quote:
Talk about a buzzkill. Could not disagree more.
quote:
i thought TCTTS review smacked of elitism and pompousness.
Ha. Ah, yes. The ol' "elitism and pompousness" label when someone doesn't like something you do. Never mind the fact that A) I posted a link to a positive article/review with a thumbs up the very next day, and B) literally said, in the same initial post...
quote:
I'm definitely enjoying the show... it's still a lot of fun... Looking forward to finishing.
That said... I finished the series tonight and ended up LOVING it. Again, as stated, my initial reaction was after THREE episodes. At that point, it
was fairly unoriginal, and Winona Ryder
was pretty annoying. For me, Ryder never got any better, but the "unoriginality" ended up coming together in a really brilliant way. How they managed to tie in EVERY feeling / vibe / trope / device from the era to the point where it became increasingly obvious that it was with loving intention (again, something I even alluded to in my initial post). By the end, I was astonished at how well all that stuff weaved together with the surprisingly air-tight plot. And when I say they covered everything, I mean
everything... down to the
Gremlins/Christmas vibe of the "One Month Later" segment at the end. It really was super cool.
It's just that in general, I have this thing about how so many filmmakers nowadays are tragically steeped in nostalgia, trying to
copy Spielberg rather than actually try and
be the next Spielberg by doing something fresh. Abrams and a lot of his cohorts worship at that alter, in the worst way, and the bad taste of
Super 8 still lingers for me. And three episodes in, that was my gut reaction... not ANOTHER Amblin rip off, with the filmmakers trying once again to ape that particular era instead of trying to make THIS one memorable. But
Stranger Things ultimately ended up going beyond that into something truly complex and unique, and I've already gushed to multiple people over text since finishing just a couple hours ago.