Bondi cleaning the floor with Dems in committee hearings...

26,025 Views | 354 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by Ag with kids
FCBlitz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old McDonald said:

Apache said:

I voted for Trump, but let's not act like he's a pillar of morality or some non-corruptible saint. Some of this stuff he's into stinks to high heaven. He's playing the game like everyone has done before him, using his position to enrich himself & his family for generations to come. I expected more from him.
except he's doing so at an unprecedented scale. he's in a league of his own.

for example: nancy pelosi used to be the poster child for abusing her office for self enrichment. she's worth $400 million after 40 years in office. trump's wealth increased ten times that much in 2025 alone.


Link please….
chris1515
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

chris1515 said:

BusterAg said:


But, for people like, I dunno, Biden and Pelosi, you don't even have to go outside of their immediate family.




On a scale of 0-10, how familiar would you say you are with the Trump family crypto dealings?

I've only watched a few clips here and there of the Bondi testimony and wow, it seems like a disaster for her. She must be hating her career choice right now.

Massie and Ro should be treated as heroes for seeing this thing through to this point.

About as familiar as I am with Hunter's paintings, Hunter's Ukrainian board seats, and Biden's involvement with Chinese hedge funds.

At least everything that Trump does with the crypto stuff is out in the open.


Here's an article on what I'm talking about. Hunter was an amateur…

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/inside-187m-deal-between-trump-003116654.html
zephyr88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

True...

Especially since she's NOT a MIILF...

She's just a hot older woman (because she has no children)...

To no surprise, she's been engaged three times and married/divorced twice.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag with kids said:

BusterAg said:

Im Gipper said:

DOJ continues to step on their own wanker


Would you favor:

1) Underedaction of potential victims.?
2) Overredaction of people that have not been proven to have committed a crime.?
3) Waiting for 10 years to get that perfect?
4) Just being unreasonable, no matter what?

Supposedly there are about 6 million pages...

The DOJ was given 30 days to release them (with redactions). So, that's reviewing, doing determinations on redacting, and then the redactions of 200,000 files a day.

And people are surprised that they didn't get done on time.

They were a month late and put out 3 million pages...so 50,000 a day.

And then people are surprised at them not doing a perfect job of redacting?


The thing that will amuse me later is no matter what happens, even if they release every single last shred of EVERYTHING they have...there will be a large cadre of people, many of them on this board, who will claim that they didn't release everything and that they're hiding the REAL scandalous stuff...

This is called coping.

Bondi said "the files are on my desk" on 2/21/2025. If there's 6MM pages, assuming they're reading 50,000 pages/day, they should have been done by the end of August. If they went half as fast so they could be more careful, it still should have been completed by now.

Bondi was slow-rolling this from the start, hoping it would just go away. Then when she got called to the carpet, DOJ had an "oh ****" moment, and had to scramble to even pretend they were complying with the law. The level of contempt she's shown to Congress would be enough in a normal situation for Congress to throw her ass out.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why would she slow roll it? Some things aren't conspiracies.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ts5641 said:

Why would she slow roll it? Some things aren't conspiracies.


It's not a conspiracy to say they've slow rolled this. That's a fact.


I'm Gipper
DeschutesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ts5641 said:

Why would she slow roll it?


That is obvious. There are many powerful people in these files who never want these files to be made public. Bondi's boss is one of those people.

Quote:

Some things aren't conspiracies.


Agreed. Some things aren't conspiracies, and some things are. Ditto for coverups. Some things aren't coverups, and some things are. This has clearly been a government coverup. Other than the victims' names, it needs to be fully exposed.
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ts5641 said:

Why would she slow roll it? Some things aren't conspiracies.


I'm going to post this again. Read slowly. If there are any big words or historical references you need help with, let me know.



So what? It had been beyond obvious that the only lynchpin keeping all of the information in the dark has been the myriad of powerful people holding guns to each other's heads. Every organization and individual from the Palm Beach police, business leaders, politicians, power brokers, the FBI, the DOJ, Congress, the courts...all of them have slow-played a multi-faceted Cuban Missile Crisis-like escalation of behind the scenes brinksmanship. This quid pro quo, mutual assured destruction, or whatever you want to call it, has been the SOP for the entire past decade or more, and I scoff, no - guffaw - that people seem so slow to recognize and admit this blindingly obvious truth.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
zephyr88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ts5641 said:

Why would she slow roll it? Some things aren't conspiracies.

She was told to slow roll it. She's been muzzled by the governing establishment.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
zephyr88 said:

ts5641 said:

Why would she slow roll it? Some things aren't conspiracies.

She was told to slow roll it. She's been muzzled by the governing establishment.

How she has handled all of it does seem to benefit everyone but those who were assaulted and abused.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
zephyr88 said:

ts5641 said:

Why would she slow roll it? Some things aren't conspiracies.

She was told to slow roll it. She's been muzzled by the governing establishment.



And who would that be?

I'm Gipper
DeschutesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
More just came out about Kimbal Musk and Epstein.

Kimbal is Elon's brother. Billionaire. On the board of Tesla and Starlink. Big shareholder of Tesla.

It is amazing some people will argue there's been no coverup by Bondi and Kash and Blanche and Mike Johnson, despite their constantly changing lies, and the fact most of the released files still are redacted, and the fact Ghisaine is now in a Club Fed facility, and despite the fact the deal Acosta made with Dershowitz in 2007-08 and Acosta's subsequent burying of the case and plea deal makes it one of the most scandalous coverups in U.S. history.
jt2hunt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What is more?
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HTownAg98 said:

Ag with kids said:

BusterAg said:

Im Gipper said:

DOJ continues to step on their own wanker


Would you favor:

1) Underedaction of potential victims.?
2) Overredaction of people that have not been proven to have committed a crime.?
3) Waiting for 10 years to get that perfect?
4) Just being unreasonable, no matter what?

Supposedly there are about 6 million pages...

The DOJ was given 30 days to release them (with redactions). So, that's reviewing, doing determinations on redacting, and then the redactions of 200,000 files a day.

And people are surprised that they didn't get done on time.

They were a month late and put out 3 million pages...so 50,000 a day.

And then people are surprised at them not doing a perfect job of redacting?


The thing that will amuse me later is no matter what happens, even if they release every single last shred of EVERYTHING they have...there will be a large cadre of people, many of them on this board, who will claim that they didn't release everything and that they're hiding the REAL scandalous stuff...

This is called coping.

Bondi said "the files are on my desk" on 2/21/2025. If there's 6MM pages, assuming they're reading 50,000 pages/day, they should have been done by the end of August. If they went half as fast so they could be more careful, it still should have been completed by now.

Bondi was slow-rolling this from the start, hoping it would just go away. Then when she got called to the carpet, DOJ had an "oh ****" moment, and had to scramble to even pretend they were complying with the law. The level of contempt she's shown to Congress would be enough in a normal situation for Congress to throw her ass out.

You misspelled TRUMP...he was the one who blew off the issue. Bondi just did what he wanted...

I think he was looking at it like his "lock her up" theme that he used to rile up the base and then just dropped after being elected the first time. The base just let it slide.

I think he expected the same thing - he used it to rile up the base then figured he could drop it and it would just go away.

But, apparently, lots of folks think it's the most important issue in the entire world...more important than immigration, the economy, foreign policy, etc. The conspiracy **** on the thread is like re-reading the qanon thread...

BTW, it's not coping to realize that going through that many ****ing pages would take a long time.

You can turn off signatures, btw
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ts5641 said:

Why would she slow roll it? Some things aren't conspiracies.

EVERYTHING with Epstein is a conspiracy theory.
You can turn off signatures, btw
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeschutesAg said:

ts5641 said:

Why would she slow roll it?


That is obvious. There are many powerful people in these files who never want these files to be made public. Bondi's boss is one of those people.

Quote:

Some things aren't conspiracies.


Agreed. Some things aren't conspiracies, and some things are. Ditto for coverups. Some things aren't coverups, and some things are. This has clearly been a government coverup. Other than the victims' names, it needs to be fully exposed.

Well all the files have been released now. So, it has been.
You can turn off signatures, btw
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Well all the files have been released now. So, it has been.


With plenty of improper redactions.

And the Maxwell to minimum security move remains a mystery.

I'm Gipper
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

zephyr88 said:

ts5641 said:

Why would she slow roll it? Some things aren't conspiracies.

She was told to slow roll it. She's been muzzled by the governing establishment.



And who would that be?

Trump.

Duh.

He just wanted the issue to go away.
You can turn off signatures, btw
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Quote:

Well all the files have been released now. So, it has been.


With plenty of improper redactions.

Well, then fix them.
You can turn off signatures, btw
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As I posted earlier...and what is already becoming true...

Quote:

The thing that will amuse me later is no matter what happens, even if they release every single last shred of EVERYTHING they have...there will be a large cadre of people, many of them on this board, who will claim that they didn't release everything and that they're hiding the REAL scandalous stuff...


Personally, I think Epstein was the other shooter on the grassy knoll...
You can turn off signatures, btw
Queso1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What a freaking joke. So many are so frothy to own da libs that we accept this blatant coverup
They paid for their wars with your tax dollars and also with your untaxed dollars. Inflation is theft.
DeschutesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:


Well all the files have been released now.


"Riiiiight."
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeschutesAg said:

Quote:


Well all the files have been released now.


"Riiiiight."

Just as I predicted...
You can turn off signatures, btw
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

As I posted earlier...and what is already becoming true...

Quote:

The thing that will amuse me later is no matter what happens, even if they release every single last shred of EVERYTHING they have...there will be a large cadre of people, many of them on this board, who will claim that they didn't release everything and that they're hiding the REAL scandalous stuff...


Personally, I think Epstein was the other shooter on the grassy knoll...

It all started when he planned the assassin of Caesar on Isola Pedofila…
zephyr88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

zephyr88 said:

ts5641 said:

Why would she slow roll it? Some things aren't conspiracies.

She was told to slow roll it. She's been muzzled by the governing establishment.



And who would that be?

It's the same coin
zephyr88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

Im Gipper said:

zephyr88 said:

ts5641 said:

Why would she slow roll it? Some things aren't conspiracies.

She was told to slow roll it. She's been muzzled by the governing establishment.



And who would that be?

Trump.

Duh.

He just wanted the issue to go away.

It's all of them
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bump. People who support what Pam Bondi did deserve to see their proud words at the top. Just trying to help.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
zephyr88 said:

Ag with kids said:

Im Gipper said:

zephyr88 said:

ts5641 said:

Why would she slow roll it? Some things aren't conspiracies.

She was told to slow roll it. She's been muzzled by the governing establishment.



And who would that be?

Trump.

Duh.

He just wanted the issue to go away.

It's all of them

LOL.

There is only 1 person that can muzzle Bondi.

I'm Gipper
zephyr88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

zephyr88 said:

Ag with kids said:

Im Gipper said:

zephyr88 said:

ts5641 said:

Why would she slow roll it? Some things aren't conspiracies.

She was told to slow roll it. She's been muzzled by the governing establishment.



And who would that be?

Trump.

Duh.

He just wanted the issue to go away.

It's all of them

LOL.

There is only 1 person that can muzzle Bondi.

Correct - ony one person wags the dog.

But who's being protected - all of them..
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Queso1 said:

What a freaking joke. So many are so frothy to own da libs that we accept this blatant coverup

Accept the cover-up from whom?

Who is responsible for the cover up?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

Queso1 said:

What a freaking joke. So many are so frothy to own da libs that we accept this blatant coverup

Accept the cover-up from whom?

Who is responsible for the cover up?

Fred in Accounting. Always follow the money.
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusterAg said:

Queso1 said:

What a freaking joke. So many are so frothy to own da libs that we accept this blatant coverup

Accept the cover-up from whom?

Who is responsible for the cover up?


Well, you see, that's the thing about a cover-up, now, isn't it?
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
zephyr88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

Queso1 said:

What a freaking joke. So many are so frothy to own da libs that we accept this blatant coverup

Accept the cover-up from whom?

Who is responsible for the cover up?

The 2-sided coin
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
At this point what do people think remains covered up? What evidence other than innuendo is there that this DOJ is actively covering up?

You can't just say "oh here's the coverup" and then blame it solely on Bondi and Trump.

Where we are is exactly where many of us said we would be when the former Saint Massie started his windmill tilting.

Their "transparency act" was done to campaign and raise money. Else it would have had a focused approach, reasonable compliance deadlines and consequences for non-compliance. They didnt, because fundraising on failing to do something is more effective than campaigning on "mission accomplished".
WestTexasAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tea Party said:

Maybe you saw a different video than me or it needs more context leading up to this, but that short clip did not look good for Bondi.

She seemed like the one interrupting and slinging mud rather than participating in the hearing.

She did a lot of deflecting and changing the subject. She has been less than impressive.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.