— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 28, 2024
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 28, 2024
A boring theory (apologies in advance), but possibly Yearick, Hooper and Crooks are simply Antifa types who independently hatched a plan to assassinate Trump. One volunteered to be the shooter. The other two (and maybe there were others) had roles to play as eyes and ears, or possibly causing distractions and drawing attention away from the shooter. I wonder if they attended other Trump rallies to refine their plans. Poor security was exploited without any inside help. I'd like to know what's in the FBI files on Yearick and Hooper!nortex97 said:
Genuine question; what is the theory of coordination between Crooks and Yearick? I just don't have one. IF it was Yearick on the roof who was killed, what happened to Crooks, and what was he doing when the former was taken out?
If this was in fact coordinated as a hit, as is the theory, why were both Crooks and Yearick involved, and why did both disappear afterward (obviously one is dead)? As simple as misdirection, as with the 'man on the water tower' or heavily photographed primary/near counter-sniper team that didn't take the shot? Useful distraction as with Cheatle's DEI idiocy on parade?
I can't call it a theory...more like an hypothesis...why would both be walking around that Butler site as "persons of interest"?nortex97 said:
Genuine question; what is the theory of coordination between Crooks and Yearick? I just don't have one. IF it was Yearick on the roof who was killed, what happened to Crooks, and what was he doing when the former was taken out?
If this was in fact coordinated as a hit, as is the theory, why were both Crooks and Yearick involved, and why did both disappear afterward (obviously one is dead)? As simple as misdirection, as with the 'man on the water tower' or heavily photographed primary/near counter-sniper team that didn't take the shot? Useful distraction as with Cheatle's DEI idiocy on parade?
Has anyone explained why the two local LE snipers left the building that had them covering that sector, including the roof? I know they say "to look for Crooks", but are we to believe, while Trump was on stage, they just said, the hell with our assigned coverage, let's leave this area unprotected and go look for some guy? Who gave them the order to leave at that moment? If these guys were trained snipers, they're high valued individuals for that one task. The ones I've known have been very singularly minded individuals and would only leave if directed too. It just seems too convenient of an answer.SeMgCo87 said:I can't call it a theory...more like an hypothesis...why would both be walking around that Butler site as "persons of interest"?nortex97 said:
Genuine question; what is the theory of coordination between Crooks and Yearick? I just don't have one. IF it was Yearick on the roof who was killed, what happened to Crooks, and what was he doing when the former was taken out?
If this was in fact coordinated as a hit, as is the theory, why were both Crooks and Yearick involved, and why did both disappear afterward (obviously one is dead)? As simple as misdirection, as with the 'man on the water tower' or heavily photographed primary/near counter-sniper team that didn't take the shot? Useful distraction as with Cheatle's DEI idiocy on parade?
At 20, Crooks probably has trouble peeing in a toilet in the morning...and he was rejected by his HS shooting team. So, I have my doubts he was proficient enough to take/make that shot...Yearick has a history of hating both Trump and the establishment. And was supposedly practicing shooting at the same range as Police...the only thing mentioned about Crooks and the practice range is that he was seen there...but no confirmation/pictures or receipts...
That is also the case with most of this crap...we have lots of conspiracy theories...lots of facts and a timeline, but no confirmation from the F_I, C_A or any other Fed investigative organization...even of the timeline...
And Wray deliberately throwing shade on the "bullet" ... misinforming us that it could also be a fragment of something...be it teleprompter glass (how can they justify that angle???), or bullet fragment, or piece of an alien spacecraft.
It boils down to this...they do not want to tell the American Public anything...even though simpler is better, I am beginning to think this whole plot is way more complex than some dumb 20 yr old trying to shoot Trump.
So here's how it works:
— Clint Russell (@LibertyLockPod) July 28, 2024
The media spends years refusing to cover Trump's speaking events. They cut away mid-speech and describe it as "protecting their viewers from misinformation." Then, suddenly, there is a Trump event that gets covered by the major news outlets.… pic.twitter.com/Bp2Y03lYpm
Why won't you report on Maxwell Yearick as the dead Shooter? Even @RogerJStoneJr believes it's him! Your silence on the matter is disturbing. I'm a faithful listener and supporter of Infowars. Video: https://t.co/HK2145ZdWP pic.twitter.com/5KdX9Y8faW
— Samantha 😎 SamsTwitch.com (@Samstwitch_Sam) July 28, 2024
Another alarming security failure.
— Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) July 28, 2024
A local SWAT officer in PA told ABC his team had no contact with Secret Service at the rally until after the assassination attempt on President Trump.
Our House Task Force will find the answers the American people deserve. pic.twitter.com/RojvR4YfDb
Channeling/separate radio communications between different groups is not 'conspiratorial' imho (it's actually pretty tough to sync up encrypted radio comms between systems, yet it's much harder when they don't even talk to each other that day at all), but the fact that they had those images at 5:45 and took 26 minutes to do…functionally not a damn single thing to protect Trump is the most damning single fact.Quote:
Now, he did say in that briefing that he can't defend, you know, what happened in Butler. I don't think anybody could. I did ask him. Found out that apparently -- because there were -- there were reports that the snipers had the, you know, assassin in their sights for minutes, asked for permission, were denied permission to take him out. That apparently is false. That's what he told us. They acquired him after the shots were fired.
But again, we need -- we need detailed interviews with those individuals to find out exactly what happened. It's unbelievable how little information has been coming from federal law enforcement. But those are just some of the questions I have, is exactly what happened.
We want a detailed timeline. We need all their communications, both written emails, text, but also we need voice recordings of any verbal communication.
Here's what we did find out when my staff, you know, committee staff went down to Butler on Friday. First of all, at 5:45, the sniper teams, the Secret Service did receive the photos of Crooks and they knew he was at the AGR building. So this is 26 minutes before he took his first shot. So we've had that confirmed.
We also have confirmed that the radios that local law enforcement gave the Secret Service sniper teams were never used by the Secret Service. So again, all the communication was channeled. People were, you know, the sniper and SWAT teams were on different communication channels than the patrol officers, different communication channels from the Secret Service, all funneled in through a central communications system, which obviously delayed things and allowed this tragedy to happen.
RGLAG85 said:Has anyone explained why the two local LE snipers left the building that had them covering that sector, including the roof? I know they say "to look for Crooks", but are we to believe, while Trump was on stage, they just said, the hell with our assigned coverage, let's leave this area unprotected and go look for some guy? Who gave them the order to leave at that moment? If these guys were trained snipers, they're high valued individuals for that one task. The ones I've known have been very singularly minded individuals and would only leave if directed too. It just seems too convenient of an answer.SeMgCo87 said:I can't call it a theory...more like an hypothesis...why would both be walking around that Butler site as "persons of interest"?nortex97 said:
Genuine question; what is the theory of coordination between Crooks and Yearick? I just don't have one. IF it was Yearick on the roof who was killed, what happened to Crooks, and what was he doing when the former was taken out?
If this was in fact coordinated as a hit, as is the theory, why were both Crooks and Yearick involved, and why did both disappear afterward (obviously one is dead)? As simple as misdirection, as with the 'man on the water tower' or heavily photographed primary/near counter-sniper team that didn't take the shot? Useful distraction as with Cheatle's DEI idiocy on parade?
At 20, Crooks probably has trouble peeing in a toilet in the morning...and he was rejected by his HS shooting team. So, I have my doubts he was proficient enough to take/make that shot...Yearick has a history of hating both Trump and the establishment. And was supposedly practicing shooting at the same range as Police...the only thing mentioned about Crooks and the practice range is that he was seen there...but no confirmation/pictures or receipts...
That is also the case with most of this crap...we have lots of conspiracy theories...lots of facts and a timeline, but no confirmation from the F_I, C_A or any other Fed investigative organization...even of the timeline...
And Wray deliberately throwing shade on the "bullet" ... misinforming us that it could also be a fragment of something...be it teleprompter glass (how can they justify that angle???), or bullet fragment, or piece of an alien spacecraft.
It boils down to this...they do not want to tell the American Public anything...even though simpler is better, I am beginning to think this whole plot is way more complex than some dumb 20 yr old trying to shoot Trump.
And the sniper changing his focus to the trees lines up with the video I saw of the man, who was shot through the side, the woman's purse being hit, then the bullet disintegrate on the rail, all on the top row of the stands to the left of Trump. That angle couldn't be achieved from the building angle. The angle I'm describing was depicted in the video above of the SS sniper changing his focus.
Someone gifted me a premium membership! I can upload longer videos here now. Thanks for all the birthday wishes my friends :) It was a good one
— Dave (@realDJStew724) July 29, 2024
I'll get working on the next part in the morning. Goodnight everyone! pic.twitter.com/gvSKZZt39T
Agreed, but it was Yearick on the roof, not Crooks.nortex97 said:
This I think is the 'other' new video posted (clearly from a bystander, caution, profanity):Someone gifted me a premium membership! I can upload longer videos here now. Thanks for all the birthday wishes my friends :) It was a good one
— Dave (@realDJStew724) July 29, 2024
I'll get working on the next part in the morning. Goodnight everyone! pic.twitter.com/gvSKZZt39T
To me, this sort of 'seals the deal' that it was only one shooter, on the roof, but I'll wait for the 'experts' to clarify/study. It does seem as though the local cops…really rushed "Crooks" in their response. The 3 or 4 rapid fire after the first shot were unlikely to be precisely aimed.
Scar didn't directly kill Mufasa, but he set in motion the events that led to it.nortex97 said:
It's not gonna just go away.Details on the improvised bombs were in a document released by a federal government task force to law enforcement departments across the country.
— Tony Seruga (@TonySeruga) July 27, 2024
The FBI described two improvised explosive devices in the would-be assassin’s car that used a radio-controlled initiation system… pic.twitter.com/RyBRGtwBZy
The media may not talk about it but the people will, and some US officials are trying to get the word out:At what point does the Secret Service’s reckless indifference to Trump’s safety start to mimic intent to cause him harm?
— Mike Lee (@BasedMikeLee) July 27, 2024
King David didn’t kill Uriah the Hittite with his own hands.
But he sent him to a dangerous place and then deliberately left him unprotected. https://t.co/RyphMkDsziDo you see what Gerald sees?
— John Cullen 🐓 (@I_Am_JohnCullen) July 28, 2024
Pretty sure I do..
Is that what I think it is?#UhOh https://t.co/BWb0rT6ewE pic.twitter.com/yxl6KuR7LwCNN had forensic audio analyst Rober Maher evaluate the audio.
— John Cullen 🐓 (@I_Am_JohnCullen) July 27, 2024
He places the origin of the 1st shots
360-393 feet from the microphone.
What's the Problem:
"Crooks" body is 475 feet away.#UhOh #ISeeWhatOthersCant #TheScienceOfWhere pic.twitter.com/FSoeMKbKxY
I'd say the guy on a roof with a gun a hundred thirty yards away was something that needed more prompt action, but that's just me.Quote:
The Trump detail's first warning came when Crooks began to open fire at 6:11 p.m., eight minutes after Trump took the stage.
Some of Trump's top advisers, who were located under a large white tent behind the stage, initially believed the sound of gunfire was fireworks and did not immediately take cover, the newspaper reported.
Trump advisers told the outlet they first learned of concerns when the shooting was happening, stressing that they did not know why they were told of the suspicious person report so they could decide whether to delay Trump's speech.
"Nobody mentioned it. Nobody said there was a problem," Trump told Fox News' Jesse Watters. "They could've said, 'Let's wait for 15 minutes, 20 minutes, five minutes,' something. Nobody said I think that was a mistake."
A Secret Service official told The Post that investigators are still working to determine whether anyone told Trump's security detail or other Secret Service operational teams about the suspicious person report.
The official said reports of suspicious people are fairly common at some public events and sometimes are not enough of a concern that plans need to be changed or that the senior official's security detail needs to be notified.
— James Lindsay, anti-Communist (@ConceptualJames) July 29, 2024
My war room hit w/ @nataliegwinters today https://t.co/zfF5EAV2OC
— Mike Benz (@MikeBenzCyber) July 29, 2024
Thanks. Had not heard that.nortex97 said:
On further review from what I have read the Yearick armory is unconnected to the Yearick thought to be on scene. II haven't seen any real proof it's owned by his parents, if he was in fact the shooter.
Facial shape for dead shooter is different than Crooks face above...the above is more angular, with pointy chin...Madman said:
Just a thought on the ear from the dead man photo.
Crooks appears to have a very similar ear. So maybe not Maxwell. Just something I noticed while listening to a poor quality video about the event.
That is true. Pixels get filled in.Madman said:
I will caution everyone myself included to take the photographic evidence with a grain of salt. Unfortunately, we are working with screenshots of screenshots in some instances.
Even after we take out the problems with cell phone cameras, pictures have a tendency to get warped in these instances
I could see it. He has melted down a few times about Trump policies etc. when forced to talk on camera about his sedition.Quote:
Was Mayorkas responsible for the attempted assassination's near success? I think there is a good argument that he is.
Just to be clear, I don't think Mayorkas arranged a hit on Donald Trump. Even for him this would be a bridge too far.
Rather, he has been a key part of the campaign to demonize Trump and fully on board with ramping up the political temperature, and he likely was involved in ensuring that Trump's team was denied the resources it needed and requested to protect the once and former president.
We are all focused on the wrong target when it comes to the grotesque failures of the Secret Service, or at least we are missing the fact that the top of the chain of command for the Secret Service wasn't Kimberly Cheatle, but Alejandro Mayorkas. It is he who ultimately ran the Secret Service, and he should be held responsible.