2000 Mules

69,588 Views | 897 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by aggiehawg
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Pookers said:

PA24 said:

Waiting on response from Senate Minority Leader, turtle neck himself and also Graham. You know, the usual suspects that hid their head n the sand.


2020 doesn't happen without the GOPe wing of the establishment helping in the steal.
Have to agree. Electronic voting systems have been problematical since their introduction. Which, if you recall, began as a response to the hanging chad crap from 2000 in Florida. Because some dumb Democrat election official couldn't properly design a punch paper ballot.

From there, it went even more downhill. Now, Dominion may have zero to do with Venezuela (which I don't think they do) but their creation and very rapid expansion, courtesy of the Holder Justice Department, tells another story.
Is there a legitimate reason for the justice department to be involved with acquiring voting systems?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Funky Winkerbean said:

aggiehawg said:

Pookers said:

PA24 said:

Waiting on response from Senate Minority Leader, turtle neck himself and also Graham. You know, the usual suspects that hid their head n the sand.


2020 doesn't happen without the GOPe wing of the establishment helping in the steal.
Have to agree. Electronic voting systems have been problematical since their introduction. Which, if you recall, began as a response to the hanging chad crap from 2000 in Florida. Because some dumb Democrat election official couldn't properly design a punch paper ballot.

From there, it went even more downhill. Now, Dominion may have zero to do with Venezuela (which I don't think they do) but their creation and very rapid expansion, courtesy of the Holder Justice Department, tells another story.
Is there a legitimate reason for the justice department to be involved with acquiring voting systems?
They used antitrust, then gave Dominion 40% of the market.

Go figure.
jimmo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
91AggieLawyer said:

Infection_Ag11 said:


Now full disclosure, I have an inherent bias against D'Souza. I think he's a moron who has spent years grifting for profit. He gets absolutely obliterated in long form debates on any topic. Sam Harris, Hitchens and Jordan Peterson have all slapped him back to the Stone Age at various points. He's just not very bright and I don't believe he even believes half the content he puts out. He has a very Candice Owens vibe.

I have no words.

Can you post the links where he's been "slapped back to the Stone Age?"

This rant produces nothing specific and is full of unjustified ad hominem. Shiela Jackson Lee is a moron. D'Souza is NOT.
I'd be interested in that link as well
Boo Weekley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
91AggieLawyer said:

Infection_Ag11 said:


Now full disclosure, I have an inherent bias against D'Souza. I think he's a moron who has spent years grifting for profit. He gets absolutely obliterated in long form debates on any topic. Sam Harris, Hitchens and Jordan Peterson have all slapped him back to the Stone Age at various points. He's just not very bright and I don't believe he even believes half the content he puts out. He has a very Candice Owens vibe.

I have no words.

Can you post the links where he's been "slapped back to the Stone Age?"

This rant produces nothing specific and is full of unjustified ad hominem. Shiela Jackson Lee is a moron. D'Souza is NOT.


It's hilarious….Dinesh is definitely a high IQ individual. I would like to see him getting owned by these other guys as well. Prob religious debates…which are almost always useless and accomplish nothing.

Infection Ag was always a big Fauci guy….prob still is…the receipts are on Texags. Just fyi.
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Infection_Ag11 said:

Of course there was voter fraud, there has been fraud in every national election ever held in any country ever.

That being said I actually watched this while working on notes this morning and it left a lot to be desired. The foundation of the claim presented is the cell phone data tracking various "mules" to drop boxes and political headquarters. The problem is this is based on a rash of assumptions only some of which are reasonable.

Yeah the videos of the woman taking off her gloves and stuff is highly irregular, but the fact is 99.9% of the votes they counted in this documentary rely on said assumptions and some of them are baseless.

Now full disclosure, I have an inherent bias against D'Souza. I think he's a moron who has spent years grifting for profit. He gets absolutely obliterated in long form debates on any topic. Sam Harris, Hitchens and Jordan Peterson have all slapped him back to the Stone Age at various points. He's just not very bright and I don't believe he even believes half the content he puts out. He has a very Candice Owens vibe.
Fine. Certainly this deserves an in depth investigation and the Dems would want it all exposed to show how it all wrong. I mean this is really damning evidence and they need to be able to show why it was all wrong. Instead I would expect they will use a combination of ignoring it and trying to destroy the people involved with it which is exactly what they would do if they know it is true.

I am also confident that D'Souza would do a live interview or debate with no opportunity to edit to discuss the movie and issues.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
CSTXAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fasthorse05 said:

CSTXAg92 said:

Bidens leg hairs said:


Where was the Republican Party? Don't you think with all the millions in campaign funds that you would have a team of investigators and spies tracking the Democrat Party and trying to expose fraud like this?






Silent, if not complicit.

Trump was *truly* a Washington outsider. Republicans wanted him out of office as much as dims.
I've thought about your comment, or a version of your comment, a lot.

It's a given the Dems/Left were going to viscerally hate Trump. They've viscerally hated every single Republican president, and will continue to do so. From Reagan to '41 to '43, they were all going to "destroy America, democracy, my children, the world, and and college football". But Trump was and has been different.

The reason I bring this up is what exactly did Trump do that any other Republican president didn't do, except to be rough around the edges while speaking and pick his cabinet rather poorly. Otherwise, he had outstanding policies and pissed off a lot of our allies with frank conversations.

Even other Republicans turned on him; I'd say about 20% of elected Republicans supported getting rid of him. I understand RINO's, etc., but they NEVER supported getting rid of a sitting Republican president before. Have any of y'all ever wondered if there's something else the general public doesn't know about Trump, other than being an outsider. It's not like Trump was going to expose all of the corruption in DC, and elsewhere. He never got a chance, and never even got started. Our government has reached the the size that it can do what it wants, when it wants, so one man wasn't going to change it.

Just my 2 cents.


Washington politicians rise through the ranks granting favors and keeping tabs on who owes them what. Trump didn't rise through the ranks. He didn't owe anyone anything. As a result, he couldn't be kept in check. That made him a huge threat to the establishment.
CSTXAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keegan99 said:

I don't think you understand what harvesting is. It doesn't require deceased or incapacitated voters.

Harvesting is finding someone who is otherwise a non-voter, and then guiding them through the process. You fill out the mail-in application for them (if necessary in the state), and then when the ballot arrives, guide them through completion. Finally, you ferry the ballot to a drop box.

It's particularly easy if the person is elderly. Many elderly living alone are just happy to have someone to talk to. And many nursing home operators are happy to get in on the operation.


It's even easier if you have access to a curbside mailbox. Theoretically, the voter doesn't even need to be involved. Especially if signature-verification is weak or non-existent.


Elderly (due to their living in old folk homes) and drumroll please… **HISPANICS** are two of the most easily exploited demographics. Brings a whole new perspective to why dims are so keen to allow illegal immigration.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CSTXAg92 said:

fasthorse05 said:

CSTXAg92 said:

Bidens leg hairs said:


Where was the Republican Party? Don't you think with all the millions in campaign funds that you would have a team of investigators and spies tracking the Democrat Party and trying to expose fraud like this?






Silent, if not complicit.

Trump was *truly* a Washington outsider. Republicans wanted him out of office as much as dims.
I've thought about your comment, or a version of your comment, a lot.

It's a given the Dems/Left were going to viscerally hate Trump. They've viscerally hated every single Republican president, and will continue to do so. From Reagan to '41 to '43, they were all going to "destroy America, democracy, my children, the world, and and college football". But Trump was and has been different.

The reason I bring this up is what exactly did Trump do that any other Republican president didn't do, except to be rough around the edges while speaking and pick his cabinet rather poorly. Otherwise, he had outstanding policies and pissed off a lot of our allies with frank conversations.

Even other Republicans turned on him; I'd say about 20% of elected Republicans supported getting rid of him. I understand RINO's, etc., but they NEVER supported getting rid of a sitting Republican president before. Have any of y'all ever wondered if there's something else the general public doesn't know about Trump, other than being an outsider. It's not like Trump was going to expose all of the corruption in DC, and elsewhere. He never got a chance, and never even got started. Our government has reached the the size that it can do what it wants, when it wants, so one man wasn't going to change it.

Just my 2 cents.


Washington politicians rise through the ranks granting favors and keeping tabs on who owes them what. Trump didn't rise through the ranks. He didn't owe anyone anything. As a result, he couldn't be kept in check. That made him a huge threat to the establishment.


Trump had likely favors needed in the small game where he did business. Otherwise he was free to do as he saw fit. No doubt he saw cronyism to an extreme that he didn't previously imagine.

Tear it all down!
CSTXAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AG512 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Of course there was voter fraud, there has been fraud in every national election ever held in any country ever.

That being said I actually watched this while working on notes this morning and it left a lot to be desired. The foundation of the claim presented is the cell phone data tracking various "mules" to drop boxes and political headquarters. The problem is this is based on a rash of assumptions only some of which are reasonable.

Yeah the videos of the woman taking off her gloves and stuff is highly irregular, but the fact is 99.9% of the votes they counted in this documentary rely on said assumptions and some of them are baseless.

Now full disclosure, I have an inherent bias against D'Souza. I think he's a moron who has spent years grifting for profit. He gets absolutely obliterated in long form debates on any topic. Sam Harris, Hitchens and Jordan Peterson have all slapped him back to the Stone Age at various points. He's just not very bright and I don't believe he even believes half the content he puts out. He has a very Candice Owens vibe.


I don't think you really watched it


Or, he's just intellectually and/or morally dishonest.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Watching it now..

In discussing Philadelphia and it's 1100 mules, my first thought was concerning how would 1,100 mules have access to so many ballots? I then recalled the trucker that was interviewed by the media and he stated he was carrying ballots, but I don't recall where he picked them and where they were delivered. Anyone remember that?
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bethpage, New York. Delivery to Harrisburg, PA.

The trucker's name was Jesse Morgan.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Welp, that's the only good reason I can think of.

I can't think of a single person the Dems would have treated like they did Trump, and only elected Republicans joined in on the Dem party; I don't know of many conservative voters who were in the same boat.

I have maybe 25% faith in McCarthy, although November is a long way away. Everyone seems to believe it will be a blowout, and I'm not sure. I take a very long time to make up my mind on a human/politician, and I've watched McCarthy's actions for 20 years, and he's not only not a decent conservative, he's a sorry individual. I'd be willing to bet you he was working to push Trump out; there's a lot of circumstantial evidence to support it.
Whirligigs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CSTXAg92 said:

AG512 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Of course there was voter fraud, there has been fraud in every national election ever held in any country ever.

That being said I actually watched this while working on notes this morning and it left a lot to be desired. The foundation of the claim presented is the cell phone data tracking various "mules" to drop boxes and political headquarters. The problem is this is based on a rash of assumptions only some of which are reasonable.

Yeah the videos of the woman taking off her gloves and stuff is highly irregular, but the fact is 99.9% of the votes they counted in this documentary rely on said assumptions and some of them are baseless.

Now full disclosure, I have an inherent bias against D'Souza. I think he's a moron who has spent years grifting for profit. He gets absolutely obliterated in long form debates on any topic. Sam Harris, Hitchens and Jordan Peterson have all slapped him back to the Stone Age at various points. He's just not very bright and I don't believe he even believes half the content he puts out. He has a very Candice Owens vibe.


I don't think you really watched it


Or, he's just intellectually and/or morally dishonest.


It's rich infection_ag still posting on this board offering any insight on any topic after his Covid fear porn initiation.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Funky Winkerbean said:

Watching it now..

In discussing Philadelphia and it's 1100 mules, my first thought was concerning how would 1,100 mules have access to so many ballots? I then recalled the trucker that was interviewed by the media and he stated he was carrying ballots, but I don't recall where he picked them and where they were delivered. Anyone remember that?
My recollection was that he was coming from New Jersey. Only a bridge separates them over the Delaware River.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why aren't states and counties using local law enforcement to check these things out? Interview a few people and get this stuff exposed.
Shoefly!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Funky Winkerbean said:

Watching it now..

In discussing Philadelphia and it's 1100 mules, my first thought was concerning how would 1,100 mules have access to so many ballots? I then recalled the trucker that was interviewed by the media and he stated he was carrying ballots, but I don't recall where he picked them and where they were delivered. Anyone remember that?

Yes he picked them up in New York State at a copy shop that that has since burned to the ground, about the same time or close to the Nashville bombing blowing up the AT&T comms under the city.
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funky Winkerbean said:

Why aren't states and counties using local law enforcement to check these things out? Interview a few people and get this stuff exposed.
because they report to liberal city councils/mayors
snowdog90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
91AggieLawyer said:

Infection_Ag11 said:


Now full disclosure, I have an inherent bias against D'Souza. I think he's a moron who has spent years grifting for profit. He gets absolutely obliterated in long form debates on any topic. Sam Harris, Hitchens and Jordan Peterson have all slapped him back to the Stone Age at various points. He's just not very bright and I don't believe he even believes half the content he puts out. He has a very Candice Owens vibe.

I have no words.

Can you post the links where he's been "slapped back to the Stone Age?"

This rant produces nothing specific and is full of unjustified ad hominem. Shiela Jackson Lee is a moron. D'Souza is NOT.


Yes. Infection ag thinks D'Souza is a moron, but lauded the amazing Dr. Fauci. Pretty telling.
pluto29
How long do you want to ignore this user?
M4 Benelli
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't even want to watch this as I have no desire to buy a new TV after I'd put my foot through the one I own. Doubt any of this information is new to people who have been following, so it's just more salt to the wounds. May red pill some CM's, one would hope.

I
Marcus Brutus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Infection_Ag11 said:

Of course there was voter fraud, there has been fraud in every national election ever held in any country ever.

That being said I actually watched this while working on notes this morning and it left a lot to be desired. The foundation of the claim presented is the cell phone data tracking various "mules" to drop boxes and political headquarters. The problem is this is based on a rash of assumptions only some of which are reasonable.

Yeah the videos of the woman taking off her gloves and stuff is highly irregular, but the fact is 99.9% of the votes they counted in this documentary rely on said assumptions and some of them are baseless.

Now full disclosure, I have an inherent bias against D'Souza. I think he's a moron who has spent years grifting for profit. He gets absolutely obliterated in long form debates on any topic. Sam Harris, Hitchens and Jordan Peterson have all slapped him back to the Stone Age at various points. He's just not very bright and I don't believe he even believes half the content he puts out. He has a very Candice Owens vibe.


It's not based on a "rash" of assumptions. Do you even understand the term "rash"? More than one ballot means it is a ballot for someone other than the individual. You do know it's illegal in PA for anyone but the voter to mail their ballot or return it in person, unless given written permission behalf of a disabled person and then only when the ballot was given to that named person up front. Are you really asserting that the sky is not blue?:

Quote:

If the elector is unable to appear at the office of the county board of elections to receive the ballot, the board shall give the elector's absentee ballot to an authorized representative of the elector who is designated in writing by the elector. The authorized representative shall deliver the absentee ballot to the elector and return the completed absentee ballot, sealed in the official absentee ballot envelopes, to the office of the county board of elections, which shall retain the ballot, unopened, until the canvassing of all absentee ballots.


Your ad hom at the end is a nice touch to the nonsense you posted.
bigfooticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Very well done via visual presentation that's irrefutable with video and technical data illustrating what many of us all knew
RoadkillBBQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funky Winkerbean said:

Why aren't states and counties using local law enforcement to check these things out? Interview a few people and get this stuff exposed.
The state level is exactly where this needs to occur.
Hopefully we see this start happening now that this film has been released. I would find it hard to believe any politician at the state or federal level hasn't watched this. And you know damn well it's being talked about in quiet circles.
RoadkillBBQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
C@LAg said:

Funky Winkerbean said:

Why aren't states and counties using local law enforcement to check these things out? Interview a few people and get this stuff exposed.
because they report to liberal city councils/mayors
Abbott and Paxton don't.
They need to be the ones who kick the top off this ant bed.
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This documentary just confirms one aspect of what the establishment did to ensure Trump lost the election and Democrats gained power as described in Time magazine's "The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election".

Even with controlling the media message they still had to cheat in selected metropolitan areas in swing states to win.

It also suggests that the 50/50 Senate is not legitimate because the Georgia runoff was rigged. It would also be interesting to see if the Michigan and Arizona Senate races show any unexplained anomalies.

The establishment politicians, bureaucrats, and those who have bought them are the true threat to our republic. The are intentionally destroying the country for their own lust for power.
FJB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"Show us proof!!!" /libs

Dinesh -


Who is John Galt?

2026
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump won without the mail in ballot drop box stuffing, as D'Souza and True the Vote have shown. Just think how bigly trump would have won had it not been for years of Russia Russia Russia lies, good people on both sides lies, non-stop hatred from msm fake news convincing sheeple to hate him more and more, and then complete censoring by big tech and cover from msm with more Russia lies about the proof of Biden's long suspected and obvious corruption on hunter's laptop. That censoring was worse election interference than anything Russia could have ever dreamed of.
jpb1999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Shoefly! said:

Funky Winkerbean said:

Watching it now..

In discussing Philadelphia and it's 1100 mules, my first thought was concerning how would 1,100 mules have access to so many ballots? I then recalled the trucker that was interviewed by the media and he stated he was carrying ballots, but I don't recall where he picked them and where they were delivered. Anyone remember that?

Yes he picked them up in New York State at a copy shop that that has since burned to the ground, about the same time or close to the Nashville bombing blowing up the AT&T comms under the city.
Really... so the copy shop burned. When?

You can't even make this stuff up...
sleepybeagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Quote:

"The democrats have ruined election day"

No truer words spoken.

If votes were handled with the same seriousness as bank transactions - not a penny would be lost or unaccounted for.

The question isn't how to secure the vote - but why don't we do it?
blacksox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do you guys really believe this conspiracy theory nonsense? Or is this like an inside joke I'm not aware of?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
blacksox said:

Do you guys really believe this conspiracy theory nonsense? Or is this like an inside joke I'm not aware of?
Do you really believe Biden won legitimately?
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
blacksox said:

Do you guys really believe this conspiracy theory nonsense? Or is this like an inside joke I'm not aware of?
There's a lot you're not aware of.
Welloiledmachine04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
blacksox said:

Do you guys really believe this conspiracy theory nonsense? Or is this like an inside joke I'm not aware of?
Go away troll or try to defend the actions documented in the movie.

Same with infection ag. Please be specific. But as it was said, being a sheepish covid fear porn advocate, I doubt we will get any honest debate from him.
medwriter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CSTXAg92 said:

Watched the virtual debut tonight. After seeing the movie, no intellectually or morally honest person can claim the 2020 election was without fraud.

https://www.2000mules.com/
I've been meaning to watch this. Thanks for your post!
bigfooticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would be shocked if FJB even broke 60 million legit votes
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.