Again FWIW, Mike Lindell two hour video on YouTube (for now) on the election.
*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****
2,704,327 Views |
20889 Replies |
Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
its gone
The Hubs put it up on TV and then it was pulled about five minutes into it. I have it going on my computer on Youtube still but expect it to drop soon. I'm over and hour into it.Towns03 said:
its gone
Colonel Waldron has already been on. Now Ramsland has been talking about what he found starting after the 2018 election in Dallas. Dallas uses ES&S machines. But remember that the Holder Justice Department ordered ES&S to give 30% of its existing business to Dominion in 2010-2011. That included machines and customer contracts.
Also, Dominion acquired Sequoia (indirectly*) from Smartmatic around the same time period. Under the terms of the acquisition, Dominion was obliged to honor the contracts that were still using Sequoia's system. The city of Chicago was one of those Sequoia contracts. When there was a problem in the 2018 election in Chicago (post Dominion acquisition) tech support from Venezuela was sent in to rectify the problems.
Until a few days ago, I was unaware that there were problems in New Jersey in 2018, which also used Sequoia systems in some locations. So Sequoia is still in operation in locations under Dominion's supervision but Sequoia is running their own software, not Dominion's. from what I can gather.
* Long story but basically Sequoia Voting System got on someone's radar and their ownership (Smartmatic) was about to be investigated by CFIUS because of the foreign ownership issue. On the eve of when the investigation was to begin (originally agreed to by Smartmatic) they announced a friendly buy-out by American Management that was owner financed by Smartmatic. They still had ties. But then Dem Senators stated asking about whether that transaction was a sham to avoid the CFIUS investigation. At that point, Dominion swooped in and acquired them.
Should be on OAN at noon
Google/ YouTube censoring the My Pillow guy to protect the corrupt globalist politician they bought so they could get rid of the America-first guy is just more evidence that there's probably some truth in there, or at least some items that raise questions that some people might want to look further into.
Do we really need our thought police to be some tech guys in Silicon Valley letting the world know that porn and a million other sick things on the Internet are okay, but this company CEO talking about fraud will damage our brains so they must protect us from hearing it?
Do we really need our thought police to be some tech guys in Silicon Valley letting the world know that porn and a million other sick things on the Internet are okay, but this company CEO talking about fraud will damage our brains so they must protect us from hearing it?
oh no said:
Google/ YouTube censoring the My Pillow guy to protect the corrupt globalist politician they bought so they could get rid of the America-first guy is just more evidence that there's probably some truth in there, or at least some items that raise questions that some people might want to look further into.
It's on OAN now then again at midnight.
no OAN on xfinity
Or dishoh no said:
no OAN on xfinity
Trump judge?
No, New York state judge. (In NY state, the district courts are called supreme courts. Causes a lot of confusion sometimes. But it's just a state district court, a trial court, not an appellate court.)redline248 said:
Trump judge?
From the article in the tweet.
Quote:
In ruling against Brindisi, DelConte argued that the Democrat did not provide enough evidence that certifying Tenney would cause "irreparable harm," given that he still had a remedy at the federal level.
It's not clear when Brindisi's appeal will begin. His attorneys announced Friday morning that they will appeal DelConte's rejection of several hundred ballots that Brindisi wanted counted.
In his ruling, DelConte criticized local elections boards for what he said amounted to "systemic violations of state and federal election law" that affected both candidates. In particular, he singled out Oneida County's failure to process more than 2,400 applications from voters who registered via the DMV, which rendered them unable to vote on Election Day.
Would be poetic justice if the state court ruled that he could not sue because he had federal remedies available, and then the federal court rules he doesn't have standing.aggiehawg said:
From the article in the tweet.Quote:
In ruling against Brindisi, DelConte argued that the Democrat did not provide enough evidence that certifying Tenney would cause "irreparable harm," given that he still had a remedy at the federal level.
It's not clear when Brindisi's appeal will begin. His attorneys announced Friday morning that they will appeal DelConte's rejection of several hundred ballots that Brindisi wanted counted.
In his ruling, DelConte criticized local elections boards for what he said amounted to "systemic violations of state and federal election law" that affected both candidates. In particular, he singled out Oneida County's failure to process more than 2,400 applications from voters who registered via the DMV, which rendered them unable to vote on Election Day.
Well...this certainly seems to break the narrative that Trump has lost 60+ cases and been slapped down by every court...
https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-won-two-thirds-of-election-lawsuits-where-merits-considered_3688543.html
https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-won-two-thirds-of-election-lawsuits-where-merits-considered_3688543.html
Quote:
Of the 22 cases that have been heard by the courts and decided on their merits, Trump and Republicans have prevailed in 15, according to citizen journalist John Droz Jr., a physicist and environmental advocate in Morehead City, N.C.
This means Trump has won two-thirds of the cases fully adjudicated by the courts.
Droz and a team of volunteers dug through court filings and legal minutiae to track down 81 lawsuits that were filed in connection with the Nov. 3, 2020 presidential election. The lawsuits were tracked on Droz's publicly available spreadsheet that was current as of Feb. 6.
Of the 81 cases, 11 were withdrawn or consolidated and 23 were dismissed for lack of standing or on other grounds. Both the cohort of 11 and of 23 should not be considered "wins or losses for either side," Droz says, because they "have nothing to do with the merits of the case."
This leaves 47 cases. Of those 47, 22 have been finalized after the court heard arguments, considered evidence, and then issued a ruling.
Of those 22, Trump or Republicans won 15 and lost 7, according to the analysis.
Waiting for the TexAg liberal to update his "win-loss" record. What a goober.
txags92 said:
Well...this certainly seems to break the narrative that Trump has lost 60+ cases and been slapped down by every court...
https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-won-two-thirds-of-election-lawsuits-where-merits-considered_3688543.htmlQuote:
Of the 22 cases that have been heard by the courts and decided on their merits, Trump and Republicans have prevailed in 15, according to citizen journalist John Droz Jr., a physicist and environmental advocate in Morehead City, N.C.
This means Trump has won two-thirds of the cases fully adjudicated by the courts.
Droz and a team of volunteers dug through court filings and legal minutiae to track down 81 lawsuits that were filed in connection with the Nov. 3, 2020 presidential election. The lawsuits were tracked on Droz's publicly available spreadsheet that was current as of Feb. 6.
Of the 81 cases, 11 were withdrawn or consolidated and 23 were dismissed for lack of standing or on other grounds. Both the cohort of 11 and of 23 should not be considered "wins or losses for either side," Droz says, because they "have nothing to do with the merits of the case."
This leaves 47 cases. Of those 47, 22 have been finalized after the court heard arguments, considered evidence, and then issued a ruling.
Of those 22, Trump or Republicans won 15 and lost 7, according to the analysis.
Post this as a new thread. Cant wait to hear our CMs tell us it's all fake because epoch times and orange man bad.
Sets up very nice for a Red wave in 21 months
oh no said:still quite amazing that many house seats were picked up by Rs, including every one that was considered a "toss up"... and Joe Biden smashed Obama's record with over 81 million votes.PJYoung said:
Republicans win the last contested seat in the House.
It takes a broken mind to think the GOP brand itself buoys all these congressional races and that trump is damaging these races.
FrioAg 00 said:
Sets up very nice for a Red wave in 21 months
Agreed.
The Debt said:oh no said:still quite amazing that many house seats were picked up by Rs, including every one that was considered a "toss up"... and Joe Biden smashed Obama's record with over 81 million votes.PJYoung said:
Republicans win the last contested seat in the House.
It takes a broken mind to think the GOP brand itself buoys all these congressional races and that trump is damaging these races.
I guess the Dems forgot to cheat on the down ballot races? How does this work exactly?
PJYoung said:The Debt said:oh no said:still quite amazing that many house seats were picked up by Rs, including every one that was considered a "toss up"... and Joe Biden smashed Obama's record with over 81 million votes.PJYoung said:
Republicans win the last contested seat in the House.
It takes a broken mind to think the GOP brand itself buoys all these congressional races and that trump is damaging these races.
I guess the Dems forgot to cheat on the down ballot races? How does this work exactly?
They needed to cheat in handful of states....not all 50. It's not that hard to figure out.
You cant explain how trump was as far behind in OH and FL as he was in PA and MI, but magically he carried OH and FL...easily. then explain why he doesnt have the same effect in PA as he did in OH, oh and Joe is actively campaigning to kill PA energy.
438 House members plus however many Senators were up is a lot of coding for algos to weight those votes without being blatantly fraudulent. Plus, I believe their own hype with the polling and the imaginary Blue Wave dampened the urgency for such detailed (and hard to accomplish in that many precincts) effort.PJYoung said:The Debt said:oh no said:still quite amazing that many house seats were picked up by Rs, including every one that was considered a "toss up"... and Joe Biden smashed Obama's record with over 81 million votes.PJYoung said:
Republicans win the last contested seat in the House.
It takes a broken mind to think the GOP brand itself buoys all these congressional races and that trump is damaging these races.
I guess the Dems forgot to cheat on the down ballot races? How does this work exactly?
The goal was to make sure Trump was not reelected, first and foremost.
Well crap.
ETA: Pic
LINKQuote:
The Arizona Senate on Monday failed in an attempt to hold the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in contempt as lawmakers seek to conduct their own audit of the presidential election results.
Breaking with the Republican caucus and casting the crucial vote against the measure, which could have led to the arrest of board members, Sen. Paul Boyer said he wanted to give the county and Senate more time to work out their ongoing legal dispute.
"Today's vote merely provides a little bit more time for us to work together charitably and amicably as friends," Boyer, R-Glendale, told the Senate.
Boyer joined all the chamber's Democrats and the final vote was 15-15, which lacked the majority needed to pass.
ETA: Pic
What it also explains is why there was a "pause" in counting in multiple states at roughly the same time, followed by big slugs of votes for Biden. When those states were allowed to open, process, and count the votes ahead of election day in the past, the fraudsters in the big urban areas knew exactly how many ballots they had to make up during election day. So they could slip them in as needed. By not allowing them to open and process the ballots until election day, they had to string out the counting long enough to generate enough ballots to make up the difference. They didn't have time to go through and generate ballots to fix all the carnage happening down the ballot, they just had to make sure that whatever happened, they go rid of trump. So they kicked out the observers, put up cardboard, etc. and started flushing ballots through the machines to help Biden catch up. Hence the huge blocks of Biden only ballots coming in around 4am, the mass # of ballots that only voted in the presidential race, and the terrible coattails Biden had for a candidate supposedly getting a historically high number of votes.
Can one of our concerned moderates link to where this been DEEBOOOONKED?
from this video:
https://rumble.com/vdlomr-unveiled-the-2020-election.html
from this video:
https://rumble.com/vdlomr-unveiled-the-2020-election.html
lol grapes are sourtxags92 said:
What it also explains is why there was a "pause" in counting in multiple states at roughly the same time, followed by big slugs of votes for Biden. When those states were allowed to open, process, and count the votes ahead of election day in the past, the fraudsters in the big urban areas knew exactly how many ballots they had to make up during election day. So they could slip them in as needed. By not allowing them to open and process the ballots until election day, they had to string out the counting long enough to generate enough ballots to make up the difference. They didn't have time to go through and generate ballots to fix all the carnage happening down the ballot, they just had to make sure that whatever happened, they go rid of trump. So they kicked out the observers, put up cardboard, etc. and started flushing ballots through the machines to help Biden catch up. Hence the huge blocks of Biden only ballots coming in around 4am, the mass # of ballots that only voted in the presidential race, and the terrible coattails Biden had for a candidate supposedly getting a historically high number of votes.
Ok, give me another logical explanation for why you would fake a water line break, put cardboard over the windows of a counting location, urge republican observers to leave because you were done counting for the evening, then continue counting, aggressively force legal observers to leave ballot counting areas, etc. and then right after you do all that, big blocks of hundreds of thousands of Biden-only ballots get counted? Give me some other logical explanation for that sequence of events occurring simultaneously, but only in the key states Biden needs to win to defeat Trump. We didn't see a 3 am counting pause followed by a big Biden vote spike in Texas...or Florida...or Ohio. Just the swing states, and only in the big urban areas where fraud has been alleged for years and years.txagbear said:lol grapes are sourtxags92 said:
What it also explains is why there was a "pause" in counting in multiple states at roughly the same time, followed by big slugs of votes for Biden. When those states were allowed to open, process, and count the votes ahead of election day in the past, the fraudsters in the big urban areas knew exactly how many ballots they had to make up during election day. So they could slip them in as needed. By not allowing them to open and process the ballots until election day, they had to string out the counting long enough to generate enough ballots to make up the difference. They didn't have time to go through and generate ballots to fix all the carnage happening down the ballot, they just had to make sure that whatever happened, they go rid of trump. So they kicked out the observers, put up cardboard, etc. and started flushing ballots through the machines to help Biden catch up. Hence the huge blocks of Biden only ballots coming in around 4am, the mass # of ballots that only voted in the presidential race, and the terrible coattails Biden had for a candidate supposedly getting a historically high number of votes.