Nazi German Shepherd.Sarduakar said:torrid said:I still think it was the dog, but I'm doing to need to know which breed before I pass final judgement.dermdoc said:Fair enough. Do you dispute the fact that the only person who could have put the notes on the windshield was the owner of the car?UniqueIGN said:
From what I saw, the handwriting doesnt even look that similar. I mean I looked at the post which compared the handwriting directly and the only letter that really looked similar is the g. The rest of it is fairly normal handwriting that isn't really distinguished between most other people's handwriting.
Does he get a different justice than say a white frat guy who did it?
No justice, no peace.
Pit Bull
Racist "windshield notes" confirmed a hoax
169,055 Views |
1104 Replies |
Last: 1 yr ago by C@LAg
You are either trolling or horribly ill informed. It was 100% a hoax. The purported victim placed the notes on his vehicle just to take the photos. I don't think the identity of the person who wrote the notes has been 100% proved in the same way, but the evidence does point to a certain white female, likely the one that accompanied him to UPD.UniqueIGN said:I think it is possible that it's real still. The video may prove that notion wrong, and that's okay if it does. What matters here is that we have absolute closure on this and seeing all of the evidence would be just that.Ellis Wyatt said:
Wait. After all this, this moderately concerned new poster still thinks note incident might be real? What is being taught at A&M these days?
CoachO_08 said:
Don't feed the racist...
That sounds almost exactly word for word what Ms. NAACP said on her Twitter rant about not being racist. Hmmm....
The evidence will be released. No reason for the officer to lie because, unlike the alleged victim, he's smart enough to know that he would be caught lying.UniqueIGN said:I think it's possible the police officer lied. I'm not saying whether he did or didn't but in order to decide on whether he did or not, I need to see the evidenceNCNJ1217 said:Quote:
I'm waiting for the video to come out before I'm absolutely sure who did it which I think is a fair thing to do. I see no reason for this video to not come out. If it doesn't then that would be a bit fishy.
Do you have any reason to believe that the video, when it comes out, will show anything different than what is in the police report?
Stated a different way, do you think the officer lied in the police report?
I want you on record now, BEFORE the video comes out.
I'm convinced now that you are trolling.
UniqueIGN said:
I'm waiting for the video to come out before I'm absolutely sure who did it which I think is a fair thing to do. I see no reason for this video to not come out. If it doesn't then that would be a bit fishy.
I hope it comes out, too, but we have the police report with a detailed description of the video that makes it plain as day who placed the notes. That's good enough for me. The officer who filled it out has no reason to lie about what was on it. Chief Johnson would rightly fire him for lying.
UniqueIGN said:I think it is possible that it's real still. The video may prove that notion wrong, and that's okay if it does. What matters here is that we have absolute closure on this and seeing all of the evidence would be just that.Ellis Wyatt said:
Wait. After all this, this moderately concerned new poster still thinks note incident might be real? What is being taught at A&M these days?
Wow. Oh, sweet summer child.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
This was a complete and total failure on your part from the get go. Not a single person here believes your bull****, so you can go feign concern with your pseudo-intellectual buddies and race baiters and go scheme up your next hate crime to prove how much of a victim you are.
I will take that as a yes, the officer lied in the police report.
Why would he do that knowing there is video? The video has been viewed by apartment staff already - there are witnesses to corroborate the content. even if you and I haven't yet seen it. The officer would be an idiot to lie in the report.
You aren't using your brain.
Why would he do that knowing there is video? The video has been viewed by apartment staff already - there are witnesses to corroborate the content. even if you and I haven't yet seen it. The officer would be an idiot to lie in the report.
You aren't using your brain.
Is it really trolling to say that it's a possibility the police officer lied? The evidence likely will be released, but it's important to see whether the evidence proves it without a reasonable doubt. If it doesn't prove that Isaih put it there without a reasonable doubt, that is likely to be the end of it, but if it does prove that he put it there it's likely going to be picked up by the honor council.twk said:The evidence will be released. No reason for the officer to lie because, unlike the alleged victim, he's smart enough to know that he would be caught lying.UniqueIGN said:I think it's possible the police officer lied. I'm not saying whether he did or didn't but in order to decide on whether he did or not, I need to see the evidenceNCNJ1217 said:
Do you have any reason to believe that the video, when it comes out, will show anything different than what is in the police report?
Stated a different way, do you think the officer lied in the police report?
I want you on record now, BEFORE the video comes out.
I'm convinced now that you are trolling.
No, it doesn't. It's just a power thing. "We can say it without having our lives ruined. You can't. Ha ha!"CoachO_08 said:
Don't feed the racist...
The plain and ordinary meanings of words don't have different meanings based on the skin color of the speaker. That would make for one complicated dictionary.
NCNJ1217 said:
I will take that as a yes, the officer lied in the police report.
Why would he do that knowing there is video? The video has been viewed by apartment staff already - there are witnesses to corroborate the content. even if you and I haven't yet seen it. The officer would be an idiot to lie in the report.
You aren't using your brain.
If the officer lied about what's in the video our new friend who is totally not Isaiah wink wink would have already posted the video online to prove the officer was lying. He didn't ergo.......
You're doing this wrong. A&M IS racist, so this happened even if it didn't. Just like Jussie and Bubba.NCNJ1217 said:
I will take that as a yes, the officer lied in the police report.
Why would he do that knowing there is video? The video has been viewed by apartment staff already - there are witnesses to corroborate the content. even if you and I haven't yet seen it. The officer would be an idiot to lie in the report.
You aren't using your brain.
Once again proves the fact that liberalism trumps religion, logic, reason, etc.UniqueIGN said:I think it's possible the police officer lied. I'm not saying whether he did or didn't but in order to decide on whether he did or not, I need to see the evidenceNCNJ1217 said:Quote:
I'm waiting for the video to come out before I'm absolutely sure who did it which I think is a fair thing to do. I see no reason for this video to not come out. If it doesn't then that would be a bit fishy.
Do you have any reason to believe that the video, when it comes out, will show anything different than what is in the police report?
Stated a different way, do you think the officer lied in the police report?
I want you on record now, BEFORE the video comes out.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
If the video showed something that contradicted the police officer, Dr. Young himself would have released the video.
Because it isn't reasonable to be completely sure on your stance until you see the evidence?
So you think the officer was lying? And are you a liberal?UniqueIGN said:
Because it isn't reasonable to be completely sure on your stance until you see the evidence?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
UniqueIGN said:
Because it isn't reasonable to be completely sure on your stance until you see the evidence?
So what should happen to this guy if this was a hoax?
The hoax your friends pulled was completely unbelievable from the start. It wasn't logical in the first place, and it took this board no time to tear it apart. Give up the charade. Your friends have no credibility. We don't believe all victims because most of them aren't victims. It's been borne out repeatedly with "racial" incidents.UniqueIGN said:I think it is possible that it's real still. The video may prove that notion wrong, and that's okay if it does. What matters here is that we have absolute closure on this and seeing all of the evidence would be just that.Ellis Wyatt said:
Wait. After all this, this moderately concerned new poster still thinks note incident might be real? What is being taught at A&M these days?
What do you think about Jussie Smollett's hate crime story?
ThunderCougarFalconBird
Joined:
Oct 10, 2006
Posts:
49,134
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is hilarious. The fake hate crime hoaxer is on this thread trying to defend his honor after being completely busted.
UniqueIGN said:
Because it isn't reasonable to be completely sure on your stance until you see the evidence?
So since there was no one else on the video other than the hoaxer that's could have placed the notes on the car, we are to believe in spontaneous hate note generation? They just magically appeared? You're brilliant.
Given who runs the investigation, no one who is a friend of the truth has any confidence that A&M will attach any blame to the hoaxer, whatever the evidence. I think you'll also find that the standard in such a proceeding would normally be lower than the standard in a criminal trial, but I'm sure that an exception will be made for this kid.Quote:
Is it really trolling to say that it's a possibility the police officer lied? The evidence likely will be released, but it's important to see whether the evidence proves it without a reasonable doubt. If it doesn't prove that Isaih put it there without a reasonable doubt, that is likely to be the end of it, but if it does prove that he put it there it's likely going to be picked up by the honor council.
Just completely ignored this question. That should tell you everything you need to know.redcrayon said:UniqueIGN said:I joined because this is an explosive topic and I wanted to point out my views on the situation. It's good to be skeptical of new users, but I linked my student account to get an agtag if that helps you a bitQuote:Sure thing, you completely legitimate new user, who just so happened to join yesterday. in the middle of all this controversy.Quote:
From what I saw, the handwriting doesnt even look that similar. I mean I looked at the post which compared the handwriting directly and the only letter that really looked similar is the g. The rest of it is fairly normal handwriting that isn't really distinguished between most other people's handwriting.
What should his punishment be if he perpetuated this hoax?
UniqueIGN said:
Because it isn't reasonable to be completely sure on your stance until you see the evidence?
Seriously? I mean seriously? The officer lied on an official police report about what can be seen on video that is not in the sole possession of the police? Do you not see how ridiculous this argument is?
I mean it's "possible" that unicorns exist, but highly improbable. Same here. Now that you've proven you fail basic logic given the evidence, time to move along.UniqueIGN said:Is it really trolling to say that it's a possibility the police officer lied? The evidence likely will be released, but it's important to see whether the evidence proves it without a reasonable doubt. If it doesn't prove that Isaih put it there without a reasonable doubt, that is likely to be the end of it, but if it does prove that he put it there it's likely going to be picked up by the honor council.twk said:The evidence will be released. No reason for the officer to lie because, unlike the alleged victim, he's smart enough to know that he would be caught lying.UniqueIGN said:I think it's possible the police officer lied. I'm not saying whether he did or didn't but in order to decide on whether he did or not, I need to see the evidenceNCNJ1217 said:
Do you have any reason to believe that the video, when it comes out, will show anything different than what is in the police report?
Stated a different way, do you think the officer lied in the police report?
I want you on record now, BEFORE the video comes out.
I'm convinced now that you are trolling.
Spoiler alert: If and when video comes out, UniqueIGN will side with the hoaxer. Everybody knows that. Hell, my dog even knows that.
There's a lot of questions going on. But if it's proven without a reasonable doubt that he put it there, then it should go to the aggie honor council in which he would be properly punished. But if it isn't proven without a reasonable doubt, then it ends there, even if there's suspicion that he still did it.cz308 said:Just completely ignored this question. That should tell you everything you need to know.redcrayon said:UniqueIGN said:I joined because this is an explosive topic and I wanted to point out my views on the situation. It's good to be skeptical of new users, but I linked my student account to get an agtag if that helps you a bitQuote:Sure thing, you completely legitimate new user, who just so happened to join yesterday. in the middle of all this controversy.Quote:
From what I saw, the handwriting doesnt even look that similar. I mean I looked at the post which compared the handwriting directly and the only letter that really looked similar is the g. The rest of it is fairly normal handwriting that isn't really distinguished between most other people's handwriting.
What should his punishment be if he perpetuated this hoax?
If you can't prove something is not true then it must be true. You killed my father and you should go to jail. Prove that you didn't and you're a free man.V8Aggie said:I mean it's "possible" that unicorns exist, but highly improbable. Same here. Now that you've proven you fail basic logic given the evidence, time to move along.UniqueIGN said:Is it really trolling to say that it's a possibility the police officer lied? The evidence likely will be released, but it's important to see whether the evidence proves it without a reasonable doubt. If it doesn't prove that Isaih put it there without a reasonable doubt, that is likely to be the end of it, but if it does prove that he put it there it's likely going to be picked up by the honor council.twk said:The evidence will be released. No reason for the officer to lie because, unlike the alleged victim, he's smart enough to know that he would be caught lying.UniqueIGN said:I think it's possible the police officer lied. I'm not saying whether he did or didn't but in order to decide on whether he did or not, I need to see the evidenceNCNJ1217 said:
Do you have any reason to believe that the video, when it comes out, will show anything different than what is in the police report?
Stated a different way, do you think the officer lied in the police report?
I want you on record now, BEFORE the video comes out.
I'm convinced now that you are trolling.
UniqueIGN said:Is it really trolling to say that it's a possibility the police officer lied? The evidence likely will be released, but it's important to see whether the evidence proves it without a reasonable doubt. If it doesn't prove that Isaih put it there without a reasonable doubt, that is likely to be the end of it, but if it does prove that he put it there it's likely going to be picked up by the honor council.twk said:The evidence will be released. No reason for the officer to lie because, unlike the alleged victim, he's smart enough to know that he would be caught lying.UniqueIGN said:I think it's possible the police officer lied. I'm not saying whether he did or didn't but in order to decide on whether he did or not, I need to see the evidenceNCNJ1217 said:
Do you have any reason to believe that the video, when it comes out, will show anything different than what is in the police report?
Stated a different way, do you think the officer lied in the police report?
I want you on record now, BEFORE the video comes out.
I'm convinced now that you are trolling.
Are you familiar with Occam's razor?
Did you feel dirty after typing those names?South Platte said:
Roll call for:
iluvpoker
SUAg
BallerStaf
MassAg
Shanked
Where you boys at?
Sent my love note to mr young this morning as well.
I may keep responding to this later, but I got some engineering homework I have to finish before class. See y'all later!
I can appreciate you trying to save your friend from getting expelled, but come on man.
Sure are a whole lot of Twitter accounts that have gone private this morning.
Been binge watching a lot of law & order lately?UniqueIGN said:There's a lot of questions going on. But if it's proven without a reasonable doubt that he put it there, then it should go to the aggie honor council in which he would be properly punished. But if it isn't proven without a reasonable doubt, then it ends there, even if there's suspicion that he still did it.cz308 said:Just completely ignored this question. That should tell you everything you need to know.redcrayon said:UniqueIGN said:I joined because this is an explosive topic and I wanted to point out my views on the situation. It's good to be skeptical of new users, but I linked my student account to get an agtag if that helps you a bitQuote:Sure thing, you completely legitimate new user, who just so happened to join yesterday. in the middle of all this controversy.Quote:
From what I saw, the handwriting doesnt even look that similar. I mean I looked at the post which compared the handwriting directly and the only letter that really looked similar is the g. The rest of it is fairly normal handwriting that isn't really distinguished between most other people's handwriting.
What should his punishment be if he perpetuated this hoax?
Featured Stories
See All
Math is fundamental in Wednesday's high-profile A&M-Ole Miss contest
by Olin Buchanan
20:53
14h ago
4.2k
Scouting Report: No. 13 Texas A&M at No. 16 Ole Miss
by Tom Schuberth
9:03
14h ago
1.3k
28:24
1d ago
6.7k
Hean99
if you are a QB in the CFB, you played for one of our coaches last year…
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
5