Brett Kavanaugh rape allegations

501,711 Views | 5316 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by 93MarineHorn
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Big Al 1992 said:

And good lord, CNN and Acosta are the worst. I'm sure they have "teams" as he says combing thru videos for both sides.

This isn't journalism
End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Residents scatter like roaches...all are despicable.
Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
FroWins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TriAg2010 said:

Prediction: there will be a second 11th hour surprise Friday afternoon or shortly after the committee vote that Ford is willing to testify.


I said a few pages back that I wouldn't be surprised if a witness popped up who vaguely remembers a party where both Kavanaugh and Ford were there and the Kavanaugh was drunk.

You might be right. Something is going to happen.


They're gonna keep throwing crap against the wall hoping to derail this process.
Burt Macklin, FBI
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What are the chances that they're prepping a second woman right now, and the delayed vote now buys them time for her to "come forward" over the weekend?
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Burt Macklin, FBI said:

What are the chances that they're prepping a second woman right now, and the delayed vote now buys them time for her to "come forward" over the weekend?
Would be no surprise at all.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FroWins said:

TriAg2010 said:

Prediction: there will be a second 11th hour surprise Friday afternoon or shortly after the committee vote that Ford is willing to testify.


I said a few pages back that I wouldn't be surprised if a witness popped up who vaguely remembers a party where both Kavanaugh and Ford were there and the Kavanaugh was drunk.

You might be right. Something is going to happen.


They're gonna keep throwing crap against the wall hoping to derail this process.
Neat trick since the main accuser cannot name a date, a week, a month, nor even a year, much less a location, how she got there, how she got home, how many people were there.

Perjury from the get go.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Burt Macklin, FBI said:

What are the chances that they're prepping a second woman right now, and the delayed vote now buys them time for her to "come forward" over the weekend?
After this current **** show, I doubt they try it again. Mucho egg on their faces.
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc said:

Burt Macklin, FBI said:

What are the chances that they're prepping a second woman right now, and the delayed vote now buys them time for her to "come forward" over the weekend?
After this current **** show, I doubt they try it again. Mucho egg on their faces.
Hasn't stopped them before....
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Harry Reid said he heard Romney hadn't paid taxes, with no corroboration whatsoever, and that worked.

I'm not sure how low they can go, but I think they may fear Trump's twitter finger
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Burt Macklin, FBI said:

What are the chances that they're prepping a second woman right now, and the delayed vote now buys them time for her to "come forward" over the weekend?
Nil. They try that they will be laughed out of the Senate. And likely censured.
Emotional Support Cobra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He.was.a.minor!!!! Not in a position of power. Not an adult. Not guilty. Glad those with sense are coming around.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The FBI has no jurisdiction. Overlook the Statute of Limitations issue even if she's not completely FOS, it is a state matter. NO FEDERAL LAWS WERE CLAIMED TO HAVE BEEN VIOLATED.

Why do Dem lawmakers not understand how the government, of which they are a part, operates?
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Because they're used to just bending the rules in their favor with a complicit press
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

The FBI has no jurisdiction. Overlook the Statute of Limitations issue even if she's not completely FOS, it is a state matter. NO FEDERAL LAWS WERE CLAIMED TO HAVE BEEN VIOLATED.

Why do Dem lawmakers not understand how the government, of which they are a part, operates?


They don't care. They just want it delayed.
One day at a time.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pinche Abogado said:

Residents scatter like roaches...all are despicable.
Funny how that works. And the truth shall set you free (and shut them up)
FroWins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

FroWins said:

TriAg2010 said:

Prediction: there will be a second 11th hour surprise Friday afternoon or shortly after the committee vote that Ford is willing to testify.


I said a few pages back that I wouldn't be surprised if a witness popped up who vaguely remembers a party where both Kavanaugh and Ford were there and the Kavanaugh was drunk.

You might be right. Something is going to happen.


They're gonna keep throwing crap against the wall hoping to derail this process.
Neat trick since the main accuser cannot name a date, a week, a month, nor even a year, much less a location, how she got there, how she got home, how many people were there.

Perjury from the get go.


They'll say stuff that would walk right up to the line of perjury.

They know they couldn't convict Kavanaugh any any court and that's not their goal.

They just want to keep throwing up obstacles to delay the vote past the midterms.

If they got Flake (unlikely, just a grand stander who hates trump), Collins and Murkowski to say they'd vote no I the next two weeks, then that's be a huge bonus.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

If they got Flake (unlikely, just a grand stander who hates trump), Collins and Murkowski to say they'd vote no I the next two weeks, then that's be a huge bonus.
Collins and Flake have already stated their reservations about this political trick by the Dems. Trying the exact same thing again, won't carry much water with either them nor Murkowski, IMO.

Just too obvious and FOS.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Collins was almost assuredly the first number in trump's Rolodex to get called - hence the reason Kavenaugh got the nod. Collins will pay enough attention to this Ford circus to maintain her credibility and appear concerned but she won't flip on a judge that she certainly blessed long before the nomination was announced.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FroWins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I agree, that's why I said it be a huge bonus for them to flip her with some "new" information in the next couple of weeks. Meaning I don't think it's likely.

I think the best they could really hope for would be to somehow get the vote pushed back past the election. And that's still not likely. But don't think they won't stop trying to throw up roadblocks.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tallgrant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tucker acarlson just said she win't Testify "until the FBI completes its investigation"
biobioprof
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lawyer is on CNN now.

saying monday is too soon. Wants the FBI to look first. Good luck with that.

doesn't look at all like Lyle Lovett to me.
MRB10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
T&P

Old Tom Morris
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We need the FBI to investigate real crimes, not 40 year old HS fantasies.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
biobioprof said:

lawyer is on CNN now.

saying monday is too soon. Wants the FBI to look first. Good luck with that.

doesn't look at all like Lyle Lovett to me.
THEY DON"T HAVE JURISDICTION!

Her client better make up a kidnapping across state lines or something to invoke federal jurisdiction.

I hate the state of the current bar and judiciary. Freakin' incompetent boobs, the lot of them.
Old Tom Morris
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I may have had my lunch money stolen when I was in kindergarten in 1979. I'm going to call the Dallas FBI field office in the AM.
AgResearch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BoilerAg10 said:

T&P


Ummmm....more pics of the "victim" please....
HelloUncleNateFitch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What a goofy charade. Time to move along and vote.
RikkiTikkaTagem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
biobioprof said:

lawyer is on CNN now.

saying monday is too soon. Wants the FBI to look first. Good luck with that.

doesn't look at all like Lyle Lovett to me.


Even if everything she said is true what would/could the FBI do? I don't understand why, in any cidcumstance, they need to say/do anything for her to testify. What could they possibly go off of?
Aggie97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is a stall tactic. They want the FBI to investigate until after the mid term elections. They are worried some red state Dems will still vote for him. If the vote is after November there is no pressure for them to vote him in.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
annie88 said:


CNN proving they are garbage again everyday
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BoilerAg10 said:

T&P


Poor *******. Photographic evidence
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old Tom Morris said:

We need the FBI to investigate real crimes, not 40 year old HS fantasies.
Yeah, perhaps they could stop a terrorist or two
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I wouldn't be surprised if a witness popped up who vaguely remembers a party where both Kavanaugh and Ford were there and the Kavanaugh was drunk.

Two kids in high school drunk at the same party?

No. Way.

Now that is shocking.
First Page Last Page
Page 23 of 152
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.