Terrific testimony from the expert. Then goes back to dumb explanation. Should have finished with the full video.
Now Binger knows he needs to keep him up there for longer to charge the defense more $$$$$$$$$powerbelly said:
The rate question didn't land there.
I think he was hoping that the expert was working at a discount.crowman2010 said:Now Binger knows he needs to keep him up there for longer to charge the defense more $$$$$$$$$powerbelly said:
The rate question didn't land there.
I would focus on that. He needs to try to discredit if he can.BlackGoldAg2011 said:
why do i feel like binger is about to focus on the missing 9 seconds where he estimated kyle's running speed....
"Pickup and me did it in 45 flat sir."BlackGoldAg2011 said:
why do i feel like binger is about to focus on the missing 9 seconds where he estimated kyle's running speed....
i would too, but its going to suck for everyone else because its almost entirely irrelevant minutiaFriscoKid said:I would focus on that. He needs to try to discredit if he can.BlackGoldAg2011 said:
why do i feel like binger is about to focus on the missing 9 seconds where he estimated kyle's running speed....
Yes, just switched back to wapoAgBQ-00 said:
anyone else lose the feed?
Just switched to CourtTV on YouTubeAgBQ-00 said:
anyone else lose the feed?
ABATTBQ11 said:BadMoonRisin said:
Here's the average intelligence level of someone falling for whatever the press says and ignoring first hand videographic evidence for over a year.
I think the issue is simply not paying much attention. When you consider all that you read, hear, or see on a daily basis, you simply don't have time to critically dig into every detail of every headline, story, tweet, etc.
It's not an act of intentionally ignoring anything, it's simply not questioning things seem at a glance and moving on. This person probably paid about 5 minutes of attention to this over the last year, and is only now revisiting it because it's back in the news. Their prior knowledge may be hearing about it in passing, and that's it, because they just didn't care enough to divert attention from their daily life.
This person looks like she has recently been redpilled and only started looking into stuff herself recently.ABATTBQ11 said:BadMoonRisin said:
Here's the average intelligence level of someone falling for whatever the press says and ignoring first hand videographic evidence for over a year.
I think the issue is simply not paying much attention. When you consider all that you read, hear, or see on a daily basis, you simply don't have time to critically dig into every detail of every headline, story, tweet, etc.
It's not an act of intentionally ignoring anything, it's simply not questioning things seem at a glance and moving on. This person probably paid about 5 minutes of attention to this over the last year, and is only now revisiting it because it's back in the news. Their prior knowledge may be hearing about it in passing, and that's it, because they just didn't care enough to divert attention from their daily life.
Let me add a few points-
— Sarah Beth Burwick (@sarahbeth345) November 11, 2021
1. All my friends/family are progressively and I recently woke up to their hyocrisy and msm BS
2. I admit I haven’t paid much attention to the case
3. If you hear someone called a white supremacist enough times, you believe it unless…
agreed lets. we can use it as a case study learning video to train officers about maintaining composure in stressful situations and quickly & accurately assessing threats and judiciously responding to them as appropriateflashplayer said:
Yes, let's watch the video at 1/4 speed and microanalyze.
aggiehawg said:
Anyone remember what Mark O'Mara did during the Zimmerman trial? He demonstrated to the jury how long the four or so minutes really is by being silent for that amount of time.
So for everything from Ziminski's first shot until Kyle raises his hands to surrender to police was under 3 minutes.