Not to mention, he only used the abbreviation once and proceeded to fully write it out. Would have been shorter to just not use the abbreviation.

And then proceeded to use #UAP in the search terms

Believe I've heard that acronym from Elizando or someone similar. Think the differentiator is the UAP having phenomenon could encompass a wider range. AAV limits the range to mechanical or technological.

Eta: I agree however that all the acronyms get tiresome

BenTheGoodAg said:

---

And then proceeded to use #UAP in the search terms

---

#WTFistheRAEFOSNetwork would be more appropriate.

To be fair, there are tons of instances outside of the UAP community - it just bugs me.

I remember when there was a big push to calling dorms 'residence halls' because "the term 'dorms' has a negative connotation". But if you haven't changed any of the other factors, won't 'residence halls' also just have a negative connotation?

This story is 100% accurate. An extremely powerful Defense Aerospace lobby is pushing key politicians in Congress to block the Schumer Amendment to the NDAA. https://t.co/vKXG4pDrLK

— Ross Coulthart (@rosscoulthart) November 24, 2023

What is the name of the lobby group and which companies do they serve? It's not good enough to blame this on some shadow group, imo.

I'm confused. Did you not read the article? Grusch even called out Rogers and Turner, specifically, in his Rogan interview. I don't know what lobby group/companies they're serving, but this isn't some solely anonymous sourcing/random "shadow group" kind of thing. Specific people are naming specific names, and reputable journalists like Coulthart are backing them up. That counts for something.

Quote:

---

Liberation Times has learned that this week, two influential Republicans, namely Rep. Mike Rogers, Chair of the House Armed Services Committee, and Rep. Mike Turner, Chair of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, have escalated their efforts to eliminate the UAP Disclosure Act from the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2024.

The two representatives have successfully garnered support from Senate Minority Leader Senator Mitch McConnell and the new Speaker of the House, Rep. Mike Johnson, who are now backing their endeavors to either remove or significantly weaken the UAP Disclosure Act.

---

TCTTS said:

---

I'm confused. Did you not read the article? Grusch even called out Rogers and Turner, specifically, in his Rogan interview. I don't know what lobby group/companies they're serving, but this isn't some solely anonymous sourcing/random "shadow group" kind of thing. Specific people are naming specific names, and reputable journalists like Coulthart are backing them up. That counts for something.

Quote:

---

Liberation Times has learned that this week, two influential Republicans, namely Rep. Mike Rogers, Chair of the House Armed Services Committee, and Rep. Mike Turner, Chair of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, have escalated their efforts to eliminate the UAP Disclosure Act from the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2024.

The two representatives have successfully garnered support from Senate Minority Leader Senator Mitch McConnell and the new Speaker of the House, Rep. Mike Johnson, who are now backing their endeavors to either remove or significantly weaken the UAP Disclosure Act.

---

---

The tweet says "an extremely powerful defense aerospace lobby..."

I did not ask for names of congress reps. I did read the article, and unfortunately, there are no indications of what specific verbiage they want changed or eliminated, or why.

I realize that. It's just kind of weird to me that someone's initial response to this is to act as if specific people naming specific names isn't a big deal in and of itself, and instead treat this as bunk unless they're naming specific verbiage or whatever as well.

It's not a big deal to name those reps. It's never a secret when congress does this sort of stuff, and it's not a surprise either.

Who is influencing them? That's more important, imo, bc then it might be easier to figure out why.

Edit: and I'm not saying it's bunk

Unfortunately, my understanding is that the Schumer-Rounds Amendment is poised to be shot down on Monday by Republican leadership on the House Armed Services Committee. This is the last opportunity for interested constituents to make their voice heard on this issue.

— Christopher K. Mellon (@ChrisKMellon) November 25, 2023

“Mitch McConnell went to Schumer and said: It’s over, it’s out” - Garry Nolan on the Schumer amendment right now on @GoodTroubleShow #uapx #uaptwitter #ufox pic.twitter.com/te4Bn0vGFy

— Andreas Wedenberg (@andadsson) November 26, 2023

"I was told by leadership that it was blocked by the intelligence community and that is a very chilling effect, if someone can reach through the veil of government and pierce it to the point of we do not have access to something, you've got to start asking yourself who the hell's… https://t.co/rzIVqch2av

— 👽 (Ruby) 👽 (@ObserveByProxy7) November 26, 2023

The spooks don't play and they know all the buttons to push.

I really can't imagine a scenario where we get full disclosure.

Yeah, there was never not going to be pushback, but ultimately we're right back to where we've always been, and where this has always been headed regardless - a dependence on an eventual wave of whistleblowers/leakers to force the hand of the powers-that-be to where they have no choice but to come clean. They could have done it the "easy" way through the Schumer amendment, and potentially avoided prosecution, but now this thing is going to get really, really ugly - or at least uglier than it would have been.

Wasn't that video right after the hearings in regard to not allowing the scif's? Not that the comments don't still hold true, just that I think these people in congress aren't going to do sh*t.

Three Republican lawmakers 'colluded' to block UAP transparency: Coulthart | NewsNation Prime

Ross Coulthart discussing the latest news about the alleged blocking of the Schumer amendment.

H/T: @Baptiste_Fri #ufoX #ufo #uap #ufotwitter #ufos pic.twitter.com/k4fwzRqbJN

— Mike Colangelo (@MikeColangelo) November 27, 2023

Contractors are a major influence as GOP heavy donors. The military pullout, relatively speaking, away from CA is a major reason it's now a one party state. That's what is happening here, sadly.

I want Anna Paulina Luna to have as much screen time as possible, this much I know.

Grusch was, "exposed to intelligence products that were visual."

I believe that counts as firsthand information. #ufos #uap #aliens #uapX https://t.co/3SAEMyA72d

— Joe Murgia (@TheUfoJoe) November 27, 2023

Garry Kasparov, a very vocal critic of Putin, says he is frequently asked,
"Why haven't you been killed?'
His answer,
"Because I'm too famous"

Mr. Grusch should do more to get famous.

A great explainer from @MicahHanks about why the battle to keep the @SenSchumer #UAP amendment matters. A blatantly self interested effort is underway by gravely compromised politicians to conceal momentous revelations of huge public interest. https://t.co/f88u19MBkQ

— Ross Coulthart (@rosscoulthart) November 27, 2023

Yes. One of my points is, the spooks are incentivized to avoid disclosure if they have something OR if they have nothing.

Either way, they don't want the truth to come out.

In case you're late to the party, the debate about the legitimacy of these videos has eclipsed the entire UFO community and the biggest proponent of their authenticity is now offering over 100,000 dollars to anyone who can prove they're the 'hoaxer' as they likely do not exist. https://t.co/t6KK5we7G0

— The Whole Rabbit (@1WholeRabbit) November 27, 2023

TCTTS said:

---

In case you're late to the party, the debate about the legitimacy of these videos has eclipsed the entire UFO community and the biggest proponent of their authenticity is now offering over 100,000 dollars to anyone who can prove they're the 'hoaxer' as they likely do not exist. https://t.co/t6KK5we7G0

— The Whole Rabbit (@1WholeRabbit) November 27, 2023

---

Probably so they can pay them to make more "ALIENS!" videos…

TCTTS said:

---

In case you're late to the party, the debate about the legitimacy of these videos has eclipsed the entire UFO community and the biggest proponent of their authenticity is now offering over 100,000 dollars to anyone who can prove they're the 'hoaxer' as they likely do not exist. https://t.co/t6KK5we7G0

— The Whole Rabbit (@1WholeRabbit) November 27, 2023

---

Yeah, I saw Kim Dotcom kick this off with $100k. Glad to see the focus primarily here and I wish Ashton would just stick to the video as well. I know I have vented on here plenty about him, but he was on the Koncrete podcast the other day and I tried to watch, but man he makes it hard. He quoted ChatGPT for the visibility range of a plane at ~40k feet during a witness discussion. When challenged with a different ChatGPT figure of 240 mi (his was 310 mi), he stubbornly replied, "My ChatGPT said 310 miles," completely ignoring that it's just basic math (well, at least the basic calculation of the plane losing visibility due to curvature).

Still keeping an eye on it, but man I would love for someone else to take over or at least someone to get him to rein in some of his confirmation bias'.

Saw that as well and in 100% agreement.

This investigator of the flight is worth following.

https://theunexplained.tv/episodes/edition-597-richard-godfrey

"Aerospace engineer Richard Godfrey makes international news this week with his detailed and exhaustive data-crunching and research he believes has, after more than 7 years, finally located the wreckage of missing Malaysian Airlines jet - Flight MH 370. It vanished on a flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing in March 2014. We talk about the case - and the possible role of the pilot in the downing of the 777."

Three sources briefed on those alleged top secret operations told us that the Office of Global Access (OGA), a wing of the CIA's Science and Technology Directorate, has played a central role since 2003 in orchestrating the collection of craft of non human origin. https://t.co/Rj1yWft3rB

— Christopher Sharp (@ChrisUKSharp) November 28, 2023

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12796167/CIA-secret-office-UFO-retrieval-missions-whistleblowers.html

EXCLUSIVE: CIA's secret office has conducted UFO retrieval missions on at least NINE crash sites around the world, whistleblowers reveal