China Coronavirus Outbreak Spreads; Hundreds Infected As Human-To-Human Transmission

3,307,766 Views | 21764 Replies | Last: 4 mo ago by Stat Monitor Repairman
Pizza
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk said:

Pluralizes Everythings said:

samurai_science said:

Rapier108 said:

richardag said:

Stat Monitor Repairman said:


Wondering if the DOJ and FBI will be investigating. Shouldn't they be seizing all communications within these organizations? Maybe an International court should get involved for the mass murder of millions?
Most likely the Chinese stole the information. They spend countless amounts of money and time on industrial espionage.
Which we paid for, and remember Gain of Function was restarted UNDER TRUMP.


Gaslighting
That is just straight up lying


That too.
Anyone who chooses to ride a bicycle in the street is a threat to themselves, and others. If a vehicle strikes you accidentally, YOU are at fault; and the laws of physics supercede all else when you're in the path of a 2 ton killing machine. Know your place, stay off the road.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pluralizes Everythings said:

captkirk said:

Pluralizes Everythings said:

samurai_science said:

Rapier108 said:

richardag said:

Stat Monitor Repairman said:


Wondering if the DOJ and FBI will be investigating. Shouldn't they be seizing all communications within these organizations? Maybe an International court should get involved for the mass murder of millions?
Most likely the Chinese stole the information. They spend countless amounts of money and time on industrial espionage.
Which we paid for, and remember Gain of Function was restarted UNDER TRUMP.


Gaslighting
That is just straight up lying


That too.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/u-s-lifts-moratorium-on-funding-controversial-high-risk-virus-research/

U.S. Lifts Moratorium on Funding Controversial, High-Risk Virus Research


December 19, 2017
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.science.org/content/article/us-halts-funding-new-risky-virus-studies-calls-voluntary-moratorium


No grants for flu, SARS, or MERS while government pursues 1-year risk analysis


  • 17 OCT 2014
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099%2818%2930006-9/fulltext


Fauci was running the NIH

On Dec 19, 2017, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced that they would resume funding gain-of-function experiments involving influenza, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pluralizes Everythings said:

samurai_science said:

Rapier108 said:

richardag said:

Stat Monitor Repairman said:


Wondering if the DOJ and FBI will be investigating. Shouldn't they be seizing all communications within these organizations? Maybe an International court should get involved for the mass murder of millions?
Most likely the Chinese stole the information. They spend countless amounts of money and time on industrial espionage.
Which we paid for, and remember Gain of Function was restarted UNDER TRUMP.


Gaslighting
You are wrong.....try again
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pluralizes Everythings said:

captkirk said:

Pluralizes Everythings said:

samurai_science said:

Rapier108 said:

richardag said:

Stat Monitor Repairman said:


Wondering if the DOJ and FBI will be investigating. Shouldn't they be seizing all communications within these organizations? Maybe an International court should get involved for the mass murder of millions?
Most likely the Chinese stole the information. They spend countless amounts of money and time on industrial espionage.
Which we paid for, and remember Gain of Function was restarted UNDER TRUMP.


Gaslighting
That is just straight up lying


That too.
Proof posted. Gain of Function RESTARTED under Trump.....

agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great thread bump

A historical record.
The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you never know if they are genuine. -- Abraham Lincoln.



Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

  • The head of the World Health Organisation warned on Tuesday that governments need to prepare for a disease even deadlier than Covid-19.
  • He warned that nation states cannot "kick this can down the road" and that the next global disease was bound to "come knocking".
  • They are also drafting a broader pandemic treaty which is up for ratification next year.
  • "A commitment from this generation [to a pandemic accord] is important, because it is this generation that experienced how awful a small virus could be," said Dr Tedros.

Will the next pandemic be rolled out to curb social unrest associated with an imminent global economic meltdown?
Aggie521
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Most likely aligned with the next election so Joe can go back to the basement for campaigning.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why was gain of function being pursued? I know most here assume it was to create a super virus to unleash on the world, but I'm betting there's a more reasonable answer.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Funky Winkerbean said:

Why was gain of function being pursued? I know most here assume it was to create a super virus to unleash on the world, but I'm betting there's a more reasonable answer.
They will tell you it's so they can learn everything they can about the virus so they can prevent it, fight it going forward, and/or manipulate it to be less severe.

Considering all of the public proclamations of reducing the population by the WEF and the elites I'm just going to believe what they are telling us - they want to figure out how to weed out the population.

COVID was a great practice run...a respiratory virus that only affects the old and the obese is already dialed in pretty well.
justcallmeharry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Potential. Deadlier. Sounds like a big maybe...



ETA - from the linked article:

"No specific diseases were named. But 'Disease X' a place-holder given to a devastating pathogen not yet discovered is on the UN agency's list of pressing threats."
If you think I am a liberal, you are incorrect. Assume sarcasm on my part. Sorry if something I post has already been posted. Just the way it is!!
mickeyrig06sq3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Funky Winkerbean said:

Why was gain of function being pursued? I know most here assume it was to create a super virus to unleash on the world, but I'm betting there's a more reasonable answer.
Giving benefit of doubt, it was excessive curiosity just to see what they could do to it, hubris in thinking that they could fully control it, and poor safety procedures that released it. The subsequent fear, panic, and ignorance caused the most detrimental impact, not the actual virus. The creation of the us vs them mentality that allowed some truly disgusting behavior was the biggest negative outcome. The fact that the HermanCainAward subreddit even exists, let alone be as popular as it was, is frightening.
Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Funky Winkerbean said:

Why was gain of function being pursued? I know most here assume it was to create a super virus to unleash on the world, but I'm betting there's a more reasonable answer.
Is there a more "reasonable answer"?

I asked this question many times myself. Why gain of function research? Why did we ever do this, fund it, etc? If the goal was that nefarious as to create a virus, super or not, to release on humanity, obviously no one is going to admit that. And I am not ruling that at. But I have never seen what I would consider to be a reasonable answer as to why we would screw around with something so potentially destructive as gain of function research on viruses.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think their motives were scientific, but selfish or at least recklessly self absorbed. They were trying to find ways to predict and prevent or deal effectively with a future virus outbreak. At least, the Americans and some of the Chinese researchers in actual virology for medical research were. I don't doubt that. But it was argued very strongly by a large contingent in that area of study that in the effort to research transmission risk to humans, creating the vectors and the viruses that could actually achieve that in a lab environment GREATLY increased the risk of a human to human transmissible outbreak actually occurring. The knowledge of how it might happen and how to stop it was far less significant than the actual danger that mode of research presented. They were far more likely to cause what they were allegedly trying to prevent. That sentiment prevailed…briefly. But, some selfish arrogant eggheads managed to offshore the research, then lay low until nobody was paying close attention and resume it with additional funding.

And like complete idiots, they chose a communist nation legendary for poor quality control and covering up cutting corners, at a facility in a massive urban area, and at a bio security level that was laughably inadequate given what they were handling.

There really should be a Nuremberg type international trial for those involved in setting that up.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
People will slide back into pandemic protocol as easy as getting back with their ex.

So the idea the people won't stand for it this time is pie-in-the-sky.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences.
We had a number of warnings right before covid dropped but we ignored those warnings. Event 201 is an example. The signal to noise ratio was too high.

Now whenever they come out with warnings like this, we'd better listen. If We've learned one thing ... they'll tell you exactly what is about to happen, you've just got to be listening. Nobody gaf about covid when this thread started in Jan 2020.

We listening now though.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Urban Ag said:

Funky Winkerbean said:

Why was gain of function being pursued? I know most here assume it was to create a super virus to unleash on the world, but I'm betting there's a more reasonable answer.
Is there a more "reasonable answer"?

I asked this question many times myself. Why gain of function research? Why did we ever do this, fund it, etc? If the goal was that nefarious as to create a virus, super or not, to release on humanity, obviously no one is going to admit that. And I am not ruling that at. But I have never seen what I would consider to be a reasonable answer as to why we would screw around with something so potentially destructive as gain of function research on viruses.


My less skeptical side is hoping that by improving gain of function, that something good could be learned/created to actually help humanity. Could these viral characteristics be used in other ways to treat diseases and relieve suffering? Could it offer a breakthrough in cancer treatment? The worst part is that now it's political and we'll never know the whole truth.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Humans created a virus that was not naturally occurring to this earth.

At the end of the day, humanity created an an alien in the form of a highly transmissible respiratory virus.

Humans battled the virus to the tune of $14 trillion in the US alone and completely wrecked the global economy in the process.

Covid and the failed covid response was the worst human failure of all time.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Starting to agree with you as it also raised awareness on how ignorant the masses can be, even in this age of information.
Hoyt Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This was a fun thread. I went to Thailand on vacation around end of Feb when this all started and had to come back early. That was quite the fiasco.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Mortality rates for those who received mechanical ventilation in the 18-to-65 and older-than-65 age groups were 76.4% and 97.2%, respectively.
Is the data from this study close to being true?

A 97.2% mortality rate for persons over 65 which were put on a ventilator?

If you recall the Chinese developed the ventilator protocol for treatment of covid patients early on, and the US eagerly adopted it. There was a time in this country where people were screeching for more ventilators.

I don't see how that 97% mortality rate possible, but what do I know?

Three years later, it seems like the Chinese trolled the US into killing a bunch of our own people.

Covid might have been the greatest troll job of all time, along with the greatest failure of leadership of all time.

Also of note, you may remember threads on here, very early on, that warned people not to let their loved ones get put on a ventilator if at all possible. You had a small minority of medical people recommending a ventilator only as a last resort. Turns out they were right. So credit to those posters wherever they are.
pagerman @ work
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Funky Winkerbean said:

Why was gain of function being pursued? I know most here assume it was to create a super virus to unleash on the world, but I'm betting there's a more reasonable answer.

I don't think a reasonable answer exists that would make sense of the highest paid bureaucrat in the federal government circumventing US law and outsourcing highly technical and secret research into creating a bio weapon to the government of a belligerent country with known technical limitations and massively sub-standard health and safety standards (to the point of them being a passing thought at best).
Old May Banker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Why was gain of function being pursued?


Money... always follow the money.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?



I have no idea about the validity or the facts being correct.

If y'all know the guy, you can opine. A doctor buddy of mine in Dallas sent it to me today. It's WELL worth a listen.


Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fasthorse05 said:



I have no idea about the validity or the facts being correct.

If y'all know the guy, you can opine. A doctor buddy of mine in Dallas sent it to me today. It's WELL worth a listen.
Some of you folks out there aren't ready for whats in this video.

I don't want y'all having an existential crisis or anything.

Don't go too far off the rails now, ya hear?
CardiffGiant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wow.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat, I wasn't sure where to put that. It probably deserves it's own thread, but I don't have enough confidence to know the accuracy of the speaker.

A doctor buddy of mine in Dallas sent it to me yesterday afternoon. I had to take a little time to try and verify it, when and where it was. That's why I asked some of y'all who the guy is and what his background was.

Apparently, it was from May 3rd, I believe. I haven't spoken to my old Aggie buddy who sent it, but will attempt to do so today.

Often times, the hyperbole before a video is just that, hyperbole, but in this case, and assuming it's true and correct, appears to be pretty damned accurate.
XXXVII
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Any update? Who is that guy, and where was the speech given?
DeSantis 2024

FJB, FJB, FJB, etc
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?

How close are we to the final numbers being in?
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
XXXVII said:

Any update? Who is that guy, and where was the speech given?
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/videos-the-international-covid-summit?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=583200&post_id=121560307&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email

Looks like he was the moderator of the event, "The International Covid Summit III in the European Parliament, Brussels".
DrEvazanPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman said:


How close are we to the final numbers being in?
PANdeMIC oF THe uNVacCiNaTED
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:


How close are we to the final numbers being in?



Everything that was done to us, all for the damn flu. Biggest scam in history.
plain_o_llama
How long do you want to ignore this user?
XXXVII said:

Any update? Who is that guy, and where was the speech given?
International Covid Summit III - part 1
Go to 13:10


The speaker appears to be this David Martin
https://www.davidmartin.world

Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?

When does the treaty ceding authority over pandemics to the WHO get ratified?

Anyone know?
First Page Last Page
Page 619 of 622
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.