Tbs2003 said:
AgLiving06 said:
PJYoung said:
dermdoc said:
PJYoung said:
Agnzona said:
The death rate is the big lie. 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, when all said is done this will end up at .05%.
South Korea has done an amazing job with this and their death rate (CFR) will end up being well over 1%.
And they only tested 190k out of 61 million people. The actual mortality rate is much lower than that.
You know the people they tested weren't random, right? Or maybe you haven't read about what they have done.
They aggressively tested every cluster and tracked contacts down using cellphone and credit card data of EVERYbody that infected person was suspected of coming into contact with and tested them.
THAT is how they have controlled their outbreak. There is not some great unknown of positive cases in South Korea, that is why their case load is flattening and there is not a ton of new clusters popping up like we have all over.
Here's the problem I have with this and I have to use the flu as the comparison (on stats not symptoms).
I believe these are close enough stats:
Deaths this season: 22,000
Confirmed cases: 220,000
Estimated people who contract flue: 36,000,000
If you are putting your entire hope on testing capability, unfortunately it's a false hope. The vast vast majority of people will get or have already gotten it and will never know, just like the flu.
This is the problem I've had with this whole thing. We've allowed the hype to ruin common sense.
We need to get prepared, which we are doing now, but then we have to let everyone get back to their life and let this thing spread or die out.
We have been through this disingenuous "confirmed flu cases" argument over here:
https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3101273/replies/56211462
Significant increases in testing capability + rigorous contact tracing after these 2-4 week quarantines is our only real hope for getting control of this thing without either long-term quarantines (not really viable) or a huge number of deaths (if we lift quarantines without a plan). In the best case, short of therapeutic advances in the near term, I think the mortality rate will be at > 0.8% (more likely 1%).
And my point is you'll never achieve this.
Lets do some more math.
This article is from 3/17, but best I could find
LinkAccording to the article the numbers we have are:
Tested: 270,000
Population: 50,000,000
Percent of population tested: 0.54%So the country who is the case study on testing hasn't even been able to test 1% of their population.
If I use round numbers, and put the US at 300,000,000 people, then to simply be on par with Korea, we would need to get to 1.62 million test, and even then we'd have tests 0.5% of our population.
So testing capability is good, but in the end, it won't be relevant to the vast majority of people who get the virus.