***Russian - Ukraine War Tactical and Strategic Updates*** [Warning on OP]

6,931,820 Views | 45722 Replies | Last: 2 min ago by MaroonStain
MeatDr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MeatDr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
V8Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MeatDr said:




What good is a western jet without the support for maintenance?
MeatDr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

chickencoupe16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

4 rounds per minute maximum with a trained and proficient crew. 2 rounds per minute sustained. In no case could they just volley fire all 40k rounds at once. Thanks for your input.

Firing at the theoretical sustained or maximum rate isn't remotely realistic.


Yeah, I'm aware that they aren't going to actually fire all 40k at once but I'm not the one that suggested that to begin with...
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MeatDr said:


Has Russia ever even successfully performed an amphibious invasion? I guess I can't see how they have the history with it to make those landing ships all that intimidating. If they're having trouble with a mostly ground invasion right on their border, how are they going to possibly expect success doing it the harder way?
Ulrich
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I predicted this early on, it's the only way the invasion makes sense.

Russia expected Donbas to join, not resist. They also expected token resistance in the rest of the country. Putin really thought he was liberating Ukraine; he believed his own propaganda a lot more than the Ukrainians ever did.

So now, Russia has:
Strengthened NATO's sense of purpose
Forced several more countries to join NATO
Forced Europe to invest heavily in alternatives to Russian energy
Weakened the eastern bloc alliance
Obliterated Russia's prestige and credibility
Decisively lost any sympathy that previously existed in Eastern Ukraine

Next up: keep an eye on Belarus. Antiwar violence has begun. I doubt this will foment regime change and a split from Russia, but it could.

It seems very unlikely that he's going to control significant new parts of Ukraine after this; at best he'll keep Crimea and the Donbas will be some kind of DMZ.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waffledynamics said:

MeatDr said:


Has Russia ever even successfully performed an amphibious invasion? I guess I can't see how they have the history with it to make those landing ships all that intimidating. If they're having trouble with a mostly ground invasion right on their border, how are they going to possibly expect success doing it the harder way?
Not for an amphibious landing, but likely loading to either deliver reinforcements around Mariupol or to demonstrate near Odessa to keep Ukraine from shifting forces from there to the eastern front.
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

Waffledynamics said:

MeatDr said:


Has Russia ever even successfully performed an amphibious invasion? I guess I can't see how they have the history with it to make those landing ships all that intimidating. If they're having trouble with a mostly ground invasion right on their border, how are they going to possibly expect success doing it the harder way?
Not for an amphibious landing, but likely loading to either deliver reinforcements around Mariupol or to demonstrate near Odessa to keep Ukraine from shifting forces from there to the eastern front.


It's the Baltic fleet, not the Black Sea. They can't gain entry to the Black Sea. This is a Jerry Jeff Walker maneuver known as Pissin in the Wind.
aggrad02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

Waffledynamics said:

MeatDr said:


Has Russia ever even successfully performed an amphibious invasion? I guess I can't see how they have the history with it to make those landing ships all that intimidating. If they're having trouble with a mostly ground invasion right on their border, how are they going to possibly expect success doing it the harder way?
Not for an amphibious landing, but likely loading to either deliver reinforcements around Mariupol or to demonstrate near Odessa to keep Ukraine from shifting forces from there to the eastern front.


They can't get into the Black Sea, Turkey has it closed.

These Russian resources are in the Baltic Sea (Northern Europe).
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is the Baltic, not the Black.

Bosporus is closed by Turkey. Russia is not getting any additional assets into the Black Sea.
BQ_90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

Waffledynamics said:

MeatDr said:


Has Russia ever even successfully performed an amphibious invasion? I guess I can't see how they have the history with it to make those landing ships all that intimidating. If they're having trouble with a mostly ground invasion right on their border, how are they going to possibly expect success doing it the harder way?
Not for an amphibious landing, but likely loading to either deliver reinforcements around Mariupol or to demonstrate near Odessa to keep Ukraine from shifting forces from there to the eastern front.
Turkey will not let any of those ships into the Black Sea. Also that would weaken their Baltic Fleet
MeatDr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They were given a surrender or else ultimatum with a deadline of 9am this morning.
AGS-R-TUFF
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
G Martin 87 said:

Wargaming predicts stalemate ahead as neither Ukraine nor Russia will have the ability to maintain offensives soon.

https://mwi.usma.edu/wargaming-a-long-war-ukraine-fights-on/

Putin's overarching goal in all of his previous military actions has been to restore Russian national identity and glory by reversing the collapse of the Soviet/Russian Union/Federation. If protracted stalemate is the future in Ukraine, I just find it very hard to believe that he won't resort to a tactical nuke in a desperate attempt to win. The rhetoric on both sides has ramped up to the point where a negotiated settlement will not satisfy him.
This has been his weapon of psychological deterrence from the start. After the slaughter he has unleashed, I don't think the Ukes will ever bend the knee - even if a tac nuke is deployed. It will likely raise their fury to an even higher level if that's possible.

And one would hope that NATO has identified an array of targets which could be immediately destroyed in response. So the outcome Putin's anticipating may be exactly the opposite and potentially cripple his efforts from that point forward…but again, one would hope.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BQ_90 said:

74OA said:

Waffledynamics said:

MeatDr said:


Has Russia ever even successfully performed an amphibious invasion? I guess I can't see how they have the history with it to make those landing ships all that intimidating. If they're having trouble with a mostly ground invasion right on their border, how are they going to possibly expect success doing it the harder way?
Not for an amphibious landing, but likely loading to either deliver reinforcements around Mariupol or to demonstrate near Odessa to keep Ukraine from shifting forces from there to the eastern front.
Turkey will not let any of those ships into the Black Sea. Also that would weaken their Baltic Fleet
Oooops, read right past Baltic Sea and ass-u-me-d the Black Sea.
DCPD158
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AGS-R-TUFF said:

G Martin 87 said:

Wargaming predicts stalemate ahead as neither Ukraine nor Russia will have the ability to maintain offensives soon.

https://mwi.usma.edu/wargaming-a-long-war-ukraine-fights-on/

Putin's overarching goal in all of his previous military actions has been to restore Russian national identity and glory by reversing the collapse of the Soviet/Russian Union/Federation. If protracted stalemate is the future in Ukraine, I just find it very hard to believe that he won't resort to a tactical nuke in a desperate attempt to win. The rhetoric on both sides has ramped up to the point where a negotiated settlement will not satisfy him.
This has been his weapon of psychological deterrence from the start. After the slaughter he has unleashed, I don't think the Ukes will ever bend the knee - even if a tac nuke is deployed. It will likely raise their fury to an even higher level if that's possible.

And one would hope that NATO has identified an array of targets which could be immediately destroyed in response. So the outcome Putin's anticipating may be exactly the opposite and potentially cripple his efforts from that point forward…but again, one would hope.
Ukraine's responses into Russia itself has been very limited to this point. If RU uses a tactical nuke on Ukraine soil, all gloves are off for any and all attacks on Russian soil. There would be an unbelievable number of terror attacks in every major Russian city and the war would become real to the everyday RU citizen.
Company I-1, Ord-Ords '85 -12thFan and Websider-
CW Griswold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Happy Easter! He is risen, but the Moskva has not.
Build It
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Way past time for some fighter jets to find their way to Ukraine.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ulysses90 said:

74OA said:

Waffledynamics said:

MeatDr said:


Has Russia ever even successfully performed an amphibious invasion? I guess I can't see how they have the history with it to make those landing ships all that intimidating. If they're having trouble with a mostly ground invasion right on their border, how are they going to possibly expect success doing it the harder way?
Not for an amphibious landing, but likely loading to either deliver reinforcements around Mariupol or to demonstrate near Odessa to keep Ukraine from shifting forces from there to the eastern front.


It's the Baltic fleet, not the Black Sea. They can't gain entry to the Black Sea. This is a Jerry Jeff Walker maneuver known as Pissin in the Wind.

Pissin' in the wind, bettin' on a losing friend
Makin' the same mistakes, we swore we'd never make again

Truer words have never been spoken about the Russian military.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


MeatDr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Remember the Russian propaganda tweet showing armed Ukraine soldiers getting out of an ambulance? OSINT investigation in the thread below. They were helping citizens evacuate at that time and thus acting as noncombatants.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1515363257284014082.html

amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
At some point soon Putin will announce victory and fortify his hold in the east. His popularity in Russia will go up, and the west will lean on Ukraine to accept a settlement to end the bloodshed.
MeatDr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MeatDr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maybe he thought a secondary explosion was a third missile?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Around 8:30 mark. Really concerned this is…going to get out of hand today.

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

krainian intelligence published audio of what it said was an intercepted call of a Russian solider allegedly telling his wife that Moscow's own forces had bombed a town in Russia in order to blame the attack on Kyiv's military.

Aleksandr Bogomaz, the governor of Russia's Bryansk region bordering Ukraine, alleged on Thursday that two buildings in the town of Klimovo were damaged in an attack carried out by Ukrainian forces, Radio Free Europe reported. Russia's state-run TASS news agency cited medical workers, who said that seven people including a pregnant woman, were harmed in the assault.
Quote:

On Friday, the Security Service of Ukraine released audio of a call it said was between a Russian soldier and his wife discussing the Klimovo attack. The roughly two and a half minute audio clip was published to the intelligence service's official Facebook page. Newsweek has not independently verified the audio.
Quote:

"These are our heroes," the Russian soldier can be heard telling his wife, according to a translation. When his wife asked "why" Moscow would do such a thing, he responds, by saying it is "necessary" and "is done in order to provoke" Ukrainians.
Quote:

The soldier goes on to point to bombings that occurred in Moscow ahead of the Second Chechen War. "It was the same in the Chechen War. Apartments were blown up in Moscow, like terrorists," he says.
Link
Agsuffering@bulaw
How long do you want to ignore this user?
amercer said:

At some point soon Putin will announce victory and fortify his hold in the east. His popularity in Russia will go up, and the west will lean on Ukraine to accept a settlement to end the bloodshed.


Why would we? They are killing Russians and grinding up Russian weaponry. Plus, it keeps the spotlight off our domestic problems.

The Germans and select others may want it to end, but what leverage do they really have? The US, GB, and the eastern euros (Hungary excepted) are the Uke sponsors.
MeatDr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MeatDr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


MeatDr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


As far as I can tell they are made by a Ukrainian toy company. https://toys-kopitsa.com.ua/uk/vse-bude-ukrayina/
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh my.



Biden going over there would be a disaster in the making.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lots of pictures of the war at this Link
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This tells us all we need to know about the future of Russian/Ukrainian relations: There won't be any.

Ukraine used to be a huge supplier to Russia's defense industry. That changed after Crimea, but they were still exporting major and key components for Russian weapons. After this, I can see a full on embargo on anything remotely weapons related, if Ukraine is willing to sell them anything at all. Russia can kiss a lot of their top of the line systems goodbye without Ukrainian cooperation.

That will be a hard pill for Russia to swallow, since they export a lot of weapons and will need to rebuild a large amount of equipment. It also means the Chinese can corner the market on countries the US and Europeans won't sell to, and it's doubtful Russia can make up that market share anytime soon.

Honestly, win, lose, or draw in this conflict, Putin has made a massive strategic blunder. This will take Russia decades to recover from. Even if they withdraw, I see some sanctions, like those against military supply chains, becoming permanent. They're going to waste a huge portion of their military assets in Ukraine, and they won't have the cash or the suppliers to rebuild them. They've also only strengthened their adversaries in NATO and China, and they've blown years of strategic development to get Europe dependent on Russian gas. They'll still be about to sell it, but Europe is on a path to diversification, and they're not going to be looking back after this. That political leverage is going to be gone.

Even if they get parts of eastern Ukraine, they'll likely face an insurgency Hell bent on killing and punishing them. Anyone left will good a special hated in their heart for Russians. Any Russians moving there are going to be treated like carpetbaggers, and it wouldn't shock me if many ended up dead. The Russians will have to keep troops and armor there for decades, and they'll have to pay for it.

All the while, the next generation of Ukrainians will be raised on stuffed bayraktars and javelins.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Honestly, win, lose, or draw in this conflict, Putin has made a massive strategic blunder. This will take Russia decades to recover from. Even if they withdraw, I see some sanctions, like those against military supply chains, becoming permanent. They're going to waste a huge portion of their military assets in Ukraine, and they won't have the cash or the suppliers to rebuild them. They've also only strengthened their adversaries in NATO and China, and they've blown years of strategic development to get Europe dependent on Russian gas. They'll still be about to sell it, but Europe is on a path to diversification, and they're not going to be looking back after this. That political leverage is going to be gone.
So much this. Russia's standing in the world will never be the same.
First Page Last Page
Page 502 of 1307
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.