Democrat controlled voting, of course only one side is ever going to complain about it being rigged. What a foolish point.
California only started mailing ballots to every active registered voter in 2022. What happened before that really isn't relevant.
You should change your name to Leftist Spin Ag, No Spin is laughably false.
So no one on the right complained about rigged elections before 2022?
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
ts5641 said:
And the concerned moderates still do not understand the danger of the left and the dems. They illegally stole an election. They did it right in front of our eyes and don't care that we know. And yet CM's will vote for dems because Orange Man Bad or talarico seems like such a nice man.
Conservativism and leftism are like oil and water. They do not mix.
People need to stop pretending that we can keep the charade going of keeping us together long term.
Learn about the Texas Nationalist Movement
https://tnm.me
https://tnm.me
No Spin Ag said:VegasAg86 said:No Spin Ag said:
There's always something fishy, but when "the system is rigged!" Is only ever called when one's side loses, it starts to sound a lot like the sky is falling.
I'm sure there's some idiots that get through, but when California has been doing mail in voting for over a century (per the Google) yet it's only been since Trump's been a politician that the system has been rigged, yet only when a republican loses, it kind of loses its effect, especially over a decade and a half later.
It's a Democrat controlled state, with Democrat controlled voting, of course only one side is ever going to complain about it being rigged. What a foolish point.
California only started mailing ballots to every active registered voter in 2022. What happened before that really isn't relevant.
You should change your name to Leftist Spin Ag, No Spin is laughably false.
So no one on the right complained about rigged elections before 2022?
lol, no, "100 years of mail-in voting" isn't relevant when they change the rules like that
No Spin Ag said:Who?mikejones! said:
What about paying for votes? What about 120 year olds voting 51 times?🚨 Meet Doris, she lives in California and is registered as a 126 year old who has voted in 51 elections and has NO IDEA.
— Nick shirley (@nickshirleyy) June 7, 2026
California’s voting system is so corrupt that by simply knocking on the door of the “126 year old” proves election fraud.
EXPOSE IT ALL. pic.twitter.com/5WEaFKem3P
Those definitely need to be looked into. Those also have definitely in every election, in every state (red and blue) for as far back as I can recall. Again, when one side (i don't really care which because I say the same to libs who say the system was rigged when Trump won each time) only complains when they're guy loses but never when their guy wins, that's when I question the "concern" about the system.
Are you for or against legislation that would ensure one legal vote per one legal voter, in every election?
I don't think you know me.
Difference being that other stayes at least usually make some effort to clean up the rolls. Cali doesn't.
Even then- heres the biggest issue:
https://nypost.com/2026/06/09/us-news/thousands-of-homeless-la-voters-registered-at-shelters-without-beds-including-one-linked-to-raman/
Quote:
Among them was the St. Joseph Center in Venice, a drop-in center that, according to voting records, had 185 voters registered to its address and received $600,000 in taxpayers' money from the homeless and housing committee while Raman was chair
Quote:
One homeless man on Skid Row, Norman, said he's witnessed voter registration efforts in the area for years and claims he had previously been paid to help sign up voters and that cigarettes were offered to some people during the drives.
Now, inquiring minds might suggest that they when pay all these homeless people to register and then ballots are sent out to every registered voter and thousands are sent to homeless drop in shelters with few actual residents- who fills them out?
The wanderer on the street or someone else?
Jack Squat 83 said:No Spin Ag said:Who?mikejones! said:
What about paying for votes? What about 120 year olds voting 51 times?🚨 Meet Doris, she lives in California and is registered as a 126 year old who has voted in 51 elections and has NO IDEA.
— Nick shirley (@nickshirleyy) June 7, 2026
California’s voting system is so corrupt that by simply knocking on the door of the “126 year old” proves election fraud.
EXPOSE IT ALL. pic.twitter.com/5WEaFKem3P
Those definitely need to be looked into. Those also have definitely in every election, in every state (red and blue) for as far back as I can recall. Again, when one side (i don't really care which because I say the same to libs who say the system was rigged when Trump won each time) only complains when they're guy loses but never when their guy wins, that's when I question the "concern" about the system.
Are you for or against legislation that would ensure one legal vote per one legal voter, in every election?
100% for.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
No Spin Ag said:Jack Squat 83 said:No Spin Ag said:Who?mikejones! said:
What about paying for votes? What about 120 year olds voting 51 times?🚨 Meet Doris, she lives in California and is registered as a 126 year old who has voted in 51 elections and has NO IDEA.
— Nick shirley (@nickshirleyy) June 7, 2026
California’s voting system is so corrupt that by simply knocking on the door of the “126 year old” proves election fraud.
EXPOSE IT ALL. pic.twitter.com/5WEaFKem3P
Those definitely need to be looked into. Those also have definitely in every election, in every state (red and blue) for as far back as I can recall. Again, when one side (i don't really care which because I say the same to libs who say the system was rigged when Trump won each time) only complains when they're guy loses but never when their guy wins, that's when I question the "concern" about the system.
Are you for or against legislation that would ensure one legal vote per one legal voter, in every election?
100% for.
Then you should be totally outraged about what's going on in California.
Featured Stories
See All
Details on Bucky McMillan’s contract extension
by Luke Evangelist
3:05
3h ago
1.3k
10:29
4h ago
876
LIVE: Day 4 of the NCAA Outdoor Championships
by Richard Zane
AgFrogfan
***** Official United States of America vs Paraguay World Cup 2026 Thread *****
in Texas A&M Soccer
20