****Kyle Rittenhouse Trial-Day 8****

97,005 Views | 1106 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by American Hardwood
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He should have let the whole thing play before stopping and doing all of this technical questioning
Emotional Support Cobra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He is completely blinded by hubris. His badgering of Kyle yesterday betrayed his total ignorance of why anyone would carry a gun in public. He truly did not understand the concept of not expecting something bad to happen but being prepared in case something does.
crowman2010
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why aren't we able to see the video?
lunchbox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IMO, the defense is doing itself a disservice by not having a more tech-savvy attorney asking the questions...
BlackGoldAg2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
crowman2010 said:

Why aren't we able to see the video?
i can see it just fine on the PBS News Hour youtube stream
Player To Be Named Later
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, any voting base that votes for this guy as a DA gets what they ask for and I'll have 0 sympathy for their neighborhoods.
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For lawyers, is it a strategy to object during expert witness testimony to disrupt the flow and impact for the jury?
powerbelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lunchbox said:

IMO, the defense is doing itself a disservice by not having a more tech-savvy attorney asking the questions...
Totally agree.
Strongweasel97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YellAg2004 said:

I know multiple lawyers on here have cringed at how...cavalier...Binger has been with regards to known 3rd rails of legal practice, but at the same time, other than getting a tongue lashing, nothing happens.
100 percent nailed it. It's all bluster if you're not going to do something about it.

The 5th amendment violation yesterday should have ended it.

I don't care who's on trial and whether I believe they're innocent or guilty. That is sacred cow territory and every US citizen should realize it's the only thing between them and unlawful prosecution, especially when the state plays with the cards stacked in their favor from the jump.

planoaggie123
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is a mini train wreck.....
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BlackGoldAg2011 said:

crowman2010 said:

Why aren't we able to see the video?
i can see it just fine on the PBS News Hour youtube stream
Got a link?
AggiePetro07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lunchbox said:

IMO, the defense is doing itself a disservice by not having a more tech-savvy attorney asking the questions...
If the jury is older it may be ok.
powerbelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BlackGoldAg2011 said:

crowman2010 said:

Why aren't we able to see the video?
i can see it just fine on the PBS News Hour youtube stream
PBS is showing it, WaPo isn't showing the exhibit video.
4the_Record
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

IMO, the defense is doing itself a disservice by not having a more tech-savvy attorney asking the questions...

I think rather they're doing Rittenhouse a disservice... its his future on the line.
powerbelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?

crowman2010
How long do you want to ignore this user?
said:

BlackGoldAg2011 said:

crowman2010 said:

Why aren't we able to see the video?
i can see it just fine on the PBS News Hour youtube stream
Got a link?
HtownAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4stringAg said:

For lawyers, is it a strategy to object during expert witness testimony to disrupt the flow and impact for the jury?
Yes, but do not strenuously object a second time.

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks!
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doesn't the fbi drone footage have enough continuous play that they could have timed out the time between events from that? Was that withheld from the defense or did they have access to it?
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am hoping we get a continuous play through. I think it would be much more powerful to have the jury realize it was a matter of less than 3 minutes
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Strongweasel97 said:

YellAg2004 said:

I know multiple lawyers on here have cringed at how...cavalier...Binger has been with regards to known 3rd rails of legal practice, but at the same time, other than getting a tongue lashing, nothing happens.
100 percent nailed it. It's all bluster if you're not going to do something about it.

The 5th amendment violation yesterday should have ended it.

I don't care who's on trial and whether I believe they're innocent or guilty. That is sacred cow territory and every US citizen should realize it's the only thing between them and unlawful prosecution, especially when the state plays with the cards stacked in their favor from the jump.


this is why I believe a mistrial with prejudice should have occurred and then the judge just has to be strong and let the political chips fall where they may and deal with the fallout. Yeah, he's going to be called a pawn for the defense but he's going to get that anyway because the prosecutor has put him in the position to have to scold them time and time again by violating procedure and rules.

in other words, what the mob and media think shouldn't matter when it comes to a defendants rights.
powerbelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wish they prepared this in a more fluid way. It is hard to follow.
The Fife
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This guy is boring. Whose side even called him?
TheHulkster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old dudes and computer troubles, name a more iconic duo.
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Fife said:

This guy is boring. Whose side even called him?
He's a defense expert witness.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgBQ-00 said:

I am hoping we get a continuous play through. I think it would be much more powerful to have the jury realize it was a matter of less than 3 minutes
Agree fully. Should have led with that. And then work back.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
powerbelly said:

I wish they prepared this in a more fluid way. It is hard to follow.
Felt the same way. Rekeita feed all agree with that too.
tk111
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Has to be losing the jury's attention. Wrap it up into something tangible or **** off with this slo mo stuff
AggiePetro07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
move the damn mouse
The Fife
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ugh, now I'm having flashbacks from when I visit my parents. Or even now when they come to visit and my dad stay on his stupid laptop all the time, printing emails, attachments, or whatever bullcrap.
BlackGoldAg2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
mkorzo said:

Old dudes and computer troubles, name a more iconic duo.
this is why i've enjoyed the texas RRC going to zoom only hearings, because when i'm giving expert testimony it lets me drive the presentation of my own exhibits. of course it bites back a bit when i forget that the court reporter can't accurately record the location of my cursor when discussing exhibit details.
AustinCountyAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I turned it off. bboorrriinngggg
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What is the point of showing all of these? Why no analysis or discussion of why they are important?
Show a video and then describe what you want them to see from this.
BlackGoldAg2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gosh that slow motion of the final set of shootings is conclusive in favor of the defense
NASAg03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Damn that slow-mo is so impressive. I'm amazed Kyle was able to keep his composure and defend himself.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.