atmtws said:

---

Whistle Pig said:

---

No indications of hacking, no indications of "vote switching".

Hand audits verified the paper ballots. 8 million of them. Trump lost. There's another election tomorrow and I suspect Republicans will win on the same machines as they did in 2016, 2014, 2010........

---

Missed the first 596 pages I'm assuming?

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3152743/1

---

missed ignored. Gateway Pundit made it all up, Thank God for reputable media like CNN/MSNBC and online purveyors of facts like twitter, reddit, and facebook.

atmtws said:

---

Whistle Pig said:

---

No indications of hacking, no indications of "vote switching".

Hand audits verified the paper ballots. 8 million of them. Trump lost. There's another election tomorrow and I suspect Republicans will win on the same machines as they did in 2016, 2014, 2010........

---

Missed the first 596 pages I'm assuming?

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3152743/1

---

Didn't miss it. It's impressive only for its volume of discredited theories that only get replaced by the next one. The Q thread and pizzagate thread were long too.

Please don't quote for those of us with that account blocked. Thanks

Will be like when too comfortable Hillary did not put the pedal to the metal on cheating to beat President Trump. Just parlayed and pivoted her fake dossier investment into Russia Russia Russia collusion.

Cepe said:

---

Please don't quote for those of us with that account blocked. Thanks

---

This isn't "Cepe's" personal safe space.

Bless your heart. We are Still waiting on that Russian collusion…however, Pizzagate, proper, was a conspiracy that the media ran with to discredit the larger story which we later found was true. It just didn't involved a pizza parlor. It was a private island, the Lolita Express and Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, etc. and Trump banning Epstein from his properties. Nice try though.

Quote:

---

Pizzagate, proper, was an idiotic conspiracy that conspiracy theorists ran with and some still believe. And resulted in a hundred page thread here

---

FIFY

Regarding the Fetterman/Dem campaign lawsuit in federal court to get the undated ballots counted. What's going to happen is the state officials are not going to contest the suit. This was their strategy in 2020. Because the state officials will refuse to contest the suit, the judge will enter a default order in Fetterman's favor.

There will be postmarks and county scans of the envelopes to prove they were received on time so it's a non issue. Which is why the courts rejected this silly lawsuit.

Private PoopyPants said:

---

Regarding the Fetterman/Dem campaign lawsuit in federal court to get the undated ballots counted. What's going to happen is the state officials are not going to contest the suit. This was their strategy in 2020. Because the state officials will refuse to contest the suit, the judge will enter a default order in Fetterman's favor.

---

I think the GOP would have cause to file in that case.

I don't think it'll be a default. But I suspect they are playing it like 2020 - it will be drawn out in court a few days and during that time the cheat machine will be dumping ballots for Fester, they won't be segregated, then that Soros SOS will just shrug and say no way to know which shouldn't count.

Hey can we move the 2022 Congressional elections to the "official" thread below?

this one is already 21,000 posts and most people are not going to keep up with it.

Maybe staff can edit the title and add 2020 to it?

Why do you care what happens to this thread?

Quote:

---

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/patriotism-unity/trusting-election-process-election-officials

---

Look who co-wrote an article about "trusting the election process"?

Raffensberger may not be my least trusted individual, but he's damned sure in the running.

I didn't even bother to read it.

No doubt Raffensperger and Gabe Sterling were/are on the take. Their actions cannot be justified any other way.

"Least favorite" for what? Following the law and doing their jobs?

i was sort of treating this 2+ year old election day thread for all things cheating / fraud related and the new 2022 thread for simply just election results for today... but the communist party has so much fraud, shenanigans, and suspicious "coincidences" that raise so many fraud questions, those types of posts are on all of the election threads. there will be a lot of DEBOOOONKED oinking points to decimate later.

oh no said:

---

i was sort of treating this 2+ year old election day thread for all things cheating / fraud related and the new 2022 thread for simply just election results for today... but the communist party has so much fraud, shenanigans, and suspicious "coincidences" that raise so many fraud questions, those types of posts are on all of the election threads. there will be a lot of DEBOOOONKED oinking points to decimate later.

---

We've seen this movie before.

Quote:

---

Raffensberger may not be my least trusted individual, but he's damned sure in the running."

---

"trusted" not "favorite", amigo!

Quote:

---

POSTED ON NOVEMBER 7, 2022 BY STEVEN HAYWARD IN THOUGHT FOR THE DAY
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY: THE IDIOT VOTE

Quote:

---

"[T]he depressing but undeniable fact [is] that the gravest danger to our republican government is that too many idiots vote. . .
"Such idiots, to be sure, range across the political spectrum, and are of all colors, creeds, nations of origin and, yes, political orientations. Yet in America today, only one of the dominant partiesguess which oneis actually dependent on the idiot vote for its very survival. Ignoramuses are the Democrats' core constituency. Can't name your congressman or a single Supreme Court justice? Have vaguely heard of Gettysburg, but can't quite place the war? Get your idea of news from People and Us or Comedy Central? You're a single-issue voter and the single issue is more-more-more and who-cares-how-it -gets-paid-for? The Dems not only want you to vote, they will hunt you down, fill out the registration form for you and show up on election day and drag you to the polls. And if you can't make it, they'll send someone else and say you did. And all the while, proudly cast themselves as defenders of democracy, because the right to vote is, you know, like sacrosanct."

---

Harry Stein, The Idiot Vote: The Democrats' Core Constituency

---

Due to election day, I'll deviate from a normal post having meat, to this comment today from Powerline.

Pretty damned accurate, or for the nitpickers, considerably more accurate than 99% of Republican voters.

Quote:

---

This is kinda election day news, since Vindman willingly being used as a spy helped get rid of Trump and therefore help push the impeachment. Plus, Vindman is a disgusting human and reporbate.

BTW, Hawg, I'm sure you recognize the judge, our old friend Boasberg. Can't believe he apparently did something right.


https://amgreatness.com/2022/11/09/judge-dismisses-vindman-lawsuit-against-trump/

Quote:

---

Politico reports that Mr. Vindman's lawsuit, which claims that his civil rights had been violated by several top Trump Administration officials, was thrown out by Judge James Boasberg of the U.S. District Court. Mr. Vindman specifically named Donald Trump Jr., former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, former Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino, and former Deputy White House Communications Director Julia Hahn as the officials who he believed had smeared him publicly.

Judge Boasberg, however, determined that Mr. Vindman did not have a legal basis to sue the four officials under the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, declaring that "political hackery alone does not violate" that law. However, the Obama-appointed Boasberg hinted at his support for Mr. Vindman's overall cause despite the lack of legal standing, adding that "the court does not decide the validity of those attacks, regardless of whether some were outside the bounds of appropriate political discourse."

---

---

The New York Times: Los Angeles drops criminal charges against election software executive accused of illegally sending data about poll workers to China.

— The Bias (@thebias_news) November 10, 2022

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Without further ado, here are the 10 separate articles I refer to collectively as the "10 Irrefutable Points of the 2020 Election" (I am grateful for those willing to support my work in election integrity).
I. Trump Won the Bellwether Counties
II. Trump Won the Bellwether States
III. The Primary Model Shows a Trump Landslide
IV. Trump's Enormous Incumbent Vote Gain
V. The Shift of Power in the U.S. House Suggests a Trump Landslide
VI. Voter Registration by Party Foreshadows a Trump Landslide
VII. Florida's Rightward Shift Foreshadows a Trump Landslide
VIII. Trump's Gains in Battlegrounds are All-Time Records
IX. Trump's Minority Gains Foreshadow a Massive 2020 Landslide
X. Post-Election Behavior by Media and Politicians
There you have it. The next time someone suffering from Biden Induced Depression Syndrome (BIDS) says, "maybe, but what proof do you have?" review these points with them. They can be researched, fact-checked, and shot to pieces by the media and it won't change the accuracy of them one bit. People may disagree with the analysis of these points, but there is one thing they won't change:
My indicators, trends, bellwethers, and predictors go back in some cases to 1872, and in every case, they point to a massive 2020 landslide for the incumbent President, Donald J. Trump.

---

LINK

A little "light" reading before Tuesday.

---

Now that it is over 2 years since the 2020 election, I wanted to find a summary of the best proof the election was stolen. Would this list be the best proof? If not, could someone direct me to best source providing a summary of the proof that the election was stolen.

Yes that summary is the best "proof" of fraud in that it's no proof at all. Start with 1, bellwethers change all the time, survivorship bias, it means nothing. Plus Trump lost 14 bellwethers in 2016 and 2020.

Whistle Pig said:

---

Yes that summary is the best "proof" of fraud in that it's no proof at all. Start with 1, bellwethers change all the time, survivorship bias, it means nothing. Plus Trump lost 14 bellwethers in 2016 and 2020.

---

Can you imagine the limp wristed, high treble, no bass squealing from Whistle Pig had these exact same set of circumstances happened to Dems?

Still not sure the fascination with whatever nonsense the pig says. If you read it, that's on you. If you quote it, you are just spreading the manure around so the rest of us partake in the aroma...

Hungry Ojos said:

---

Whistle Pig said:

---

Yes that summary is the best "proof" of fraud in that it's no proof at all. Start with 1, bellwethers change all the time, survivorship bias, it means nothing. Plus Trump lost 14 bellwethers in 2016 and 2020.

---

Can you imagine the limp wristed, high treble, no bass squealing from Whistle Pig had these exact same set of circumstances happened to Dems?

---

Straight to ad hom instead of addressing the point. The exact circumstances did happen to both parties because about the same amount of "bellwethers" missed both times.

ravingfans said:

---

Still not sure the fascination with whatever nonsense the pig says. If you read it, that's on you. If you quote it, you are just spreading the manure around so the rest of us partake in the aroma...

---

This. Don't feed the troll. Don't respond or quote.

Tailgate88 said:

---

ravingfans said:

---

Still not sure the fascination with whatever nonsense the pig says. If you read it, that's on you. If you quote it, you are just spreading the manure around so the rest of us partake in the aroma...

---

This. Don't feed the troll. Don't respond or quote.

---

Trolling = incontrovertible facts that hurt your feelings.