Gaetz nominated for AG

70,419 Views | 1139 Replies | Last: 6 hrs ago by valvemonkey91
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
All right Photoshoppers we need a Judge Dredd Gaetz meme stat!
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BMX Bandit said:

Logos Stick said:

ok, 5-4 against. my bad


do you even know what the Canning concurrence was? It appears you don't. nothing wrong with that, but you are just throwing up numbers without any basis.

Quote:

so you believe it will be challenged if he does typical recess and SCOTUS will rule against?
Absolutely.

In the Canning case, Scalia wrote in the concurrence that to be a recess appointment the vacancy must "happen during the Recess," ie, offices that become vacant during that intermission. He was joined by Alito, Roberts and Thomas.

So unless those 3 have a complete 180 change of opinion, thats 3 votes against.

Gorsuch, Kavanagh and Barrett are all Scalia fans, so you only need 2 of them to make 5.

But then consider the 3 liberals. You only need 2 of them to find any reason to go against Trump. Its a safe bet that happens.

But the kicker is, and what Trump knows, is that that probably doesn't matter.


Take his hypo:

Trump does a recess appointment of Gaetz.

SCOTUS says that the appointment violates the constitution.


What happens in the interim? Gaetz is still going to be essentially the attorney general. the lower courts are not going to issue an injunction saying he can't be in office.

Is it worth all this headache to the GOP? I say no.

Thats why I think Gaetz gets confirmed the traditional way. The threat of the whole thing blowing up only hurts republicans in thelong run.



On my first post I thought Scalia was alone. Then I looked and saw it was the four conservatives, thus my numbers.

This is the first time anyone has stated that it will be ruled unconstitutional. No one anywhere has claimed that.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hmm. No further comment.

Red Fishing Ag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Hmm. No further comment.



I am sure this is just for personal work.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HTownAg98 said:

This whole thing makes me feel like we're scraping the bottom of the barrel with Gaetz.
merrick garland made me feel like we already rusted and pitted out the bottom of the barrel. We need a whole new cask.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
House Ethics reported to have been hacked and the only thing breached was the Gaetz investigation report


What are the odds of that happening
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
Fat Black Swan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
An increasing number of GOP senators have changed their tune in the last couple of days.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Charpie said:

Here is a better link.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/19/us/politics/matt-gaetz-hack-testimony.html?unlocked_article_code=1.bE4.f2SX.A-EoaFu8nQma&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
So again, just an allegation. Like the dossier, I am sure it is "super legit" and no one in the FBI can verify or deny it because of an ongoing investigation. I think I've heard this one before.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MarkTwain said:

House Ethics reported to have been hacked and the only thing breached was the Gaetz investigation report


What are the odds of that happening
Slim to none and slim just left the building.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

MarkTwain said:

House Ethics reported to have been hacked and the only thing breached was the Gaetz investigation report


What are the odds of that happening
Slim to none and slim just left the building.
Don't worry. Adam Schiff will tell us what the information is. He promises.
rathAG05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Then they are spineless. Just because he's Elon Musk doesn't mean he knows what he's doing when it comes to cabinet picks.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So the entire allegation teeters on the word of Joel Greenberg a proven liar and self confessed fabricator of political disinformation. According to Greenberg the unnamed 17 year old was a sex worker aka hooker. Who has false credentials and worked in a strip club under an alias. Reportedly two escorts were disposed claiming they attended between five and 10 "sex parties" with Gaetz between 2017 and 2018, when Gaetz was already in Congress, and one claims to have witnessed Gaetz "having sex with her unnamed friend," who was underage at the time. No actual victim has come forward. No wonder the Biden DOJ never went after this, it's sketchy at best.
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rathAG05 said:

Then they are spineless. Just because he's Elon Musk doesn't mean he knows what he's doing when it comes to cabinet picks.
No, but he has billions of dollars and seems to be one of the president elect's right hand men for now. He has also said he was ready to primary any elected official that got in the way of Trumps agenda.

Plus, he's one of if not the smartest guy in the world. He's no novice at dealing with large, complicated organizations. He might just have a little better insight and ideas than anyone on this board as to what it might take to gut and rebuild the DOJ.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MarkTwain said:

So the entire allegation teeters on the word of Joel Greenberg a proven liar and self confessed fabricator of political disinformation. According to Greenberg the unnamed 17 year old was a sex worker aka hooker. Who has false credentials and worked in a strip club under an alias. Reportedly two escorts were disposed claiming they attended between five and 10 "sex parties" with Gaetz between 2017 and 2018, when Gaetz was already in Congress, and one claims to have witnessed Gaetz "having sex with her unnamed friend," who was underage at the time. No actual victim has come forward. No wonder the Biden DOJ never went after this, it's sketchy at best.
That was pretty obvious from what their lawyer said (or didn't say). Else how would a 17 year old even know or be invited to a house party circuit event? If the other two hookers did not bring her with them, she had to be in the industry to even hear about it.

Again, shades of Duke lacrosse and Mike Nifong. When a hooker is your primary/sole witness, there are credibility issues. Prosecutors don't like to bring cases that they don't think they can win. Nifong did it anyway and lost his license permanently and his freedom for a time.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Red Fishing Ag93 said:

aggiehawg said:

Hmm. No further comment.



I am sure this is just for personal work.
You know what would be hilarious would be for another investigative group to send a truck like that and have operatives go to all the people who were crooked in Garlands team and tell them they were there to pick up all the files they didn't want trump's team to find. Take them all to the truck, then not shred them and instead turn them over to congressional investigators.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Either he is wrongly accused or a sick ass dude; either is acceptable for the skull cracking retribution the criminals require.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?



Lol!
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fun fact:

Don Gaetz's house was the home of Truman in the Truman Show.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From Don Surber:
Quote:

DC fears retribution for a decade of prosecutorial persecution of Trump and his team.

Politico reported, "Senate Republicans deliver a message to Trump: Gaetz's confirmation is in jeopardy. They're privately hoping Trump doesn't make them walk the plank."

Walk the plank?
What plank?

West Virginia's Shelley Moore Capito, a former Cherry Blossom Princess in DC when her daddy was a congressman, is up for re-election in 2026. (Murkowski is another former Cherry Blossom Princess. Same reason.) She might want to consult Liz Cheney on what opposition to Donald Trump can do to a Republican.

Does anyone believe that a state that gave Trump 70% of its votes this month will punish her for supporting his choice for attorney general?

In a sane world, the opposite would be the case. But we don't live there. We live in a world where the federal government runs the Senate, not the other way around. Capito is now No. 4 in the Republican caucus pecking order the highest female. Call her Roberta Byrdette because she is more concerned about personal power than representing the state.

Trump carried 31 states the most by any president in 20 years.
Those 31 states sent 62 senators to DC to represent them.

They don't. They hate Gaetz and they hate their states. Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa told Politico, "He's got an uphill climb."

Isn't she the pig farmer who told voters she knew how to cut pork? The national debt doubled during her 10 years in the Senate.

Trump carried Iowa by 8 points in 2020, when she was re-elected by 6. He carried the state by 13 points this time. She should say "yea" and sit the heck down.

The people have spoken and they said Trump picks his cabinet, not former Cherry Blossom Princesses who have run the national debt up while ignoring the needs of the people.

Instead of picking on Gaetz, how about doing something useful like investigating FJB's refusal to help hurricane victims in western North Carolina and Tennessee? The Biden administration already cleared Gaetz of any wrongdoing. We know this because they investigated him and could not indict him on anything, not even a parking violation.
Sit down, shut up, and fall in line, senators.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hoyt Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wonder what horse trading went on for that one.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
none. he was always a safe "yes"

Collins, Murkowski, Tillis, Cassidy, McConnell & Cornyn are potentially the ones that have to be swayed
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Following up pn Graham.

FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BMX Bandit said:

none. he was always a safe "yes"

Collins, Murkowski, Tillis, Cassidy, McConnell & Cornyn are potentially the ones that have to be swayed

I have it on good authority that Cornyn will play ball…
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cornyn has to know after his welcome at the state rnc meeting last year that he is on an extreme short leash
You do not have a soul. You are a soul that has a body.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am 99% sure Cornyn is a "yes".

Just listed him a a possibility, even if very far fetched.
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BMX Bandit said:

I am 99% sure Cornyn is a "yes".

Just listed him a a possibility, even if very far fetched.

It's been made clear to him that he'd better be a yes…
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FireAg said:

BMX Bandit said:

I am 99% sure Cornyn is a "yes".

Just listed him a a possibility, even if very far fetched.

It's been made clear to him that he'd better be a yes…
I'll be calling his office tomorrow.
mazzag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

FireAg said:

BMX Bandit said:

I am 99% sure Cornyn is a "yes".

Just listed him a a possibility, even if very far fetched.

It's been made clear to him that he'd better be a yes…
I'll be calling his office tomorrow.


https://www.cornyn.senate.gov/contact-john-cornyn/
mazzag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Scroll down for all his state numbers.
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Axios is reporting some House Republicans might not be onboard with a recess.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/scoop-house-republicans-may-block-trump-from-gaetz-recess-appointment/ar-AA1usRKj
Quote:

Some House Republicans are prepared to block President-elect Trump from using a recess appointment on attorney general nominee Matt Gaetz.
[url=https://www.axios.com/2024/11/20/house-democrats-force-vote-gaetz-ethics-report?utm_medium=partner&utm_source=microsoft-start&utm_content=link&utm_campaign=subs-partner-msoft-sneakpeek][/url]
Why it matters: In the case of recess appointments, the House can use a procedural trick to block a president from bypassing the Senate.
  • Several House Republicans would vote against any motion to go into recess, Axios has learned.
  • Trump's plan to circumvent the Senate's "advice and consent" role is complicated, but there's a clear constitutional provision that gives him the power to adjourn Congress, which would open the door for a recess appointment.

Quote:

What they're saying: Some House Republicans have deep reservations about recessing the House just to give Trump the power to use recess appointments.

  • "I've already said we shouldn't be going into recess," said Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.).
  • "It will be something that I'd discuss with leadership first before being public," Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) told Axios. "I don't want to say either way out of respect to the Speaker. I owe him to talk to him first."

Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TRM said:


Quote:

What they're saying: Some House Republicans have deep reservations about recessing the House just to give Trump the power to use recess appointments.

  • "I've already said we shouldn't be going into recess," said Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.).
  • "It will be something that I'd discuss with leadership first before being public," Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) told Axios. "I don't want to say either way out of respect to the Speaker. I owe him to talk to him first."



I will be contributing to their primary opponents in two years!
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maybe I am dense and will confess I haven't read the exact language in the constitution, but what does the house have to do with this? The Senate has the advice and consent role, not the house, so if the Senate is in recess, isn't that sufficient to do recess appointments?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.