Gaetz nominated for AG

70,509 Views | 1139 Replies | Last: 6 hrs ago by valvemonkey91
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
At this point I think Trump is just trolling the Democrats and media...
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So I guess this means Mike Johnson is safe as House Speaker?
Tom Kazansky 2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jeeper79 said:

He made the House a dysfunctional circus. This is a terrible pick.



All the expected posters hate this pick.

Love it.
sam callahan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We need someone to fight the swamp.

Gaetz "Ok. I'll fight."

No. Not like that!
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tom Kazansky 2012 said:

Jeeper79 said:

He made the House a dysfunctional circus. This is a terrible pick.



All the expected posters hate this pick.

Love it.

It's starting to make me feel better about it.
Charlie 31
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


This is more evidence to support congressional term limits so that we can have a better chance to elect officials to the U.S. House and U.S. Senate who are in tune with what the American people want and need
Tom Kazansky 2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
torrid said:

So I guess this means Mike Johnson is safe as House Speaker?


No one is safe. These next four years are going to be political mayhem.

BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc said:

He wasn't my first choice, but the way he's already making the libs on here cry, I may have to rethink it!
And that's really what much of all this is about.....schaudenfraude.
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
C@LAg said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

Rossticus said:

BluHorseShu said:

Logos Stick said:

Per this X post. Did I miss something:


Good grief. That guy is insufferable. The silver lining is that Trump will likely turn over a few of the appointments....if history is any indication. Gaetz is a showboat and not up for that task. But then we're all full of opinions. Just surprising given the myriad of well qualified candidates. I will say that I don't doubt that Gaetz will do absolutely anything Trump tells him too, legal or not.


Qualification pales in comparison to loyalty. Trump has to be sure his appointments will do whatever he asks them to without pause or question. If they won't then it doesn't matter how "qualified" they are. He learned from his last term.


They need to do the tasks that he sets out but they sure as **** need to let him know when they think something is a poor idea. The blind loyalty many of you believe should exist is scary.
now do the biden administration. across the board.

all of a sudden NOW YOU are getting the vapors about blind loyalty to the agenda?


When did we ever have conversations about Biden's people following him blindly? I would have said the same thing with them as well.

And how long are you going to base everything Trump does based off of Biden? It's going to sound like Obama and his blaming of Bush. Trump needs to make the best decisions possible, not just better decisions than Biden.
If you say you hate the state of politics in this nation and you don't get involved in it, you obviously don't hate the state of politics in this nation.
BlueSmoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What's the backstory of the dims talking point about him and the underage girl and sex trafficking?
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GeorgiAg said:

Elect a clown, expect a circus
Biden did not disappoint. LOL.
RedHand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BluHorseShu said:

Rossticus said:

BluHorseShu said:

Logos Stick said:

Per this X post. Did I miss something:


Good grief. That guy is insufferable. The silver lining is that Trump will likely turn over a few of the appointments....if history is any indication. Gaetz is a showboat and not up for that task. But then we're all full of opinions. Just surprising given the myriad of well qualified candidates. I will say that I don't doubt that Gaetz will do absolutely anything Trump tells him too, legal or not.


Qualification pales in comparison to loyalty. Trump has to be sure his appointments will do whatever he asks them to without pause or question. If they won't then it doesn't matter how "qualified" they are. He learned from his last term.
And that's good for Trump if you trust his motives, but potentially bad for the American people if there aren't any ethical guard rails. Its like when Trump fired Sessions for not doing everything he wanted. I believe Sessions ran into an ethical and likely legal dilemma and told him he could not pursue the course of action he wanted. You want loyalty but you should also want people to tell you what is out of bounds and why. The leader of a country who's staff only tell them yes and aren't concerned with the ethical, legal or moral repercussions of their actions should be feared by the people.

For the same reason we dislike Biden and the FBI for all the things they did that probably weren't ethical or even legal, we should expect ethics and integrity in this administration. You don't want G. Gordon Liddy types
You aren't wrong, but some people only learn by getting punched in the face. A lot of these Democrats need to be punched in the face and Gaetz will have no problem doing that. My issue is will Gaetz know when enough is enough.
AggieUSMC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The problem is that the Republicans will only have a 52 seat majority. Assuming every Dem will vote no on Gaetz, they can only afford to lose 2 R votes.
Murkowski and Collins are almost certain no's. I'm affraid there are more "concerned moderates" in the Republican Senate caucus that will tank this nomination.
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


At what point to senators like Murkowski and Collins just switch parties? And who else might they take with them? Hell, at this point Cornyn and Mitch the Glitch might even join in. It is not unprecedented for control of the Senate to switch based simply on an existing senator declaring membership in the other party or independent status. Happened with Jeffords in 2001.
Aggie97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieUSMC said:

The problem is that the Republicans will only have a 52 seat majority. Assuming every Dem will vote no on Gaetz, they can only afford to lose 2 R votes.
Murkowski and Collins are almost certain no's. I'm affraid there are more "concerned moderates" in the Republican Senate caucus that will tank this nomination.


Actually if that happens then Vance would be the tiebreaking vote
RAB87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BluHorseShu said:

Logos Stick said:

Per this X post. Did I miss something:


Good grief. That guy is insufferable. The silver lining is that Trump will likely turn over a few of the appointments....if history is any indication. Gaetz is a showboat and not up for that task. But then we're all full of opinions. Just surprising given the myriad of well qualified candidates. I will say that I don't doubt that Gaetz will do absolutely anything Trump tells him too, legal or not.
20 million illegals and Crooked Joe Biden would like a word with you.
45-70Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't underestimate the ability of republicans to make this a massive mess and have enough numbers to block him.
2023NCAggies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

Waffledynamics said:

Not sure I see the appeal of Gaetz here.
Consider who love his him and who sees a disaster in the making.

MAGA thinks he's the greatest thing ever because they want watch everything burn.

Everyone who can see things without the Trump colored glasses sees that Gaetz is a nutcase who nearly handed the House to the Democrats in 2023. Had he succeeded, they would have been able to pass a bill to declare Trump guilt of insurrection, and ban him from running. Gaetz is easily very capable of blowing up Trump's presidency with his dumbassary.
Oh look who doesn't agree, who would have thought? Lol

Thanks for confirming Gaetz is an excellent pick
Demosthenes81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I get the feeling that this nomination is a throwaway. Getz goes down and then Trump nominates who he really wants, probably someone else with baggage but not as much as Matt
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BlueSmoke said:

What's the backstory of the dims talking point about him and the underage girl and sex trafficking?

His adopted son and him being single. I think that's it.
YokelRidesAgain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieUSMC said:

The problem is that the Republicans will only have a 52 seat majority. Assuming every Dem will vote no on Gaetz, they can only afford to lose 2 R votes.
Murkowski and Collins are almost certain no's. I'm affraid there are more "concerned moderates" in the Republican Senate caucus that will tank this nomination.
53 vote majority, so they can lose 4
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Demosthenes81 said:

I get the feeling that this nomination is a throwaway. Getz goes down and then Trump nominates who he really wants, probably someone else with baggage but not as much as Matt
Rope-a-dope?
Sq 17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BlueSmoke said:

What's the backstory of the dims talking point about him and the underage girl and sex trafficking?


Had a very young female companion , after some digging it was determined the relationship probably started before she was 18 and it also appears they traveled internationally while she was a minor

Both of these are kind of illegal and could fall under the term Traficking

The companion chose not to cooperate with the investigation and it went nowhere

oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BlueSmoke said:

What's the backstory of the dims talking point about him and the underage girl and sex trafficking?
IIRC, around 6 or 8 years ago, before he was married, he allegedly used an escort service for some dates. allegations came out years later- over 4 years ago- that one of his dates was under 18 at the time, which he may or may not have known. this is what they tried to bribe or blackmail him and his family about. he refused to pay the ransom, the news story "broke". libs melted down about Gaetz being a pedo because one of his dates years earlier might have been 17 at the time. it guess it's trafficking if he hired a date from an escort service in Florida and flew her to attand a gala or a dinner in DC. so he's not pure and worthy to be in government in liberal minds. it was investigated. They found nothing I guess, because it's been years since then and now he's married, been in congress for another term after that, and just reelected again.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
torrid said:

will25u said:


At what point to senators like Murkowski and Collins just switch parties? And who else might they take with them? Hell, at this point Cornyn and Mitch the Glitch might even join in. It is not unprecedented for control of the Senate to switch based simply on an existing senator declaring membership in the other party or independent status. Happened with Jeffords in 2001.
Murkowski is just announcing that she is open for bids. She will "reluctantly" vote to confirm once an acceptable package of earmarks is arranged for.
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Charlie 31 said:

will25u said:


This is more evidence to support congressional term limits so that we can have a better chance to elect officials to the U.S. House and U.S. Senate who are in tune with what the American people want and need


Murkowski and Collins are irrelevant CM garbage at this point. lol.
TheWoodlandsTxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WBBQ74
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old adage: Better to have him inside the tent p-issing out than outside the tent p-issing in.
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The comments are gold!

AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So she was a sitting member of congress as a teenage girl? Odd.
You do not have a soul. You are a soul that has a body.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Establishment R's are free to fight Trump on appointments, but they do so at their own career's peril…
In reply to
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTm2004 said:

The comments are gold!



Get her a body bag. A big one.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Demosthenes81 said:

I get the feeling that this nomination is a throwaway. Getz goes down and then Trump nominates who he really wants, probably someone else with baggage but not as much as Matt
Put up a sacrificial lamb to give the Dems their "win"?

Maybe it makes the others go smoother?

Could be.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I was a teenage girl when Matt Gaetz decided it was appropriate to body shame and belittle me as a sitting member of Congress


Wut??
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:



Uhhh ohh.. is it Rudy time next ! Come on Trump do it

Then Flynn is next
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.