"Mostly Peaceful" Capitol Insurrection

12,989 Views | 233 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by fka ftc
AggieCo2023
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Can someone explain how Tucker showing cherry picked clips without violence is any different than what Conservatives accused Liberals of doing with the BLM protests? Conservatives ridiculed the phrase "mostly peaceful" protests endlessly all to turn around and do the same thing with Jan 6th. Do they think we didn't see the footage of them fighting Capitol Police. Hitting them with weapons? Multiple dead?
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is there a poster with less credibility here? And posting a tweet from Liz Cheney, a woman who knew their narrative was a lie but went along with the fascists anyway?

Who is Ray Epps?
AggieCo2023
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Also compare how McCarthy and other Republicans talk about it now vs. after it happened
AggieCo2023
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Answer the question.
Jeeper79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:



Can someone explain how Tucker showing cherry picked clips without violence is any different than what Conservatives accused Liberals of doing with the BLM protests? Conservatives ridiculed the phrase "mostly peaceful" protests endlessly all to turn around and do the same thing with Jan 6th. Do they think we didn't see the footage of them fighting Capitol Police. Hitting them with weapons? Multiple dead?
Because Tucker's clips are a response to the what the left did. He cherry picked to show the rest of the story. No need to show the violent parts again, they have already been shown ad nauseum.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

Is there a poster with less credibility here? And posting a tweet from Liz Cheney, a woman who knew their narrative was a lie but went along with the fascists anyway?

Who is Ray Epps?

He's only convincing himself.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I dont know the answer you're seeking. I do know we've already been presented the violence portions through the show trial congress had. It was a production directed by an abc news guy, iirc.

So far as I'm concerned, tucker is just completing the picture so we can take everything in and go from there.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:

Answer the question.
You are *****ing about Republicans doing what your fascists have just been proven to have done. You didn't say a peep for two years as Hollywood producers helped craft your 100% false narrative and people were railroaded.

Shhhhhhh.
webgem08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OP parrots Liz Cheney and JoJo.
Burrus86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OP, I would say that using a Liz Chenny tweet as your opening position is a losing proposition. Wyoming voters spoke loud and clear about Liz and her opinions on this topic. Poor Liz....she is just a bitter woman now.
The Banned
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:

Answer the question.


Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Instead of telling the truth, the Dems made it out to be the near death of our country. That was the action. Don't cry about the reaction. It was only natural.
AggieCo2023
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cmon Tucker is clearly trying to downplay what happened on Jan 6th. Just because every second wasn't mass chaos and violence doesn't prove much.
Franklin Comes Alive!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Says that Tucker cherry picked clips while posting a clip of cherry picked clips


Impressive
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agthatbuilds said:

I dont know the answer you're seeking. I do know we've already been presented the violence portions through thay dhow trail congress had. It was a production directed by an abc news guy, iirc
It was a Stalinist panel of Party members. It was just as objective and truth-seeking as anything the USSR ever had.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:

Cmon Tucker is clearly trying to downplay what happened on Jan 6th
You chose the rules.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dear OP:

If the entire footage, in context, confirms the Dem Narrative rather than showing it to be a cherry picked couple of minutes from dozens of hours of peaceful action, then why are they fighting so hard for it not to be released and viewed by the public?

Further, what about the footage clearly proving your parties lies about Clancy and Sicknic to be 100% false? Seems like you're trying to distract from that too?

Can't wait to hear your honest answers
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:



Also compare how McCarthy and other Republicans talk about it now vs. after it happened
And? Your fascists were threatening to remove people from congress who rejected their (now proven) lies.

The subject is all the lies our government peddled surrounding this event. The distractions are pathetic.

"Look! Over there! Is that a Chinese balloon?"

Red Red Wine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What a clown-show.

OP - you need to stop. Your only goal is to make conservatives angry and attack you. That's old sauce man.

If you really want to have a "discussion", then drive-by sh**tings with your keyboard are not the way.

PS> Jan 6th was a Democratic Party/Propaganda Media Arm of the Left movie. It is a complete joke. Everyone knows it. If this was a "real" concern, then why did people storming DC during the Summer of Love and burning buildings/smashing windows/assaulting police given ZERO ATTENTION.

So sick of fake outrage on both sides: it is only used to keep the "idiot American voters" against each other instead of who both sides should hate - POLITICIANS, CIA, FBI, DOJ, and the IRS. That is who needs to be sent packing.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:



Can someone explain how Tucker showing cherry picked clips without violence is any different than what Conservatives accused Liberals of doing with the BLM protests? Conservatives ridiculed the phrase "mostly peaceful" protests endlessly all to turn around and do the same thing with Jan 6th. Do they think we didn't see the footage of them fighting Capitol Police. Hitting them with weapons? Multiple dead?
1 person died in the "riots". And that was an unarmed protester that was shot by capitol police with zero justification.

The "mostly peaceful" comments are making fun of the response by politicos and media to the BLM riots that were burning entire city blocks, where actual multiple people were killed and absolutely nothing was done because of the fear of doing anything to stop black mobs from doing whatever they wanted, because being called a racist by stopping an actual no-sht riot is far worse apparently than the riot and the damage and lives lost.

The "cherry picking" is showing footage that Congress wanted to keep hidden, because it absolutely destroys the narrative we were all shovel fed by the media and government colluding to ensure we saw only what they wanted us to see.

Nobody is denying that there was some level of upheaval or violence, but you don't want to hear that. You'd much rather try to deflect by steering the argument down a path away from what he footage shows. Because you can't argue what the footage actually shows.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:

Answer the question.

Are you making demands of random internet message board posters?

Wow.
One day at a time.
tk111
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He "cherry picked" the clips (were you hoping he'd show all eleventy billion hours of footage on air?) that specifically obliterate the biggest lies that were told using the cherry picked clips we've been shown ad nauseam for years now.

Like Buffalo hat shaman guy, the face of the whole violent episode, being casually guided around the capitol by police in front of dozens of other police. Or the officer who was martyred all over liberal outlets as dying from injuries sustained (which had largely been proven wrong already) shown on video acting perfectly fine with no apparent injuries after supposedly being attacked.
TXAGFAN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
American Hardwood said:

AggieCo2023 said:



Can someone explain how Tucker showing cherry picked clips without violence is any different than what Conservatives accused Liberals of doing with the BLM protests? Conservatives ridiculed the phrase "mostly peaceful" protests endlessly all to turn around and do the same thing with Jan 6th. Do they think we didn't see the footage of them fighting Capitol Police. Hitting them with weapons? Multiple dead?
Because Tucker's clips are a response to the what the left did. He cherry picked to show the rest of the story. No need to show the violent parts again, they have already been shown ad nauseum.
Which narrative seems more likely, the one we've seen for a couple years in countless videos and extensive coverage or the clips Tucker found? Use your critical thinking, I know it means you may have to acknowledge Tucker is wrong and this was more than nothing (something even McCarthy has to acknowledge given his previous commentary on the day).
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shorter AggieCo2023: "You should rely on my preferred information gatekeepers, y'all! Any additional information from anywhere else is like totally a Threat To Democracy (TM)!
TXAGFAN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zero justification? You watch the same video I did?

She is a textbook "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" example.
fixer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:



Can someone explain how Tucker showing cherry picked clips without violence is any different than what Conservatives accused Liberals of doing with the BLM protests? Conservatives ridiculed the phrase "mostly peaceful" protests endlessly all to turn around and do the same thing with Jan 6th. Do they think we didn't see the footage of them fighting Capitol Police. Hitting them with weapons? Multiple dead?


Because Jan 6 was mostly peaceful.

Blm riots were so far from " mostly peaceful " that the term 'gaslighting' is laughably inadequate.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:

Cmon Tucker is clearly trying to downplay what happened on Jan 6th. Just because every second wasn't mass chaos and violence doesn't prove much.
This is laughable and shows how easy it is to get the lapdogs to follow the overlord commands without even thinking.

Don't pay attention to the man behind the curtain.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

American Hardwood said:

AggieCo2023 said:



Can someone explain how Tucker showing cherry picked clips without violence is

Which narrative seems more likely, the one we've seen for a couple years in countless videos and extensive coverage or the clips Tucker found? Use your critical thinking, I know it means you may have to acknowledge Tucker is wrong and this was more than nothing (something even McCarthy has to acknowledge given his previous commentary on the day).
The clips Tucker found, without question. The Stalinist committee hid any evidence that countered the narrative they peddled for two years. They even edited footage for dramatic effect to sway the gullible. Clearly it worked on some special people. And to maximize the impact, they ran their propaganda in prime time and hired a network producer to help them do so.

There is no contest which is more believable.
A_Gang_Ag_06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Covid and Jan. 6. Two nothing burgers that I can't believe people still won't shut up about.
Robert L. Peters
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They withheld exculpatory evidence. This isn't about Jan 6. There was clearly violence. This is about the false narrative these crooks played to us.
What you say, Paper Champion? I'm gonna beat you like a dog, a dog, you hear me!
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

Zero justification? You watch the same video I did?

She is a textbook "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" example.
I did. And no, there was no justification for the officer to pull his weapon and fire through a glass door into a crowd of people in the manner than he did.

In any other situation, had a civilian done the exact same thing - they would be brought up on murder charges.

But hey, keep towing that party line! I'm sure your overlords will reward you with the gristle off of a chicken bone after they have eaten the meat for your loyalty.
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieCo2023 said:



Can someone explain how Tucker showing cherry picked clips without violence is any different than what Conservatives accused Liberals of doing with the BLM protests? Conservatives ridiculed the phrase "mostly peaceful" protests endlessly all to turn around and do the same thing with Jan 6th. Do they think we didn't see the footage of them fighting Capitol Police. Hitting them with weapons? Multiple dead?
Why did your Democrat ilk add crowd noise for production and effect to make it look worse? Why did the committee specifically lie about Josh Hawley? Why is your ilk not telling us the truth about Ray Epps and other likely informants who were essentially goading people that were there? Why do you call this an 'insurrection' where there were no weapons, no military participation, no law enforcement apparatus, and no popular support for a revolution?

I would love the answer to these questions from our resident leftist trolls.
Aggies2009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lol this thread didn't go how OP thought it would
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

Zero justification? You watch the same video I did?

She is a textbook "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" example.
It's ok to kill unarmed protestors as long as they are white and likely to be conservatives.

Got it.


Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Green Dragon said:

They withheld exculpatory evidence.

Related:




So...all you BuT hE SiGnEd A cOnFesSioN! wankers can shut the Hell straight up.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.