***Russian - Ukraine War Tactical and Strategic Updates*** [Warning on OP]

7,733,338 Views | 48149 Replies | Last: 40 min ago by PJYoung
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
File5 said:

You must have stepped off early on the oblique BQ: 800 m^2 is 8611 ft^2




Yeah you're right... I was dumb and used cube instead of square. I'd like to think it's 21,000 sf though
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Ukrainian air defense is active in the south of Odesa region to repel new drone attack against Reni and Izmail
https://liveuamap.com/en/2023/7-september-ukrainian-air-defense-is-active-in-the-south

Russia must not care about the chance of drones going over the border to Romania.
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MouthBQ98 said:

The cost is not the cost of the drones shot down. It is the cost avoidance of what those drones might damage or destroy that needs to be considered.


Long term the initial cost bs the cost of munitions does need to be considered since you can build thousands of drones for the price of one anti drone system. Plus you need systems that will be easier for infantry to use on their own.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Duplicate post deleted.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Fife
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm glad to see them lose any variant of the missile type they used to shoot down MH17!
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Uke observation and attack drones as well as close air support is forcing them to push more and more of these things too close to the front. Desperation is going to cost them more "elite" equipment.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ukraine finding ways to reach out and touch Russia. "But they also speak to how Ukraine is trying to disrupt Russia away from the front lines with a mix of long-range strikes and special operators willing to go deep in enemy territory. And in both cases, home-grown, or at least home-repurposed, weapons are playing an outsize role."

RAIDS
jbeaman88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lb sand said:

I get a chuckle out of this quote:
"no health concerns from the depleted uranium armor-piercing rounds. "

Except getting hit by one!
I got more of a chuckle from the statement by a country that has launched countless missiles against civilians acting so concerned about the health of civilians and combatants.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gepard doing work.

GUNS
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Another
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I believe they said it was the 3rd.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GarryowenAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What I wouldn't give for the Ukes to capture a T-14…
SouthTex99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
sclaff
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Russians fire upon their own retreating troops in Robityne- on purpose.

JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
sclaff said:

Russians fire upon their own retreating troops in Robityne- on purpose.




Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn would not be surprised same with not accepting their own pows back without trade.

Been off grid a week. Appreciate all the updates and satisfied to see Ukes continuing to push orcs out.

Last 3 days on reddit looks like orcs lost tons of assets including 4-5 BUk ADA units.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GarryowenAg said:

What I wouldn't give for the Ukes to capture a T-14…


They're all back in Russia. They never really did anything.
lurker76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sclaff said:

Russians fire upon their own retreating troops in Robityne- on purpose.


A story that goes back to WW1 and followed up in WW2.
Gilligan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lurker76 said:

sclaff said:

Russians fire upon their own retreating troops in Robityne- on purpose.


A story that goes back to WW1 and followed up in WW2.


…and continues to this day. Sad that this is still happening in 2022, 2023, 202?????…

AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rossticus said:




The table is almost set to launch a second prong somewhere much further south. They've pulled A LOT of reserves to one small area. Fix them in place and hit them hard elsewhere.
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SouthTex99 said:

This concentration of Russians looks like a beautiful artillery and bombing range. Rain it down.


I could only imagine a huge barrage of USN missiles from a fleet.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG




Quote:

The Ukrainian tactics: The Ukrainians take an important objective and then "consolidate." This means that they dig in and prepare for a reflexive Russian counterattack. Being covered by precision fires and cluster munitions, these new positions are very difficult to retake and the Russians' weaknesses in organizing on the fly and coordinating attacks come to bear.

This also enables the Ukrainians to inflict a high casualty ratios on the Russians even thought they are on the offense. The strategy of depleting the Russians reduces Ukrainians casualties, but also weakens the Russians for each of the next offensive punches. Russians running out of troops and equipment is more important than their loss of real estate, since they cannot effectively replace those losses.

#RussiaLosingBadly
Rongagin71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Its been said before, but the "Russia cannot effectively replace losses" line is yet to be proven correct.
Russia is very huge, and even if Putin drops dead and his replacement settles the war, it may only be a few years until the Russian military is rebuilt, possibly stronger than before - we just don't know the future.
lurker76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gilligan said:

lurker76 said:

sclaff said:

Russians fire upon their own retreating troops in Robityne- on purpose.


A story that goes back to WW1 and followed up in WW2.


…and continues to this day. Sad that this is still happening in 2022, 2023, 202?????…


True that it is sad, but has the psyche of the Russians changed that much in the last 500 years or more? I'm not a Russian historian, nor a real student of history, but from the Tzars to Lenin to Stalin et al to Putin, how many of the leaders of Russia cared about their citizens other than a means to support their lifestyle and power?
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rongagin71 said:

Its been said before, but the "Russia cannot effectively replace losses" line is yet to be proven correct.
Russia is very huge, and even if Putin drops dead and his replacement settles the war, it may only be a few years until the Russian military is rebuilt, possibly stronger than before - we just don't know the future.
Demographics rules the future and theirs is horrific.

Ukraine will be in a worse position since the demographics are similar and they're much smaller but they will be armed to the teeth.

Gordo14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rongagin71 said:

Its been said before, but the "Russia cannot effectively replace losses" line is yet to be proven correct.
Russia is very huge, and even if Putin drops dead and his replacement settles the war, it may only be a few years until the Russian military is rebuilt, possibly stronger than before - we just don't know the future.


I disagree. Russia is having a crisis of quality troops, equipment, and if they draft more people they will struggle more economically. Being isolated the way they are makes it much harder for them to fully mobilize society the way Ukraine has. The wave of bodies strategy is less effective with modern technology due to weapon precision and surveillance.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PJYoung said:

Rongagin71 said:

Its been said before, but the "Russia cannot effectively replace losses" line is yet to be proven correct.
Russia is very huge, and even if Putin drops dead and his replacement settles the war, it may only be a few years until the Russian military is rebuilt, possibly stronger than before - we just don't know the future.
Demographics rules the future and theirs is horrific.

Ukraine will be in a worse position since the demographics are similar and they're much smaller but they will be armed to the teeth.


........and Ukraine will still have all of rich Europe at its back, securing its strategic rear and resupplying it. In contrast, the Kremlin's only "friends" are a few poor pariah states and China which sees Russia as a junior ally of convenience to be shed when of no further use. Putin's war is a disaster for both sides.
First Page Last Page
Page 1199 of 1376
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.