Meghan Markle just called the Royal Family racists on Oprah

29,939 Views | 358 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by ABATTBQ11
Magic City Wings
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texasaggie32 said:

She's a narcissistic liar.
Just her?
Onceaggie2.0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wHAT DOES sHANKED PUNT THINK?
Tanya 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agsalaska,

It does not help me if I don't know what you are laughing at!
Tanya 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rangerdanger said:

zephyr88 said:

Quote:

Extra kudos on making bank on this interview.
Yah, real honorable... dish on your family to make a buck. What a turd.


What does the royal family do for Britain other than bring in tourist and tabloid dollars?
fascinators
Verne Lundquist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's real simple.

She thought she could be an activist and be in the royal family. She found out she couldn't. Then all this hell broke lose.
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A bunch of conservatives choosing to support royalists over an American. ****ing loyalist need to leave.
zephyr88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rangerdanger said:

zephyr88 said:

Quote:

Extra kudos on making bank on this interview.
Yah, real honorable... dish on your family to make a buck. What a turd.

What does the royal family do for Britain other than bring in tourist and tabloid dollars?
If he didn't want that life, then just walk away. No need to run down your family on Oprah - or let your wife do it either. But Harry is so whipped and confused now that he lets his mouthy wife do all the talking.
azul_rain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm weirded out over how many grown men are invested in this crap
you may all go to hell and i will go to Texas
agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tanya 93 said:

agsalaska,

It does not help me if I don't know what you are laughing at!
1. You comment about father in laws.

2. The royal family having a brown baby.
oldcrow91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Dirty Sock said:

I believe her.












I also just don't care


The second thing.
RAB91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who knew that Trump was so right.....

CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

A bunch of conservatives choosing to support royalists over an American. ****ing loyalist need to leave.
Good lord, no. Don't support any of these nitwits, and I can't fathom why Brits put up with the Royal Family and all the dukes, earls, vicounts, discounts, etc. etc.
Verne Lundquist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tanya 93 said:

Verne Lundquist said:

Also Harry has never met his father in law

That is fudged up shii
I am not convinced that is that messed up
It is when the rift between Meghan and the dad was because the dad talked to the press. And he's apologized multiple times.
Tanya 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Verne Lundquist said:

Tanya 93 said:

Verne Lundquist said:

Also Harry has never met his father in law

That is fudged up shii
I am not convinced that is that messed up
It is when the rift between Meghan and the dad was because the dad talked to the press. And he's apologized multiple times.
He has done too much for me to think he is really sorry.
He got his attention, his photos in the British Tabloids, and quotes in the paper.

Her half sister is even worse
Texasaggie32
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So is general theme Obama voters Stan Meghan and conservatives are #TeamQueen?
sonnysixkiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Here is a man who could have had almost any woman and picked this below average ;$&@; really have to question his judgement.
Bucketrunner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He definitely married down
Tanya 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texasaggie32 said:

So is general theme Obama voters Stan Meghan and conservatives are #TeamQueen?
She says that the Queen has always been wonderful to her.

So that would be kinda weird to have that split
rgag12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Harry has always been the ****-up his whole life it seems. Couldn't **** it up any worse than marrying that BSC racist nobody.
Mulberrywildman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dude, you're trying way too hard, just take a breath and relax. You're going to concerned moderate yourself to a freaking heart attack.
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mulberrywildman said:

Dude, you're trying way too hard, just take a breath and relax. You're going to concerned moderate yourself to a freaking heart attack.
let him live his life.

please.
Tanya 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I do think this stuff is part of what led to the split.


https://www.boredpanda.com/uk-media-double-standarts-royal-meghan-markle-kate-middleton/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=organic










Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tanya 93 said:

I do think this stuff is part of what led to the split.


https://www.boredpanda.com/uk-media-double-standarts-royal-meghan-markle-kate-middleton/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=organic













Now she knows how Trump feels.
BCG Disciple
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She's a strong woman. Has mentally whipped Harry and has brilliantly controlled him by way of his feelings about his mother. He is a shell of a man, as you'd expect from a royal. Hilarious to watch him talk of pain of leading arguably the most privileged upbringing in the world while also throwing race baiting comments out there. Guy is completely brainwashed.
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This will be like Christmas to the British press this entire week, especially their yellow and rag-mag tier.

Whatever "hate" she thought she experienced is about to hit her 100 fold.

L08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Magic City Wings said:

Harry would have already bailed if this **** wasn't true.
I doubt it. I think in the beginning she was a means of escape for him from his life of 'duty', while at the same time bringing attention to himself. He also seems a bit mentally fragile, allowing him to easily buy in to her victim complex. People like her start to believe their own lies after awhile making it their 'reality'. Once a child became involved, it was too late for him to really change course.
Tanya 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
L08 said:

Magic City Wings said:

Harry would have already bailed if this **** wasn't true.
I doubt it. I think in the beginning she was a means of escape for him from his life of 'duty', while at the same time bringing attention to himself. He also seems a bit mentally fragile, allowing him to easily buy in to her victim complex. People like her start to believe their own lies after awhile making it their 'reality'. Once a child became involved, it was too late for him to really change course.
Well, Charles, Anne, and Andrew all divorced their children's other parent
tylercsbn9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

C@LAg said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

C@LAg said:

1. she is irrelevant. a D list actress who married a B-list British celebrity.
2. she is an attention *****. she should not be airing dirty laundry one way or the other.
3. her husband is a little ***** for going along with it and allowing her to do this.

they will be divorced with less than 10 years of marriage.


I wouldn't call Harry a B list British celebrity...
He is the B-team now.
His wife is permanently and constantly being trashed by ALL of the British press.
His reputation, while better, is significantly tarnished.
No longer (seriously) in the line of succession.
William and Kate and their offspring are now the primary A tier focus on the Brits.

Harry and his wife are definitely the B team

Harry has always been the B team when it comes to succession. Prince Charles -> Prince William -> Prince Harry.


Dude likely isn't Charles' son
Ragoo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why can't they just say what needs to be said. The monarch exists with not because the people in the UL allow it. It has no other merit or requirement.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That Markle avocado article title is incredible. That is a Trump level hit piece right there.

"Trump Points Finger at Journalist and the Butterfly Effect of the Wind From His Finger Causes 100 foot Tsunami in Indonesia Killing Thousands"
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?






L08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tanya 93 said:

L08 said:

Magic City Wings said:

Harry would have already bailed if this **** wasn't true.
I doubt it. I think in the beginning she was a means of escape for him from his life of 'duty', while at the same time bringing attention to himself. He also seems a bit mentally fragile, allowing him to easily buy in to her victim complex. People like her start to believe their own lies after awhile making it their 'reality'. Once a child became involved, it was too late for him to really change course.
Well, Charles, Anne, and Andrew all divorced their children's other parent
Oh, I think he probably will too eventually. Not right after choosing the course he took, and not with his child at that young of an age though. Charles stayed with Diana for their sake (and to an even larger degree when it comes to Charles, for image's sake) for longer than he would have otherwise.
mjschiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oprah, is a racist
Marvin J. Schiller
MelvinUdall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I can't believe there are that many posts of people that care...I don't care, but I did post on this thread, so there is that...
Captain Hindsight 20/20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can't wait for the Queen to drop the results of Harry's DNA test
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.