Sine poena nulla lex.
completely agree.Orlando Ayala Cant Read said:
Dual Dragon Ride was Cheese City.
Bran will tell her that along with her daddy needed killing as well.gigemJTH12 said:
Does she even know only Targs can ride dragons? If so, she should know he's a targ already...right?
Autist bran will show her what he and his buddies have been discussing on 4chan.Sarduakar said:Bran will tell her that along with her daddy needed killing as well.gigemJTH12 said:
Does she even know only Targs can ride dragons? If so, she should know he's a targ already...right?
I mean, that's fine, but by all means explain to me the connectionC@LAg said:it is just a loose grouping. do not take it personal.smokeythebear said:
Melissandre is counted as a Targ?? Are you kidding me?
a yo e that wasn't one of the other great houses went to targ???smokeythebear said:I mean, that's fine, but by all means explain to me the connectionC@LAg said:it is just a loose grouping. do not take it personal.smokeythebear said:
Melissandre is counted as a Targ?? Are you kidding me?
smokeythebear said:I mean, that's fine, but by all means explain to me the connectionC@LAg said:it is just a loose grouping. do not take it personal.smokeythebear said:
Melissandre is counted as a Targ?? Are you kidding me?
C@LAg said:Yes. To be consistent with TV lore, there could be a fire event that he is involved with, and emerges unburnt.MuckRaker96 said:
so these points have probably been beaten to death, but I am in non-scroll back mode.
1) Is there anyway they can actually prove to Danerys that Jon is Aegon Targaryen? Sam has a piece of paper (so did Ned Stark) and Bran has shown no ability to take anyone on his Magical Mystery Tours. What would compel her to believe it, even if Jon was compelled to tell her?
2) If Jon Snow dies defeating the White Walkers, there's no way in hell the North goes with Dany to fight Cersei - Sansa, Arya, Tormund, etc. arent the kneeling types. So does Dany burn them all the way she burned the Tarlys or does she leave the North to the North and continue South?
That is the most logical way to prove it.
That and the dragons taking to him.
Quote:
David Benioff, one of the showrunners, said in an "Inside the Episode" segment that "only Targaryens" can ride, which is a departure from the books and the show's own history-and-lore segments. This could be a retroactive continuity change, or more likely, Benioff meant in the present show story line, since right before that he said, "No one's ever ridden a dragon except for Dany," and that doesn't cancel out her ancestors. Still, the idea that dragon-riding is proof of a Targaryen bloodline persists, and how that plays out in "Game of Thrones" remains to be seen.
C@LAg said:but 2 of the "dragonseeds' were not identified as having any Targ blood in them.CapCityAg89 said:
Yea, the flying dragons is definitely book lore. I don't think it's been even addressed on the show but in the books, they had a recruitment thing to find dragon riders and most recruits got burnt up.
Books, Dany was "unburnt" but it was a one time thing. Not fireproof like in the show. Show, fireproof seems to be a "true Dragon-Targ" thing.
Nettles - who worked on conditioning the dragon to accept her and the other.. Wulf or Ulf or something like that.