Actually, I'm surprised you guys are watching Oprah.
technically auxiliariesrgag12 said:titan said:Learn something everyday. The blue is certainly more prominent than the red.BQ78 said:
Actually blue
Weren't the Hessians mercenaries? I bet there ones in blue, red, and green.
AggiePops said:
Actually, I'm surprised you guys are watching Oprah.
Maybe you should watch it? You sure do have lengthy opinions about it for someone that did not watch it.annie88 said:AggiePops said:
Actually, I'm surprised you guys are watching Oprah.
I didn't watch Oprah it's all over the news in snippets, Twitter, etc. I haven't even seen the interview just read about parts of it.
Genius. Like Prager said a few weeks ago -- "those who believe they are victims can never be happy, and often won't be very constructive" . And this is true even of actual victims who dwell on something --- it keeps them from the present life. Such mindset only regresses -- its always "back then" to them. It was a good segment.BenFiasco14 said:
NSIAP
https://instagr.am/p/CMKvn8gnSx0
A is A said:Maybe you should watch it? You sure do have lengthy opinions about it for someone that did not watch it.annie88 said:AggiePops said:
Actually, I'm surprised you guys are watching Oprah.
I didn't watch Oprah it's all over the news in snippets, Twitter, etc. I haven't even seen the interview just read about parts of it.
HollywoodBQ said:no 2ACanyonAg77 said:Good lord, no. Don't support any of these nitwits, and I can't fathom why Brits put up with the Royal Family and all the dukes, earls, vicounts, discounts, etc. etc.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
A bunch of conservatives choosing to support royalists over an American. ****ing loyalist need to leave.
Millions watched it. So I would say yesaggie3200 said:
Does anyone really care what Markle has to say?
Worse....I don't care even one iota. They're a relic of about 500+ years ago.DallasAg 94 said:
I don't believe her.
aggie3200 said:
Does anyone really care what Markle has to say?
I watched it live. I wouldn't post on a topic about and interview if I didn't watch the interview. I do not rely on twitter as news.annie88 said:A is A said:Maybe you should watch it? You sure do have lengthy opinions about it for someone that did not watch it.annie88 said:AggiePops said:
Actually, I'm surprised you guys are watching Oprah.
I didn't watch Oprah it's all over the news in snippets, Twitter, etc. I haven't even seen the interview just read about parts of it.
Why? I was replying to the OP, where the comment was clearly stated not to mention the few Twitter clips about it.
For someone making ignorant blanket statements about the monarchy, you might want to take your own advice
careful. this is an unpopular opinion on this threadsnowdog90 said:
Well, just to jump in again...
Royals
Total scumbags. Whatever they "do for their country" is mere breadcrumbs. It's akin to Pablo Escobar giving 20s to the peasants of Bogota and building them a soccer field.
The Royals are rich beyond imagination for seemingly having the right relatives. They were great friends with Jimmy Savile, as I stated. Prince Andrew (like Bill Clinton) was a frequent guest of Jeffrey Epstein at Pedo Island and other places.
Bill Clinton
Total scumbag.. Rapist. Liar. Pedophile. On and on.
They are all scumbags, which is evidently the primary qualification to be a world leader. Pedo Joe fits right in.
Btw, the Royals killed Diana. Meghan should really tread lightly.
thirdcoast said:
The black community should be wondering if Meghan is too white to be acting so woke for blacks.
She suffers from same illness as Kap....never been black enough her whole life, and now has platform to finally be accepted as black.
ABATTBQ11 said:BCG Disciple said:Clob94 said:
Holy sheet.
A clear cut libel case? Going to assume this guy is not an attorney.
How much do you know about British law?
the libel is Meghan insinuating that the entire royal family are racists because she didn't single out an individual who made the remarks.BCG Disciple said:ABATTBQ11 said:BCG Disciple said:Clob94 said:
Holy sheet.
A clear cut libel case? Going to assume this guy is not an attorney.
How much do you know about British law?
Fair point. Enough to know it is absolutely insane to believe that there is enough specificity involved in the statements to constitute defamation. She didn't even say anything. Someone somewhere made a comment about their baby's skin tone and THAT is clear cut libel? What if someone jokingly said it's not possible to be more fair skinned than Harry - as a ginger dig? We have no idea what was said and how it was said or if it was said and literally no idea about who was supposed to have said it - to say it's clear cut libel is insane!
BCG Disciple said:ABATTBQ11 said:BCG Disciple said:Clob94 said:
Holy sheet.
A clear cut libel case? Going to assume this guy is not an attorney.
How much do you know about British law?
Fair point. Enough to know it is absolutely insane to believe that there is enough specificity involved in the statements to constitute defamation. She didn't even say anything. Someone somewhere made a comment about their baby's skin tone and THAT is clear cut libel? What if someone jokingly said it's not possible to be more fair skinned than Harry - as a ginger dig? We have no idea what was said and how it was said or if it was said and literally no idea about who was supposed to have said it - to say it's clear cut libel is insane!
Ragoo said:the libel is Meghan insinuating that the entire royal family are racists because she didn't single out an individual who made the remarks.BCG Disciple said:ABATTBQ11 said:BCG Disciple said:Clob94 said:
Holy sheet.
A clear cut libel case? Going to assume this guy is not an attorney.
How much do you know about British law?
Fair point. Enough to know it is absolutely insane to believe that there is enough specificity involved in the statements to constitute defamation. She didn't even say anything. Someone somewhere made a comment about their baby's skin tone and THAT is clear cut libel? What if someone jokingly said it's not possible to be more fair skinned than Harry - as a ginger dig? We have no idea what was said and how it was said or if it was said and literally no idea about who was supposed to have said it - to say it's clear cut libel is insane!
He looks like his grandfather in this photo:ShaggySLC said:PanzerAggie06 said:
James Hewitt. British Army officer who had an affair with Diana. Look him up. The resemblance between him and Harry is definitely there.
Never knew (read: gave a ****) she was even remotely "mixed".thirdcoast said:
How dark will the child's skin be?
Probably not near as dark as the average blonde hair blue eyed 100% white surfer. Meghan isn't even the type of biracial you assume as black. She has pale skin, narrow nose, and straight hair looking more latin or mideastern. Probably why she is flexing so hard with the woke stuff....finally a chance to really be seen as black.
I don't think you would mistake her mother for being white or AsianBigRobSA said:Never knew (read: gave a ****) she was even remotely "mixed".thirdcoast said:
How dark will the child's skin be?
Probably not near as dark as the average blonde hair blue eyed 100% white surfer. Meghan isn't even the type of biracial you assume as black. She has pale skin, narrow nose, and straight hair looking more latin or mideastern. Probably why she is flexing so hard with the woke stuff....finally a chance to really be seen as black.
I'm half-and-half, my son is a quarter. He looks white as ****. I expected nothing less with his white ass mom.
Is she as black as Warren is Indian (feather, not dot)?
Her mother:PanzerAggie06 said:
I had no clue she wasn't white. I just assumed she, being a rich and pampered prima Donna, was a white chick that spent a lot of time at the beach working on her tan.
Is her mom or dad black?