"Mostly Peaceful" Capitol Insurrection

13,007 Views | 233 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by fka ftc
Eso si, Que es
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am entirely on board with any provable violence being prosecuted according to our nations laws.

I would welcome any evidence of Trump inciting violence. I don't shy away from these threads and have consistently sided with the rule of law. Where do you stand on rule of law and inciting violence?

One of many examples of Liberal law makers inciting violence with no investigation or repercussions:




AggieCo2023
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is going exactly how I thought it would lol I've been here long enough to know no one's really going to chang their minds
Deplorable
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now do black lives matter.

93MarineHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Can someone explain how Tucker showing cherry picked clips without violence is any different than what Conservatives accused Liberals of doing with the BLM protests? Conservatives ridiculed the phrase "mostly peaceful" protests endlessly all to turn around and do the same thing with Jan 6th. Do they think we didn't see the footage of them fighting Capitol Police. Hitting them with weapons? Multiple dead?
Please educate yourself and try again. A cop killed an unarmed woman walking thru a door. That's the only person who died.
fixer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmellba99 said:

TXAGFAN said:

Zero justification? You watch the same video I did?

She is a textbook "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" example.
I did. And no, there was no justification for the officer to pull his weapon and fire through a glass door into a crowd of people in the manner than he did.

In any other situation, had a civilian done the exact same thing - they would be brought up on murder charges.

But hey, keep towing that party line! I'm sure your overlords will reward you with the gristle off of a chicken bone after they have eaten the meat for your loyalty.


Fantastic post .

The leftists are deeply satisfied that Babbitt was murdered.

Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggies2009 said:

Lol this thread didn't go how OP thought it would
Nothing really seems to.

It would be funny if he weren't teaching kids.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:



Fantastic post .

The leftists are deeply satisfied that Babbitt was murdered.


And as with babies, they'd joyfully kill her again.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fixer said:

schmellba99 said:

TXAGFAN said:

Zero justification? You watch the same video I did?

She is a textbook "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" example.
I did. And no, there was no justification for the officer to pull his weapon and fire through a glass door into a crowd of people in the manner than he did.

In any other situation, had a civilian done the exact same thing - they would be brought up on murder charges.

But hey, keep towing that party line! I'm sure your overlords will reward you with the gristle off of a chicken bone after they have eaten the meat for your loyalty.


Fantastic post .

The leftists are deeply satisfied that Babbitt was murdered.



Compare Babbitt's shooting with that of "Don't Shoot, Hands Up" Michael Brown.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Still waiting for OP to answer my question
93MarineHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

TXAGFAN said:
Zero justification? You watch the same video I did?

She is a textbook "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" example.
Yes, after guiding the Shaman around for a few minutes, the cops should have just pulled their guns and shot him dead. Play stupid games and all, right?
fixer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:

This is going exactly how I thought it would lol I've been here long enough to know no one's really going to chang their minds


So then you were dishonestly asking for feedback and an " answer to your question".

Got it.
fixer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Squadron7 said:

fixer said:

schmellba99 said:

TXAGFAN said:

Zero justification? You watch the same video I did?

She is a textbook "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" example.
I did. And no, there was no justification for the officer to pull his weapon and fire through a glass door into a crowd of people in the manner than he did.

In any other situation, had a civilian done the exact same thing - they would be brought up on murder charges.

But hey, keep towing that party line! I'm sure your overlords will reward you with the gristle off of a chicken bone after they have eaten the meat for your loyalty.


Fantastic post .

The leftists are deeply satisfied that Babbitt was murdered.



Compare Babbitt's shooting with that of "Don't Shoot, Hands Up" Michael Brown.


But why?

Two different scenarios.

Never mind … I get your point now…
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:

This is going exactly how I thought it would lol I've been here long enough to know no one's really going to chang their minds

Your complete inability to mount a convincing argument had nothing to do with this, certainly.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Exactly. For some reason I guess the board needed another J6 hot take thread.
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

American Hardwood said:

AggieCo2023 said:



Can someone explain how Tucker showing cherry picked clips without violence is any different than what Conservatives accused Liberals of doing with the BLM protests? Conservatives ridiculed the phrase "mostly peaceful" protests endlessly all to turn around and do the same thing with Jan 6th. Do they think we didn't see the footage of them fighting Capitol Police. Hitting them with weapons? Multiple dead?
Because Tucker's clips are a response to the what the left did. He cherry picked to show the rest of the story. No need to show the violent parts again, they have already been shown ad nauseum.
Which narrative seems more likely, the one we've seen for a couple years in countless videos and extensive coverage or the clips Tucker found? Use your critical thinking, I know it means you may have to acknowledge Tucker is wrong and this was more than nothing (something even McCarthy has to acknowledge given his previous commentary on the day).
The truth is that some violence occurred, but it was not led by Trump who was not there, and it was not anything closely resembling an insurrection. The truth is that QAnon Shaman was allowed by capital police to essentially free roam the building. The truth is that some people involved were severely punished while others were not. The truth is that this incident was far less destructive than other protests in recent history that were not treated with this much attention by either the government or the MSM. There are many other truths as well.

I am unaware of anything Tucker said that was wrong. I don't have to admit anything. Tucker Carlson isn't that important in the face of these truths.

I can't answer your question directly because I don't know what you think the narrative based on Tucker's clips is.

I do know that any narrative that includes or concludes that what happened on 1/6 was an insurrection is categorically false.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

Exactly. For some reason I guess the board needed another J6 hot take thread.
This beating has been savage.
Franklin Comes Alive!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So in your opinion the weird shaman guy being shown around the capital by officers does or doesn't deserve 4 years in prison?
Garrelli 5000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

American Hardwood said:

AggieCo2023 said:



Can someone explain how Tucker showing cherry picked clips without violence is any different than what Conservatives accused Liberals of doing with the BLM protests? Conservatives ridiculed the phrase "mostly peaceful" protests endlessly all to turn around and do the same thing with Jan 6th. Do they think we didn't see the footage of them fighting Capitol Police. Hitting them with weapons? Multiple dead?
Because Tucker's clips are a response to the what the left did. He cherry picked to show the rest of the story. No need to show the violent parts again, they have already been shown ad nauseum.
Which narrative seems more likely, the one we've seen for a couple years in countless videos and extensive coverage or the clips Tucker found? Use your critical thinking, I know it means you may have to acknowledge Tucker is wrong and this was more than nothing (something even McCarthy has to acknowledge given his previous commentary on the day).
Rich. The J6 committee refused any evidence counter to their pre-planned recommendation of charges. Dems cherry picked which Rs could be on the committee surprise surprise chose the two most rabid never-trumpers with an R next to their name. Wouldn't allow evidence of Pelosi ignoring requests for additional police presence requested well before the day.

You are such a partisan hack that you can't even acknowledge that maybe, just maybe, nobody knows Jack s*** about the truth, because our gov and media are both so corrupt their stories might as well be labeled fiction.

That would mean you lapped up the spoon-fed liberal narrative for years. Incapable of moving from "muh-team" by even attempting to apply logic.
Staff - take out the trash.
Tanya 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheEternalPessimist said:

TXAGFAN said:

Zero justification? You watch the same video I did?

She is a textbook "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" example.
It's ok to kill unarmed protestors as long as they are white and likely to be conservatives.

Got it.





She was climbing thru a broken window of a barricaded door.

Do you let people climb into your home unscathed as long as they are unarmed?
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:

This is going exactly how I thought it would lol I've been here long enough to know no one's really going to chang their minds
Openly admitting you created a troll thread is a bold move.
zoneag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OP is fast approaching "why we shouldn't be worried about inflation" territory. Wonder what her next username will be.
Robert L. Peters
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She got what she came for. She was brainwashed by Q. I'm sorry she had to die.
What you say, Paper Champion? I'm gonna beat you like a dog, a dog, you hear me!
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
anyone that thinks jan 6th is an actual insurrection100% took the covid jab, and believes joe biden got 81 million votes.

if you fall into this category i am a nigerian prince and i need you to help me with some money. just give me all of your bank account info.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tanya 93 said:

TheEternalPessimist said:

TXAGFAN said:

Zero justification? You watch the same video I did?

She is a textbook "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" example.
It's ok to kill unarmed protestors as long as they are white and likely to be conservatives.

Got it.





She was climbing thru a broken window of a barricaded door.

Do you let people climb into your home unscathed as long as they are unarmed?
She was completely surrounded by police. While what she was doing was stupid, I am pretty sure the death penalty is not the legal punishment for it. There was not a family on the other side of that door. She was not going to be able to enter and hurt anyone. That is the definition of excessive force. And that cop didn't even have to face a Grand Jury.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
zoneag said:

OP is fast approaching "why we shouldn't be worried about inflation" territory. Wonder what her next username will be.
Or Tesla is finished territory.

Wait.
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

Tanya 93 said:

TheEternalPessimist said:

TXAGFAN said:

Zero justification? You watch the same video I did?

She is a textbook "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" example.
It's ok to kill unarmed protestors as long as they are white and likely to be conservatives.

Got it.





She was climbing thru a broken window of a barricaded door.

Do you let people climb into your home unscathed as long as they are unarmed?
She was completely surrounded by police. While what she was doing was stupid, I am pretty sure the death penalty is not the legal punishment for it. There was not a family on the other side of that door. She was not going to be able to enter and hurt anyone. That is the definition of excessive force. And that cop didn't even have to face a Grand Jury.
Not to mention, firing into a crowd like that was irresponsible and negligent.
TXAGFAN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheEternalPessimist said:

TXAGFAN said:

Zero justification? You watch the same video I did?

She is a textbook "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" example.
It's ok to kill unarmed protestors as long as they are white and likely to be conservatives.

Got it.



I don't care if they're purple AOC liberals.
fixer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tanya 93 said:

TheEternalPessimist said:

TXAGFAN said:

Zero justification? You watch the same video I did?

She is a textbook "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" example.
It's ok to kill unarmed protestors as long as they are white and likely to be conservatives.

Got it.





She was climbing thru a broken window of a barricaded door.

Do you let people climb into your home unscathed as long as they are unarmed?


Maybe the officer thought he was in the wrong home.

TXAGFAN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
93MarineHorn said:

Quote:

TXAGFAN said:
Zero justification? You watch the same video I did?

She is a textbook "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" example.
Yes, after guiding the Shaman around for a few minutes, the cops should have just pulled their guns and shot him dead. Play stupid games and all, right?
Did he try to get into an area guarded by a cop who clearly wasn't having a field trip with nutty conservatives?
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:



Can someone explain how Tucker showing cherry picked clips without violence is any different than what Conservatives accused Liberals of doing with the BLM protests? Conservatives ridiculed the phrase "mostly peaceful" protests endlessly all to turn around and do the same thing with Jan 6th. Do they think we didn't see the footage of them fighting Capitol Police. Hitting them with weapons? Multiple dead?
Show me where they tried to burn down the capitol.

Then after you respond with people yelling and banging on doors. Juxtapose that against some of the liberal insurrectionists at the Supreme Court yelling and banging on doors.
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:

Answer the question.
No - you answer the questions.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:



Can someone explain how Tucker showing cherry picked clips without violence is any different than what Conservatives accused Liberals of doing with the BLM protests? Conservatives ridiculed the phrase "mostly peaceful" protests endlessly all to turn around and do the same thing with Jan 6th. Do they think we didn't see the footage of them fighting Capitol Police. Hitting them with weapons? Multiple dead?
Uh, there weren't "multiple dead" on Jan 6, just one protestor who was shot by police.

There were MULTIPLE riots in the summer of 2020 that were violent and led to looting, multiple injuries (50+ secret service agents injured in front of White House), deaths (people gunned down during looting)...many of which was caught on camera. Some of them even occurred at government buildings.

Then you had people like Rand Paul and his wife who were surrounded by rioters outside the White House after the 2020 Republican convention...a real instance of enraged people threatening elected officials.

How many 'committees' were formed to investigate those? None. How many people were arrested and held for months? Did any politicians compare those riots to terrorist attacks? Were they portrayed as people trying to overthrow the government? Nope.

The reaction and outrage over the 2020 riots was nothing compared to the politicizing and outrage over Jan 6. The 2020 riots were brushed off while Jan 6 was turned into a tribunal.

Jan 6 was a protest that turned into a riot...but was never a deadly insurrection to overthrow the government as the media and certain politicians keep portraying it. That was Tucker's point. The footage clearly shows it wasn't a planned attack. The police ushered many of those people in as they would protestors.

There is a difference in people acting stupid with looting/trespassing and brushing with security...compared to an actual deadly coordinated terrorist attack to bring down the government.
93MarineHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

She got what she came for. She was brainwashed by Q. I'm sorry she had to die.
But why her? Why did the weeping little b/tch pick Ashley Babbitt to shoot, an unarmed woman, instead of all the actual violent MEN that were there? Perhaps he feared killing a Fed.
Tea Party
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:



Can someone explain how Tucker showing cherry picked clips without violence is any different than what Conservatives accused Liberals of doing with the BLM protests? Conservatives ridiculed the phrase "mostly peaceful" protests endlessly all to turn around and do the same thing with Jan 6th. Do they think we didn't see the footage of them fighting Capitol Police. Hitting them with weapons? Multiple dead?
Jan 6th was the left's Reichstag_fire

Quote:

The Reichstag fire was an arson attack on the Reichstag building, home of the German parliament in Berlin, on Monday 27 February 1933, precisely four weeks after Nazi leader Adolf Hitler was sworn in as Chancellor of Germany. Marinus van der Lubbe, a Dutch "council communist", was the apparent culprit; however, Hitler attributed the fire to Communist agitators. He used it as a pretext to claim that Communists were plotting against the German government, and induced President Paul von Hindenburg to issue the Reichstag Fire Decree suspending civil liberties, and pursue a "ruthless confrontation" with the Communists.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichstag_fire#cite_note-1][1][/url] This made the fire pivotal in the establishment of Nazi Germany.
Congrats OP on being a naive puppet to big brother rather than believing what your eyes see. Hopefully one day, ideally sooner than later, you would have a realization that you are being led by wolves. Please do not construe this as a pro-GOP statement because it is far from that too.
Learn about the Texas Nationalist Movement
https://tnm.me
Bryanisbest
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It does show the absolute truth about one thing for sure: the police were very accommodating to the main protester and were more like tour guides of the Capitol for him. Not afraid, not threatened, not forceful, not barring the way to anything, but inviting. This fact alone raises a lot of questions about the Jan 6 committee narrative. No wonder the government withheld this video from the guy and his attorney.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.