redline248 said:
I posted a link months ago that none of you ever bothered to read.
Some short notes I remember off the top of my head
The model of the apparent drone used to capture the video didn't exist at the time of the flight
The original version of the video didn't even have model number markings visible on the drone
The video also was circulated years ago and deemed to be a fake the first time
I may not have all those details completely right, but that was the gist
I found the link. The bit about the orbs is halfway down
https://observers.france24.com/en/asia-pacific/20230323-mh370-why-these-two-videos-don-t-show-what-happened-to-the-lost-plane
Every one of these points has already been addressed. I'm not going to go searching for them through hours of interviews, but you're more than welcome to hunt them down, and then whether or not you buy the answers is of course up to you.
Either way, highlighting arguments this late in the game, from months ago, long before all of this really took off, is relatively pointless. If only because there is an increasingly massive amount of people, in the hundreds, on both sides of the argument, going back and forth, utilizing all kinds of experts, pouring over every last fact and figure, debunking one side, and then debunking the debunks, to the point where no one is ever going to "win" this thing. And that reason alone is why I find this all so compelling, because there has yet to be that one silver bullet that kills the argument of one side or the other, which is almost never the case with these kinds of things.
