*****Official Conspiracy Theory Thread*****

83,966 Views | 763 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by donkeykick90
Coppell97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Madman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When street scams are run in any big city in the world its common to have a team of two or more. It can be as simple as walking behind the next mark for a pickpocket to aid in his escape. If the victim notices the second man can "accidentally" step in the path of the victim to aid in the thief's escape. All the while acting surprised and confused to the reality of the situation.

Or in this case. When it was time to retrieve the rifle Crooks could go be his awkward self beside the nearest security officer. Later when the shooter was getting in place repeat the act, etc.
Towns03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nm
Just an Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Genuine question; what is the theory of coordination between Crooks and Yearick? I just don't have one. IF it was Yearick on the roof who was killed, what happened to Crooks, and what was he doing when the former was taken out?

If this was in fact coordinated as a hit, as is the theory, why were both Crooks and Yearick involved, and why did both disappear afterward (obviously one is dead)? As simple as misdirection, as with the 'man on the water tower' or heavily photographed primary/near counter-sniper team that didn't take the shot? Useful distraction as with Cheatle's DEI idiocy on parade?
A boring theory (apologies in advance), but possibly Yearick, Hooper and Crooks are simply Antifa types who independently hatched a plan to assassinate Trump. One volunteered to be the shooter. The other two (and maybe there were others) had roles to play as eyes and ears, or possibly causing distractions and drawing attention away from the shooter. I wonder if they attended other Trump rallies to refine their plans. Poor security was exploited without any inside help. I'd like to know what's in the FBI files on Yearick and Hooper!
SeMgCo87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Genuine question; what is the theory of coordination between Crooks and Yearick? I just don't have one. IF it was Yearick on the roof who was killed, what happened to Crooks, and what was he doing when the former was taken out?

If this was in fact coordinated as a hit, as is the theory, why were both Crooks and Yearick involved, and why did both disappear afterward (obviously one is dead)? As simple as misdirection, as with the 'man on the water tower' or heavily photographed primary/near counter-sniper team that didn't take the shot? Useful distraction as with Cheatle's DEI idiocy on parade?
I can't call it a theory...more like an hypothesis...why would both be walking around that Butler site as "persons of interest"?

At 20, Crooks probably has trouble peeing in a toilet in the morning...and he was rejected by his HS shooting team. So, I have my doubts he was proficient enough to take/make that shot...Yearick has a history of hating both Trump and the establishment. And was supposedly practicing shooting at the same range as Police...the only thing mentioned about Crooks and the practice range is that he was seen there...but no confirmation/pictures or receipts...

That is also the case with most of this crap...we have lots of conspiracy theories...lots of facts and a timeline, but no confirmation from the F_I, C_A or any other Fed investigative organization...even of the timeline...

And Wray deliberately throwing shade on the "bullet" ... misinforming us that it could also be a fragment of something...be it teleprompter glass (how can they justify that angle???), or bullet fragment, or piece of an alien spacecraft.

It boils down to this...they do not want to tell the American Public anything...even though simpler is better, I am beginning to think this whole plot is way more complex than some dumb 20 yr old trying to shoot Trump.

"You are being watched..."
RGLAG85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SeMgCo87 said:

nortex97 said:

Genuine question; what is the theory of coordination between Crooks and Yearick? I just don't have one. IF it was Yearick on the roof who was killed, what happened to Crooks, and what was he doing when the former was taken out?

If this was in fact coordinated as a hit, as is the theory, why were both Crooks and Yearick involved, and why did both disappear afterward (obviously one is dead)? As simple as misdirection, as with the 'man on the water tower' or heavily photographed primary/near counter-sniper team that didn't take the shot? Useful distraction as with Cheatle's DEI idiocy on parade?
I can't call it a theory...more like an hypothesis...why would both be walking around that Butler site as "persons of interest"?

At 20, Crooks probably has trouble peeing in a toilet in the morning...and he was rejected by his HS shooting team. So, I have my doubts he was proficient enough to take/make that shot...Yearick has a history of hating both Trump and the establishment. And was supposedly practicing shooting at the same range as Police...the only thing mentioned about Crooks and the practice range is that he was seen there...but no confirmation/pictures or receipts...

That is also the case with most of this crap...we have lots of conspiracy theories...lots of facts and a timeline, but no confirmation from the F_I, C_A or any other Fed investigative organization...even of the timeline...

And Wray deliberately throwing shade on the "bullet" ... misinforming us that it could also be a fragment of something...be it teleprompter glass (how can they justify that angle???), or bullet fragment, or piece of an alien spacecraft.

It boils down to this...they do not want to tell the American Public anything...even though simpler is better, I am beginning to think this whole plot is way more complex than some dumb 20 yr old trying to shoot Trump.
Has anyone explained why the two local LE snipers left the building that had them covering that sector, including the roof? I know they say "to look for Crooks", but are we to believe, while Trump was on stage, they just said, the hell with our assigned coverage, let's leave this area unprotected and go look for some guy? Who gave them the order to leave at that moment? If these guys were trained snipers, they're high valued individuals for that one task. The ones I've known have been very singularly minded individuals and would only leave if directed too. It just seems too convenient of an answer.

And the sniper changing his focus to the trees lines up with the video I saw of the man, who was shot through the side, the woman's purse being hit, then the bullet disintegrate on the rail, all on the top row of the stands to the left of Trump. That angle couldn't be achieved from the building angle. The angle I'm describing was depicted in the video above of the SS sniper changing his focus.
Leonard H. Stringfield
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"It was a weather balloon" is/was the greatest of all.
"Roswell, 1947, there was a uap (ufo) that crashed, in fact there were 2 uaps, 1 crashed and one flew away and the other one did not and was recovered by the US GOVERNMENT."
- Lue Elizondo-former director of the Pentagon's Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program-August 20, 2024

Are A&M's core values..optional? Who has the POWER to determine that? Are certain departments exempt? Why?

Farsight Institute, Atlanta, GA

Coppell97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This guy makes a good point. It's been media blackout on trump since J6th They took 2-weeks off for this story and now it's back to black.
Just an Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


I knew USSS skipped out on the joint briefing that morning but zero comms with supporting security elements (State/federal/local) until after the hit/attempt? WTAF yet again, if true.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wray testifying Tuesday in a Senate hearing (closed doors). Will be interesting what Senator Johnson reports back:

Quote:

Now, he did say in that briefing that he can't defend, you know, what happened in Butler. I don't think anybody could. I did ask him. Found out that apparently -- because there were -- there were reports that the snipers had the, you know, assassin in their sights for minutes, asked for permission, were denied permission to take him out. That apparently is false. That's what he told us. They acquired him after the shots were fired.

But again, we need -- we need detailed interviews with those individuals to find out exactly what happened. It's unbelievable how little information has been coming from federal law enforcement. But those are just some of the questions I have, is exactly what happened.

We want a detailed timeline. We need all their communications, both written emails, text, but also we need voice recordings of any verbal communication.

Here's what we did find out when my staff, you know, committee staff went down to Butler on Friday. First of all, at 5:45, the sniper teams, the Secret Service did receive the photos of Crooks and they knew he was at the AGR building. So this is 26 minutes before he took his first shot. So we've had that confirmed.

We also have confirmed that the radios that local law enforcement gave the Secret Service sniper teams were never used by the Secret Service. So again, all the communication was channeled. People were, you know, the sniper and SWAT teams were on different communication channels than the patrol officers, different communication channels from the Secret Service, all funneled in through a central communications system, which obviously delayed things and allowed this tragedy to happen.
Channeling/separate radio communications between different groups is not 'conspiratorial' imho (it's actually pretty tough to sync up encrypted radio comms between systems, yet it's much harder when they don't even talk to each other that day at all), but the fact that they had those images at 5:45 and took 26 minutes to do…functionally not a damn single thing to protect Trump is the most damning single fact.

Add that if Seymour Hersh is right…that Obama threatened "Joe" with the 25th amendment last week unless he dropped out, that's also problematic, as in my view it makes it likely Obama was reacting with this coup timing to the missed hit. And I know a lot of folks won't agree with me on this, but I always think to 'Cherchez la femme' in these matters around Obama because he is a moron stooge front man himself, and suspect Valerie Jarret's involvement.

After all, if there was an Iranian threat on Trump, it likely would have run through Valerie. She's been critical for a while of the Bidens, was instrumental in pushing the HRC Russian interference in the Trump presidency, her book was called after all "When the Perfect plan crumbles, the adventure begins" and loves working in the shadows in DC. Of course she's also all aboard the Kamala train this week. Oh, and by the way, Kim Cheatle is also from the Chicago political machine, from Illinois. She's been labeled a "Dr. Jill" hire but I suspect was also a Jarrett fan club insider.
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RGLAG85 said:

SeMgCo87 said:

nortex97 said:

Genuine question; what is the theory of coordination between Crooks and Yearick? I just don't have one. IF it was Yearick on the roof who was killed, what happened to Crooks, and what was he doing when the former was taken out?

If this was in fact coordinated as a hit, as is the theory, why were both Crooks and Yearick involved, and why did both disappear afterward (obviously one is dead)? As simple as misdirection, as with the 'man on the water tower' or heavily photographed primary/near counter-sniper team that didn't take the shot? Useful distraction as with Cheatle's DEI idiocy on parade?
I can't call it a theory...more like an hypothesis...why would both be walking around that Butler site as "persons of interest"?

At 20, Crooks probably has trouble peeing in a toilet in the morning...and he was rejected by his HS shooting team. So, I have my doubts he was proficient enough to take/make that shot...Yearick has a history of hating both Trump and the establishment. And was supposedly practicing shooting at the same range as Police...the only thing mentioned about Crooks and the practice range is that he was seen there...but no confirmation/pictures or receipts...

That is also the case with most of this crap...we have lots of conspiracy theories...lots of facts and a timeline, but no confirmation from the F_I, C_A or any other Fed investigative organization...even of the timeline...

And Wray deliberately throwing shade on the "bullet" ... misinforming us that it could also be a fragment of something...be it teleprompter glass (how can they justify that angle???), or bullet fragment, or piece of an alien spacecraft.

It boils down to this...they do not want to tell the American Public anything...even though simpler is better, I am beginning to think this whole plot is way more complex than some dumb 20 yr old trying to shoot Trump.
Has anyone explained why the two local LE snipers left the building that had them covering that sector, including the roof? I know they say "to look for Crooks", but are we to believe, while Trump was on stage, they just said, the hell with our assigned coverage, let's leave this area unprotected and go look for some guy? Who gave them the order to leave at that moment? If these guys were trained snipers, they're high valued individuals for that one task. The ones I've known have been very singularly minded individuals and would only leave if directed too. It just seems too convenient of an answer.

And the sniper changing his focus to the trees lines up with the video I saw of the man, who was shot through the side, the woman's purse being hit, then the bullet disintegrate on the rail, all on the top row of the stands to the left of Trump. That angle couldn't be achieved from the building angle. The angle I'm describing was depicted in the video above of the SS sniper changing his focus.


The new 10 min vid on the other thread shows multiple officers with guns drawn attempting to gain LOS on the roof yet the two cops who had LOS of the roof depart their post.

Cue the "mmm OK" meme.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This I think is the 'other' new video posted (clearly from a bystander, caution, profanity):



To me, this sort of 'seals the deal' that it was only one shooter, on the roof, but I'll wait for the 'experts' to clarify/study. It does seem as though the local cops…really rushed "Crooks" in their response. The 3 or 4 rapid fire after the first shot were unlikely to be precisely aimed.
sam callahan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you were going to encourage/allow/induce a shooter, what would you have done differently?

That many security gaps can't be reasonably explained by incompetence. It certainly could be explained by a script.
SeMgCo87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

This I think is the 'other' new video posted (clearly from a bystander, caution, profanity):



To me, this sort of 'seals the deal' that it was only one shooter, on the roof, but I'll wait for the 'experts' to clarify/study. It does seem as though the local cops…really rushed "Crooks" in their response. The 3 or 4 rapid fire after the first shot were unlikely to be precisely aimed.
Agreed, but it was Yearick on the roof, not Crooks.

If the ******pic of Crooks is real, then Crooks would not want a scraggly beard to detract from his new she/her face...and Crooks has a pointy chin, unlike the dead shooter on the roof, and his Yearick likeness.

**The silence of Crooks' parents is deafening and why no media curiosity??
**Why the abhorrent lack of communication and coordination?
**F_I has not revealed any contents of his phone, other than throw shade at everything under the sun?
**Why did they spend a week in silence, then put Cheatle on the stand, who admitted nothing?
**C_A denies it used MKULTRA on Crooks...at what point in the past has C_A admitted to anything?
**Yearick verbally hated Trump, and all authority, why has investigation totally avoided him?
**There probably is a second shooter, or three...maybe 4, but I suspect he is a US agent...on the Tower, in the building under Yearick...or two in there.

Conspiracy, yeah...NO.
And it's not a boating accident, either.


"You are being watched..."
sleepybeagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So...was Trump and the security team just unlucky? Or... was it opportunity meeting preparation?

You could argue the SS gave the Crooks the opportunity by their "ineptness" - but how did Crooks know that that roof would be unguarded? He seemed very prepared.
sleepybeagle
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Advance site work failure.


JamesE4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

It's not gonna just go away.



The media may not talk about it but the people will, and some US officials are trying to get the word out:






Scar didn't directly kill Mufasa, but he set in motion the events that led to it.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Erik Prince and Shawn Ryan are…worth listening to.



Skip to 14 minutes if you want to skip the header stuff.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump's team wonders why they weren't alerted:

Quote:

The Trump detail's first warning came when Crooks began to open fire at 6:11 p.m., eight minutes after Trump took the stage.

Some of Trump's top advisers, who were located under a large white tent behind the stage, initially believed the sound of gunfire was fireworks and did not immediately take cover, the newspaper reported.

Trump advisers told the outlet they first learned of concerns when the shooting was happening, stressing that they did not know why they were told of the suspicious person report so they could decide whether to delay Trump's speech.

"Nobody mentioned it. Nobody said there was a problem," Trump told Fox News' Jesse Watters. "They could've said, 'Let's wait for 15 minutes, 20 minutes, five minutes,' something. Nobody said I think that was a mistake."

A Secret Service official told The Post that investigators are still working to determine whether anyone told Trump's security detail or other Secret Service operational teams about the suspicious person report.
The official said reports of suspicious people are fairly common at some public events and sometimes are not enough of a concern that plans need to be changed or that the senior official's security detail needs to be notified.
I'd say the guy on a roof with a gun a hundred thirty yards away was something that needed more prompt action, but that's just me.

Proud to say I didn't fall for a single one of these 'conspiracies:'


No reason Wray couldn't disclose this data in the Senate hearings today:

That is, if there isn't a conspiracy the FBI is yet again involved in covering up.
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mike Benz is stating two separate Federal LEAs were supposed to have been covering that roof top and it appears both lost or abandoned responsibility at the same time. Thats very telling if true.

He also said hsi had more agents in on J6 as the fbi did.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Vindman traitor sitting behind one of the SS testifying.
Madman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just a thought on the ear from the dead man photo.



Crooks appears to have a very similar ear. So maybe not Maxwell. Just something I noticed while listening to a poor quality video about the event.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We did find out that the FBI has conducted forensic testing on the three explosive devices (two in car, one incomplete one at home) meaning they have analyzed those materials. Has there been a search warrant issued for the Yearick Armory for comparison purposes?

Or has the FBI dismissed the AZ plates connection because Crooks appeared to get his materials through encrypted purchases?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
On further review from what I have read the Yearick armory is unconnected to the Yearick thought to be on scene. II haven't seen any real proof it's owned by his parents, if he was in fact the shooter.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

On further review from what I have read the Yearick armory is unconnected to the Yearick thought to be on scene. II haven't seen any real proof it's owned by his parents, if he was in fact the shooter.
Thanks. Had not heard that.
SeMgCo87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Madman said:

Just a thought on the ear from the dead man photo.



Crooks appears to have a very similar ear. So maybe not Maxwell. Just something I noticed while listening to a poor quality video about the event.
Facial shape for dead shooter is different than Crooks face above...the above is more angular, with pointy chin...

Dead shooter is Yearick. Eyes appear further apart as well...

"You are being watched..."
Madman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I will caution everyone myself included to take the photographic evidence with a grain of salt. Unfortunately, we are working with screenshots of screenshots in some instances.

Even after we take out the problems with cell phone cameras, pictures have a tendency to get warped in these instances
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Madman said:

I will caution everyone myself included to take the photographic evidence with a grain of salt. Unfortunately, we are working with screenshots of screenshots in some instances.

Even after we take out the problems with cell phone cameras, pictures have a tendency to get warped in these instances
That is true. Pixels get filled in.
Madman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And I think the pic of the dead shooter could be a screen shot from a video.

Video is always a little off even after correcting for lens issues. The way each frame is made means that the upper right of the image is older than the bottom left. And the video capture software also makes educated guesses when it perceives camera movement.


I do think the odd ear fold on the picture I posted looks a lot like the dead man's ear. Very distinct.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hotair.com on Mayorkas:

Quote:

Was Mayorkas responsible for the attempted assassination's near success? I think there is a good argument that he is.

Just to be clear, I don't think Mayorkas arranged a hit on Donald Trump. Even for him this would be a bridge too far.

Rather, he has been a key part of the campaign to demonize Trump and fully on board with ramping up the political temperature, and he likely was involved in ensuring that Trump's team was denied the resources it needed and requested to protect the once and former president.

We are all focused on the wrong target when it comes to the grotesque failures of the Secret Service, or at least we are missing the fact that the top of the chain of command for the Secret Service wasn't Kimberly Cheatle, but Alejandro Mayorkas. It is he who ultimately ran the Secret Service, and he should be held responsible.
I could see it. He has melted down a few times about Trump policies etc. when forced to talk on camera about his sedition.

He is precisely the vermin I am most excited to vote out this year. His deliberate empowerment/enrichment of Mexican drug cartels and human/sex trafficking is disgusting beyond my ability to describe on this site per terms of service.
Madman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I guess I just missed this or maybe it is new

Claims Crooks threatened to shoot up his own HS five years earlier. And that Crooks was very interested in Ethan Crumbley the Oxford High shooter



But of course this is the first time I have watched anything on this channel and it is fringe.
Madman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG



Dead shooter pic on the left, Crooks yearbook photo right.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This just dropped.

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.