"Mostly Peaceful" Capitol Insurrection

12,995 Views | 233 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by fka ftc
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Squadron7 said:

The Green Dragon said:

They withheld exculpatory evidence.

Related:




So...all you BuT hE SiGnEd A cOnFesSioN! wankers can shut the Hell straight up.
They withheld exculpatory evidence, seems to be a pattern with Democratic leftist party hacks and lawyers. Shades of Andrew Weissmann and his merry band of henchmen.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Slicer97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WHOOP!'91 said:


I will take Trump's economy over pretty much anyone else's. Everyone was benefitting from the prosperity. I couldn't care one whit about his personality. His policies had the world in a far better place than it is today.

Trump has a ****ty personality.

Biden has a ****ty personality, presides over a ****ty economy, is a ****ty president, and wears ****ty pants.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:

Can someone explain how Tucker showing cherry picked clips without violence is any different than what Conservatives accused Liberals of doing with the BLM protests? Conservatives ridiculed the phrase "mostly peaceful" protests endlessly all to turn around and do the same thing with Jan 6th. Do they think we didn't see the footage of them fighting Capitol Police. Hitting them with weapons? Multiple dead?
Tucker has shown videos of capitol police giving the qanon guy a tour of the capitol. Put up videos of the qanon guy carrying weapons, destroying property or just disobeying a police officer or go away.
No, I don't care what CNN or MSNBC said this time
Ad Lunam
Tanya 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
93MarineHorn said:

Quote:

She was the one climbing thru the window?
Several people were climbing thru windows. I wonder what made her special to the fearful cop. Seriously, all kinds of chicken fighting was going on outside and the cops just stood there. People were entering the capitol thru many areas and no one else was shot or fired upon. Why her? I know you don't know and will accept whatever bs the capitol police spew. I'm just curious why this "brave defender" of the capitol only shot one unarmed woman and no one else.



She was climbing thru a barricaded door.


Smart people don't do that when protesting the government
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barbacoa taco said:

American Hardwood said:

AggieCo2023 said:



Can someone explain how Tucker showing cherry picked clips without violence is any different than what Conservatives accused Liberals of doing with the BLM protests? Conservatives ridiculed the phrase "mostly peaceful" protests endlessly all to turn around and do the same thing with Jan 6th. Do they think we didn't see the footage of them fighting Capitol Police. Hitting them with weapons? Multiple dead?
Because Tucker's clips are a response to the what the left did. He cherry picked to show the rest of the story. No need to show the violent parts again, they have already been shown ad nauseum.
But Tucker wasn't doing it to "show all sides." He's pushing the narrative that Jan 6 was benign and not a big deal. He's attempting to normalize and downplay it. But I don't care what Tucker or the MSM shows me. I watched 1/6 live, as it happened, with my own eyes, before any news network could even attempt to change the narrative. And I will always be completely disgusted with the events of that day and I'll never forgive Trump or any of the other a**sholes (e.g. Ken Paxton) who participated and incited the crowd to do what they did.

Ok fine, some of the protesters were Joe Schmos who walked around the capitol and looked at pretty paintings and didn't do much else. Are they the problem? No, even though what they did was still a crime.

If the defense in the Alex Murdaugh trial shows the jury videos of Alex and his wife and son having a picnic in the park and having a great time together, what is that supposed to prove? That he didn't do it, because here's a video of him not murdering his wife and son?

That's why Tucker's segment on this is stupid. Showing innocuous things from that day does not change the other bad things that happened.
Someone didn't watch the segment because this is exactly what he did. He brought on one of the Capitol Police that was there who gave a lengthy, very bipartisan account of what happened that day. There were some that were violent and there were many that were not. He even showed chaotic footage that wasn't just the Shaman being escorted peacefully through the capitol.

The policeman also confirmed the complete lack of communication from Pelosi to police leadership on down which left the front line guys on their own to make solo decisions. The moron in charge of that whole fiasco has since been employed by Pelosi in her district. How utterly convenient!!!

His point is to show how the government has completely overblown this ordeal to such absurdity that you are naturally going to have the other side question everything, as we should. Democrats compare J6 to freaking D-Day and 9-11 for God's sake. I'm not sure there is anything more insulting to people who actually dealt with those two events first hand.

Do you really blame anyone for questioning the narrative considering the 1984 level lying that has occurred since 2016 by the Democrats? Really?

93MarineHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, she was trespassing.....along with hundreds of others. This cop chose lethal force for one small woman doing what many other more formidable looking men were doing. Very strange, selective and cowardly use of force.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tanya 93 said:

TheEternalPessimist said:

TXAGFAN said:

Zero justification? You watch the same video I did?

She is a textbook "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" example.
It's ok to kill unarmed protestors as long as they are white and likely to be conservatives.

Got it.

She was climbing thru a broken window of a barricaded door.

Do you let people climb into your home unscathed as long as they are unarmed?
There were up to 5 law enforcement officers within virtual arms reach of her, most likely armed law enforcement officers. At any time they could have apprehended her prior to he being shot by the other officer that was on the other side of the door she was attempting to climb through.

Sorry I disagree with you, you're comparing untrained home owners with explicitly trained law enforcement officers. At no time did she exhibit a mortal threat to anyone and could easily been subdued.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
.
Tanya 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
93MarineHorn said:

Yes, she was trespassing.....along with hundreds of others. This cop chose lethal force for one small woman doing what many other more formidable looking men were doing. Very strange, selective and cowardly use of force.



She was the only climbing thru that broken window of a barricaded door.

Don't climb partially thru it.
It is that simple.
93MarineHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Good. Grief.

In your hypothetical you just posted, it seems like it would have been a good idea for someone like maybe...I don't know...Nancy Pelosi...to NOT ignore requests for additional security that day? Just spitballing here.

Things that (*SHOULD*) make you go hmmmmm...

Some of you really need to either educate yourselves on the entire situation or sit out the discussion. Good grief.
Yes. The real scandal was the complete ineptitude of the people in charge of securing the capitol. They had intel that this would be a large angry crowd. Perhaps it wasn't ineptitude at all as they got what they really wanted.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barbacoa taco said:


But Tucker wasn't doing it to "show all sides." He's pushing the narrative that Jan 6 was benign and not a big deal.
Bull***** That is a lie.

He is countering the false narrative the people you vote for put out there. They spent two years destroying lives (one literally) and lying to the American people. You should be outraged that they think so little of you that they blatantly lie to you so you will lick their boots.

Instead of saying "you guys are right," you're attacking the only person who has aired the truth. Get ahold of yourself and stop licking boots.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yellerjacket said:

Ellis Wyatt said:



She was completely surrounded by police. While what she was doing was stupid, I am pretty sure the death penalty is not the legal punishment for it. There was not a family on the other side of that door. She was not going to be able to enter and hurt anyone. That is the definition of excessive force. And that cop didn't even have to face a Grand Jury.
If the political parties were reversed, Conservatives would be saying "FAFO"! Liberals would be saying "They didn't' have to kill her!". You know it. I know it. Everyone knows it.
They aren't reversed. You're in Fantasyland, created by liars and thieves. Wake up. You were lied to and you are willfully defending the liars.
93MarineHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

She was the only climbing thru that broken window of a barricaded door.

Don't climb partially thru it.
It is that simple.
Do you think the cop was in danger from her more so than everyone else? Why do you think LETHAL force was necessary. She would have been just one more unarmed person walking thru the capitol. Just go ahead re-package the above response without attempting to address anything else. It's what you do.
WHOOP!'91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yellerjacket said:

Ellis Wyatt said:



She was completely surrounded by police. While what she was doing was stupid, I am pretty sure the death penalty is not the legal punishment for it. There was not a family on the other side of that door. She was not going to be able to enter and hurt anyone. That is the definition of excessive force. And that cop didn't even have to face a Grand Jury.
If the political parties were reversed, Conservatives would be saying "FAFO"! Liberals would be saying "They didn't' have to kill her!". You know it. I know it. Everyone knows it.
SCOTUS chamber was full of protestors banging on the doors and none of them were shot. Surprisingly, they were there protesting because of another lie from the left about Kavanaugh.
Satellite of Love
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:

Cmon Tucker is clearly trying to downplay what happened on Jan 6th. Just because every second wasn't mass chaos and violence doesn't prove much.
It proves it wasn't a violent inssurection that the media and left have been pushing for 2 years now. Lots of people there just hanging out in the crowd or walking around the Capitol not causing any trouble.
Slicer97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
93MarineHorn said:

Quote:

Good. Grief.

In your hypothetical you just posted, it seems like it would have been a good idea for someone like maybe...I don't know...Nancy Pelosi...to NOT ignore requests for additional security that day? Just spitballing here.

Things that (*SHOULD*) make you go hmmmmm...

Some of you really need to either educate yourselves on the entire situation or sit out the discussion. Good grief.
Yes. The real scandal was the complete ineptitude of the people in charge of securing the capitol. They had intel that this would be a large angry crowd. Perhaps it wasn't ineptitude at all as they got what they really wanted.

That's been obvious since Jan 6, 2021.

The biggest shame is that no politicians were harmed. Fed-level democrats, a not-small number of fed-level republicans, and a large number of bureaucrats they've appointed are power-mad scum that need to be removed from office.
FriskyGardenGnome
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Per the DOJ's Justice Manual,

1-16.200 - DEADLY FORCE
[ol]
  • Law enforcement officers and correctional officers of the Department of Justice may use deadly force only when necessary, that is, when the officer has a reasonable belief that the subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or to another person.
    [ol]
  • Deadly force may not be used solely to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect.
  • Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle. Firearms may not be discharged from a moving vehicle except in exigent circumstances. In these situations, an officer must have an articulable reason for this use of deadly force.
  • If feasible and if to do so would not increase the danger to the officer or others, a verbal warning to submit to the authority of the officer shall be given prior to the use of deadly force.
  • Warning shots are not permitted outside of the prison context.
  • Officers will be trained in alternative methods and tactics for handling resisting subjects, which must be used when the use of deadly force is not authorized by this policy.
  • Deadly force should not be used against persons whose actions are a threat solely to themselves or property unless an individual poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others in close proximity.
  • [/ol][/ol]

    If you think her actions met this threshold, we can agree to disagree.
    Beast of Burden
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    93MarineHorn said:

    Quote:

    She was the only climbing thru that broken window of a barricaded door.

    Don't climb partially thru it.
    It is that simple.
    Do you think the cop was in danger from her more so than everyone else? Why do you think LETHAL force was necessary. She would have been just one more unarmed person walking thru the capitol. Just go ahead re-package the above response without attempting to address anything else. It's what you do.


    Weird watching a self-described hippie be so cold and blood thirsty.
    Tanya 93
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    93MarineHorn said:

    Quote:

    She was the only climbing thru that broken window of a barricaded door.

    Don't climb partially thru it.
    It is that simple.
    Do you think the cop was in danger from her more so than everyone else? Why do you think LETHAL force was necessary. She would have been just one more unarmed person walking thru the capitol. Just go ahead re-package the above response without attempting to address anything else. It's what you do.



    He probably was poorly trained. Terrified. And shot someone he did perceive as a real threat.

    You don't believe he feared and want to make her some innocent victim.

    Don't climb into the window.
    You stay alive.
    YouBet
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Satellite of Love said:

    AggieCo2023 said:

    Cmon Tucker is clearly trying to downplay what happened on Jan 6th. Just because every second wasn't mass chaos and violence doesn't prove much.
    It proves it wasn't a violent inssurection that the media and left have been pushing for 2 years now. Lots of people there just hanging out in the crowd or walking around the Capitol not causing any trouble.
    You also had Congress people lying about where they were that day to try and sell the insurrection narrative even harder. See AOC.
    FriskyGardenGnome
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Tanya 93 said:

    93MarineHorn said:

    Quote:

    She was the only climbing thru that broken window of a barricaded door.

    Don't climb partially thru it.
    It is that simple.
    Do you think the cop was in danger from her more so than everyone else? Why do you think LETHAL force was necessary. She would have been just one more unarmed person walking thru the capitol. Just go ahead re-package the above response without attempting to address anything else. It's what you do.



    He probably was poorly trained. Terrified. And **** someone he did perceive as a real threat.

    You don't and want to make her some innocent victim.

    Don't climb into the window.
    You stay alive.
    Per the DOJ's own guidelines for their officers, "Officers will be trained in alternative methods and tactics for handling resisting subjects, which must be used when the use of deadly force is not authorized by this policy."

    No one of consequence has stated the officer was poorly trained.


    YouBet
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    gotsand said:

    Tanya 93 said:

    93MarineHorn said:

    Quote:

    She was the only climbing thru that broken window of a barricaded door.

    Don't climb partially thru it.
    It is that simple.
    Do you think the cop was in danger from her more so than everyone else? Why do you think LETHAL force was necessary. She would have been just one more unarmed person walking thru the capitol. Just go ahead re-package the above response without attempting to address anything else. It's what you do.



    He probably was poorly trained. Terrified. And **** someone he did perceive as a real threat.

    You don't and want to make her some innocent victim.

    Don't climb into the window.
    You stay alive.
    Per the DOJ's own guidelines for their officers, "Officers will be trained in alternative methods and tactics for handling resisting subjects, which must be used when the use of deadly force is not authorized by this policy."

    No one of consequence has stated the officer was poorly trained.



    And if he was why wasn't he disciplined?

    Bottom line for this guy is that he did something in service for the Democrats and he's black. That dude had a Get Out of Jail Free Card and it got played.
    fka ftc
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Tanya 93 said:

    93MarineHorn said:

    Quote:

    She was the only climbing thru that broken window of a barricaded door.

    Don't climb partially thru it.
    It is that simple.
    Do you think the cop was in danger from her more so than everyone else? Why do you think LETHAL force was necessary. She would have been just one more unarmed person walking thru the capitol. Just go ahead re-package the above response without attempting to address anything else. It's what you do.



    He probably was poorly trained. Terrified. And shot someone he did perceive as a real threat.

    You don't believe he feared and want to make her some innocent victim.

    Don't climb into the window.
    You stay alive.
    Funny take.

    I guess they didn't here the executive order from Biden that says "shoot 'em in the leg" or "fire a warning shot in the air".

    It was a terrible shoot with several levels of less lethal force available.

    Also, his shot could have resulted in that crowd becoming truly enraged.

    I am not excusing her behavior. But that does not mean the cop should not also be facing charges.

    Defending that cop is simply un-American.
    TarponChaser
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    WHOOP!'91 said:

    TarponChaser said:

    The intransigence of both sides here is absurd.

    It is 100% true that there were a large number of protestors who were violent and bent on destruction.

    It is also 100% true that there were many more protestors who were little more than peaceful, well-behaved gawkers.

    The video of the police walking around with Chansley is not remotely evidence that he was "on a guided tour." The police were outnumbered by what? 10 to1? The estimates I've seen have the number of police inside the building at 195 and the number of protestors in the Capitol at over 2,000. They damn sure knew they couldn't physically escalate things to remove protestors forcibly without likely being overrun and causing an even larger outbreak of violence so they shadowed him to make sure he didn't get too far out of line. So he wasn't being violent but he wasn't just being shown around like a Congressional tourist.

    And while Trump didn't cross the line and call for violence or anything like that, he damn sure stirred the pot. He ran a ****ty campaign vs. Sleepy Joe and the media (you want real collusion, the virtual hand-in-glove relationship between the Dems, MSM, and social media is the real threat to our republic) but the way he handled covid and the complete inability to not have diarrhea of the mouth or fingers via Twitter sunk his candidacy. Not actual fraudulent votes as every damn bit of evidence has shown. Hell, the majority of his advisors told him the same thing. There's no bureaucracy or political machine in this country capable of pulling off such a large-scale fraud. The simple truth is Trump fcked up and he couldn't handle the fact that he's responsible for people voting against him and instead figured a benign vegetable would be the lesser of two evils.

    I personally didn't but his behavior post-election and his continual whining, petty, vindictiveness and how he's effectively caused major losses in 2018, 2020, and 2022 should relegate him to the dust-bin of history.

    Hell, he's somehow manage to convince millions of people that actual conservative policies and good governance makes one a RINO. Trump only cares about Trump, the fact we got some good justices on SCOTUS and lower courts is the only good thing he accomplished and that's because he listened to actual conservatives from the Federalist Society. The rest of his policies are largely undone by the proverbial "pen and a phone" because for all his claims about making deals he couldn't actually do it.

    Time to move past him and his acolytes.
    Why were they walking Chansley around at all, much less just him?

    Trump's campaign? He was out in front of huge crowds while sleepy Joe was in the basement. Don't forget the big hand the FBI gave Xiden by sitting on the Hunter laptop, along with the 'intelligence community' colluding with social media and legacy media to claim it wasn't real.

    Trump was robbed even before we get to ballot harvesting, state voting laws being unConstitutionally changed, or vote fraud questions.

    I will take Trump's economy over pretty much anyone else's. Everyone was benefitting from the prosperity. I couldn't care one whit about his personality. His policies had the world in a far better place than it is today.

    1) you don't think seeing a dude dressed like he was would make you wonder if he was right in the head? No need to escalate, just escort him around, placate him, and try to get him to leave.

    2) Yes, Trump's campaign. He consistently played pissed off and whining and said stupid ***** Because of who he was and the hostility of the media he couldn't afford to make missteps and he consistently did so, even if dishonestly portrayed. Yes the FBI fcked him too but that goes back to him having zero margin for error and he made a lot of them.

    3) the voting laws being changed is a separate question from fraud- Trump did get screwed by those changes but there's no mechanism to redo an election because those changes were unconstitutional. Ultimately, the screwing up of those voting laws are the result of failures in prior elections which allowed those judges to be appointed or elected. The fraud claims are false and even Trump's lawyers have admitted as much and tried to convince him of that. Ballot harvesting was legal at the time though a sketchy practice.

    4) sure, the economy from 2017 to early 2020 was great but despite having both Houses prior to 2018 Trump didn't cut spending as promised and delivered on very little other than judicial appointments. Had he won in 2020 the economy with inflation would still be in the crapper because he refused to cut spending and engaged in economic policies (see tariffs) that exacerbated inflation. I don't think it would have been as bad as it's been but then you're arguing about whether or not you prefer a sch1t-sandwich or a sch1t-slurpee.

    I do agree the world would be in a better place because we wouldn't have seen the disaster in Afghanistan and I doubt Putin would have invaded Ukraine. But I'm not talking about the Trump vs. Biden choice in 2020, I'm talking about the need to move on from Trump and stop refusing to admit that a lot of people were violent on January 6 because it sounds like the progs refusing to condemn the AntiFa/BLM violence because some of their people weren't violent.
    richardag
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    YouBet said:

    barbacoa taco said:

    American Hardwood said:

    AggieCo2023 said:



    Can someone explain how Tucker showing cherry picked clips without violence is any different than what Conservatives accused Liberals of doing with the BLM protests? Conservatives ridiculed the phrase "mostly peaceful" protests endlessly all to turn around and do the same thing with Jan 6th. Do they think we didn't see the footage of them fighting Capitol Police. Hitting them with weapons? Multiple dead?
    Because Tucker's clips are a response to the what the left did. He cherry picked to show the rest of the story. No need to show the violent parts again, they have already been shown ad nauseum.
    But Tucker wasn't doing it to "show all sides." He's pushing the narrative that Jan 6 was benign and not a big deal. He's attempting to normalize and downplay it. But I don't care what Tucker or the MSM shows me. I watched 1/6 live, as it happened, with my own eyes, before any news network could even attempt to change the narrative. And I will always be completely disgusted with the events of that day and I'll never forgive Trump or any of the other a**sholes (e.g. Ken Paxton) who participated and incited the crowd to do what they did.

    Ok fine, some of the protesters were Joe Schmos who walked around the capitol and looked at pretty paintings and didn't do much else. Are they the problem? No, even though what they did was still a crime.

    If the defense in the Alex Murdaugh trial shows the jury videos of Alex and his wife and son having a picnic in the park and having a great time together, what is that supposed to prove? That he didn't do it, because here's a video of him not murdering his wife and son?

    That's why Tucker's segment on this is stupid. Showing innocuous things from that day does not change the other bad things that happened.
    Someone didn't watch the segment because this is exactly what he did. He brought on one of the Capitol Police that was there who gave a lengthy, very bipartisan account of what happened that day. There were some that were violent and there were many that were not. He even showed chaotic footage that wasn't just the Shaman being escorted peacefully through the capitol.

    The policeman also confirmed the complete lack of communication from Pelosi to police leadership on down which left the front line guys on their own to make solo decisions. The moron in charge of that whole fiasco has since been employed by Pelosi in her district. How utterly convenient!!!

    His point is to show how the government has completely overblown this ordeal to such absurdity that you are naturally going to have the other side question everything, as we should. Democrats compare J6 to freaking D-Day and 9-11 for God's sake. I'm not sure there is anything more insulting to people who actually dealt with those two events first hand.

    Do you really blame anyone for questioning the narrative considering the 1984 level lying that has occurred since 2016 by the Democrats? Really?
    Thank you for the post. The leftist apologists need to understand that although Tucker presides over an opinion show he did show both sides.
    Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
    Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
    BigRobSA
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Tanya 93 said:

    93MarineHorn said:

    Quote:

    She was the only climbing thru that broken window of a barricaded door.

    Don't climb partially thru it.
    It is that simple.
    Do you think the cop was in danger from her more so than everyone else? Why do you think LETHAL force was necessary. She would have been just one more unarmed person walking thru the capitol. Just go ahead re-package the above response without attempting to address anything else. It's what you do.



    He probably was poorly trained. Terrified. And shot someone he did perceive as a real threat.

    You don't believe he feared and want to make her some innocent victim.

    Don't climb into the window.
    You stay alive.


    Sorry, as a grown ass man...not in a zombie movie...a chick poses zero threat as she is breaking through window. Dude was simply on a power trip and shot n unarmed woman when there was about eleventy different methods to handle the situation.
    richardag
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Tanya 93 said:

    93MarineHorn said:

    Yes, she was trespassing.....along with hundreds of others. This cop chose lethal force for one small woman doing what many other more formidable looking men were doing. Very strange, selective and cowardly use of force.



    She was the only climbing thru that broken window of a barricaded door.

    Don't climb partially thru it.
    It is that simple.
    We agree, but non-lethal force should have been used.
    Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
    Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
    Beast of Burden
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Quote:

    1) you don't think seeing a dude dressed like he was would make you wonder if he was right in the head? No need to escalate, just escort him around, placate him, and try to get him to leave.


    Fantasyland.

    Wow hahahaha.
    Satellite of Love
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Very true. Plus the media lying about other members of Congress (Hawley running away)
    Tanya 93
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    fka ftc said:

    Tanya 93 said:

    93MarineHorn said:

    Quote:

    She was the only climbing thru that broken window of a barricaded door.

    Don't climb partially thru it.
    It is that simple.
    Do you think the cop was in danger from her more so than everyone else? Why do you think LETHAL force was necessary. She would have been just one more unarmed person walking thru the capitol. Just go ahead re-package the above response without attempting to address anything else. It's what you do.



    He probably was poorly trained. Terrified. And shot someone he did perceive as a real threat.

    You don't believe he feared and want to make her some innocent victim.

    Don't climb into the window.
    You stay alive.
    Funny take.

    I guess they didn't here the executive order from Biden that says "shoot 'em in the leg" or "fire a warning shot in the air".

    It was a terrible shoot with several levels of less lethal force available.

    Also, his shot could have resulted in that crowd becoming truly enraged.

    I am not excusing her behavior. But that does not mean the cop should not also be facing charges.

    Defending that cop is simply un-American.


    I have no problems with him facing charges.

    This didn't have to happen. Don't climb. Follow your training.


    She stays alive.
    She isn't an innocent victim though.
    Satellite of Love
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    People are forgetting that Rosanne Boyland was killed on 1/6 as well. Evidance came out showing police striking her 3 times, with two of them in the head as Boyland laid on the ground. The officer tried a 4th time but lost the stick during the hitting motion.
    Rockdoc
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Reverse everything and he's in jail.
    TarponChaser
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Beast of Burden said:

    Quote:

    1) you don't think seeing a dude dressed like he was would make you wonder if he was right in the head? No need to escalate, just escort him around, placate him, and try to get him to leave.


    Fantasyland.

    Wow hahahaha.

    Considering multiple cop friends said that's what they'd do in such a situation your position is fantasy.
    BluHorseShu
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    aginlakeway said:

    AggieCo2023 said:

    Answer the question.

    Are you making demands of random internet message board posters?

    Wow.
    Are you asking questions of internet message board posters and then answering your own question in the same post? Wow
    Rodney Ruxin
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    How many people were killed and how much property damage was there as a result of the 1/6 compared to let's just say, the summer riots of 2020?

    Do you think this is an apples to apples comparison? You may want to start there to help answer your question.
     
    ×
    subscribe Verify your student status
    See Subscription Benefits
    Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.