Russia/Ukraine from Another Perspective (Relaunch Part Deux)

522,866 Views | 9428 Replies | Last: 25 min ago by nortex97
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3365034/replies/66913053
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No answer, just trolling. Not surprising
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Please stop clogging up the thread with drivel if you're not going to take the time to learn the history of the region.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

Perhaps you missed the question. You have probably the second most posts on this thread, so what do you think:

Do you think Russia is justified in their ongoing invasion of Ukraine? If so, why?
He didn't miss it. He ignores questions that are directed towards him if he doesn't want to answer and then deflects.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There's so much nuance and history that a simple question can't be answered. It's so complicated, you couldn't possibly understand so I'll deflect and hide.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PlaneCrashGuy said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Ag with kids said:

aggiehawg said:



Black markets and degrees of graft and corruption happen in every war. But to that degree?
While I'm VERY sure that the Ukes are getting their piece of the corruption pie, I look at Hersch as being about as trustworthy as TASS,


Exactly, I couldn't stop laughing at "famed reporter Seymour Hersh." Dude is 86 and is more senile than Biden and Trump combined at this point but just trying to stay relevant by joining the anti Ukraine crusade with his "anonymous sources." Maybe Sacks would like to dive into Hersh's bizarre bin Laden theories next.


Ad hom + strawman. Btw, its OK to acknowledge Uke is as corrupt as they come.


Not sure you know what either of those terms mean, but yes, there's likely some skimming happening just like there always is in any war. Doesn't make it anymore hilarious that Sacks is using Hersh as if he's some kind of legitimate source. And it also wouldn't be happening if Putin didn't decide to invade.


Another ad hom. The last sentence is hilariously naive.

Uke corruption definitely didn't start 2 years ago, and anyone who was paying attention before the invasion would know that.


No unprovoked Putin led invasion, no (or at least much less) US aid = less money to skim. So yes, as usual everything negative that happens in this war is 100% Putin's fault.

Seems pretty simple to understand but I get that it may be too complex for you to figure out.


"Unprovoked"

As I said, hilariously naive. But I appreciate you letting me know arguing with you isn't worth my time.
Yes...

Unprovoked. Without quotes...

Wanting to join a defensive alliance that exists to protect its members from Russian aggression is NOT provocation...


Anyone can reply-

Do you seriously believe that was the extent of the reasoning for the war? How nuanced is your understanding of the why behind all this?
I do understand. And I understand the nuances.

But, first, I'd really like to hear YOUR view on the reasoning and nuances...


What nuances? I don't think you and I mean the same thing when we say that word, so when you said it just now: what was that referencing?

I think that, with some exceptions, Russia is allowed to do what Russia thinks is in the best interest of Russia.
So...no nuances in your position. Just blunt force.

Caveman want. Caveman take.


Thats a very poor characterization if my position, but it is entirely unsurprising. We can clarify the minutia if you're interested.

I'd like to better understand what you wrote earlier, so I'll ask again: What nuances do you understand?
No it's not.

It's an accurate description.

You're just trying to be clever and obfuscate it.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


The hardest videos to watch are the ones with no clear "Oh they should have done this instead"
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PlaneCrashGuy said:

Please stop clogging up the thread with drivel if you're not going to take the time to learn the history of the region.
Then please...

Teach us the history of the region so we can better understand your nuanced or non-nuanced view of the region.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Ag with kids said:

aggiehawg said:



Black markets and degrees of graft and corruption happen in every war. But to that degree?
While I'm VERY sure that the Ukes are getting their piece of the corruption pie, I look at Hersch as being about as trustworthy as TASS,


Exactly, I couldn't stop laughing at "famed reporter Seymour Hersh." Dude is 86 and is more senile than Biden and Trump combined at this point but just trying to stay relevant by joining the anti Ukraine crusade with his "anonymous sources." Maybe Sacks would like to dive into Hersh's bizarre bin Laden theories next.


Ad hom + strawman. Btw, its OK to acknowledge Uke is as corrupt as they come.


Not sure you know what either of those terms mean, but yes, there's likely some skimming happening just like there always is in any war. Doesn't make it anymore hilarious that Sacks is using Hersh as if he's some kind of legitimate source. And it also wouldn't be happening if Putin didn't decide to invade.


Another ad hom. The last sentence is hilariously naive.

Uke corruption definitely didn't start 2 years ago, and anyone who was paying attention before the invasion would know that.


No unprovoked Putin led invasion, no (or at least much less) US aid = less money to skim. So yes, as usual everything negative that happens in this war is 100% Putin's fault.

Seems pretty simple to understand but I get that it may be too complex for you to figure out.


"Unprovoked"

As I said, hilariously naive. But I appreciate you letting me know arguing with you isn't worth my time.
Yes...

Unprovoked. Without quotes...

Wanting to join a defensive alliance that exists to protect its members from Russian aggression is NOT provocation...


Anyone can reply-

Do you seriously believe that was the extent of the reasoning for the war? How nuanced is your understanding of the why behind all this?
I do understand. And I understand the nuances.

But, first, I'd really like to hear YOUR view on the reasoning and nuances...


What nuances? I don't think you and I mean the same thing when we say that word, so when you said it just now: what was that referencing?

I think that, with some exceptions, Russia is allowed to do what Russia thinks is in the best interest of Russia.
So...no nuances in your position. Just blunt force.

Caveman want. Caveman take.


Thats a very poor characterization if my position, but it is entirely unsurprising. We can clarify the minutia if you're interested.

I'd like to better understand what you wrote earlier, so I'll ask again: What nuances do you understand?
No it's not.

It's an accurate description.

You're just trying to be clever and obfuscate it.


Are you unwilling to clarify what you meant? I asked a direct question about the meaning of one of your posts.

When you said "I do understand. And I understand the nuances" what were you referencing?
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

There's so much nuance and history that a simple question can't be answered. It's so complicated, you couldn't possibly understand so I'll deflect and hide.


You've already made up your mind, I wont waste my time on you further. You may call it what you want. I'm smiling.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It was a simple question. You seemed to imply Russia was provoked. If you're not interested in a good faith discussion there is a word for it.

"Please refrain from posting comments that are intended to draw other posters off-sides and not offered as a good faith attempt at constructive community discussion. We remove content meant to provoke and incite conflict within the community."
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PlaneCrashGuy said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Ag with kids said:

aggiehawg said:



Black markets and degrees of graft and corruption happen in every war. But to that degree?
While I'm VERY sure that the Ukes are getting their piece of the corruption pie, I look at Hersch as being about as trustworthy as TASS,


Exactly, I couldn't stop laughing at "famed reporter Seymour Hersh." Dude is 86 and is more senile than Biden and Trump combined at this point but just trying to stay relevant by joining the anti Ukraine crusade with his "anonymous sources." Maybe Sacks would like to dive into Hersh's bizarre bin Laden theories next.


Ad hom + strawman. Btw, its OK to acknowledge Uke is as corrupt as they come.


Not sure you know what either of those terms mean, but yes, there's likely some skimming happening just like there always is in any war. Doesn't make it anymore hilarious that Sacks is using Hersh as if he's some kind of legitimate source. And it also wouldn't be happening if Putin didn't decide to invade.


Another ad hom. The last sentence is hilariously naive.

Uke corruption definitely didn't start 2 years ago, and anyone who was paying attention before the invasion would know that.


No unprovoked Putin led invasion, no (or at least much less) US aid = less money to skim. So yes, as usual everything negative that happens in this war is 100% Putin's fault.

Seems pretty simple to understand but I get that it may be too complex for you to figure out.


"Unprovoked"

As I said, hilariously naive. But I appreciate you letting me know arguing with you isn't worth my time.
Yes...

Unprovoked. Without quotes...

Wanting to join a defensive alliance that exists to protect its members from Russian aggression is NOT provocation...


Anyone can reply-

Do you seriously believe that was the extent of the reasoning for the war? How nuanced is your understanding of the why behind all this?
I do understand. And I understand the nuances.

But, first, I'd really like to hear YOUR view on the reasoning and nuances...


What nuances? I don't think you and I mean the same thing when we say that word, so when you said it just now: what was that referencing?

I think that, with some exceptions, Russia is allowed to do what Russia thinks is in the best interest of Russia.
So...no nuances in your position. Just blunt force.

Caveman want. Caveman take.


Thats a very poor characterization if my position, but it is entirely unsurprising. We can clarify the minutia if you're interested.

I'd like to better understand what you wrote earlier, so I'll ask again: What nuances do you understand?
No it's not.

It's an accurate description.

You're just trying to be clever and obfuscate it.


Are you unwilling to clarify what you meant? I asked a direct question about the meaning of one of your posts.

When you said "I do understand. And I understand the nuances" what were you referencing?
You don't ever answer "direct questions". You've had numerous ones posed to you.

I've answered many of them.

Obfuscation...
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think it's apparent that PCG's intent at this point is to simply get the thread locked again. When someone can't answer basic direct questions then it's obvious what they are doing.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good weekend for Russia:



Quote:

The conflict between Russia and Ukraine would have never happened without the interference of the West and its "insane"idea of an ever-expanding NATO, Tarik Cyril Amar, an associate professor at Koc University in Istanbul, believes.

Speaking to RT's Oksana Boyko on Worlds Apart, the history professor shared his thoughts on the insistence of both Kiev and its Western backers on inflicting a decisive battlefield defeat on Russia which seemingly remains unchanged despite all the setbacks the Ukrainian military has suffered. For Kiev, such a belief might actually be genuine, he suggested.

"Regarding the Ukrainian leadership, I would not be able to tell. I have a guess that President Zelensky himself is, basically, delusional and has become drunk on his own rhetoric as well as the flattery that he used to receive from the West. I think it has really deranged him a bit and disturbed his relationship to reality,"the RT.com contributor suggested.

In the West, the understanding that such a goal is not viable has become more prominent, and talk of continuous support for Ukraine is, at least partially, a "negotiation tactic," the professor argued.

"Concerning the West, my guess is that quite a few people in Washington and in the EU as well understand that they have to get out of this war without a Russian defeat. Now do they understand already how much they have to concede? Again, I can't tell," Amar stated.

Western decision makers, particularly in the US, apparently still "live in the 1990s" and refuse to realize that the age of "unilateralism" is over. The Russian leadership, as well as China and Iran, live in the present, Amar claimed.

Without Western interference, the conflict between Kiev and Moscow would have never started, and multiple opportunities to bring it to an end were deliberately sabotaged, including the Minsk agreement of 2015 and the Istanbul talks of March 2022, Amar said.

"The roots of the war do really go to 2008, the infamous Bucharest summit, when both Georgia and Ukraine were put by the West into this insane position of saying' One day you'll be in NATO, but not now,' which, of course, exposed them and made them threats for Russia."

The West's insistence on fueling the conflict largely stems from two ideas, Amar explained. The West "simply won't give up on its idea of expanding NATO, which in itself is an insane idea," as well as pursues a "long-term geopolitical strategy of getting Russia down," as it refused to accept Moscow's resurgence following the 1990s turmoil.






It bears repeating;

Rongagin71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There has been speculation for years about Russia's GPS jamming abilities.
Now use seems to go beyond Ukraine and, two weeks ago, to have "dropped" GPS over Poland.
More probing is currently being reported.

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes, glonass (the Russian system) and GPS jamming has been a key weapon, and they've toyed with it in the Baltic states/Poland of late;

Quote:

On Dec. 25 and 26 a wide swath of northern Poland and southern Sweden was impacted. The next week, on New Year's Eve, aircraft across a large area of southeastern Finland reported disruptions. On Jan. 10, 13 and 16 the northern half of Poland was the primary target. On the 19, southern Sweden and northern Poland felt the effects. Estonia and Latvia were the targets most recently on Jan. 24.

In each case the disruption was detected by aviation safety ADS-B systems carried by commercial aircraft, and were displayed on the website GPSJam.org.

Analyses of the Christmas interference by graduate student Zach Clements at the University of Texas Radionavigation Laboratory. Clements studies GPS disruptions and has published on locating the sources from satellites in low earth orbit

In an interview, he said he determined a number of transmitters were involved spread across a wide area. Some were simply jamming GPS signals to deny service. But at least one transmitter was spoofing aircraft so their instruments would show them far from their actual location and flying in a circle.

While the phenomenon known as "circle spoofing" has been frequently observed with ships, this was the first time it was reported in aviation.

Clements told me he is reasonably sure the source of the circle spoofing was inside Russia. "The points at which the aircraft began to be impacted by the spoofing and where they regained authentic GPS indicate that the spoofer is somewhere in western Russia," he said. "Interestingly, the location the aircraft were spoofed to is a field about a kilometer from Russia's decommissioned Smolensk military airbase."

Graduate researcher Zixi Liu at Stanford confirmed to me that based on her analysis, a number of jammers were almost certainly involved in the Christmas jamming. Her previous research used aviation ADS-B data to geo-locate sources of GPS disruptions.
Now, this appears to be an operator directing a jammer/spoof at a specific aircraft, to cause some confusion/an alert to be shown. We Pretty clearly the pilots knew they weren't at the Russian air base as spoofed but it is dangerous none the less. EW and jamming has become critical with the proliferation of drones in the war.

PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When you said "I do understand. And I understand the nuances" what were you referencing?
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Proposing to send Uke 60B, when our marines only cost 58B. Clown world on full display.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Wow.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

For Proposing Peace Talks
With Moscow


Fake headline is fake. I went to the actual Hill article with this citation and it wasn't mentioned by Zelenskyy as his reason at all.


Typical. ALWAYS check Nortex links
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


How many abandoned towns will have to fall before the stalemare narrative is widely abandoned?
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:



Wow.


Tweet and headline seem to be misleading at best (but likely just blatantly lying for clicks) - nowhere in the article does Zelensky say to the interviewer he's firing the general for secret peace talks Russia. That's all from anonymous sources from our favorite 86 year old war reporter/bin Laden conspiracy theorist.

Could still be true, but certainly nothing like what that purposely misleading headline says.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Its never good news for Uke when the pro-Russian accounts are using the Uke accounts for their source material

Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So maybe they'll finally take an abandoned village by March? So we averaging one village every 5 months?
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

So maybe they'll finally take an abandoned village by March? So we averaging one village every 5 months?


I find it interesting you're not considering the human cost in your assessment here. The videos coming out of Avdeevka are not pretty.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PlaneCrashGuy said:

When you said "I do understand. And I understand the nuances" what were you referencing?
What I understood. The the nuances of it.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

Quote:

For Proposing Peace Talks
With Moscow


Fake headline is fake. I went to the actual Hill article with this citation and it wasn't mentioned by Zelenskyy as his reason at all.


Typical. ALWAYS check Nortex links
hahaha...

But, if what was stated WAS true, it would actually be a legitimate reason to fire him.

Basically making an end run around the leader of the country and avoiding the chain of command is not exactly how you want things done for ANYONE in the military for WHATEVER reason.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

So maybe they'll finally take an abandoned village by March? So we averaging one village every 5 months?
Should make it to Kyiv by the year 2525...

And maybe the rest of Ukraine by the year 3535...
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PlaneCrashGuy said:

Teslag said:

So maybe they'll finally take an abandoned village by March? So we averaging one village every 5 months?


I find it interesting you're not considering the human cost in your assessment here. The videos coming out of Avdeevka are not pretty.
Are you smiling because the Russians have killed some more Ukrainian civilians.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

Teslag said:

So maybe they'll finally take an abandoned village by March? So we averaging one village every 5 months?


I find it interesting you're not considering the human cost in your assessment here. The videos coming out of Avdeevka are not pretty.
Are you smiling because the Russians have killed some more Ukrainian civilians.


I was told the town was abandoned, meaning no civilians.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

Teslag said:

Quote:

For Proposing Peace Talks
With Moscow


Fake headline is fake. I went to the actual Hill article with this citation and it wasn't mentioned by Zelenskyy as his reason at all.


Typical. ALWAYS check Nortex links
hahaha...

But, if what was stated WAS true, it would actually be a legitimate reason to fire him.

Basically making an end run around the leader of the country and avoiding the chain of command is not exactly how you want things done for ANYONE in the military for WHATEVER reason.
Don't tell the Vindmans, FBI, Ohrs (ham radio enthusiasts), love birds, or Eric Ciaramella.

Kiev and the UFA is an absolute mess.

chickencoupe16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PlaneCrashGuy said:

When you said "I do understand. And I understand the nuances" what were you referencing?


How many nuances would he have to list to satisfy you? 2? 5? 30? If he lists all but one that you can think of has he failed your test? If he forgets your favorite nuance has he failed?

I can't decide if you're a troll or actually believe. On one hand, I can't imagine someone actually believing and arguing such nonsense. On the other, I can't imagine someone having the commitment to keep such a ridiculous troll going for so long.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Ag with kids said:

Teslag said:

Quote:

For Proposing Peace Talks
With Moscow


Fake headline is fake. I went to the actual Hill article with this citation and it wasn't mentioned by Zelenskyy as his reason at all.


Typical. ALWAYS check Nortex links
hahaha...

But, if what was stated WAS true, it would actually be a legitimate reason to fire him.

Basically making an end run around the leader of the country and avoiding the chain of command is not exactly how you want things done for ANYONE in the military for WHATEVER reason.
Don't tell the Vindmans, FBI, Ohrs (ham radio enthusiasts), love birds, or Eric Ciaramella.

Kiev and the UFA is an absolute mess.


Those *******s should have been buried UNDER the jail.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PlaneCrashGuy said:

Ag with kids said:

PlaneCrashGuy said:

Teslag said:

So maybe they'll finally take an abandoned village by March? So we averaging one village every 5 months?


I find it interesting you're not considering the human cost in your assessment here. The videos coming out of Avdeevka are not pretty.
Are you smiling because the Russians have killed some more Ukrainian civilians.


I was told the town was abandoned, meaning no civilians.
I guess they killed them or they all had to leave their homes. Must have left you absolutely giddy that Russia has done that to those civilians.
First Page Last Page
Page 170 of 270
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.