This isn't a court room.

What do you think about Jussie Smollett's Chicago incident last year?

Don't forget he also said that a truck full of white guys told him that he doesn't belong at their "PWI." Maybe this is just a hobby for him.

UniqueIGN said:

---

cz308 said:

---

redcrayon said:

---

UniqueIGN said:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

From what I saw, the handwriting doesnt even look that similar. I mean I looked at the post which compared the handwriting directly and the only letter that really looked similar is the g. The rest of it is fairly normal handwriting that isn't really distinguished between most other people's handwriting.

---

Sure thing, you completely legitimate new user, who just so happened to join yesterday. in the middle of all this controversy.

---

I joined because this is an explosive topic and I wanted to point out my views on the situation. It's good to be skeptical of new users, but I linked my student account to get an agtag if that helps you a bit

---

What should his punishment be if he perpetuated this hoax?

---

Just completely ignored this question. That should tell you everything you need to know.

---

There's a lot of questions going on. But if it's proven without a reasonable doubt that he put it there, then it should go to the aggie honor council in which he would be properly punished. But if it isn't proven without a reasonable doubt, then it ends there, even if there's suspicion that he still did it.

---

What are your thoughts on people who fake hate crimes? What should the punishment be?

And FYI ... it won't end there. Good luck!

UniqueIGN said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Wait. After all this, this moderately concerned new poster still thinks note incident might be real? What is being taught at A&M these days?

---

I think it is possible that it's real still. The video may prove that notion wrong, and that's okay if it does. What matters here is that we have absolute closure on this and seeing all of the evidence would be just that.

---

Un****ing believable! I love how this, I'm smarter than they are, newbie is trying to set what he thinks is an iron clad narrative. "If the video isn't released, the police are corrupt."

A little hint junior, THE WRITING WAS IDENTICAL AND THE DUDE LEFT HIS OWN NOTES! IT WAS A HOAX AND NO ONE OWES YOU ANYTHING. THE COPS ARE NOT THE BAD GUYS, BLM IS.

Mr. Young. I think you owe some people their money. Fair is Fair! We didn't start this! We didn't mean for this to happen! But we're not giving up until you pay! Fair is Fair!

I don't know if you all caught it in the report.

But the Hoaxer pointed out an innocent guy walking his dog.
(We all know the dog actually did it, I've known some racist dogs in my time)

Imagine for a second the dog decided to stop and pee or smell something at the wrong moment

That guy's life would be ruined now over this, even if at some later time he was proven innocent it would be with him forever.

Slocum on a mobile said:

---

bmks270 said:

---

Redacted attempted to frame an innocent person.

Police report:

Quote:

---

"Redacted initially denied placing the papers, and pointed to the w/m walking the dog on the leash as the actor."

---

---

That guy's dog takes a whizz, and he'd be doxxed and nuked, possibly with no job.

---

You know, that's the truth and it may be the scariest facet of an evilly concocted scheme that could have easily turned tragic for at least one person, and held that potential for who knows how many others? Extremely adept observation.

We've all seen, in the last page or so, a classic case of Leftism 101.

Get busted/exposed for bad behavior and all of a sudden you hear a lot of "reasonable doubt" and "innocent until proven guilty". It's like they fall in love with the Constitution for the very first time...

However,
If there is even any PERCEIVED bad behavior from their opposition, all that goes right out the window. It's how they can impeach a President based on absolutely nothing and feel perfectly justified in doxxing random white kids in the back of a truck. It's the same damn thing. Rules are for thee and not for me.

Quote:

---

I think it's possible the police officer lied.

---

I think you're delusional.

Let's assume the police officer lied.

Isiah says that the Park West Management has been very helpful to him.

It's likely then, that the PW people could give Isiah a copy of the tape, and he could blast it on social media.

Instead, he has gone radio silent, making his Twitter private.

That's damn good evidence of who the liar is, hint: The liar does not work for UPD.

The saddest thing here is if this were not a hoax, every poster here would be condemning this action and demand expulsion w/ any criminal investigation if applicable (and rightly so).

Now we have a proven hoax that only serves to further divide all of us. This is in direct contradiction of the path these so-called "activists" want us to believe is their goal. Yet here we are and none of them are calling these folks out.

Just be honest with yourself that your goal isn't unity, it's division and hate (just directed towards one group of people).

V8Aggie said:

---

The saddest thing here is if this were not a hoax, every poster here would be condemning this action and demand expulsion w/ any criminal investigation if applicable (and rightly so).

Now we have a proven hoax that only serves to further divide all of us. This is in direct contradiction of the path these so-called "activists" want us to believe is their goal. Yet here we are and none of them are calling these folks out.

Just be honest with yourself that your goal isn't unity, it's division and hate (just directed towards one group of people).

---

Good point. True uniters would call racism out where they see it - they would condemn this hoax. They would say, We are against racism wherever we see it - and that includes those who dishonestly try to frame others. THey would be logically consistent. Others, seeing the honesty, would join their movement and great things might happen.

Alas, unity doesn't seem to be the goal.

UniqueIGN said:

---

twk said:

---

UniqueIGN said:

---

NCNJ1217 said:

---

Do you have any reason to believe that the video, when it comes out, will show anything different than what is in the police report?

Stated a different way, do you think the officer lied in the police report?

I want you on record now, BEFORE the video comes out.

---

I think it's possible the police officer lied. I'm not saying whether he did or didn't but in order to decide on whether he did or not, I need to see the evidence

---

The evidence will be released. No reason for the officer to lie because, unlike the alleged victim, he's smart enough to know that he would be caught lying.

I'm convinced now that you are trolling.

---

Is it really trolling to say that it's a possibility the police officer lied? The evidence likely will be released, but it's important to see whether the evidence proves it without a reasonable doubt. If it doesn't prove that Isaih put it there without a reasonable doubt, that is likely to be the end of it, but if it does prove that he put it there it's likely going to be picked up by the honor council.

---

Yes, it is really trolling in this case. Chief Johnson would not abide an officer lying about this.

TChaney said:

---

Sure are a whole lot of Twitter accounts that have gone private this morning.

---

Shocking.

Truly disgusting bunch of cowards the whole lot of them from Young down to the management office.

AGGies0311 said:

---

---

Doesn't Martin work at Park West, or did I incorrectly hear that somewhere?

My question is, how does a College Station business say they are no longer working with the city police concerning a crime that occurred on their property?

aggiedata said:

---

---

Love Gun said:

---

AGGies0311 said:

---

---

Doesn't Martin work at Park West, or did I incorrectly hear that somewhere?

---

I'm not sure if Martin does, but I know his assumed male interest that I alluded to earlier in the thread does.

What an interesting development...

As Larry Elder points out about proven hoaxes - shouldn't everyone be overjoyed that this isn't real? We should be thrilled and happy that these notes aren't a real reflection of the community.

And I am.

ParkWest blocked me? Holy crap these people are deranged.

AGGies0311 said:

---

---

My daughter (white) lives at PW. I'm feeling anxious that there is a resident there that may accuse her of a fake hate crime. What if she had been randomly walking past "Martin's" car in the police video? It's obvious that "Martin" would have accused her. He accused the dog-walker. Does my daughter not have the right to feel safe at her home at Park West? Why does the perpetrator of a fake hate crime need to be coddled by the university to feel safe when they are the ones creating racist anxiety for other students of all races? Students of color now have evidence which they may not realize is fake that A&M is not safe for them and white students feel equally concerned that they may be accused of a fake hate crime. PW and the University could address both by expelling "Martin" from the university immediately.

Satellite of Love said:

---

ParkWest blocked me? Holy crap these people are deranged.

---

An apartment complex blocked you?

UniqueIGN said:

---

NCNJ1217 said:

---

Quote:

---

I'm waiting for the video to come out before I'm absolutely sure who did it which I think is a fair thing to do. I see no reason for this video to not come out. If it doesn't then that would be a bit fishy.

---

Do you have any reason to believe that the video, when it comes out, will show anything different than what is in the police report?

Stated a different way, do you think the officer lied in the police report?

I want you on record now, BEFORE the video comes out.

---

I think it's possible the police officer lied. I'm not saying whether he did or didn't but in order to decide on whether he did or not, I need to see the evidence

---

It's probably helpful to have a little skepticism these day.

But answer this. Think about it carefully and be honest. If the police report indicated that they believed the white male walking his dog did indeed have the time and is the suspected perpetrator; would you say "'I'm waiting for the video to come out before I'm absolutely sure who did it which I think is a fair thing to do."

Again. Please be honest.

UniqueIGN said:

---

EDIT: I have reached my post limit for now, but does this yard look like Park West? And what color is my hand? Im not Isaih just someone pointing out that the police report made no mention on whether or not the handwriting was similar to hers. Why is any difference of opinion here met with hostility?

---

for a completely new poster you know an awful lot about what goes on here???

sock much?

HumpitPuryear said:

---

AGGies0311 said:

---

---

My daughter (white) lives at PW. I'm feeling anxious that there is a resident there that may accuse her of a fake hate crime. What if she had been randomly walking past "Martin's" car in the police video? It's obvious that "Martin" would have accused her. He accused the dog-walker. Does my daughter not have the right to feel safe at her home at Park West? Why does the perpetrator of a fake hate crime need to be coddled by the university to feel safe when they are the ones creating racist anxiety for other students of all races? Students of color now have evidence which they may not realize is fake that A&M is not safe for them and white students feel equally concerned that they may be accused of a fake hate crime. PW and the University could address both by expelling "Martin" from the university immediately.

---

Yeah I would think that either way Park West has a problem. Either there is a rampant racist on the loose over there that is now emboldened because their very overt and public racist act was ignored by police OR there is a race-baiting liar trying to set up innocent people to have their lives ruined living there.

I don't understand how they can just not address this. If I was thinking about sending my kids to live there I would definitely need some answers.

Quote:

---

I don't know if you all caught it in the report.

But the Hoaxer pointed out an innocent guy walking his dog.
(We all know the dog actually did it, I've known some racist dogs in my time)

Imagine for a second the dog decided to stop and pee or smell something at the wrong moment

That guy's life would be ruined now over this, even if at some later time he was proven innocent it would be with him forever.

---

Great point! In today's mob rule environment your life can be ruined WAY before the truth comes out. The "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" that the hoaxers are clinging to now would be completely drowned out by their screams for "justice". Cowards like Young would be more than happy to appease the mob and expel an innocent student and even support criminal prosecution.

AGGies0311 said:

---

---

So the apartment complex is keeping Martin safe... from himself?