Who needs mathematicians to tell you the seemingly impossible data irregularities are impossible when CNN already told you it's been debunked with zero proof, zero inspections, zero forensic audits?aggiehawg said:
The math doesn't work. Humans could not have possibly affected the vote counts on the precinct level in Fulton County to that level of specificity. It had to be an algo, so sayeth this expert.
Rumble
Quote:
In a legal filing Monday requesting a manual audit of the election, Elias, whose Perkins Coie law firm is representing Brindisi, argued that there were "substantial errors and irregularities in the conduct of the election."
Citing alleged discrepancies between votes counted by hand and votes counted by ballot machines, Elias argued that the error rate, extrapolated across the entire district, could mean that thousands of votes were improperly counted by the machines.
He also complained about procedural faults with the conduct of the voting process, alleging failures to comply with New York State election law.
In one passage, he asserted (original emphasis):Quote:
In this case, there is reason to believe that voting tabulation machines misread hundreds if not thousands of valid votes as undervotes, (supra at 4), and that these tabulation machine errors disproportionately affected Brindisi, (id.). In addition, Oswego County admitted in a sworn statement to this Court that its tabulation machines were not tested and calibrated in the days leading up to the November 3, 2020 General Election as required by state law and necessary to ensure that the counts generated by tabulation machines are accurate.
That was a very odd segment.AGHouston11 said:
Bob Sellers on Newsmax said it's not true ......
It is like they are using 1984 as a how-to book, right?MR Gadsden said:
Isn't it funny how the truth is now labeled as extremism?
Statistical anomalies in real time of vote spikes and total votes dropping, corroborated by affidavits of eyewitnesses at the time, corroborated (maybe) by video from surveillance cameras=evidence.MR Gadsden said:
Isn't it funny how the truth is now labeled as extremism?
Interesting accusation there...that the machines were not tested and calibrated in the days leading up to the election. Is that when the algorithms were updated in other locations to make sure the elections went the way they were supposed to? But this county didn't let them come in and "calibrate" the machines and the dem wound up losing? Interesting concept. Would be a fascinating deep dive to look at voting percentages in areas where the machines were "calibrated" just before the election versus areas where they were not.EKUAg said:
And now the Dems are arguing in court ref NY-22 that the voting machines changed votes..
If the courts have any consistency whatsoever, they will throw Elias' suit out stating that the candidate doesn't have standing to challenge the machine calibration, or that it is too late to request relief since they didn't file a complaint about the lack of calibration before the election.aggiehawg said:
And those machines were from Dominion.
That's a tall order.txags92 said:If the courts have any consistency whatsoever, they will throw Elias' suit out stating that the candidate doesn't have standing to challenge the machine calibration, or that it is too late to request relief since they didn't file a complaint about the lack of calibration before the election.aggiehawg said:
And those machines were from Dominion.
It was more of a wistful dream on my part than an actual statement of expectation.aggiehawg said:That's a tall order.txags92 said:If the courts have any consistency whatsoever, they will throw Elias' suit out stating that the candidate doesn't have standing to challenge the machine calibration, or that it is too late to request relief since they didn't file a complaint about the lack of calibration before the election.aggiehawg said:
And those machines were from Dominion.
Sweet! Lets start the discovery phase ASAP.aggiehawg said:They are.HumpitPuryear said:
How awesome would it be if these are Dominion machines?
wiki
Quote:
Voting technology company Smartmatic filed a $2.7 billion lawsuit against attorneys Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell, as well as Fox News and some of the network's hosts, accusing them of grievously harming the company by claiming it was involved in widespread election fraud.
The firm accused Giuliani and Powell, close allies of former President Trump, of creating "a story about Smartmatic" and said the Fox Corporation, Fox News and the anchors Lou Dobbs, Maria Bartiromo and Jeanine Pirro joined "the conspiracy to defame and disparage Smartmatic and its election technology and software."
The HillQuote:
"With this action, Smartmatic says: Enough. Facts matter. Truth matters. Defendants engaged in a conspiracy to spread disinformation about Smartmatic. They lied. And they did so knowingly and intentionally. Smartmatic seeks to hold them accountable for those lies and for the damage that their lies have caused," Smartmatic said in the suit.
"The story turned neighbor against neighbor," the complaint added, referencing baseless claims that Smartmatic tech manipulated the vote in the presidential election. "The story led a mob to attack the U.S. Capitol."
txags92 said:If the courts have any consistency whatsoever, they will throw Elias' suit out stating that the candidate doesn't have standing to challenge the machine calibration, or that it is too late to request relief since they didn't file a complaint about the lack of calibration before the election.aggiehawg said:
And those machines were from Dominion.
Yeah yeah...either you can challenge vote fraud or you can't. If 60+ courts have ruled that candidates, voters, states, etc. have no standing to sue to overturn an election, and that you cannot sue before, during, or after an election, and that even if you find people who voted illegally, you can't do anything about it, then what is one more court case? If candidates are allowed standing to sue in NY court, but are not allowed standing in all other state's courts, then you have a bunch of cases that need to go to the supreme court.ravingfans said:txags92 said:If the courts have any consistency whatsoever, they will throw Elias' suit out stating that the candidate doesn't have standing to challenge the machine calibration, or that it is too late to request relief since they didn't file a complaint about the lack of calibration before the election.aggiehawg said:
And those machines were from Dominion.
This is state of NY. The other cases were Pennsylvania, Michigan etc. The court here is NY state. The other cases are supreme court.
A democrat said it was food delivery and news repeated it. Therefore, IT'S BEEN DEBUNKED.aggiehawg said:Statistical anomalies in real time of vote spikes and total votes dropping, corroborated by affidavits of eyewitnesses at the time, corroborated (maybe) by video from surveillance cameras=evidence.MR Gadsden said:
Isn't it funny how the truth is now labeled as extremism?
Th supposed explanation has been it was either a food delivery or a newsvan dropping off cameramen and camera equipment. The video should tell the tale of what was actually in those containers and where the contents were taken.
If there is nothing untoward happening, so be it. Still want the questions answered though.
You forgot threat to our democracy.oh no said:A democrat said it was food delivery and news repeated it. Therefore, IT'S BEEN DEBUNKED.aggiehawg said:Statistical anomalies in real time of vote spikes and total votes dropping, corroborated by affidavits of eyewitnesses at the time, corroborated (maybe) by video from surveillance cameras=evidence.MR Gadsden said:
Isn't it funny how the truth is now labeled as extremism?
Th supposed explanation has been it was either a food delivery or a newsvan dropping off cameramen and camera equipment. The video should tell the tale of what was actually in those containers and where the contents were taken.
If there is nothing untoward happening, so be it. Still want the questions answered though.
Further, if you still want answers, it has been proven that you are a white supremacist, domestic terrorist, believe in conspiracy theories, and people like you need to be hunted.
Just glad I'm not being labeled as threat to our republic as that would be hurtful. Since so few Democrats understand we have a Constitutional Republic (as of today that is) makes it easy to dismiss their other ill-informed and idiotic opinions.MTTANK said:You forgot threat to our democracy.oh no said:A democrat said it was food delivery and news repeated it. Therefore, IT'S BEEN DEBUNKED.aggiehawg said:Statistical anomalies in real time of vote spikes and total votes dropping, corroborated by affidavits of eyewitnesses at the time, corroborated (maybe) by video from surveillance cameras=evidence.MR Gadsden said:
Isn't it funny how the truth is now labeled as extremism?
Th supposed explanation has been it was either a food delivery or a newsvan dropping off cameramen and camera equipment. The video should tell the tale of what was actually in those containers and where the contents were taken.
If there is nothing untoward happening, so be it. Still want the questions answered though.
Further, if you still want answers, it has been proven that you are a white supremacist, domestic terrorist, believe in conspiracy theories, and people like you need to be hunted.
