Logos Stick said:

---

captkirk said:

---

That isn't what you said. Read what you wrote again

---

That's exactly what I said. You don't understand how it's calculated. You learned. Only a full ****** would compare the YoY rate in May of this year to the YoY rate in May of last year. That is completely meaningless.

---

I know very well how its calculated. Based on your previous posting history I assumed full ******. Words have meanings

I would tell you what I think of your intellect, but I would take a ban.

Logos Stick said:

---

I would tell you what I think of your intellect, but I would take a ban.

---

At least I know what "most" means

YOY > LOL

captkirk said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

I would tell you what I think of your intellect, but I would take a ban.

---

At least I know what "most" means

---

You've proven otherwise.

I'm not very familiar with these topics, but I dug into it a bit. Please let me know if I understood this wrong.

CPI = the fractional change in price in a month reference period (IE 1-31 May 2025, 1-31 May 2024)
CPI is real prices aggregated across different types of products, weighted by consumer spending, and tells you the % change in that month period. It's normalized to 100, so 130 would be a 30% increase.

YOY for May 2025 would be calculated by (CPI(may2025) - CPI(may2024) )/ CPI(may2024)
This gives you the % change over that year period.

So what I'm taking from it is that in From May 2024 - May 2025 prices have increased by 2.3% relative to that time period.

From May 2023 - May 2024, prices increased by 3.3% relative to that time period.

Not really sure the May 2025 YOY / May 2024 YOY comparison really works, I think it's because these are relative prices, not actual prices

American Hardwood said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Immigration - B, until he supported amnesty for certain groups, he was an A+.

Fiscal - F, things are still getting more and more expensive (govt inflation numbers are a joke, still), no real spending cuts or tax cuts (keeping the current rate is "Meh!", actually cut taxes more for everyone) BuildBackBetter2 is a joke. Gut regulations. Tariffs are liberal idiocy.

Foreign Policy- A


Overall, C-

Like before, he's "Meh!" and lacks leadership, in general.

---

Care to revise that grade?

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump announces illegal alien farm workers will NOT be granted amnesty.

“We’re NOT talking AMNESTY.” pic.twitter.com/qz8gI7CM0n

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) July 8, 2025

---

Nope. He's merely playing word games. Amnesty, by any name, is amnesty. You can call it "Happy Trumpy Time" and it will still be amnesty.

Rushmore......Give it to him.

Immigration - A-; shut down current border crossings but deportations haven't been that high despite the press

Economy - B; passed BBB and kept his tax cuts, tariffs haven't drastically affected economy. Spending continues to be out of control and stock market returns have been meh thus far

Foreign Policy - B+; did not solve Russia Ukraine "day one". Showed great leadership in the Israel Iran crisis. Got concessions from NATO

Staffing - C-; Gaetz, Bondi, National Security team blunders, taking leads from Loomer

I'd give the guy a B so far. It has been a crazy 6 months for everyone and Trump has done a lot (good and bad). But there are several key campaign promises that have been walked back.

A+

TDS is off the charts. Exposing far left Libs for what they are: mentally ill and unstable.

Immigration has people self-deporting. Media hates what he is doing so we know it is great.

Cut taxes. NO PRESIDENT will ever cut spending. CONGRESS has become so corrupt we will never see spending cuts until we have a major recession or major conflict. So Blaming Trump is stupid and lazy. Be glad he cut your taxes. At least you have more of your own money back even if govt spending does continue growing and reducing its worth. At this point, big growth in the economy is the only way pay for all of these entitlements.

Tariffs - good. All of these parasitic countries deserve a taste of their own medicine.

Iran - good.

Ukraine/Russia: have to start putting the screws to Putin. But he needs to get Israel/ME resolved first and then can turn up the heat on Putin.

Gulf of America.
Buying Greenland - come on. That was a great troll.

NATO up to 5%. That's unheard of. Name another president that would even make them pay their previous normal 2.5%. You can't.

Busted up the stupid EPA rule that allowed California to set CAFE standards on the rest of America. That was some grade A Bs from liberals that needed to be deleted.

Dropped the price of oil into the $60s/bbl. Gotta be careful though to stay in that sweet spot: $70/bbl would be better.

Working to bring investment and save jobs in America. Who is against that?

Seriously, name a President who has done more in 5 months than Trump?

Overall a B. He's done a lot of great things. Unfortunately he's up against a beast that is so firmly entrenched it would take decades of a Trump presidency to come close to destroying it.

So who won the YoY fight?

GeorgiAg said:

---

So who won the YoY fight?

---

LOL

I give him a B.

Immigration and foreign policy have been his strong points.

DOGE was kind of a mess in implementation but he's getting costs down. Tariffs are all over the place and the BBB adds too much to the deficit. Some of his cabinet picks have been sub par.

Epstein files? WTF

TexAgs91 said:

---

American Hardwood said:

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

Closing the border: B. Sure he's done excellent for stopping the flow of illegals but what bout the wall? It needs to be COMPLETED during his term which will at least be a permanent obstacle.

Deporting illegals: he's done more than any other president I've seen in my lifetime, but it's not enough. He needs to raise those deportation numbers up at least an order of magnitude to deport anywhere near 10 million illegals.

Draining the swamp: D. He seems to have all the right people in place but nothing is happening.

Economy: B ( A on the tarrifs, D on cutting the debt, B on everything else)

Foreign Policy, mideast: A
Foreign policy, Ukraine/Russia: B

Nasa: D for dumbass - letting Jarred Issaccman go and slashing Nasa's budget.

Ending Joe Biden's reign of terror: A+

I won't be paying much attention to this on July 20th. That's Moon Landing Day!

---

I've always considered the wall an expensive boondoggle. While it may impart partial discouragement, it isn't going to really stop much in the long run and will be a maintenance problem for a long time.

By far the best and cheapest way to solve the problem is to remove all the incentives for crossing illegally and imparting real consequences for doing so. Trump is doing a great job on that. We won't need a wall if nobody wants to risk crossing the border.

---

Wow.... This is your idea after seeing what Biden did the last 4 years? The next Marxist in office will open the floodgates again and make sure there are incentives to bring in as many illegals as possible.

---

…until the next president reverses again and away they go. Trump has shown that it is possible that the possibility of leeching off America is not guaranteed even if someone friendly to criminals is elected. The images of arrests, Alligator Alcatraz, and deportations is powerful. It will have a lasting effect even through a leftist regime should one follow Trump.

Really disappointed with the stuff in the last 24-48 hours.

American Hardwood said:

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

American Hardwood said:

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

Closing the border: B. Sure he's done excellent for stopping the flow of illegals but what bout the wall? It needs to be COMPLETED during his term which will at least be a permanent obstacle.

Deporting illegals: he's done more than any other president I've seen in my lifetime, but it's not enough. He needs to raise those deportation numbers up at least an order of magnitude to deport anywhere near 10 million illegals.

Draining the swamp: D. He seems to have all the right people in place but nothing is happening.

Economy: B ( A on the tarrifs, D on cutting the debt, B on everything else)

Foreign Policy, mideast: A
Foreign policy, Ukraine/Russia: B

Nasa: D for dumbass - letting Jarred Issaccman go and slashing Nasa's budget.

Ending Joe Biden's reign of terror: A+

I won't be paying much attention to this on July 20th. That's Moon Landing Day!

---

I've always considered the wall an expensive boondoggle. While it may impart partial discouragement, it isn't going to really stop much in the long run and will be a maintenance problem for a long time.

By far the best and cheapest way to solve the problem is to remove all the incentives for crossing illegally and imparting real consequences for doing so. Trump is doing a great job on that. We won't need a wall if nobody wants to risk crossing the border.

---

Wow.... This is your idea after seeing what Biden did the last 4 years? The next Marxist in office will open the floodgates again and make sure there are incentives to bring in as many illegals as possible.

---

…until the next president reverses again and away they go. Trump has shown that it is possible that the possibility of leeching off America is not guaranteed even if someone friendly to criminals is elected. The images of arrests, Alligator Alcatraz, and deportations is powerful. It will have a lasting effect even through a leftist regime should one follow Trump.

---

BS again. Over 10 million illegals came in during Biden's regime. Do the math. How many deportations per day would be required to deport 10 million illegals in 4 years. Do Trump's deportation goals reach that number.

You say just deport them like it's easy.
How many terrorists made it into the country during Joe's 4 years of open border?
Do you really think we know who and where they all are and can easily just go pick them up?

How many court battles did and will Trump have to fight?

How many violent riots will happen because of the deportations and how many NG will need to be deployed during Trump's term to make this happen?

After going after the terrorist/hard criminal illegal aliens, how politically feasible will it be to deport the rest?


What if the next marxist president is a 2 term disaster?

TexAgs91 said:

---

American Hardwood said:

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

American Hardwood said:

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

Closing the border: B. Sure he's done excellent for stopping the flow of illegals but what bout the wall? It needs to be COMPLETED during his term which will at least be a permanent obstacle.

Deporting illegals: he's done more than any other president I've seen in my lifetime, but it's not enough. He needs to raise those deportation numbers up at least an order of magnitude to deport anywhere near 10 million illegals.

Draining the swamp: D. He seems to have all the right people in place but nothing is happening.

Economy: B ( A on the tarrifs, D on cutting the debt, B on everything else)

Foreign Policy, mideast: A
Foreign policy, Ukraine/Russia: B

Nasa: D for dumbass - letting Jarred Issaccman go and slashing Nasa's budget.

Ending Joe Biden's reign of terror: A+

I won't be paying much attention to this on July 20th. That's Moon Landing Day!

---

I've always considered the wall an expensive boondoggle. While it may impart partial discouragement, it isn't going to really stop much in the long run and will be a maintenance problem for a long time.

By far the best and cheapest way to solve the problem is to remove all the incentives for crossing illegally and imparting real consequences for doing so. Trump is doing a great job on that. We won't need a wall if nobody wants to risk crossing the border.

---

Wow.... This is your idea after seeing what Biden did the last 4 years? The next Marxist in office will open the floodgates again and make sure there are incentives to bring in as many illegals as possible.

---

…until the next president reverses again and away they go. Trump has shown that it is possible that the possibility of leeching off America is not guaranteed even if someone friendly to criminals is elected. The images of arrests, Alligator Alcatraz, and deportations is powerful. It will have a lasting effect even through a leftist regime should one follow Trump.

---

BS again. Over 10 million illegals came in during Biden's regime. Do the math. How many deportations per day would be required to deport 10 million illegals in 4 years. Do Trump's deportation goals reach that number.

You say just deport them like it's easy.
How many terrorists made it into the country during Joe's 4 years of open border?
Do you really think we know who and where they all are and can easily just go pick them up?

How many court battles did and will Trump have to fight?

How many violent riots will happen because of the deportations and how many NG will need to be deployed during Trump's term to make this happen?

After going after the terrorist/hard criminal illegal aliens, how politically feasible will it be to deport the rest?


What if the next marxist president is a 2 term disaster?

---

I never said the actual numbers of the deportations itself was going to make the difference. It is the message it sends. You aren't looking at this from the perspective of the immigrant. Think of the promises they once believed that all you had to do is show up on the border and you'd be given a hotel to live in, free food and health care, basically an endless supply of goodies and benefits at the expense of the taxpayers.

That message has changed 180 degrees to now being you might end up in an alligator prison, deported to God knows where, maybe a max prison in El Salvidor. You won't be able to move freely about society for fear of being picked up, then your whole family and everyone else you are associated with. You have poll numbers showing that a significant majority of Americans don't want you here. You have places of work being raided.

The RISK of illegal entry has gone way, way up and the benefits way, way down. There is no guarantee that a future president will change things for any significant length of time. There is no guarantee that a future Marxist president will last more than 1 term. You are expecting people to risk their lives on that gamble?

There is a reason Homan is frequently talking tough in no uncertain terms on every available media platform. He wants the world to know the free ride is over and consequences for trying will be severe.

THAT is the benefit of this effort even if the total number of forced deportations is relatively low to the total number of illegals.

You totally missed the point with all of your comments.

yeah; they always said there were around 11 to 20 million illegal immigrants in the country before 2021. ..but that estimate had gone unchanged for probably two decades so it was probably way too low. ...then in just a four year period, Biden let in probably over 20 million people unfettered, coming from over 180 different countries.

I saw a post on X yesterday (sorry, can't find it right now, but I'll go look), that indicated that just to get back to pre-2020 "equilibrium" days at the current rate of deportations, it's going to take about 18 years.

The treasonous regime knew what they were doing by opening the floodgates with that many people that quickly. They knew it could never be undone. They didn't care about the safety of their citizens or the strain on economy and infrastructure. They knew there would be backlash, but they also knew with 95% of pravda media on their side, they could pull on heart strings of one or two examples like a maryland dad or something. They're playing the long game. The "path to amnesty" for all that the politically elite in the socialist regime always talk about will happen eventually and that permanent power grab is the only goal. Your safety be damned.

D overall

A+ bombing Iran

A+ J6 pardons

A+ lib tears

C - Immigration

F - Tariffs

F - Government Spending

F - Drain the swamp

F - Epstein

F - Russia

F - USAID and DOGE implementation. Running off Elon will end up biting him in the asz.

TexAgs91 said:

---

American Hardwood said:

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

American Hardwood said:

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

Closing the border: B. Sure he's done excellent for stopping the flow of illegals but what bout the wall? It needs to be COMPLETED during his term which will at least be a permanent obstacle.

Deporting illegals: he's done more than any other president I've seen in my lifetime, but it's not enough. He needs to raise those deportation numbers up at least an order of magnitude to deport anywhere near 10 million illegals.

Draining the swamp: D. He seems to have all the right people in place but nothing is happening.

Economy: B ( A on the tarrifs, D on cutting the debt, B on everything else)

Foreign Policy, mideast: A
Foreign policy, Ukraine/Russia: B

Nasa: D for dumbass - letting Jarred Issaccman go and slashing Nasa's budget.

Ending Joe Biden's reign of terror: A+

I won't be paying much attention to this on July 20th. That's Moon Landing Day!

---

I've always considered the wall an expensive boondoggle. While it may impart partial discouragement, it isn't going to really stop much in the long run and will be a maintenance problem for a long time.

By far the best and cheapest way to solve the problem is to remove all the incentives for crossing illegally and imparting real consequences for doing so. Trump is doing a great job on that. We won't need a wall if nobody wants to risk crossing the border.

---

Wow.... This is your idea after seeing what Biden did the last 4 years? The next Marxist in office will open the floodgates again and make sure there are incentives to bring in as many illegals as possible.

---

…until the next president reverses again and away they go. Trump has shown that it is possible that the possibility of leeching off America is not guaranteed even if someone friendly to criminals is elected. The images of arrests, Alligator Alcatraz, and deportations is powerful. It will have a lasting effect even through a leftist regime should one follow Trump.

---

BS again. Over 10 million illegals came in during Biden's regime. Do the math. How many deportations per day would be required to deport 10 million illegals in 4 years. Do Trump's deportation goals reach that number.

You say just deport them like it's easy.
How many terrorists made it into the country during Joe's 4 years of open border?
Do you really think we know who and where they all are and can easily just go pick them up?

How many court battles did and will Trump have to fight?

How many violent riots will happen because of the deportations and how many NG will need to be deployed during Trump's term to make this happen?

After going after the terrorist/hard criminal illegal aliens, how politically feasible will it be to deport the rest?


What if the next marxist president is a 2 term disaster?

---

That is my greatest fear - you get a Bernie Sanders or an AOC type in with Dem House and Senate.

Absolute nightmare.

I feel like the trend is not in that direction but that could certainly change.

Joe Biden voter's greatest fear is another Joe Biden up next? If genuine, then maybe some people are starting to wake up. They just can't fall for the same old trick of someone like Shapiro or Newsom campaigning as a "moderate" or "centrist" only to show their true colors once in office.

American Hardwood said:

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

American Hardwood said:

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

American Hardwood said:

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

Closing the border: B. Sure he's done excellent for stopping the flow of illegals but what bout the wall? It needs to be COMPLETED during his term which will at least be a permanent obstacle.

Deporting illegals: he's done more than any other president I've seen in my lifetime, but it's not enough. He needs to raise those deportation numbers up at least an order of magnitude to deport anywhere near 10 million illegals.

Draining the swamp: D. He seems to have all the right people in place but nothing is happening.

Economy: B ( A on the tarrifs, D on cutting the debt, B on everything else)

Foreign Policy, mideast: A
Foreign policy, Ukraine/Russia: B

Nasa: D for dumbass - letting Jarred Issaccman go and slashing Nasa's budget.

Ending Joe Biden's reign of terror: A+

I won't be paying much attention to this on July 20th. That's Moon Landing Day!

---

I've always considered the wall an expensive boondoggle. While it may impart partial discouragement, it isn't going to really stop much in the long run and will be a maintenance problem for a long time.

By far the best and cheapest way to solve the problem is to remove all the incentives for crossing illegally and imparting real consequences for doing so. Trump is doing a great job on that. We won't need a wall if nobody wants to risk crossing the border.

---

Wow.... This is your idea after seeing what Biden did the last 4 years? The next Marxist in office will open the floodgates again and make sure there are incentives to bring in as many illegals as possible.

---

…until the next president reverses again and away they go. Trump has shown that it is possible that the possibility of leeching off America is not guaranteed even if someone friendly to criminals is elected. The images of arrests, Alligator Alcatraz, and deportations is powerful. It will have a lasting effect even through a leftist regime should one follow Trump.

---

BS again. Over 10 million illegals came in during Biden's regime. Do the math. How many deportations per day would be required to deport 10 million illegals in 4 years. Do Trump's deportation goals reach that number.

You say just deport them like it's easy.
How many terrorists made it into the country during Joe's 4 years of open border?
Do you really think we know who and where they all are and can easily just go pick them up?

How many court battles did and will Trump have to fight?

How many violent riots will happen because of the deportations and how many NG will need to be deployed during Trump's term to make this happen?

After going after the terrorist/hard criminal illegal aliens, how politically feasible will it be to deport the rest?


What if the next marxist president is a 2 term disaster?

---

I never said the actual numbers of the deportations itself was going to make the difference. It is the message it sends. You aren't looking at this from the perspective of the immigrant. Think of the promises they once believed that all you had to do is show up on the border and you'd be given a hotel to live in, free food and health care, basically an endless supply of goodies and benefits at the expense of the taxpayers.

That message has changed 180 degrees to now being you might end up in an alligator prison, deported to God knows where, maybe a max prison in El Salvidor. You won't be able to move freely about society for fear of being picked up, then your whole family and everyone else you are associated with. You have poll numbers showing that a significant majority of Americans don't want you here. You have places of work being raided.

The RISK of illegal entry has gone way, way up and the benefits way, way down. There is no guarantee that a future president will change things for any significant length of time. There is no guarantee that a future Marxist president will last more than 1 term. You are expecting people to risk their lives on that gamble?

There is a reason Homan is frequently talking tough in no uncertain terms on every available media platform. He wants the world to know the free ride is over and consequences for trying will be severe.

THAT is the benefit of this effort even if the total number of forced deportations is relatively low to the total number of illegals.

You totally missed the point with all of your comments.

---

None of that matters. Sure, the word is out during Trump's term, but all that goes out the window with the next Marxist. They will hype the benefits and open the floodgates again. By the time a republican comes back into office foreigners will forget about Trump's deportations and most republican's don't have the spine to do a deportation program like Trump has done anyways.

The best way to deal with illegal aliens is to prevent them from coming in the country in the first place. I know there are ways to get around the wall, but it's at least an obstacle that will slow them down if it's completed. That will be working for us during the next marxist's term.

This congress needs to also update laws to codify laws that reduce the incentive, like mandatory voter ID for federal elections. Congress needs to pass the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act.

oh no said:

---

yeah; they always said there were around 11 to 20 million illegal immigrants in the country before 2021. ..but that estimate had gone unchanged for probably two decades so it was probably way too low. ...then in just a four year period, Biden let in probably over 20 million people unfettered, coming from over 180 different countries.

I saw a post on X yesterday (sorry, can't find it right now, but I'll go look), that indicated that just to get back to pre-2020 "equilibrium" days at the current rate of deportations, it's going to take about 18 years.

The treasonous regime knew what they were doing by opening the floodgates with that many people that quickly. They knew it could never be undone. They didn't care about the safety of their citizens or the strain on economy and infrastructure. They knew there would be backlash, but they also knew with 95% of pravda media on their side, they could pull on heart strings of one or two examples like a maryland dad or something. They're playing the long game. The "path to amnesty" for all that the politically elite in the socialist regime always talk about will happen eventually and that permanent power grab is the only goal. Your safety be damned.

---

This. We have to have a permanent structure in place to block entry as much as possible.

WOW. New jobs report reveals that American-born workers gained 2 MILLION jobs since January, while foreign-born workers lost 543,000 pic.twitter.com/F7YrHyKWAY

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) July 9, 2025

Pretty bad so far; I was not a fan of him getting rid of Elon. He wouldn't have won in 2024 without Elon's contributions to his campaign. His execution of the tariffs was also very poor.

Elon was not "let go". He held a temporary post that by law is 130 days. He also is the CEO of a MAJOR US CORPORATION. I think he had work to do on his own businesses.

A plus

So, I will disagree with these grades:

C - Immigration: Huh? We have ICE rounding up people and deporting them every week. We have liberal judges slowing that effort at every turn. We have illegals self-deporting. We have the new bill that passed to increase funding to ICE to improve our ability to deport more and more quickly. Name ONE PRESIDENT that has done anything close to what we are seeing in the past 50 years. Name one.

F - Tariffs: So you are okay with every other country flooding our markets with cheap crap, putting excessive tariffs on our goods limiting our ability to export and create more jobs and wealth for Americans? Are you a foreign-born resident of the US per chance? What do you believe the goal of Trump's tariffs are? To destroy America or bring back jobs and opportunities to sell more American made goods to countries that currently block us from doing so? Do you know anything about this topic other than what the media tells you? Yes, tariffs have disrupted our economy, but it has also disrupted China's economy and all those who don't want to act fairly and in good faith when it comes to trade. This is a massive WIN beyond the "inconvenience" of the past three months. Curious what your take will be in say 2 years.

F - Government Spending: Name one President that has cut spending? Did you know that CONGRESS controls spending not the President? Name one Congressional session that has passed a bill to cut spending or try to cut the deficit in the past 40 years? I don't think you can name a time where Congress actually did it's job. I am all for cutting govt spending, but you realize that cutting Medicare and SS will lose you the next four elections, right? What will Liberals do if they remain in power for 20 years after Trump is gone? Hmmmm.......

F - Drain the swamp: That will NEVER happen. The best you can do is to try and fire as many hardcore leftists as possible and replace them with somewhat moderate people. The govt bureaucracy is HUGE and those are the people who carry ideology with them into the workplace. Senators and congress people are irrelevant to draining the swamp since they are elected by their states and state districts. It is the life-time staff/job holders that need to go. And what happened when DOGE and Trump tried to fire govt employees or offer them packages to leave? Rogue Federal Judges have tried to block it, stop it, slow it down, etc. So who is the Enemy of Draining the Swamp? Trump or Liberals and their activist Judges? PS> Trump still has over 3 years in office to keep purging.

F - Epstein: This one I laugh about. Epstein is a Mossad-owned asset. We were NEVER going to get the truth here especially not right now with Peace Talks hot and heavy in that region of the world. Plus, we have no idea how much of that Epstein evidence was shredded, deleted, and destroyed under Biden's DOJ. And this one has zero impact on job creation, wealth creation, improving the economy and our salaries so get mad about it, but it should have zero bearing on how we grade a President (in fact, any of them, because both sides could never release something that might be severely damaging to the US and/or Israel - just a crappy hard truth about govts.)

F - Russia: What would you be doing to Russia right now that we aren't doing? Do you have full knowledge of what is taking place? Do you know pushing Russia and China closer together is good for bad for America? Trump has tried the carrot and is now moving to the stick. Did you want him to bomb Putin? Ukraine and Russia are basically at a stalemate. Once Israel/ME peace is done, I think you will see him pivot to Putin and start exerting max pressure. But, be careful. Russia has massive oil, gas, minerals, platinum, etc that if fully sanctioned would probably have a significant impact on the world economy.

F - USAID and DOGE implementation. Running off Elon will end up biting him in the asz.: Wrong. He didn't run him off. He was an "appointee" with an expired position and he is a CEO to a major US Corp that had lefties burning his car and shooting at his dealerships. Probably not a bad idea to go take care of his businesses for a while. Musk is a brilliant person, but being brilliant and running the US Govt are VERY DIFFERENT ANIMALS.

F

Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:

---

i would give trump a B so far he had momentum to be. solid A but i am not sold on the BBB and the increase in spending and the epstein conclusion is very very fishy. i like the way he has handled the israel and middle east but wish he would stick to his guns in ukraine. we are sending the weapons yet again.

---

How much is the increase in spending?

The U.S. inflation index drops to 1.66%

Panicans can't believe their eyes 👀

Jerome Powell and the FED need to lower interest rates NOW! pic.twitter.com/jwglKKjZyC

— Patriot Lady (@angelwoman501) July 9, 2025

B-