TarponChaser said:

---

Beast of Burden said:

---

Quote:

---

1) you don't think seeing a dude dressed like he was would make you wonder if he was right in the head? No need to escalate, just escort him around, placate him, and try to get him to leave.

---

Fantasyland.

Wow hahahaha.

---

Considering multiple cop friends said that's what they'd do in such a situation your position is fantasy.

---

So all I have to do to breach the capitol, or any high-value location, is dress up in a cosplay outfit and I get full VIP access? Noted.

93MarineHorn said:

---

Yes, she was trespassing.....along with hundreds of others. This cop chose lethal force for one small woman doing what many other more formidable looking men were doing. Very strange, selective and cowardly use of force.

---

There was cowardly actions used by everyone involved...including the rioters beating people with flag poles. It was unfortunate she was killed...But there was one sure fire way it could have all been avoided...for everyone. Don't bum rush the U.S. Capitol. Sorry...they all played silly games and some won sillier prizes than others.

Franklin Comes Alive! said:

---

Says that Tucker cherry picked clips while posting a clip of cherry picked clips


Impressive

---

Next level

TarponChaser said:

---

1) you don't think seeing a dude dressed like he was would make you wonder if he was right in the head? No need to escalate, just escort him around, placate him, and try to get him to leave.

---

That's such a stupid take I didn't bother reading the rest. LOLOLOLOLOLOL!

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Is there a poster with less credibility here? And posting a tweet from Liz Cheney, a woman who knew their narrative was a lie but went along with the fascists anyway?

Who is Ray Epps?

---

ad hominem fallacy

One big difference between BLM riots and Jan 6th is the gov't didn't form a biased committee and lie, fabricate, slant opinion, and withhold information from you about BLM riots. While many Dems in leadership and the media nevertheless tried to downplay BLM riots and in some cases supported them, it wasn't state sponsored propaganda using incendiary language like "insurrection" like Jan 6th clearly was.

Most reasonable people on here don't deny that violence took place and that some broke the law and should have been held accountable. The objection is to the open deceit by the government into how serious it actually was and the political hay they attempted to make of it all the way to the 2022 midterms and still trying to make hay of it today and also the way the gov't is allegedly treating those who participated in it.

All the right pigs are squealing though on this sunlight being shined upon their "investigation"

The entire premise of the OP is incorrect.

He clearly believes that I don't support the use of citizen force to hold our government in check when it errs to the side of corruption or extending its own power beyond the limited government role clearly designed in the founding documents of our country.

I do not hold such a a belief. I do not put "rule of law" above the will of the people (the definition of Democracy), inalienable rights, or freedom.

In fact, I hold the opposite view. I believe when government goes too far and oppressed those freedoms - it is our OBLIGATION to overthrow it by force.

What I see in your video are people who have just about had enough of a corrupt DC swamp

AggieCo2023 said:

---

Can someone explain how Tucker showing cherry picked clips without violence is any different than what Conservatives accused Liberals of doing with the BLM protests? Conservatives ridiculed the phrase "mostly peaceful" protests endlessly all to turn around and do the same thing with Jan 6th. Do they think we didn't see the footage of them fighting Capitol Police. Hitting them with weapons? Multiple dead?

---

I did not see any deaths... Your creds are used up on that.

FYI Yes Tucker and Democrats cherry pick. So what is the ratio of violence vs peaceful protest. I would stand on the side of the peaceful protest, I cannot say the same about BLM or antifa.

FrioAg 00 said:

---

The entire premise of the OP is incorrect.

He clearly believes that I don't support the use of citizen force to hold our government in check when it errs to the side of corruption or extending its own power beyond the limited government role clearly designed in the founding documents of our country.

I do not hold such a a belief. I do not put "rule of law" above the will of the people (the definition of Democracy), inalienable rights, or freedom.

In fact, I hold the opposite view. I believe when government goes too far and oppressed those freedoms - it is our OBLIGATION to overthrow it by force.

What I see in your video are people who have just about had enough of a corrupt DC swamp

---

It's as if these folks have no clue as to how this country was founded and the purpose behind the Declaration of Independance and the Constitution. If they'd been the populace in the 1760s and 1770s, we'd still be subjects of the Crown.

TarponChaser said:

---

Beast of Burden said:

---

Quote:

---

1) you don't think seeing a dude dressed like he was would make you wonder if he was right in the head? No need to escalate, just escort him around, placate him, and try to get him to leave.

---

Fantasyland.

Wow hahahaha.

---

Considering multiple cop friends said that's what they'd do in such a situation your position is fantasy.

---

Even when they pass the group of 10 cops just standing around? No one else is around to intervene.

Slicer97 said:

---

FrioAg 00 said:

---

The entire premise of the OP is incorrect.

He clearly believes that I don't support the use of citizen force to hold our government in check when it errs to the side of corruption or extending its own power beyond the limited government role clearly designed in the founding documents of our country.

I do not hold such a a belief. I do not put "rule of law" above the will of the people (the definition of Democracy), inalienable rights, or freedom.

In fact, I hold the opposite view. I believe when government goes too far and oppressed those freedoms - it is our OBLIGATION to overthrow it by force.

What I see in your video are people who have just about had enough of a corrupt DC swamp

---

It's as if these folks have no clue as to how this country was founded and the purpose behind the Declaration of Independance and the Constitution. If they'd been the populace in the 1760s and 1770s, we'd still be subjects of the Crown.

---

Op and his/her ilk only value the constitution when it's convenient for them. You press them on real riots, like those carried out in Summer 2020, and they try to claim they never saw such riots. They never saw federal buildings burned, churches desecrated, towns and city halls destroyed, and local/federal law enforcement attacked and seriously injured.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

TarponChaser said:

---

1) you don't think seeing a dude dressed like he was would make you wonder if he was right in the head? No need to escalate, just escort him around, placate him, and try to get him to leave.

---

That's such a stupid take I didn't bother reading the rest. LOLOLOLOLOLOL!

---

Yea, not buying that they were using some sort of 4d chess on buffalo shaman.

In certain instances the police would deescalate. With multiple VIPs in the building, several with specific personal security details, no unknown threat is going to be escorted around and let into other areas.

Conversely, the only remotely reasonable excuse for Ashli Babbit was that supposedly the guard was standing in front of access to (classified) secure holding area prior to evac. Of course, this fits neatly into the narrative of why he discharged.

Will be interesting if there is another angle of the ashli babbit shooting. There absolutely should be 3 if not 4 HD views of that area. Stay tuned?

Quote:

---

There was cowardly actions used by everyone involved...including the rioters beating people with flag poles. It was unfortunate she was killed...But there was one sure fire way it could have all been avoided...for everyone. Don't bum rush the U.S. Capitol. Sorry...they all played silly games and some won sillier prizes than others.

---

Thank you for this insightful post that hasn't been vomited out a dozen times on this thread. Hopefully you won't hold the next cop that blows away an unarmed woman during a riot to the same standard of cowardice and give him a pass.

AggieCo2023 said:

---

One lesson of Jan 6 is this: Trump’s lies, spread on TV & social media, provoked a violent attack on our Capitol. No responsible adult, and especially no American pledged to our Constitution, should deny what happened or repeat the same reckless lies. pic.twitter.com/MReMysC534

— Liz Cheney (@Liz_Cheney) March 7, 2023

Can someone explain how Tucker showing cherry picked clips without violence is any different than what Conservatives accused Liberals of doing with the BLM protests? Conservatives ridiculed the phrase "mostly peaceful" protests endlessly all to turn around and do the same thing with Jan 6th. Do they think we didn't see the footage of them fighting Capitol Police. Hitting them with weapons? Multiple dead?

---

What quote from Trump incited violence exactly?

Did he suggest "unrest in the streets" ?
did he suggest "protestors should not let up"
Did he suggest that "if you see anyone from the Cabinet you should push back and tell them they are not welcome anymore?"
Did he ask "why there aren't uprisings any more?"

93MarineHorn said:

---

Quote:

---

There was cowardly actions used by everyone involved...including the rioters beating people with flag poles. It was unfortunate she was killed...But there was one sure fire way it could have all been avoided...for everyone. Don't bum rush the U.S. Capitol. Sorry...they all played silly games and some won sillier prizes than others.

---

Thank you for this insightful post that hasn't been vomited out a dozen times on this thread. Hopefully you won't hold the next cop that blows away an unarmed woman during a riot to the same standard of cowardice and give him a pass.

---

I supported cops shooting people trying to bum rush an attack when rioting.

If you aren't out there acting like a thug fool, the officers can't shoot you there.

WHOOP!'91 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Zero justification? You watch the same video I did?

She is a textbook "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" example.

---

Whatever else the video shows, Ashli was a small, unarmed female. In no police manual does she deserve to have lethal forced used on her without even trying to taze or otherwise subdue.

---

No ***** Let say Ashli was black and the capitol police officer was white. There would have been actual riots in DC for a month and all the liberal news media would have exposes on young Ashli's life snuffed out too soon by racist cops. There would be St Ashli monuments next to St George Floyd monuments all over America.

barbacoa taco said:

---

Gigem314 said:

---

barbacoa taco said:

---

Gigem314 said:

---

Bryanisbest said:

---

It does show the absolute truth about one thing for sure: the police were very accommodating to the main protester and were more like tour guides of the Capitol for him. Not afraid, not threatened, not forceful, not barring the way to anything, but inviting. This fact alone raises a lot of questions about the Jan 6 committee narrative.

---

And that's why the politicians and media who tried to make this look like another Benghazi or 9/11 are so enraged. They lied to create the narrative...and the leaked video disproves that narrative.

Security let the protesters and sight-seeing tourists in...then things escalated. It wasn't a coordinated and planned attack. The summer 2020 violent riots were more coordinated and planned than Jan 6 was.

---

they let SOME protesters in. They weren't sight-seeing tourists, they were protesters who didn't get violent. And most of them barged through the barriers and broke in. and the security was vastly outnumbered and probably undertrained and had no idea how to handle a situation like that, and thought the best course of action was path of least resistance.

no amount of pointing out how some people were peaceful is going to rid the stench of the bad things that happened on that day, much like the 2020 riots.

---

But yet the 2020 riots are pretty much ignored by DC...no significant arrests...no investigations...no committees on primetime television. And we're told by people like our current VP that Jan 6 belongs in the same breath as 9/11 and Pearl Harbor...they treat it like a holiday now. It wasn't coordinated, it was a protest that got out of hand. The House leadership was asked to provide additional security on Jan 6...and refused.

Just another example of people not trusting elected leaders and the media.

---

It feels like that's all this is really about, the 2020 riots. It always comes back to that. Any discussion of 1/6 and it being bad is met with "but what about BLM." So really, Tucker's segment was just a f*** you segment.

Of course it's mind-numbingly stupid to compare 1/6 to 9/11. But I'm not going to let talking heads like Tucker, Trump, and people who support them to continue to try to normalize 1/6 and act like it wasn't a big deal. It was a big deal and was a bad day for America, and no amount of showing nice, nonviolent protesters is going to change that.

---

It was only a big deal if you are a smooth brain and it was not a bad day for America. Calling it an insurrection is an insult to actual insurrections, and maybe one day we will see a real one.

samurai_science said:

---

barbacoa taco said:

---

Gigem314 said:

---

barbacoa taco said:

---

Gigem314 said:

---

Bryanisbest said:

---

It does show the absolute truth about one thing for sure: the police were very accommodating to the main protester and were more like tour guides of the Capitol for him. Not afraid, not threatened, not forceful, not barring the way to anything, but inviting. This fact alone raises a lot of questions about the Jan 6 committee narrative.

---

And that's why the politicians and media who tried to make this look like another Benghazi or 9/11 are so enraged. They lied to create the narrative...and the leaked video disproves that narrative.

Security let the protesters and sight-seeing tourists in...then things escalated. It wasn't a coordinated and planned attack. The summer 2020 violent riots were more coordinated and planned than Jan 6 was.

---

they let SOME protesters in. They weren't sight-seeing tourists, they were protesters who didn't get violent. And most of them barged through the barriers and broke in. and the security was vastly outnumbered and probably undertrained and had no idea how to handle a situation like that, and thought the best course of action was path of least resistance.

no amount of pointing out how some people were peaceful is going to rid the stench of the bad things that happened on that day, much like the 2020 riots.

---

But yet the 2020 riots are pretty much ignored by DC...no significant arrests...no investigations...no committees on primetime television. And we're told by people like our current VP that Jan 6 belongs in the same breath as 9/11 and Pearl Harbor...they treat it like a holiday now. It wasn't coordinated, it was a protest that got out of hand. The House leadership was asked to provide additional security on Jan 6...and refused.

Just another example of people not trusting elected leaders and the media.

---

It feels like that's all this is really about, the 2020 riots. It always comes back to that. Any discussion of 1/6 and it being bad is met with "but what about BLM." So really, Tucker's segment was just a f*** you segment.

Of course it's mind-numbingly stupid to compare 1/6 to 9/11. But I'm not going to let talking heads like Tucker, Trump, and people who support them to continue to try to normalize 1/6 and act like it wasn't a big deal. It was a big deal and was a bad day for America, and no amount of showing nice, nonviolent protesters is going to change that.

---

It was only a big deal if you are a smooth brain and it was not a bad day for America. Calling it an insurrection is an insult to actual insurrections, and maybe one day we will see a real one.

---

InSUrrEcSHUn

Do it right, and yes I agree.
There have been bigger insurrections in my toilet.

OP quoted JoJo. How dumb can one person be?

TheEternalPessimist said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TheEternalPessimist said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Zero justification? You watch the same video I did?

She is a textbook "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" example.

---

It's ok to kill unarmed protestors as long as they are white and likely to be conservatives.

Got it.

---

I don't care if they're purple AOC liberals.

---

I call BS. You, like every other leftist, like the imbalance of justice and law used to punish your political adversaries.

Compare the mitigation of justice on J6 tourists, who did NOTHING compared to the riots at the White House, riots and attacks on Federal buildings in Portland, and riots and mobs during the 2020 'summer of love'.........

This charade is ending soon - and you will not like what is on the other side. I am not sure I will either for that matter..... but the pendulum will swing.... and your woke cult is going to be held accountable at every level of society. Media, Cultural institutions, Government, and those who participated in your Communist mobs.

---

You can call BS all you want, I said the same thing about the looters/vandals during the BLM riots.

You want to paint people with a broad brush, but have NOTHING to support that POV - it just fits your worldview.

NM, read wrong

Tanya 93 said:

---

93MarineHorn said:

---

Quote:

---

She got what she came for. She was brainwashed by Q. I'm sorry she had to die.

---

But why her? Why did the weeping little b/tch pick Ashley Babbitt to shoot, an unarmed woman, instead of all the actual violent MEN that were there? Perhaps he feared killing a Fed.

---

She was the one climbing thru the window?

---

Another brilliant take by Tanya. You should stick to the General Board, you're in over your head here.

TarponChaser said:

---

The intransigence of both sides here is absurd.

It is 100% true that there were a large number of protestors who were violent and bent on destruction.

It is also 100% true that there were many more protestors who were little more than peaceful, well-behaved gawkers.

The video of the police walking around with Chansley is not remotely evidence that he was "on a guided tour." The police were outnumbered by what? 10 to1? The estimates I've seen have the number of police inside the building at 195 and the number of protestors in the Capitol at over 2,000. They damn sure knew they couldn't physically escalate things to remove protestors forcibly without likely being overrun and causing an even larger outbreak of violence so they shadowed him to make sure he didn't get too far out of line. So he wasn't being violent but he wasn't just being shown around like a Congressional tourist.

And while Trump didn't cross the line and call for violence or anything like that, he damn sure stirred the pot. He ran a ****ty campaign vs. Sleepy Joe and the media (you want real collusion, the virtual hand-in-glove relationship between the Dems, MSM, and social media is the real threat to our republic) but the way he handled covid and the complete inability to not have diarrhea of the mouth or fingers via Twitter sunk his candidacy. Not actual fraudulent votes as every damn bit of evidence has shown. Hell, the majority of his advisors told him the same thing. There's no bureaucracy or political machine in this country capable of pulling off such a large-scale fraud. The simple truth is Trump fcked up and he couldn't handle the fact that he's responsible for people voting against him and instead figured a benign vegetable would be the lesser of two evils.

I personally didn't but his behavior post-election and his continual whining, petty, vindictiveness and how he's effectively caused major losses in 2018, 2020, and 2022 should relegate him to the dust-bin of history.

Hell, he's somehow manage to convince millions of people that actual conservative policies and good governance makes one a RINO. Trump only cares about Trump, the fact we got some good justices on SCOTUS and lower courts is the only good thing he accomplished and that's because he listened to actual conservatives from the Federalist Society. The rest of his policies are largely undone by the proverbial "pen and a phone" because for all his claims about making deals he couldn't actually do it.

Time to move past him and his acolytes.

---

FWIW, I think the posters on right are the ones more prone to dismissing this entirely. I think it was overblown and have said as much on this thread, but it wasn't nothing. It's an embarrassing day for Republicans at best with their leader cheering on the crowd in morning at his rally (about his delusions of stolen elections) and his silence during most of the days events when he could have spoken up was deafening. (Please if someone is going to pull his tweets make sure you have your time zones right, I've engaged a few of you on this topic before).

Beast of Burden said:

---

barbacoa taco said:

---

Gigem314 said:

---

Bryanisbest said:

---

It does show the absolute truth about one thing for sure: the police were very accommodating to the main protester and were more like tour guides of the Capitol for him. Not afraid, not threatened, not forceful, not barring the way to anything, but inviting. This fact alone raises a lot of questions about the Jan 6 committee narrative.

---

And that's why the politicians and media who tried to make this look like another Benghazi or 9/11 are so enraged. They lied to create the narrative...and the leaked video disproves that narrative.

Security let the protesters and sight-seeing tourists in...then things escalated. It wasn't a coordinated and planned attack. The summer 2020 violent riots were more coordinated and planned than Jan 6 was.

---

they let SOME protesters in. They weren't sight-seeing tourists, they were protesters who didn't get violent. And most of them barged through the barriers and broke in. and the security was vastly outnumbered and probably undertrained and had no idea how to handle a situation like that, and thought the best course of action was path of least resistance.

---

Good. Grief.

In your hypothetical you just posted, it seems like it would have been a good idea for someone like maybe...I don't know...Nancy Pelosi...to NOT ignore requests for additional security that day? Just spitballing here.

Things that (*SHOULD*) make you go hmmmmm...

Some of you really need to either educate yourselves on the entire situation or sit out the discussion. Good grief.

---

Or maybe the loser president doesn't have a rally to get his rabid supporters fired up since he's lost every challenge to date in courts? MAYBE that would have been the move as well?

93MarineHorn said:

---

Yes, she was trespassing.....along with hundreds of others. This cop chose lethal force for one small woman doing what many other more formidable looking men were doing. Very strange, selective and cowardly use of force.

---

Nobody else tried to come through door/barricade I bet.

Rodney Ruxin said:

---

How many people were killed and how much property damage was there as a result of the 1/6 compared to let's just say, the summer riots of 2020?

Do you think this is an apples to apples comparison? You may want to start there to help answer your question.

---

So why weren't those people prosecuted by Trump DOJ where they had jurisdiction (I believe they did on several incidents)? Send them to jail, same as these asshats at capital.

FrioAg 00 said:

---

The entire premise of the OP is incorrect.
...
What I see in your video are people who have just about had enough of a corrupt DC swamp

---

Didn't Martin Luther King Jr. say that "A riot is the language of the unheard?"

Perhaps Jan 6th is the result being called "JIM CROW RACIST" when the suggest is made that perhaps people should show their IDs when voting?

Perhaps Jan 6th is the result of our government and media screaming RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA for two years and impeaching a sitting president when the whole thing was a big democrat lie?

Perhaps Jan 6th is the result when big media sensors voices on the right...including the president?

Perhaps Jan 6th is the result of voting results "conveniently" not being tallied until days after the election.

Perhaps Jan 6th was the result of people who really care and love this country who hate to see it being torn apart for political power and gain?

Perhaps Jan 6th was the result of being blamed for every social ill in this country when all most of us do is go to work everyday, love our family, and pay our taxes?

But... most likely Jan 6th was the hoped for and planned result of Pelosi intentionally not protecting the capital with adequate security measures while the FBI fanned the flames.

AggieCo2023 said:

---

Cmon Tucker is clearly trying to downplay what happened on Jan 6th. Just because every second wasn't mass chaos and violence doesn't prove much.

---

is there anything to "up play"? Or was the capital burned to the ground and firefight broke out and I missed it?

Ragoo said:

---

AggieCo2023 said:

---

Cmon Tucker is clearly trying to downplay what happened on Jan 6th. Just because every second wasn't mass chaos and violence doesn't prove much.

---

is there anything to "up play"? Or was the capital burned to the ground and firefight broke out and I missed it?

---

Exactly! I am okay with him trying to downplay it, because it was nothing and I hate the left. This is a cold war at the moment and ANY tactic is valid.

Quote:

---

FWIW, I think the posters on right are the ones more prone to dismissing this entirely.

---

I think the posters on the left are the ones more prone to dismissing any challenge to the hyperbole that it was a deadly insurrection to take over the govt. Just look at the angst toward one commentator who presented the idea that the protestors were wrong, but that the govt was also wrong in the way it misled Americans about what really happened.

TXAGFAN said:

---

Rodney Ruxin said:

---

How many people were killed and how much property damage was there as a result of the 1/6 compared to let's just say, the summer riots of 2020?

Do you think this is an apples to apples comparison? You may want to start there to help answer your question.

---

So why weren't those people prosecuted by Trump DOJ where they had jurisdiction (I believe they did on several incidents)? Send them to jail, same as these asshats at capital.

---

You're asking me why people who objectively burnt down property (much of it state property, not that it should matter), hurt, and even killed innocent people weren't prosecuted? Probably because it wasn't politically expedient, which you already know.

Unless you are flat out denying the actions I just referenced occurred. Is that what you're doing?

Rodney Ruxin said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Rodney Ruxin said:

---

How many people were killed and how much property damage was there as a result of the 1/6 compared to let's just say, the summer riots of 2020?

Do you think this is an apples to apples comparison? You may want to start there to help answer your question.

---

So why weren't those people prosecuted by Trump DOJ where they had jurisdiction (I believe they did on several incidents)? Send them to jail, same as these asshats at capital.

---

You're asking me why people who objectively burnt down property (some of it state property, not that it should matter), hurt, and even killed innocent people weren't prosecuted? Probably because it wasn't politically expedient, which you already know.

Unless you are flat out denying the actions I just referenced occurred. Is that what you're doing?

---

So sit down and quit squawking about the lack of prosecutions during BLM riots of summer, that is in part on the Republican executive.

I never said I denied anything happened, i said they should have been prosecuted.

TXAGFAN said:

---

Rodney Ruxin said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Rodney Ruxin said:

---

How many people were killed and how much property damage was there as a result of the 1/6 compared to let's just say, the summer riots of 2020?

Do you think this is an apples to apples comparison? You may want to start there to help answer your question.

---

So why weren't those people prosecuted by Trump DOJ where they had jurisdiction (I believe they did on several incidents)? Send them to jail, same as these asshats at capital.

---

You're asking me why people who objectively burnt down property (some of it state property, not that it should matter), hurt, and even killed innocent people weren't prosecuted? Probably because it wasn't politically expedient, which you already know.

Unless you are flat out denying the actions I just referenced occurred. Is that what you're doing?

---

So sit down and quit squawking about the lack of prosecutions during BLM riots of summer, that is in part on the Republican executive.

I never said I denied anything happened, i said they should have been prosecuted.

---

umm, wouldn't that be local city dem DAs job?

TXAGFAN said:

---

Rodney Ruxin said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Rodney Ruxin said:

---

How many people were killed and how much property damage was there as a result of the 1/6 compared to let's just say, the summer riots of 2020?

Do you think this is an apples to apples comparison? You may want to start there to help answer your question.

---

So why weren't those people prosecuted by Trump DOJ where they had jurisdiction (I believe they did on several incidents)? Send them to jail, same as these asshats at capital.

---

You're asking me why people who objectively burnt down property (some of it state property, not that it should matter), hurt, and even killed innocent people weren't prosecuted? Probably because it wasn't politically expedient, which you already know.

Unless you are flat out denying the actions I just referenced occurred. Is that what you're doing?

---

So sit down and quit squawking about the lack of prosecutions during BLM riots of summer, that is in part on the Republican executive.

I never said I denied anything happened, i said they should have been prosecuted.

---

Wtf are you talking about, you daft hack? I challenged the OP to compare the actual damage and lives lost between 1/6 and the leftist riots (which of course, he did not), to which you immediately deflected to this. You're the one who brought up prosecutions.

Ragoo said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Rodney Ruxin said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Rodney Ruxin said:

---

How many people were killed and how much property damage was there as a result of the 1/6 compared to let's just say, the summer riots of 2020?

Do you think this is an apples to apples comparison? You may want to start there to help answer your question.

---

So why weren't those people prosecuted by Trump DOJ where they had jurisdiction (I believe they did on several incidents)? Send them to jail, same as these asshats at capital.

---

You're asking me why people who objectively burnt down property (some of it state property, not that it should matter), hurt, and even killed innocent people weren't prosecuted? Probably because it wasn't politically expedient, which you already know.

Unless you are flat out denying the actions I just referenced occurred. Is that what you're doing?

---

So sit down and quit squawking about the lack of prosecutions during BLM riots of summer, that is in part on the Republican executive.

I never said I denied anything happened, i said they should have been prosecuted.

---

umm, wouldn't that be local city dem DAs job?

---

In the vast majority of cases, yes. I didn't bring that up owing to the fact this fella seems to be only to tackle one misstatement at once.