Earl_Rudder said:

---

HumpitPuryear said:

---

What is Bobulinski's background and how did he end up in business with the Bidens? He said they approached him. Why? What does he bring to the operation that they didn't already have and why him specifically?

---

- Wrestled at Penn State
- Dean's list 9/10 semesters at Penn State
- Joined US Navy, left with rank of Lieutenant
- Served as CTO at Nuclear Power Training Command (that is a pretty big deal for me, that is real competence)
- Grandfather 37 year Army Intelligence
- Father 20+ year Navy Officer
- Brother 28 year Navy Flight Officer

Seems like a like spook/military kid that became a good man and went into international business. I would have as well if I had some connections.

He also seems like a patriot, despite donating to dems during the Obama years.

---

thirdcoast said:

---

Earl_Rudder said:

---

HumpitPuryear said:

---

What is Bobulinski's background and how did he end up in business with the Bidens? He said they approached him. Why? What does he bring to the operation that they didn't already have and why him specifically?

---

- Wrestled at Penn State
- Dean's list 9/10 semesters at Penn State
- Joined US Navy, left with rank of Lieutenant
- Served as CTO at Nuclear Power Training Command (that is a pretty big deal for me, that is real competence)
- Grandfather 37 year Army Intelligence
- Father 20+ year Navy Officer
- Brother 28 year Navy Flight Officer

Seems like a like spook/military kid that became a good man and went into international business. I would have as well if I had some connections.

He also seems like a patriot, despite donating to dems during the Obama years.

---

---

Here is the full interview

I watched the interview live. He talked about his Navy experience and he's been described as "being in investments" after the Navy. That's not very specific.

He was in the Navy for four years I'm assuming right after graduation. Seems like he graduated in 1997 or so. What did he do for the 10+ years between the Navy and getting involved with Hunter Biden?

thirdcoast said:

---

HumpitPuryear said:

---

I watched the interview live. He talked about his Navy experience and he's been described as "being in investments" after the Navy. That's not very specific.

He was in the Navy for four years I'm assuming right after graduation. Seems like he graduated in 1997 or so. What did he do for the 10+ years between the Navy and getting involved with Hunter Biden?

---

I don't know what he did, but it probably wasn't attack the messenger.

As he pointed out, he is irrelevant. The facts speak for themselves. Let the FBI take his evidence and try to ruin him, or maybe hold a corrupt politician accountable for once!

His devices, chat logs, emails, and recordings have all the credibility we need.

---

I'm not attacking anyone. I hope Joe, Hillary, and Obama all spend years behind bars. The guy is not irrelevant. If he was irrelevant he wouldn't have had to tell us like four times in the interview that he's irrelevant. He is very very relevant. His background and motives ARE relevant. And there's a huge gap in his background that I can't seem to find any info to fill in. Does that not seem weird? Newsweek is one example of published bios that don't shine any light on this period in Bobulinski's life.

https://www.newsweek.com/who-tony-bobulinski-what-we-know-about-hunter-bidens-business-associate-1541520

HumpitPuryear said:

---

thirdcoast said:

---

HumpitPuryear said:

---

I watched the interview live. He talked about his Navy experience and he's been described as "being in investments" after the Navy. That's not very specific.

He was in the Navy for four years I'm assuming right after graduation. Seems like he graduated in 1997 or so. What did he do for the 10+ years between the Navy and getting involved with Hunter Biden?

---

I don't know what he did, but it probably wasn't attack the messenger.

As he pointed out, he is irrelevant. The facts speak for themselves. Let the FBI take his evidence and try to ruin him, or maybe hold a corrupt politician accountable for once!

His devices, chat logs, emails, and recordings have all the credibility we need.

---

I'm not attacking anyone. I hope Joe, Hillary, and Obama all spend years behind bars. The guy is not irrelevant. If he was irrelevant he wouldn't have had to tell us like four times in the interview that he's irrelevant. He is very very relevant. His background and motives ARE relevant. And there's a huge gap in his background that I can't seem to find any info to fill in. Does that not seem weird? Newsweek is one example of published bios that don't shine any light on this period in Bobulinski's life.

https://www.newsweek.com/who-tony-bobulinski-what-we-know-about-hunter-bidens-business-associate-1541520

---

Well, he has a big spook background...

thirdcoast said:

---

He already explained his background and motives. He cares about his family name and thinks Americans should know facts and decide for themselves.

If there was a shred of wrong doing or shady dealings in that gap you mention, then the left would not be grasping at straws with the agent of Russia nonsense.

What exactly could you find out about his past or motives that would change anything about the Biden family dealings? Serious question.

---

Oh, well, that clears it up. Can I have a slice of apple pie with that?

Seriously, if this goes anywhere Bobulinski is going to get grilled. I'm trying to figure out if he is likely to survive the grilling. Tucker makes a point of saying that Bobulinski isn't doing this for the money. He doesn't need it. He already has lots of money. OK that's not a crime. But it seems like there would be a resume floating around out there that said he was an investment analyst for Acme before being hired as a senior partner for ABC equity partners, then Tony started his own international investment consultancy serving high-income clients etc etc.

I'm not suggesting he did anything shady in that gap. But is no one interested in why this guy gets recruited by Hunter? He appears to be an outsider, not part of Hunter or Devon Archer's circle of friends. That means he had some unique skills that justified the risk of bringing him into the fold.

Does he? That's what I'm suspecting. That he is skilled at moving money around without it being noticed.

HumpitPuryear said:

---

thirdcoast said:

---

He already explained his background and motives. He cares about his family name and thinks Americans should know facts and decide for themselves.

If there was a shred of wrong doing or shady dealings in that gap you mention, then the left would not be grasping at straws with the agent of Russia nonsense.

What exactly could you find out about his past or motives that would change anything about the Biden family dealings? Serious question.

---

Oh, well, that clears it up. Can I have a slice of apple pie with that?

Seriously, if this goes anywhere Bobulinski is going to get grilled. I'm trying to figure out if he is likely to survive the grilling. Tucker makes a point of saying that Bobulinski isn't doing this for the money. He doesn't need it. He already has lots of money. OK that's not a crime. But it seems like there would be a resume floating around out there that said he was an investment analyst for Acme before being hired as a senior partner for ABC equity partners, then Tony started his own international investment consultancy serving high-income clients etc etc.

I'm not suggesting he did anything shady in that gap. But is no one interested in why this guy gets recruited by Hunter? He appears to be an outsider, not part of Hunter or Devon Archer's circle of friends. That means he had some unique skills that justified the risk of bringing him into the fold.

---

It has already become the single biggest blow to Biden's entire career. It has basically caused him to run out clock and try to avoid qs.

Half the country doesn't care that Biden is corrupt, and the other half is only going to be emboldened by a Kavanagh type lynching of Tony. So again, what exactly could there be in his past that would discredit the allegations or restore Biden's image?

titan said:

---

atmtws said:

---

titan said:

---

HowdyTAMU said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Evanhue said:

---

He seemed legit to me. And he has the texts and phone calls to back it up. Let's see if anything happens.

---

He has put his life in imminent danger by stepping forward.

---

And his family's lives.

---

Only theoretically. After all, any harm would prove the Democrats were guilty of covering up just what he said. If the crooks are smart, they would leave them all alone.

---

Ask Seth Rich how that worked out for him...

---

That was while it was happening. Not after the horse had bolted. In fact, they killed him before that story broke if remember the chronology correctly.

---

The dudes life would threatened now, later and forever more. It is not just the Biden's but every sleezebag associated with Biden will gunning for TB. TB could be Jeffrey Epstein'd at any time.

91AggieLawyer said:

---

barnyard1996 said:

---

AgsMnn said:

---

HoustonAggie37713 said:

---

AgOutsideAustin said:

---

HoustonAggie37713 said:

---

Hannity ought to forfeit his time and let Tucker have 2 hours. How many times do we have to hear him say "dirty dossier"?

---

That and his ramble on dirty air dirty water and throw grandma over the cliff gets really old.

---

Don't forget "fry em like bacon" 27 times a show.

---

Does hannity still y'all about his martial arts etc?

---

Agree with all the above, but Hannity was on the right side of history defending Trump. Gained him a lot of tenure.

That said, it is time for some new material.

---

Its WAY more than that. Hannity is the one person who deserves credit for keeping the entire Russia collusion hoax alive. It would have been dead in 2018 and forgotten, never to be heard from again but for Hannity. With all due respect to John Soloman and Sarah Carter, do you think either one of them (in spite of their great work on the issue) could have managed to get their reporting in front of a wide audience like Hannity? Yes, it took a while and yes, it required us to listen to a Hannity cliche-fest for many nights, but the entire hoax would have gone down in history as fact without Sean Hannity.

That, my friends, is inarguable. Also, Hannity is the one place you want to send someone who might be inclined toward conservatism. For many of us, he's way too repetitive, but for people who haven't heard the facts or aren't used to getting anything other than CNNed to death, Hannity is where you want to send them. No disrespect to Tucker; I watch him and not Hannity, but I'm different than the person I'm talking about. So say what you will about Sean, but his work over the last 3 years has earned him whatever he wants to say on either his TV or radio show.

---

The problem Hannity has with the average listener who wants to prove to themselves that they are free thinkers, and tends to over critique is there is only one Hannity. If there were 4 or 5 or 6 different folks that were Hannity clones then Hannity wouldn't be the only target.

Wow, swamp rats are working hard tonight!

HowdyTAMU said:

---

A Navy Seal team is guarding his family!

---

Did he say this in the interview, I haven't watched yet?

So how does something like this happen? Can the president approve something like this?

How can he approve something like this, but can't order the FBI to investigate these claims is weird to me. It's all really frustrating.

No.

I believe he said a former Seal was protecting his family and that DOJ or DOD or FBI had said that they would provide security if necessary

Has anyone seen the ratings for the number of people that whatched the interview? I think it will be a big topic of conversation at work today.

Yawn

HumpitPuryear said:

---

thirdcoast said:

---

He already explained his background and motives. He cares about his family name and thinks Americans should know facts and decide for themselves.

If there was a shred of wrong doing or shady dealings in that gap you mention, then the left would not be grasping at straws with the agent of Russia nonsense.

What exactly could you find out about his past or motives that would change anything about the Biden family dealings? Serious question.

---

Oh, well, that clears it up. Can I have a slice of apple pie with that?

Seriously, if this goes anywhere Bobulinski is going to get grilled. I'm trying to figure out if he is likely to survive the grilling. Tucker makes a point of saying that Bobulinski isn't doing this for the money. He doesn't need it. He already has lots of money. OK that's not a crime. But it seems like there would be a resume floating around out there that said he was an investment analyst for Acme before being hired as a senior partner for ABC equity partners, then Tony started his own international investment consultancy serving high-income clients etc etc.

I'm not suggesting he did anything shady in that gap. But is no one interested in why this guy gets recruited by Hunter? He appears to be an outsider, not part of Hunter or Devon Archer's circle of friends. That means he had some unique skills that justified the risk of bringing him into the fold.

---

Focus on the message, not the messenger. Bobulinksi's motives really are irrelevant because the evidence he's provided comes from all the other parties in the scheme. It's the Biden's motives you should be questioning. This all looks completely corrupt.

ETA obligatory FUP

You bring up a perfectly valid point and I do agree with that. I wish there was some groups of people out there that would be charged with investigating facts and getting to the bottom of TB's past to see what is credible and what isn't. Who could these people be and how long would that kind of thing take them to complete.........


Sarcasm aside, I do think you have a valid point that if he is coming forward with accusations, phones, electronic communication, it's time for everyone named in this to open up their kimonos. What should they be worried about showing?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter-biden-tony-bobulinski-joe-biden-unanswered-questions

Fox News who obtained copies of documents, reporting stuff that strongly suggests Joe Biden was aware of Hunter's business dealings with China. But there is nothing proving that Joe Biden was ever formally involved or received any money.

Also this report by Fox News says that nobody ever got any money - not even Hunter - because the deal with that Chinese company never materialized.

If no money is proven ever actually exchanged hands, particularly to Joe, and this story is merely primarily about Joe Biden lying about attending a meeting with his son discussing a potential business deal, a deal which didn't even actually bear fruit in terms of receiving any funds...then hard to see this story going much of anywhere. Joe Biden lying about how much he knew his son was up to isn't much of a scandal on the typical politician scandal meter.

GeorgiAg said:

---

Yawn

---

Did you watch the interview?

The Sino Hawk deal was not funded. This about more than that one deal.

Burisma definitely had money flowing to the Biden Crime Family.

Not sure I get your point.

Nothing to see. If you doubt me, ask CNN and others in MSM.lol

Ok.

Thoughts on how this would be covered if it was Eric Trump? And is this worse than what Trump allegedly did to get impeached?

And are you saying this is worth no media coverage?, compared to other stories the media makes big deals out of?

tsuag10 said:

---

Pumpkinhead said:

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter-biden-tony-bobulinski-joe-biden-unanswered-questions

Fox News who obtained copies of documents, reporting stuff that strongly suggests Joe Biden was aware of Hunter's business dealings with China. But there is nothing proving that Joe Biden was ever formally involved or received any money.

Also this report by Fox News says that nobody ever got any money - not even Hunter - because the deal with that Chinese company never materialized.

If no money is proven ever actually exchanged hands, particularly to Joe, and this story is merely primarily about Joe Biden lying about attending a meeting with his son discussing a potential business deal, a deal which didn't even actually bear fruit in terms of receiving any funds...then hard to see this story going much of anywhere. Joe Biden lying about how much he knew his son was up to isn't much of a scandal on the typical politician scandal meter.

---

Now replace the names with Donald J Trump and Donald Trump Jr/Eric Trump/Jared Kushner/Ivanka Trump. Then tell me how you feel about the story.

It's like 4 yrs ago on replay, but now we actually have a credible witness with receipts.

FTR, I'm not saying that I know for a fact TB is telling the truth, or that this is some global criminal cabal. But I am amazed that NO ONE in the MSM is even a little bit curious about this story. It's 100% transparent.

Also, I was completely fine with looking into the original accusations about Trump & Russia. Not so much with everything after....

---

If it was Trump I'd be ok with it if it was before he was president and a real estate related deal. If it was an oil and gas deal I'd be highly suspicious, particularly if he was denying it.